Develop Bugs

[ROM] Unofficial Slim Bean Ver. 3.1.0(01-12-13) Final until 4.2 works!

Anyone that has the urge to change, alter and or make better this rom. All I have to say is feel free!! The whole great thing about open source is just that. Make sure to give credit where it is due! The only credit due here is for Slim, I only compiled from there source. If I can help get slim w/android 4.2 working on hercules than I am a hero, but for now I am just sharing source of a great rom.
Compiled on the 28th. Version 2.8.1
I know gmills was having problems with his computer and I have been building for a while now so I figure why not share.
I am not having any problems with this rom at all. Stock kernel, stock build.prop etc.
I would like to have some of ya'll test as is and see if you have any issue's.
For anyone that wants to help test, I would like for a clean install,just like coming from stock phone. Format everything and start from scratch with this build. I am doing another build this evening and will let the testers know when. This build I am posting now is very stable and I will not post anything that Is not stable and pre tested in this thread. If you want to test new builds, just let me know.
I take no credit for this at all, All the members of Slim Bean and of course cyanogen and team chop sticks made this possible!
Also special thanks to team rook! If you are interested in building from source then read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1798056
Also notice this is unofficial
Slim's web site: http://slimroms.net/
Slim's add on's: http://slimroms.net/index.php/new-addons-menu
Slim's gapps : http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/all/viewcategory/40-gapps
Check out the android4.2 leaked app's here:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33573197#post33573197
Latest build 01-12-13: http://d-h.st/hQK

first lol, Ya'll can have the rest I might need this one.

How well does changing the dpi work with this rom? I know thats one of the main reason I stick with aokp because most dpi's work well?
BTW thanks for the rom

I haven't had any problems, give it a try and let me know what you think.

onlychevys said:
I haven't had any problems, give it a try and let me know what you think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slim bean works great on my sgs3, ill flash this and compare. thanks for the rom

I'll test this ROM too.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I'll give it a try also.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Been in it since last night. Haven't found problem
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using XDA Premium HD app

Will give this a spin today, I love SlimRom...thanks for compiling for us ... Are there any specific reason for the size being approximately 20MB more than the official build? Just wondering...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989

gretschpr said:
Will give this a spin today, I love SlimRom...thanks for compiling for us ... Are there any specific reason for the size being approximately 20MB more than the official build? Just wondering...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are probably some extra tweaks.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

gretschpr said:
Will give this a spin today, I love SlimRom...thanks for compiling for us ... Are there any specific reason for the size being approximately 20MB more than the official build? Just wondering...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually don't know, this is compiled straight from there source with zero tweaks or cherry pic's.

I'm going to make a new build with some of my own stuff tomorrow. As busy as this thread is I know it's going to rock all of xda lol. I will post a fresh build of Slim Bean if there is enough changes to make it worth while. I'm gonna add in some of android 4.2 app's that were leaked. You can get some of them here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33573197#post33573197. I'm collecting all I can.

onlychevys said:
I'm going to make a new build with some of my own stuff tomorrow. As busy as this thread is I know it's going to rock all of xda lol. I will post a fresh build of Slim Bean if there is enough changes to make it worth while. I'm gonna add in some of android 4.2 app's that were leaked. You can get some of them here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33573197#post33573197. I'm collecting all I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ture bit audio look on the skyrocket forum I wanna it on slim bean
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

Lil confused bro, so the benefits to this one would be that your gonna tweak yourself and your getting source from??? I know your using slims base but after that I kinda got lost. Maybe I need my energy drink this morning :thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

Been running this for a couple of days now, haven't had a single problem with it yet. I was a bit surprised when I first booted it up and it didn't have the same LCD density that the official build had but it wasn't a major deal to get that swapped over.
Thanks for helping out and providing this for us. I'd been waiting for the official update but finally decided to ahead and pull the trigger when I noticed this thread.

datrapstar said:
Lil confused bro, so the benefits to this one would be that your gonna tweak yourself and your getting source from??? I know your using slims base but after that I kinda got lost. Maybe I need my energy drink this morning :thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is Slim's base. I am going to do a 2.9 build, it appears Slim Bean has been updated. Starting build now and should be done in a couple of hours! My builds are straight from Slim's repo, with no changes. I don't know why mine build is bigger than gmills unless he is changing things in his build.? I sync there repo and build.
I am planning to do some changes but haven't done so yet

New build 2.9.0 is up in the OP, tested and running on my device.

onlychevys said:
New build 2.9.0 is up in the OP, tested and running on my device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
k, ask permission to download sir
er, we should do flicker solve?
edit build.prop?
and oso, about add on, can we use the old one?
same like i flash in version 2.6?

This ROM looks promising.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

onlychevys said:
Yes this is Slim's base. I am going to do a 2.9 build, it appears Slim Bean has been updated. Starting build now and should be done in a couple of hours! My builds are straight from Slim's repo, with no changes. I don't know why mine build is bigger than gmills unless he is changing things in his build.? I sync there repo and build.
I am planning to do some changes but haven't done so yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to question your reasoning bro just trying to understand the differences.. Vlad to see you making a contribution. In the event that you start tweaking with some of your personal things and need a tester I'm deff up to be a crash dummy :thumbup:
There's 3 ROMs that are my go to of choice and slim is one of them. I won't advertise on your thread of the other 2 choices out of respect to the thread and you. So needless to say thanks for this
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

[ROM] [CM10] [Kang] TimeLincoln's Linaro Hybrid

Building CM10 with extra patches from CM gerrit and using the Linaro toolchain. Roms were built with -O3 and strict-aliasing (for packages that were compatible).
Updates can be found on my Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/106870161233159147936/posts
Builds will be updated only when there are major changes to CM10.

First!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Uh, can you please explain more what this is? Look at other ROM OP's and then yours. Not all people are going to understand what this means. And if they don't understand it. Chances are they won't try out the ROM.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Linaro creates a modified, more optimized android tool chain for compiling android kernels and ROMs with. They also commit fixes which allow other optimization flags like the ones I mentioned. All together, these optimizations result in what seems to be a slightly faster ROM, though it could all just be placebo.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Fourth!!!

MBQsniper said:
Uh, can you please explain more what this is? Look at other ROM OP's and then yours. Not all people are going to understand what this means. And if they don't understand it. Chances are they won't try out the ROM.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm10 build with linaro. I think the thread is fine...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

On my last device, packages compiled with -O3 were noticeably improved.
I personally like the layout of the OP. No reason to list features that we all know are already present, or provide the same screenshots that are on every other thread lol.
Which packages were compiled with -O3?

killersloth said:
I personally like the layout of the OP. No reason to list features that we all know are already present, or provide the same screenshots that are on every other thread lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha yea it's cm10, pretty sure we all know what it looks like...

Kernel and system were all compiled with -O3, not all system binaries were able to be compiled with strict-aliasing, I would literally have to go through all the make files to tell you which ones though.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Nevermind

Thank you

I'll say Thanks!
Anytime I get to try out a new thing for my Gnex I'm happy!
I know that the crap that Sniper went through with his rom wasn't deserved.
So once again thanks and I'll give this a try tomorrow!

myrmidon84 said:
Anytime I get to try out a new thing for my Gnex I'm happy!
I know that the crap that Sniper went through with his rom wasn't deserved.
So once again thanks and I'll give this a try tomorrow!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's all good dude. They were mature and respectful with what they said, plus they know their stuff. So I respect them 100% and actually took the advice to heart. I had them remove my thread because all it really was, was a tweaked kang. So I'm starting over. Going to make a unique one that'll be one of a kind.
Anyway, I apologize for talking about another ROM in a ROM thread and I mean absolutely zero disrespect. I, as well as many others, always love to see new ROMs
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

I saw these last week:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012...e-boosted-30-100-percent-by-linaro-toolchain/
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...e-and-now-parts-of-it-are-being-added-to-cm9/

MBQsniper said:
It's all good dude. They were mature and respectful with what they said, plus they know their stuff. So I respect them 100% and actually took the advice to heart. I had them remove my thread because all it really was, was a tweaked kang. So I'm starting over. Going to make a unique one that'll be one of a kind.
Anyway, I apologize for talking about another ROM in a ROM thread and I mean absolutely zero disrespect. I, as well as many others, always love to see new ROMs
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel free to add me on Google talk if you need help. [email protected]
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

MДЯCЦSДИT said:
Feel free to add me on Google talk if you need help. [email protected]
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I appreciate it
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

No problem, I don't really consider this my ROM. I just tweaked the build system a little, merged some patches and pulled some stuff off CM's gerrit because sometimes I think they take too long to ship features (though I don't blame them, its better to test and make sure things are stable).
I have been doing these for myself for while and some friends expressed an interest. They seemed to have good results, so I thought others might like to give it a try. This build does not include the string optimizations for bionic because they still break the camera, unfortunately those string routine opts are a lot of what makes the linaro builds a lot faster, but the tool chain and he other optimization flags seem to help anyway. Bero claims the camera works on his maguro builds with string opts, but I have tested them just about every way I can and cannot get it to work.
Anyway glad people are using the builds, I will be putting out new ones on an almost nightly basis hopefully. Follow me on Google+ as that is much easier for me to post notifications to.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

gandhisfist said:
No problem, I don't really consider this my ROM. I just tweaked the build system a little, merged some patches and pulled some stuff off CM's gerrit because sometimes I think they take too long to ship features (though I don't blame them, its better to test and make sure things are stable).
I have been doing these for myself for while and some friends expressed an interest. They seemed to have good results, so I thought others might like to give it a try. This build does not include the string optimizations for bionic because they still break the camera, unfortunately those string routine opts are a lot of what makes the linaro builds a lot faster, but the tool chain and he other optimization flags seem to help anyway. Bero claims the camera works on his maguro builds with string opts, but I have tested them just about every way I can and cannot get it to work.
Anyway glad people are using the builds, I will be putting out new ones on an almost nightly basis hopefully. Follow me on Google+ as that is much easier for me to post notifications to.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is no placebo. The ROM is more fluid than cyanogen build. I flash a lot of ROMs and I am Kean to how they run. This is nice. Thank you
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

My nexus is so smooth already it's hard to definitely say it' smoother, but it's definitely smooth. Everything works as it should.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Bacon

Wats the difference between this ROM and jellybro????
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

AOSP ROM

I have been looking for an AOSP ROM for the SGH-T889, but I have not found one yet. Does anyone know of an AOSP build for the Note II?
I haven't found any, so I wanted to build my own. It seems like all that I need is to:
1) get the AOSP source from google
2) copy drivers from opensource.samsung.com/ (search for sgh-t889) into the AOSP tree.
3) build
4) install
Is this all that needs to be done? Or is there more that is needed to do this? I have built ASOP for Nexus S, but not for anything else.

im pretty sure it's more complicated than that. but again i don't know **** about that lol.

I wish I had some free time to try it out. Hopefully this weekend I can explore it more.

NeilMonday said:
I have been looking for an AOSP ROM for the SGH-T889, but I have not found one yet. Does anyone know of an AOSP build for the Note II?
I haven't found any, so I wanted to build my own. It seems like all that I need is to:
1) get the AOSP source from google
2) copy drivers from opensource.samsung.com/ (search for sgh-t889) into the AOSP tree.
3) build
4) install
Is this all that needs to be done? Or is there more that is needed to do this? I have built ASOP for Nexus S, but not for anything else not that easy .[/QUOTEhttp://rootzwiki.com/topic/31166-tutorial-so-you-want-to-build-aokp-jb-ubuntu-1204
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Thanks for link. It looks like aokp doesn't have note II support yet though. Or did I miss something?

Just found this which may be helpful.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1977993

Does anyone think there would be any problem running this on an sgh-t889 instead of a n7100?

I wish xda wouldn't limit you to 10 posts before you can post in development threads.

NeilMonday said:
I wish xda wouldn't limit you to 10 posts before you can post in development threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They should make it 30 so you can't do stuff like this.
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2

No, if it was 30 I would just make 20 more BS posts. If it was 0 then I could immediately make posts that were relevant.

NeilMonday said:
No, if it was 30 I would just make 20 more BS posts. If it was 0 then I could immediately make posts that were relevant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
brashmadcap said that cuz where you posted btw fail lol j/k -------->Mods sorry

@NeilMonday - Chit-chat posts do NOT belong into the development boards. I suggest you make yourself familiar with our rules before posting fancy stuff into the wrong sections.
Thread moved to General.

How about you educate yourself so you don't have to rely on others? Js

NeilMonday said:
I have been looking for an AOSP ROM for the SGH-T889, but I have not found one yet. Does anyone know of an AOSP build for the Note II?
I haven't found any, so I wanted to build my own. It seems like all that I need is to:
1) get the AOSP source from google
2) copy drivers from opensource.samsung.com/ (search for sgh-t889) into the AOSP tree.
3) build
4) install
Is this all that needs to be done? Or is there more that is needed to do this? I have built ASOP for Nexus S, but not for anything else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately its not that easy to build AOSP ROMs for devices like these. Source from samsung may contain some drivers but not all of them since OEMs tend to hold some back. You would have to fix such problems which honestly is a headache. You would also need to build a working kernel.
If you want an AOSP ROM just get a Nexus because this is not a device for AOSP ROMs. You will lose the functionality of the s-pen or other features you liked when you got this device unless they are ported(which again, is a headache to do!).
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2

minhajmsd said:
Unfortunately its not that easy to build AOSP R
for devices like these. Source from samsung may contain some drivers but not all of them since OEMs tend to hold some back. You would have to fix such problems which honestly is a headache. You would also need to build a working kernel.
If you want an AOSP ROM just get a Nexus because this is not a device for AOSP ROMs. You will lose the functionality of the s-pen or other features you liked when you got this device unless they are ported(which again, is a headache to do!).
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a post from codeworx explaining why he won't support Samsung any http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=31873214&postcount=7773

deeznutz1977 said:
Here is a post from codeworx explaining why he won't support Samsung any http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=31873214&postcount=7773
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, wish i would have read that before I got this phone. Still UBER happy with my selection, just wish I would have researched on that a little more.
Too bad about sammy not providing any documentation on the exynos chip.

rahilkalim said:
Damn, wish i would have read that before I got this phone. Still UBER happy with my selection, just wish I would have researched on that a little more.
Too bad about sammy not providing any documentation on the exynos chip.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good news is samsung is already starting to open source the exynos chipset, they listened to the developer community and have already responded.
Edit: link
http://git.insignal.co.kr/samsung/e...hardware/samsung_slsi/exynos4/?h=s-ics-exynos
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium

After installing a couple of the N7100 roms (CM 10 and an AOKP versions), It seems like there are a few things that don't work so far like the camera and cell/data. I think the cell/data should be fixable since the Nexus 4 and the SGH-T889 use the same baseband (MDM9215)?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6386/samsung-galaxy-note-2-review-t-mobile-/9
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1964850
Sure this isn't the only problem, but its a start. Thoughts?

[KERNEL] StarKissed Kangerade [4.X / Dual-Boot / uBoot][01/04]

This kernel is about customization. I found many strong points in the kernels I tested before starting this project, but couldn't find that one that combined them. This is my attempt to do so.
This thread is not directed to the elite few, so there is no need to put on your fancy hat when you enter. Relax and enjoy your device.
StarKissed Nexus Kernels
StarKissed Nexus Images
StarKissed Universal Remote App
Nexus Dual-Boot Builder App
Report Issues, View Reports, Betas
Current Kernel Options and Sources
Guide to Governors, Schedulers, Etc.
uBoot Configuration

will give it a try when you upload it :good:

will the franco kernel app still work?

5nickers said:
will the franco kernel app still work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it works on any of the three kernels, then there is no reason it wouldn't...

4.1 or 4.2?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

julllleee said:
4.1 or 4.2?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only tested for 4.1, I haven't tried it on 4.2 but it does NOT include the sdcard binary that was causing so many issues.

Any plans on making it for 4.2?

k786 said:
Any plans on making it for 4.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I based from the 4.1 branch and I haven't looked into the differences since I have no real interest in 4.2 until it is a little more polished. If there is any chance of mixed compatibility, then I would most likely do it. Right now I am trying to find some patches to make wifi a little less garbage. I can get "good" signal from my Evo3D in my back yard from the router at the front of the house. I barely get any connection 4 rooms away on the Nexus. That can't all be hardware.

noobs queston
is this kernel for 4.1.2?

kizakiyuria said:
noobs queston
is this kernel for 4.1.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the title, the first post, and the the post above yours... really??

kizakiyuria said:
noobs queston
is this kernel for 4.1.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
10chars

it's very nice to see you here twisted, in galaxy nexus forums - wanna say hi as former dhd user

Krendelrus said:
it's very nice to see you here twisted, in galaxy nexus forums - wanna say hi as former dhd user
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was a mess, this time I have the device in my hands lol

twistedumbrella said:
That was a mess, this time I have the device in my hands lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yet your builds on my Inspire 4g always worked best. Go figure, lol

Very nice. I like it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

interesting, I want to try

Things may finally start moving a little faster. I believe I finally have the Mac compiling the kernel instead of passing the job to Linux through SSH

testing it right now. looking good, thanks.

I'm just looking forward to a 4.2 kernel from twisted. Hopefully you pick it up

Me too... Want a 4.2 kernel
Craxx
Send from my Galaxy Nexus with Tapatalk

[WIP] CM 10.1 Alpha [BOOTS!!] 1/17/13

UPDATE: Jeffakajeff has an alpha out, see his post, reproduced here:
jeffakajeff said:
I got it....uploading now!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
http://www.jeffreygabbard.com/cm-10.1-20130117-UNOFFICIAL-hercules.zip
Apn is empty, no service, did not try to input.
wifi works
bluetooth does not work, I will fix later, I think I know why
Not sure what else is working or not working, but so far it runs great.
I will create a github tomorrow as soon as I can, getting late though.
I will also give proper thanks for all the sources tomorrow.
I flashed straight over a nightly, I did not do a complete wipe and install, feel free to try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello XDA'ers,
Its been a while, and I've been busy studying for the bar exam and looking for a job. Nevertheless, I decided to take a stab at compiling 4.2 for our device. Right now ADB is recognized, but there is no display output. I have to get back to studying, but please feel free to use this in any way you believe will help.
REMEMBER THIS IS NOT FUNCTIONAL, DEVS and ASPIRING DEVS ONLY
UPDATE Source:
https://github.com/abematthew/lawyermod
LINK http://sourceforge.net/projects/romchicago/files/JB/full_hercules-ota-eng.abe.zip/download
1.1.13-Added some suggested edits
Evervolv Tree Hack:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/romchicago/files/JBhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/romchicago/files/JB//

LawStud3nt said:
Hello XDA'ers,
Its been a while, and I've been busy studying for the bar exam and looking for a job. Nevertheless, I decided to take a stab at compiling 4.2 for our device. Right now ADB is recognized, but there is no display output. I have to get back to studying, but please feel free to use this in any way you believe will help.
REMEMBER THIS IS NOT FUNCTIONAL, DEVS and ASPIRING DEVS ONLY
LINK http://sourceforge.net/projects/romchicago/files/JB/full_hercules_debug-ota-eng.abe.zip/download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet!!! Hope someone can Check it out!!!!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

I'll take a look at it, thanks. Do you have a GitHub source for it?
Edit: If you guys want me to try to get a booting CM10.1 build, then can someone please pull a logcat for me through ADB?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Step Closer!..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

:good:LOL Android you are all over the place:good:

LawStud3nt said:
Hello XDA'ers,
Its been a while, and I've been busy studying for the bar exam and looking for a job. Nevertheless, I decided to take a stab at compiling 4.2 for our device. Right now ADB is recognized, but there is no display output. I have to get back to studying, but please feel free to use this in any way you believe will help.
REMEMBER THIS IS NOT FUNCTIONAL, DEVS and ASPIRING DEVS ONLY
LINK http://sourceforge.net/projects/romchicago/files/JB/full_hercules_debug-ota-eng.abe.zip/download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you use the new Sk8witskil recovery that i ported from the skyrocket? it was meant for use with Cm10.1 also,
is this added to BoardConfigcommon.mk?
BOARD_USES_QCOM_HARDWARE := true
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Will definEtly take a look. Thanks man.

Tmogalaxys2 said:
Will definEtly take a look. Thanks man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol can someone setup a github with the coding lol, i would love to fork this to my git and play around with it

ayysir said:
lol can someone setup a github with the coding lol, i would love to fork this to my git and play around with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once I get home, I'll try setting up a GitHub.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

blackwing182 said:
Did you use the new Sk8witskil recovery that i ported from the skyrocket? it was meant for use with Cm10.1 also,
is this added to BoardConfigcommon.mk?
BOARD_USES_QCOM_HARDWARE := true
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is.

I set up a GitHub for it: https://github.com/xdaandroid88/CM101Dev
Somebody else please add the files and stuff. I just did the easy part .

android88 said:
I set up a GitHub for it: https://github.com/xdaandroid88/CM101Dev
Somebody else please add the files and stuff. I just did the easy part .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet!! Great Job!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

LawStud3nt said:
Yes, it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you try something with legacy? msm8660 are now in thta legacy term, ill see what i can find, cuuz our jb blobs should work for 4.2, that multi user thing kill us all!
edit: take a look at this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_qcom-common
this needs to be re factored

blackwing182 said:
did you try something with legacy? msm8660 are now in thta legacy term, ill see what i can find, cuuz our jb blobs should work for 4.2, that multi user thing kill us all!
edit: take a look at this
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_qcom-common
this needs to be re factored
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added, but still no boot. You can DL in OP

the problem is that everything 4.2 related on aosp, cm, and on code aurora for qualcomm SoCs is all based on the msm8960. I played around a bit before I went out of town for the last 2 weeks. I posted some info that might be useful in the Skyrocket forums here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1990891
I don't know if the issue is with the device repos, the kernel, or both, but as it is now, none of the msm8660 drivers/libs are getting compiled during the build (display, audio, bluetooth, among other stuff). Adding them in from a cm10.0 build also did not work. I'm also not sure if the current msm8660-common device repo or msm8660-common kernel repo is compatible with the current implementation of "ion" rather than pmem and ashmem. My best guess is that the device_samsung_msm8660-common, device_samsung_celox-common, device_samsung_skyrocket, and device_samsung_hercules all need some significant refactoring/hacking to get it inline with 4.2 and that's beyond my knowledge in this area. I also dont know if it might be possible to incorporate the device_qcom-common repo and trim redundant/conflicting code in those other repos, but like I was saying before, that repo currently just supports the msm8960.

m4570d0n said:
the problem is that everything 4.2 related on aosp, cm, and on code aurora for qualcomm SoCs is all based on the msm8960. I played around a bit before I went out of town for the last 2 weeks. I posted some info that might be useful in the Skyrocket forums here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1990891
I don't know if the issue is with the device repos, the kernel, or both, but as it is now, none of the msm8660 drivers/libs are getting compiled during the build (display, audio, bluetooth, among other stuff). Adding them in from a cm10.0 build also did not work. I'm also not sure if the current msm8660-common device repo or msm8660-common kernel repo is compatible with the current implementation of "ion" rather than pmem and ashmem. My best guess is that the device_samsung_msm8660-common, device_samsung_celox-common, device_samsung_skyrocket, and device_samsung_hercules all need some significant refactoring/hacking to get it inline with 4.2 and that's beyond my knowledge in this area. I also dont know if it might be possible to incorporate the device_qcom-common repo and trim redundant/conflicting code in those other repos, but like I was saying before, that repo currently just supports the msm8960.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, that is just the information I needed. I should be able to dig in again on the weekend.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

I tried hacking the evervolv tree, the HTC amaze and HP touchpad are booting currently.
It compiles but does not boot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

So this is kind of a pain in the ass...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

Sucks :/
I'd wanted to give a shot at trying to build this, but I have not much knowledge and I have no idea how to do it lol.
Also, does logcat work at all?

LawStud3nt said:
So this is kind of a pain in the ass...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the status now bro