Related
I know that we can get better quality video recording out of the TP2, with the first WinMo phone shooting WVGA @ 30fps with the exact same hardware (minus cam module), I'm excited to see if someone can work their magic to incorporate better recording from the TP2.
Anyone else?
Cyph
I too am curious about this. I have actually always been curious as to whether the video capabilities are more software dependent or hardware... Though if the phone is capable of displaying the video on the viewfinder at WVGA at 30fps it should theoretically be possible to record at that quality. Anyways, we'll see what crops up later
Not at all
solsearch said:
I too am curious about this. I have actually always been curious as to whether the video capabilities are more software dependent or hardware... Though if the phone is capable of displaying the video on the viewfinder at WVGA at 30fps it should theoretically be possible to record at that quality. Anyways, we'll see what crops up later
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately the above statement is not at all true. Recording depends heavily on the camera hardware in terms of possible frame rate at a given resolution. Furthermore real-time compression and encoding is a significantly different proposition to the CPU than decoding and playback. This is not to say the TP2 hardware may not be capable of doing better than it does, just that playback capabilities are no indication.
Dennis
Like I said, I don't know how much the camera module affects it. And what I meant by theoretically is that if it can display that on the viewfinder at that res then theoretically it could be recorded in raw format (as long as the transfer to the memory could handle the speed), but it would not be practical by any means. But if the x2 is capable of it and IF the ONLY difference is the camera module, and IF the camera module is just the sensor and no graphics processing then it could possibly happen. And I'd love to see it. But neither am I going to hold my breath.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEIZvXqzxs
You see minutes 4:29 ..... But WVGA recording resolution is 720x480? or 800x480?
Thanks
The Xperia X2 has the same CPU as the Rhodium and in theory the video recording abilities can therefore be ported. The drivers for video recording must be extracted and put into the Rhodium ROM.
Even if the Rhodium camera or drivers doesn´t handle WVGA widescreen recording it´s possible with some development work to use better encoding drivers - i.e record VGA but let a good MP4 encoder with good quality do the encoding job (i.e replace the original HTC video encoder with a better one).
In this case the original HTC camera application is retained but with replaced encoders. The user only sees a quality difference - the handling of the camera app is the same otherwise.
E90 Commie said:
The Xperia X2 has the same CPU as the Rhodium and in theory the video recording abilities can therefore be ported. The drivers for video recording must be extracted and put into the Rhodium ROM.
Even if the Rhodium camera or drivers doesn´t handle WVGA widescreen recording it´s possible with some development work to use better encoding drivers - i.e record VGA but let a good MP4 encoder with good quality do the encoding job (i.e replace the original HTC video encoder with a better one).
In this case the original HTC camera application is retained but with replaced encoders. The user only sees a quality difference - the handling of the camera app is the same otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's definitely be a good thing. Maybe it could even up the fps a little bit.
The Xperia X2 has the same CPU as the Rhodium and in theory the video recording abilities can therefore be ported. The drivers for video recording must be extracted and put into the Rhodium ROM.
Even if the Rhodium camera or drivers doesn´t handle WVGA widescreen recording it´s possible with some development work to use better encoding drivers - i.e record VGA but let a good MP4 encoder with good quality do the encoding job (i.e replace the original HTC video encoder with a better one).
In this case the original HTC camera application is retained but with replaced encoders. The user only sees a quality difference - the handling of the camera app is the same otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if we can get someone on that I'd be willing to pay (big - ROM COOKERS LISTENING?? :-D ) for the capability to enhance the video recording capabilities. I just need an additional 10 fps and maybe another 200 kb/s bit rate for excellent video. That would make the video recorder to 30 fps @ ~ 1Mb/s..niiice.
If they can accomplish WVGA or even D1 (720x480) that would be cool too (or better).
I wish I had the skills/tools to do that, I'd be all over it like white on rice! LOL
Cyph
Personally I don't need 30fps (though it'd be nice). I'd be happy with a video standard such as 23.976fps or whatnot. 20 does look stuttery. Just a few more would fix that. Well. Let's hope someone looks into it. Though it might be necessary that we wait until the x2 is actually released
This question is for developers. Can devs replace crappy compression codec on Evo recording cam to record with h.264 to improve quality of vids we shoot by far. Current cam codec is SO bad that 720p does no justice for the cam. Basically in my view camcorder is useless. H.264 would change the whole game for this phone. Would love to see the rom with h.264 video camera codec. Would any shead some light on this ?
stewie-droid said:
This question is for developers. Can devs replace crappy compression codec on Evo recording cam to record with h.264 to improve quality of vids we shoot by far. Current cam codec is SO bad that 720p does no justice for the cam. Basically in my view camcorder is useless. H.264 would change the whole game for this phone. Would love to see the rom with h.264 video camera codec. Would any shead some light on this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they cant do a whole lot with any camera settings till the source kernal is released. Who knows when that will be heh
stewie-droid said:
This question is for developers. Can devs replace crappy compression codec on Evo recording cam to record with h.264 to improve quality of vids we shoot by far. Current cam codec is SO bad that 720p does no justice for the cam. Basically in my view camcorder is useless. H.264 would change the whole game for this phone. Would love to see the rom with h.264 video camera codec. Would any shead some light on this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even know what the current cam codec is?
It's MPEG-4 Part 2 (generally referred to as "MPEG-4"), which is most commonly known for it's implementations in divx/xvid.
It's not as trendy as H.264 (aka MPEG-4 Part 10 and/or AVC), but generally quality isn't what people take issue with when choosing h.264 over MP4 - it's filesize. When you get into higher resolutions with higher bit-depths, being able to compress a stream allows you to work around issues with slow write speeds.
I think you really aren't familiar with video encoding or codecs in general. You should educate yourself a bit more before announcing that a simple codec change will resolve the camera woes with the Evo.
h.264 is currently patent encumbered, which is part of why you don't see it implemented so widely.
Swapping out the codec isn't going to be a magic fix to improve this camera. It's limited by it's very design. Consider the 720p video a novelty and try to only shoot in situations with lots of ambient light and it'll be far more usable.
Petronic said:
Do you even know what the current cam codec is?
It's MPEG-4 Part 2 (generally referred to as "MPEG-4"), which is most commonly known for it's implementations in divx/xvid.
It's not as trendy as H.264 (aka MPEG-4 Part 10 and/or AVC), but generally quality isn't what people take issue with when choosing h.264 over MP4 - it's filesize. When you get into higher resolutions with higher bit-depths, being able to compress a stream allows you to work around issues with slow write speeds.
I think you really aren't familiar with video encoding or codecs in general. You should educate yourself a bit more before announcing that a simple codec change will resolve the camera woes with the Evo.
h.264 is currently patent encumbered, which is part of why you don't see it implemented so widely.
Swapping out the codec isn't going to be a magic fix to improve this camera. It's limited by it's very design. Consider the 720p video a novelty and try to only shoot in situations with lots of ambient light and it'll be far more usable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. But x.264 is not involved in any patent issues, is free, and works very will with the best container format available to date... mkv.
Now the phone will do hardware decoding of x/h.264 but you are right, I don't see any advantage other than the smaller file size. You are right again, on one of those P labeled cams the h.264 stream is much smaller than that of mpeg-2/dvd or others so it works well on those crappy hardware writers.
Changing the encoding profile of this camera would not fix your issues OP.
I've never seen bad quality from h.264 codec but then again i agree i have not research enough on the codecs comparison enough but that's why i'm asking. I just know it looks horrible. Somehow camera pics are acceptable. Thank you for the input.
stewie-droid said:
I've never seen bad quality from h.264 codec but then again i agree i have not research enough on the codecs comparison enough but that's why i'm asking. I just know it looks horrible. Somehow camera pics are acceptable. Thank you for the input.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could encode an h.264 video in a low bitrate and low resolution and it would look bad. The codec is only one factor involved in the end result. Different codecs can squeeze better quality video into a smaller file size but it comes at the expense of CPU use and other bottlenecks. In this case I don't think the choice of codec is what is holding back the video. It's probably more about processing power and overall architecture.
I'm not sure that implementing x.264 compression for the EVO would solve anything. From my experience in order to have better quality with h.264 over h.263 it requires much more processing power due to the higher compression complexity.. This would all have to be done real time by the phone.
With the great hardware being sported by the EVO I wonder if a more unorthodox approach could be implemented to attain the highest quality possible.
How about this:
Capture video using a real time lossless compression. Maybe huffyuv?
Once captured let the phone recompress the source to x.264 or whatever via a background service or at a scheduled time like 3am or something
Maybe via this method a higher frame rate could even be achieved?
amdchip said:
I'm not sure that implementing x.264 compression for the EVO would solve anything. From my experience in order to have better quality with h.264 over h.263 it requires much more processing power due to the higher compression complexity.. This would all have to be done real time by the phone.
With the great hardware being sported by the EVO I wonder if a more unorthodox approach could be implemented to attain the highest quality possible.
How about this:
Capture video using a real time lossless compression. Maybe huffyuv?
Once captured let the phone recompress the source to x.264 or whatever via a background service or at a scheduled time like 3am or something
Maybe via this method a higher frame rate could even be achieved?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uncompressed [email protected] with 8-bit color would be something like 45MB/s. (That's excluding audio.)
No current SD card supports those write speeds.
I'm not sure that you could losslessly compress it down to something that'd support even a class 6 card.
Petronic said:
Uncompressed [email protected] with 8-bit color would be something like 45MB/s. (That's excluding audio.)
No current SD card supports those write speeds.
I'm not sure that you could losslessly compress it down to something that'd support even a class 6 card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eeeeek!!
I checked it out and you are right on the money.
(8 bit @ 1280 x 720 @ 59.94field = 105 MB per/sec) / (2.33:1 huffyuv) = 45.06
Still I wonder if better video quality could be achieved via a capture now (large file size) compress later (small file size) solution.
Certainly, considering your well taken point, we would need to keep things within the requirements of the EVO's hardware (sd card included). Probably would need to keep the data rates within the EVO's stock microsd specifications in order for it to be viable for everyone.
The iPhone 4 can record in h.264 and its processor isnt *that* much more powerful than Snapdragon (and the camera is similar--same company, same sensor size, same features, just 5MP instead of 8MP). What it comes down to is lazy coding by HTC
I don't know if you guys have looked in the build.prop file but the settings are in there. I just don't have alot of time to play with them but here's what's inside. Sprint/HTC changed the line in 1.47,ro.media.enc.vid.m4v.bps, to 8000000 from 6000000 on 1.32, so I'm guessing that's how they upped the Mbits in the upgrade. I could be wrong and the change may need to be in the kernel also but play with them and see.
Code:
#
# This file describes the media capabilities and profiles
# using system properties.
#
# Note: The property key and value has some length
# limit as defined by PROPERTY_KEY_MAX and
# PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX, respectively
#
# WARNING: We may not use system properties for specifying
# media capabilities and profiles in the future
#
ro.media.enc.file.format = 3gp,mp4
ro.media.enc.vid.codec = m4v,h263
ro.media.enc.vid.h263.width = 176,1280
ro.media.enc.vid.h263.height = 144,720
ro.media.enc.vid.h263.bps = 64000,6000000
ro.media.enc.vid.h263.fps = 1,30
ro.media.enc.vid.m4v.width = 176,1280
ro.media.enc.vid.m4v.height = 144,720
ro.media.enc.vid.m4v.bps = 64000,8000000
ro.media.enc.vid.m4v.fps = 1,30
#
# Increase SKIA decode memory capability for progressive jpg file
#
ro.media.dec.jpeg.memcap = 20000000
I may not be a...
developer but when you are talking about codec you are talking my language (I am an editor). H264 isn't that great itself and won't make the EVO's footage look any better yeah you get some more detail out of the H264 but the real reason the camera doesn't look as good is the variable fps in different lighting conditions. The variable kills it. The cam should be fixed at 24fps or 30fps. If that can be done you will see a major difference. I'm not sold on the white balance either. Also I would love to have h264 but the difference in the two is compression. H264 is better but again FPS is key.
I agree as well as most of the other people that h.264 won't help by itself.
Though one thing it would help with is allowing to bump up to a higher bit rate and or FPS and still maintain speeds sufficient for Class 2 SD cards. So, even though it won't do anything by itself, it will help in that you could in theory record higher quality video to your phone.
billobob said:
The iPhone 4 can record in h.264 and its processor isnt *that* much more powerful than Snapdragon (and the camera is similar--same company, same sensor size, same features, just 5MP instead of 8MP). What it comes down to is lazy coding by HTC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Das troo, I emailed Omnivision about the issue, they said that their Evo is great there, and that I should contact HTC about it and had said they created the driver/software for it.
"Hi Steve,
I’m sorry to hear that you are experiencing issues video performance. The HTC EVO we have here works great. OmniVision only makes the sensor. HTC makes the drivers and software that run the sensor. Unfortunately, you will need to contact them with any issues.
Sorry, I couldn’t be more help.
Scott"
Then I had asked them if they have any samples they used. And sent me a video they just recorded.
"We just went outside and took this simple video. Hope it helps.
Scott"
Currently uploading right now, i'll edit the link.
EDIT: here you go
bit.ly/c0lwOb
What do you guys think?
FunYunZ said:
EDIT: here you go
bit.ly/c0lwOb
What do you guys think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not able to post links yet I'm guessing. Just type it out.
Holyrolla said:
Not able to post links yet I'm guessing. Just type it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you don't see the link? its a bit[dot]ly link. But yea i can't post links yet, so I used the URL shortening.
bit[dot]ly/ c0lwOb
That video is pretty clear, but jumpy as well (expected). Wondering if they tweaked it or installed the OTA update on it?
Holyrolla said:
That video is pretty clear, but jumpy as well (expected). Wondering if they tweaked it or installed the OTA update on it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I wondered to, but I guess not.
We are using one of our employees phones he bought from Sprint. All of the drivers and software are stock and from HTC.
Scott
Good god, that video sample is hideous! Look at this video comparison done between the Evo and the iPhone 4 in the exact same scene. There's just no competition between the two.
Good god, our Evo sucks mighty ass in the 720p category.
as the title says, what's the best video file to showcase the screen on the EVO? i was told avatar but my file's native resolution is 6xx by 3xx so it doesnt fill the screen unless i stretch it, and then you notice the stretched pixels
I was told to try a high-def file. i tried a 720p and a 1080p file and both of them played slowly and skipped on the audio (i have bigger file size videos that play fine, so it must be bitrate causing the skipping)...
thanks for your suggestions
I followed this very easy guide for converting files.
http://www.talkandroid.com/android-forums/evo-4g/5201-guide-converting-video-files-work-evo.html
I then converted Avatar from 720p. Its glorious, and everyone who wants to see the video quality of my phone, I show the Avatar movie.
I don't get it. The screen itself can't display 720p on it. Why even bother? It can't even record 720p. By that I mean the compression and low light capabilities.
But yeah, no point in trying to impress people with the screen, really. xP
well i'm also trying to impress myself. i haven't yet seen video playback at its best settings.
it can't play at 720p but if you get the step down, being standard def. it's lower than the screen res on the evo. so we get 720p and downsize it to evo's resolution which is still higher than the 640x480 type of vga size video.
thanks for the tip. i had found handbrake through a search after i posted. now waiting on avatar and watchmen to finish so i can convert
I convert my BR rips for my EVO, and the best movie I have that shows off the screen is Transformers 2. I converted the IMAX one so it fills the screen
Must have ROOT
EDIT**
I have just uploaded V2 of my profile - I have lowered the Bitrate slightly and changed from 3gp to mp4 file format.. I have also enabled 720p for the front facing camera - Let me know if the lowered bitrate still performs as well.
Folks,
This is my edited media_profile.xml for far better 720p recording.. thought I would share it..
I have upped the bitrate from just 1MB/s (default)to around 4MB/s.. for me, it is clearly better when played on my Monitor or Television.. smoother, more detail and appears clearer.
I have tried a higher bitrate but found this to be a good balance between size and quality.
I have also tried editing the xml for 1080p recording but cannot get higher than 14fps when recording so have not included it..
to install, just unrar the media_profiles.xml and copy it to /system/etc and reboot.... REMEMBER TO BACKUP YOUR ORIGINAL FIRST.
This has worked for me, but if you end up in a boot loop, pushing the original file should fix it.
Hope you enjoy it.
Bracken
Do you have a comparison video or anything? This is the kind of thing I want to see before flashing.
Nice find!
I can see the difference just watching play back on the xoom! Alot smoother...ill check out the HDMI when I get home.
Will this work on any Android device? Say my DX? I take way more video on that.
bracken21 said:
Must have ROOT
....
I have also tried editing the xml for 1080p recording but cannot get higher than 14fps when recording so have not included it..
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you a stock Kernel or Custom Kernel + overclocked CPU?
Works well, I have a similar hack for my Nexus.
Easy and simple improvement for video recording.
Using Hammerhead 2.1 & Tachi OCed kernel.
@bracken21 = does this affect the still camera picture taking?
Thank you very much, great mod.
Hi,
@Sergio PC -This does not affect the picture quality only the video..
@twister_65 -I had this completely on stock 3.1 with stock kernel and worked fined.. I'm now running it with Hammerhead 2.1 & Tachi OCed kernel.
Even OCed @1.6, when I enable 1080p recording there is no increase in FPS, it stays at around 14FPS.. I presume the actual sensor is not capable of [email protected]
@mradlauer - I have no idea if this could be done to the DX, I presume so, but what resolution, bitrate and FPS would depend on the device.. if its anything like the Xoom, putting in an unsupported profile may result in a boot loop ?
If there is interest I can upload another profile with settings as follows... but I find it pointless as 1080p @ 14fps is unwatchable.. I have tried increasing/decreasing the Bitrate but still only does 14fps.
1080p 6MB/s @ 14fps when high quality selected.
720p 4MB/s @ 30 when low quality selected.
720p @ 30fps for front facing camera.
Thanks
Bracken
720p for front would be awesome.
Great, i just would love to have it recording in MP4
€: Wait, trying it now
€²: Works Thx for This
Would changing any of these lines to 100 improve photo quality too?
<ImageEncoding quality="90" />
Stealyourface said:
720p for front would be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Front camera now enabled for 720p and file format changed to mp4
cheers
Bracken
truly great work here. thank you
im just surprised no one had done this sooner, but better late than never!!
ive only played wtih it for litterally 30 seconds however i noticed that upon pressing the record button for a video using the front facing camera, it zooms in and stretches the image vertically in the preview window. i dont think that it actually records it like this but it seems to be some sort of graphical glitch....maybe you could look into it?
id like to say thanks again. did you change anything for the still images in v2 or somthing? because i no longer see those weird lines when taking photos with the front facing camera.
THANKS!
crackmulah said:
however i noticed that upon pressing the record button for a video using the front facing camera, it zooms in and stretches the image vertically in the preview window. i dont think that it actually records it like this but it seems to be some sort of graphical glitch....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed the same issue when recording from the front camera
Excuse me, but trying this mod, I realized that the zoom in camera mode does not work. And 'this normal?
Thanks!
zoom isnt working in video mode for me either.
although i cant remember if we were ever able to.....
can you add this ?
I tried now, even the stock 3.1 does not allow it. Is there any mod ?
Regards!
Nice find.
Pretty easy to increase or lower the bitrate yourself.
I personally upped the bitrate to 35MB/s for 720p.
Adjusted the 480p resolution to 720x480 @ 20Mb/s for quick and easy converts straight to dvd with no resolution changes.
Adjusted the audio bitrate to 256kbps, sample rate to 48khz and enabled stereo recording.
Sweet stuff.
edit: Tried shooting for 60fps but it forced closed as soon as I tried to select video recording
Audionut11 said:
Nice find.
Pretty easy to increase or lower the bitrate yourself.
I personally upped the bitrate to 35MB/s for 720p.
Adjusted the 480p resolution to 720x480 @ 20Mb/s for quick and easy converts straight to dvd with no resolution changes.
Adjusted the audio bitrate to 256kbps, sample rate to 48khz and enabled stereo recording.
Sweet stuff.
edit: Tried shooting for 60fps but it forced closed as soon as I tried to select video recording
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mind posting your xml file... I personally like the tweaks you have done and would like the same..
Thanks in advance
Audionut11 said:
Nice find.
Pretty easy to increase or lower the bitrate yourself.
I personally upped the bitrate to 35MB/s for 720p.
Adjusted the 480p resolution to 720x480 @ 20Mb/s for quick and easy converts straight to dvd with no resolution changes.
Adjusted the audio bitrate to 256kbps, sample rate to 48khz and enabled stereo recording.
Sweet stuff.
edit: Tried shooting for 60fps but it forced closed as soon as I tried to select video recording
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
35MB/s is 2.1Gb per minute - that would give you around 15 mins recording on 720p on 32gb card. Plus with the size of sensor and optics, im guessing you wont see quality increase above 3MB - 4MB/s and even that is asking alot of the camera due to the noise levels and lack of light/detail passing through the small plastic lens. As for stereo recording, I thought the Xoom only had 1 mic ?
Being that bluray movies are around 34MB/s.. I think asking a small plastic lens on the xoom to do that a little much. Also the tegra 2 is listed at only supporting 20Mb... did you also amend the codec maximum bitrate as its currently set to around 5MBs.. if not, you will actually be recording @ 5MB/s.. Also, is 35MB/s over the write limit for xoom internal storage.. I could be wrong but even a class 10 cards only write at around 10MBs and reads @ 30Mbs ?
If you want to try 60fps, you would also need to amend not just the recording values but the codec preference and possible the memCap too.. ive not tried it yet, may give it a go.
Im not trying to have a go at you, just stating that your filling your xoom up for no reason... in a long winded blurbing kind away.. not had my coffee yet..
As for the problem with front camera zooming in on 720p, nothing I can do about this, that fix would be above my head.. My guess is that the google camera apk would need amended for 16:9... my knowledge of Android goes as far as this little dirty hack.
Cheers
Bracken
bummer on the zoom and front face stretch problem... Gonna have to revert to stock unless fixed in the future... Will subscribe for updates in case. Nice for folks that don't mind those couple details though
rockhumper said:
bummer on the zoom and front face stretch problem... Gonna have to revert to stock unless fixed in the future... Will subscribe for updates in case. Nice for folks that don't mind those couple details though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, just revert to version 1, it keeps the front camera stock and rear camera is improved..
As for the people not being able zoom, you can't zoom in video mode using stock... well mines never has.
I wish I knew how to port the camera front the Samsung 10.1 tab, does any one know how?
Cheers
Bracken
A while back CM12 had a patch that enabled 4K video recording. I remember that it even worked SOME of the time, but mostly it showed to be recording without saving anything. Currently on CM12 and Blisspop the option is again removed - probably because it was buggy: review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/103494
I've tried many different camera ZIPs from other manufacturers (Motorola cam, Lenovo cam) but they do not appear to enable 4K either.
I tried playing around with the media_profiles configuration file, uncommenting the 4K profile. This does enable 4K video recording - even saving, but the framerate is really bad (<10), both with stock and third party cameras.
So my question: Did anyone ever get smooth 4K video to work on AOSP? If so what was the combination of software used?
yes it did work for idiots who;
1) flased xXcameraXxfix_AROMA_VIPERPRO_v4_FAKXDA_LIKE_SUBSCRIBE_DONATE_YOUTELLMEBUGS.zip
2) set the resolution to 4K
3) shot a video
4) never realized it didn't even save, even if it did, it was lagging between 5 and 15 fps
TL;DR
no, it did not, i have flashed all the 3rd party crap from random monkeys claiming they fixed the camera on aosp promising stock quality
to those who come in here telling me it does, provide proof or gtfo
geekmystique said:
A while back CM12 had a patch that enabled 4K video recording. I remember that it even worked SOME of the time, but mostly it showed to be recording without saving anything. Currently on CM12 and Blisspop the option is again removed - probably because it was buggy: review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/103494
I've tried many different camera ZIPs from other manufacturers (Motorola cam, Lenovo cam) but they do not appear to enable 4K either.
I tried playing around with the media_profiles configuration file, uncommenting the 4K profile. This does enable 4K video recording - even saving, but the framerate is really bad (<10), both with stock and third party cameras.
So my question: Did anyone ever get smooth 4K video to work on AOSP? If so what was the combination of software used?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flash 1. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B023yzk713HzTkhNcFVvU1Z2NHc/view?pli=1
and 2. https://mega.nz/#!lhsg1bwB!ehggjqI-hCbPCHsLr2x2MirRpXRE3XMr8_gHry_NPfs
BUT, is there any non-stock ROM with STOCK camera quality? No 4K, I do not need that, only 1080p (60 fps or 30).
Nope Coki4, unfortunately Tehosiris is right: with the HTC cam and resolution "fix" I can record in 4K, but it is still way too low framerate (15 FPS or worse).
Voterx: To me 4K is most important, hence the thread. If i want proper pictures I take my DSLR anyway... 4K video is something that is really a beautiful thing if you have the screen to display it. There is a huge difference between 1080p and 4K.
To me it is starting to look like the camera driver in AOSP source is just not able to push the pixels?
Snap camera does it. I have also found that snap camera takes as good, or better in some cases, pictures as the stock camera.
cynikalJ said:
Snap camera does it. I have also found that snap camera takes as good, or better in some cases, pictures as the stock camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it does not
and
not it definitely does not
Then your using it wrong, because it does for me
geekmystique said:
Nope Coki4, unfortunately Tehosiris is right: with the HTC cam and resolution "fix" I can record in 4K, but it is still way too low framerate (15 FPS or worse).
Voterx: To me 4K is most important, hence the thread. If i want proper pictures I take my DSLR anyway... 4K video is something that is really a beautiful thing if you have the screen to display it. There is a huge difference between 1080p and 4K.
To me it is starting to look like the camera driver in AOSP source is just not able to push the pixels?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're wrong
With snap camera
What are you doing to get those file properties? Want to check what my jerky files say..
edit:
Properties here also shows 30 fps, but the video is jerky as fuuuuuu* - i guess it is saved "as" 30 FPS but it just drops a bunch. Yes it is 4K but def not 30 FPS, even if the file shows it to be (for me).
but.. if it is smooth for you I want to know your exact rom details so I can try to achieve my holy grail.
can one of the digital cowboys upload these fabled 4k videos shot on aosp?
i still yet to see a nonstock 4k video that doesn't lag like ****
@geekmystique the jerkyness doesn't show in properties, they are just the same as regular videos, you can check the properties in root explorer or any other file explorer.
it does not matter , it is important that you are not right
coki4 said:
it does not matter , it is important that you are not right
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your 2nd screenshot shows that the 4k video is in 59.9 fps, now THAT i'd like to see.
bending physics with an apk eh? :laugh:
edit: judging from the amount of silence after the bigface comments, i assume it takes an awful lot of time to upload the fabled 60fps 4k video (translation: someone is full of **** and/or clueless)
Let's not make this into a flamewar of sorts.
This is a video I took of my hand waving in front of the camera, whatever the file info says, it is not 30 FPS - by far, it is dropping frames like crazy. The file properties say 30 FPS in MPCHC, but windows properties shows the truth: 18 FPS.
https://mega.nz/#!lkkFHbrT!gi3qGdzcnBxpsoPMObzLk9jZPAtrYacJ_03mYBYwu2A
If your video looks better, great - let me know what you did. And if you can spare the time, post it please.
Let's discuss
I do not need 4K, I just need stock quality camera in custom ROMS It's different question.
Voterx said:
I do not need 4K, I just need stock quality camera in custom ROMS It's different question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i suggest you take a look at the camera comparison post here on xda, showing stock / moto / htc / whatever side-by-side
there is no such thing as stock quality on non-LG driver backed software
Anyways, i'm absolutely on geekmystique's side here, i've had multiple people giving me lectures how i need to flash xyz.zip set ABC settings to DEF, align my device towards Mars, count to 7 and stand on my left foot to have AMAZING STOCK QUALITY PHOTOS AND VIDEOS.
Guess what, i've done all those steps, flashed all the zips, pirated all the ****ty apks and gotten nothing but disappointment.
Thats why there is sarcasm towards these 'BUT MY AOSP CAMERA IZ BETTUR BRUH YOU SUK', when it's clearly not. Hell, half of the conversations ended at 'WHO NEEDS 4K' or 'I DONT NEED CAMERA ANYWAYS' which is ridiculus when it's these people giving lectures on how to flash stuff they don't even know what it contains.
dudumm tsss
coki4 said:
it does not matter , it is important that you are not right
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If so.. Please post the video - my video that I posted also says 30 FPS, but it stutters like mad. If you can get better video I would be really happy to know.
Guess the aosp camera is just as good as stock boys are back in their caves.
I use Cloudy only because of Xcam. I really would like a [email protected] or [email protected] for CM12.1