Develop Bugs

I know, I know there is probably a thread out there already.

Just traded my razr maxx for a cdma nexus. Obviously I know I'm going to notice a huge difference in battery life. So my question is what rom/kernel combos are providing the best results in battery life, speed, and stability. Feel free to bash me, but, please leave me your opinion ;-)

If your title states there is already a thread... why are you making another one?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Because I cant find the thread im looking for. Xda search sucks.

i like
aokp comes with faux123. its ****in sweet.
i always go back to imoseyons lean kernel
favorite rom is aokp.
oh check your pms

I'm on Liquid ROM 1.25 it's smooth and lasts whole day for me with about 40% left when I go to bed.
Hope this helps.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Liquid with stock kernel?

Why did you trade your max for a Nexus? I have an offer that's why I'm asking.
Development?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

CM9 + GLaDOS 1.28 ... CM9 is super stable with lots of features and it has none of the other bloat and bugs found in other roms out there (i've tried them all crack flashing and always come back to CM9) GLaDOS is simply the best kernel out there right now especially with EzeKeel's new Wheatly governor and vibration control ... best performance, batter life and stability ... if you don't know now you know

aokp b31 with franco r121, near 5 hour screen time and got me through full day too, with 14 left.
nothing surpasses franco kernel, and the best rom with most customizations is aokp. if u wanna go lite, try slimics with franco, also beast
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

This is what im talking about. Thanks

davwman said:
This is what im talking about. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
click the thanks button
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Liquid 1.25 + Lean kernel 3.0.1 = so much win
Sent from the future.

chefdave12118 said:
Why did you trade your max for a Nexus? I have an offer that's why I'm asking.
Development?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maxx is great but nexus has development. Ill miss the maxx battery life though. 6 1/2 hours of screen on time yesterday

Ive been running...
AOKP 4.2.2 Milestone build and franco kernel Nightly #378 (Full Version for all features). Then a little tweaking and modding and your phone will be a beast!! Haven't flashed a new rom in almost two months that's how sturdy and bugless this rom is.

Rich8692 said:
AOKP 4.2.2 Milestone build and franco kernel Nightly #378 (Full Version for all features). Then a little tweaking and modding and your phone will be a beast!! Haven't flashed a new rom in almost two months that's how sturdy and bugless this rom is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me? This is a year old thread.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Zepius said:
Are you kidding me? This is a year old thread.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reported the thread for closing.
a maguro wrote this.

[Q] Galaxy Nexus CM9

I am currently using a Sensation, however I will likely be purchasing a GNEX in the next week or two. I have become accustomed to flashing different ROMs on my Sensation so I wanted to know if a stable (not nightly) version of CM9 was currently available for this device. I checked on the CM site and its a bit hard to determine what is nightly vs stable, so I figured I would ask around here. Thanks in advance, and I hope to be joining the discussions on this forum soon!

no phones have a non-nightly version. NO RC1 version has came out for CM9 regardless of what phone it is.
aokp is really stable + more features than cm9.

Cm9 is stable and fast.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

nightly is VERY!!!! stable

zephiK said:
no phones have a non-nightly version. NO RC1 version has came out for CM9 regardless of what phone it is.
aokp is really stable + more features than cm9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What features are noteworthy that distinguish the two ROMs?

webmaster said:
What features are noteworthy that distinguish the two ROMs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 doesn't have many extra features ... AOKP has too many features
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

alteredmass said:
Cm9 doesn't have many extra features ... AOKP has too many features
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much what he said. Go through the roms features and change log and you can answer that question on your own.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

CM9 newest nightly is always the best f it is newer than RC!
on ZTE Blade I flash always the newest nightly of CM7...
Does GN CM9 Nightly (newest) use the Android 2.3 Gingerbread CM7 music player? If I remember fine then it is using that..

Please, use CM9 AND DONT USR AOKP! We don't need another thread about someone complaining about something not working or horrible battery drain...etc...etc. CM9 is leaps and bounds faster and more stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

Smokeey said:
Please, use CM9 AND DONT USR AOKP! We don't need another thread about someone complaining about something not working or horrible battery drain...etc...etc. CM9 is leaps and bounds faster and more stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree, AOKP is very stable. It has many features. Don't take what people says. Its about personal preference
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I came from the Sensation and while Vorbeth did a nice job with Opensensation, the nightly CM9 I'm running is VERY excellent. The only bugs I saw when I skimmed thru the thread were with people trying to run custom kernels.
And to be honest, the stock ROM was kicking ass too. There's nothing like having a phone that's truly open to unlock and have fun with. Plus, there are no bugs with certain components usually found in phones with sense or touchwiz. Bluetooth, camera, video recording and HD playback WORK exactly the way they're supposed to.
From this point forward, I will only buy a nexus device. I'm not trying to convince you, just giving my honest opinion.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Smokeey said:
Please, use CM9 AND DONT USR AOKP! We don't need another thread about someone complaining about something not working or horrible battery drain...etc...etc. CM9 is leaps and bounds faster and more stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's your own personal opinion the rom has been stable since it's release for me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Liquid or Aokp?

I want smoothness and customiziability(I know its not a word lol). I don't have a g-nex yet but will buy one this month,hopefully. So I just wanted to know ahead of time
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2

I have had the best experience with liquid rom. They just recently updated it too.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I can speak for AOKP as a great rom stable / great features / power saver / nice performance..
As for liquid.. I was about to try it but meh they wont support spanish
Galaxy Nexus AOKP m5 Franco kernel m3

+1 on that
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Why don´t you try both when you got your Gnex and see which one you like better?
btw, i would recommend Slim ICS (3.7) which has almost all the features of AOKP but is way faster.
There are a lot of nice Roms there, so just give them a try. No need to think about it when u haven´t got your phone yet

I have just bought my new GN and i can tell you for sure that you have to try every rom for yourself. I mean, I tried stock one (4.0.4), AOKP Milestone 5 and Foxhound 0.5. For example, I was not satisfied with battery usage of AOKP: in fact, I tried Foxhound and I am really satisfied. So, try whatever you want, it's free-of-charge man!

AOKP have one big problem - data and net drop.... Liquid hazen`t this problem....

vituskerk said:
AOKP have one big problem - data and net drop.... Liquid hazen`t this problem....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong i havent drop any signal in months of use not a single time
Galaxy Nexus AOKP m5 Franco kernel m3

I must say AOKP. Been using it on and off since build 28 and it's the most feature-complete ROM I have ever seen.
I'm considering either PARANOIDANDROID when the next jawdropping release hits XDA or Cyanogenmod 9. I tried Liquidsmooth, but since it reminded me so much of AOKP, I chose to stay with AOKP.

thanks everyone for their opinions it means a lot
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2

A Couple Questions From A New GNexus Owner

Hey Guys! Coming here from my SGS II actually haha. I just like the feel of this phone better!
So I had a few questions to start off with.
This one is solely based on whoever may be reading this's opinion. Which kernel do you feel atm gives you a fair balance of smooth performance and good battery life (and hopefully no heat issues).
The second question is kind of two questions. Does the Toroplus get CM10 nightly's yet? It seems that theres alot of kang's with cherry picks which i guess are coming from toro? And does anyone know if pete plans to give us toroplus users some JB bugless-beast awesomeness?
Thanks for taking the time to read

I'm trying aokp atm and it runs smoothly!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

HaiKaiDo said:
Hey Guys! Coming here from my SGS II actually haha. I just like the feel of this phone better!
So I had a few questions to start off with.
This one is solely based on whoever may be reading this's opinion. Which kernel do you feel atm gives you a fair balance of smooth performance and good battery life (and hopefully no heat issues).
The second question is kind of two questions. Does the Toroplus get CM10 nightly's yet? It seems that theres alot of kang's with cherry picks which i guess are coming from toro? And does anyone know if pete plans to give us toroplus users some JB bugless-beast awesomeness?
Thanks for taking the time to read
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey buddy look in cm thread, I believe we have official cm10 night lies and cm 9 weeklies, and I recommended francos kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I'm using MinCo which is optimized for Franco Kernel. And obviously Franco Kernel. So far smoothest and most stable ROM I have used.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus on MinCo V4 through Tapatalk 2.

Hey guys! I sure do appreciate the responses! This seems like a super nice group of people here . If anyone has any other suggestions ill take em and thanks again!! :laugh:

Is customization what you want? Or just smooth and stable rom?
If customization, I would recommend poking around sprint Gnex dev forum. A lot of good and customizable roms there!
If smooth and stable, just stock. Really. Jelly bean is only android version that I wouldn't be disappointed even with Stock rom and kernel.
Overall, I would recommend d you to use stock for awhile and then if you're not happy with it, try popular custom roms.
Have a nice day and welcome!
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app

Rom: codename android 3.5 (highly recommended, even over aokp and cm10 )
Kernel: trinity (just awesome colors ) and franco
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Francos milstone 5 and nightly kernels are the only one I've tried because their good . I don't even want to try another kernel To be honest.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Fanco over stock kernel and a stable ROM with full customization!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

I can't see past stock jelly bean after flashing countless ROMs

Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

DAZEBOY said:
Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly are you disappointed about? Try the latest official builds of cm10 or aokp. Not a nightly or a kang.. an official build.

Try Paranoid, it looks pretty wild!

SHHHH!!!! You're not allowed to say that!
I've done the same as you. The only change I've made to stock is run nova launcher to make it a bit more purdy and personalized.
Minco is pretty nice since it's really close to stock but faster, but in the end I'd rather just run stock for peace of mind (not that Minco was unstable).

Stock based roms perform the best in my opinion. Although Bamf Paradigm and Wasabi Miui run well for me, if I run them with trinity 1344 kernel.
IMO It seems like CM and AOKP stay in the nighties phase for way too long, and bugs and stability issues take too long to fix. This has been the case on most phones I have owned. They are great innovative roms though. I find it rare when a Rom with loads and loads of features runs as good as stock based roms do. I love having features, but performance, stability and battery life are above all features for me. I can just find mods myself anyways and add them as I need.

If stock is what works best for you, run stock, there's nothing wrong with that.

Why do you want people to change your mind?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

The last ROM flashed was team baked black ROM it was OK but the force issues became very annoying .I was just asking am I doing something wrong when flashing ? I don't seem to get the same user experience from using jelly bean.There is only one feature I've used that isn't stock is fast reply which I think is brilliant and will definitely be in 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

DAZEBOY said:
The last ROM flashed was team baked black ROM it was OK but the force issues became very annoying .I was just asking am I doing something wrong when flashing ? I don't seem to get the same user experience from using jelly bean.There is only one feature I've used that isn't stock is fast reply which I think is brilliant and will definitely be in 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fast reply, I don't even know what that is but anyway, Android comes down to user preference, if you enjoy stock, then rock it dude, I've tried only a handful of roms here but stock gives the most solid performance 9 out of ten times. granted I'm running Slimbean now, but I like to flash every two weeks and this rom is pretty great aside from bootup time XD.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250

bk201doesntexist said:
i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tweaked till the cows come home but I think Google have totally cracked it to be honest and early reports about 4.2 seem to suggest they've went one more step in terms of speed and look .The quick reply feature is in cm10 when you receive a SMS you get a pop up window at anytime so you can instantly reply ,must be enabled tho .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

paranoidandroid is the bomb

DAZEBOY said:
Please can someone try and change my mind because I'm only disappointed and let down every time I try one .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i love love love stock Jelly Bean. That is what i run, so i suppose i also can not see past stock JB.
i wouldn't say i'm "disappointed" in any ROMS I've tried, just that i personally have found no need to move away from stock.

crixley said:
paranoidandroid is the bomb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I might give paranoid a go tomorrow and see if I can feel the love again
But the best part of all of this is WE CAN !
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

bk201doesntexist said:
i just hit 260h with no reboots. custom built from src, JRO03R, maguro. rock stable so far. gcc 4.7.0.
just saying, stock can be rock stable, and still be fast and responsive, if you're willing to tweak it and spend time testing it.
sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even with no tweaks it ran perfect for me i guess Verizon took their time for a reason, or they're just slow. Lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

DAZEBOY said:
I think I might give paranoid a go tomorrow and see if I can feel the love again
But the best part of all of this is WE CAN !
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won't regret it dude
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

I decided to give the latest Paranoid Android a try. I am running it with the latest franco stable milestone 5. Its running pretty excellent with no bugs so far. This is an instance of a non stock ROM running pretty well. They did good on this 2.17 PA build.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

stelv said:
I decided to give the latest Paranoid Android a try. I am running it with the latest franco stable milestone 5. Its running pretty excellent with no bugs so far. This is an instance of a non stock ROM running pretty well. They did good on this 2.17 PA build.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've downloaded it too using the goo app but can't download the bug fix zip .I'll flash it soon hopefully it give me the bug again
I'll report back soon
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I've tried EOS, CM10, PA, for at least a few days each, and yep, I'm back on stock + Nova. Just couldn't be bothered any more with messing around with the others.

DAZEBOY said:
I've downloaded it too using the goo app but can't download the bug fix zip .I'll flash it soon hopefully it give me the bug again
I'll report back soon
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may have spoke too soon. I cant get Bluetooth audio to work with PA. I haven't been able to download the bug fix either. Someone posted it in the PA thread but I haven't downloaded it yet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus