!ALWAYS make a databackup.img on your device BEFORE making any changes!
Hi all!
For the past 3 weeks I have been making small changes to the build prop file inside the Android /system folder.
These changes incorporate not only a increase in speed but also stability.
What I would like to see happen is one of 2 things, or both if possible.
1. Incorporate this build.prop file into the various "System_Froyo" builds available, forcing these changes on initial install, or
2. Vogue/Polaris developers browse the file for contradicting information (things that won't work on a Vogue/Polaris) and make appropriate changes.
Improvements include:
ro.ril.disable.power.collapse (prevents sleep of death),
various dalvik vm improvements,
force hardware acceleration and performance tuning,
various telephony enhancements including ring delay time and data speeds.
After making these changes, the phone rings immediately, the UI is much smoother (GUI uses video processor primarily), and data jumped from 1.3Mb/sec to over 3.2Mb/sec, making web pages load faster. (EDIT: The 3.2Mb/sec is the top of the scale, I actually averaged 2.2Mb/sec with average pings between 300-500 across 3 different radio roms).
VOGUE/POLARIS OWNERS!
Please test this file and report findings here.
IF you find you need to remove any lines, please do so before copying the file into /system. This file works well on the AT&T networks (Cingular), but may not have much effect on other networks.
If you have trouble after installing this file, please post your bootlog file.
PoX
So may I know what rom support this?
This has only been tested on a "clean" Froyo build, so I cannot make any assumptions as to if it will work in Gingerbread/Eclair/Donut/etc.
If everyone follows the install guide on the front page, I would assume that it would work worldwide, as long as it's Froyo.
In the future I could try it out on Gingerbread and other builds, but I make no promises as development has all but ended for Android on MSM72**.
I can test this. Perhaps, kaiser on Android could be good for daily use?...
Thanks for sharing
PoXFreak said:
Hi all!
For the past 2 weeks I have been making small changes to the build prop file inside the Android /system folder.
These changes incorporate not only a increase in speed but also stability.
What I would like to see happen is one of 2 things, or both if possible.
1. Incorporate this build.prop file into the various "System_Froyo" builds available, forcing these changes on initial install, or
2. Vogue/Polaris developers browse the file for contradicting information (things that won't work on a Vogue/Polaris) and make appropriate changes.
Improvements include:
ro.ril.disable.power.collapse (prevents sleep of death),
various dalvik vm improvements,
force hardware acceleration and performance tuning,
various telephony enhancements including ring delay time and data speeds.
After making these changes, the phone rings immediately, the UI is much smoother (GUI uses video processor primarily), and data jumped from 1.3Mb/sec to over 3.2Mb/sec, making web pages load faster.
If there is interest in this, please respond to this post. If there is enough interest I will attach it to this post as a .tar file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PoXFreak said:
This has only been tested on a "clean" Froyo build, so I cannot make any assumptions as to if it will work in Gingerbread/Eclair/Donut/etc.
If everyone follows the install guide on the front page, I would assume that it would work worldwide, as long as it's Froyo.
In the future I could try it out on Gingerbread and other builds, but I make no promises as development has all but ended for Android on MSM72k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm interested in your new build.prop tar, but I do not understand the thing about the install guide, you mentioned in you second post.
My Kaiser is running CM7 RC3 on haret, so maybe I can do some testing on gingerbread, with you.
Your trials, about tweaking the app download possibility, sound very interesting too, as I read about a tweaked build.prop for a tab that simulates to be a samsung tab in combination with an older version of the app market.
Feel free to PM, although I'm quite a newby to android.
I can build with Fresh Froyo and try it, but not until April sorry.
I am currently traveling and away from a development system.
I have been slowly trying to get a reliable app2sd capability working.
I'd suggest searching old posts for power collapse to see if dzo or others long ago tried this.
It sounds promising.
muckelmaus said:
I'm interested in your new build.prop tar, but I do not understand the thing about the install guide, you mentioned in you second post.
My Kaiser is running CM7 RC3 on haret, so maybe I can do some testing on gingerbread, with you.
Your trials, about tweaking the app download possibility, sound very interesting too, as I read about a tweaked build.prop for a tab that simulates to be a samsung tab in combination with an older version of the app market.
Feel free to PM, although I'm quite a newby to android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "install guide" I'm referring to is here...
How to replace Windows Mobile with Android (Guide)
There would be a change to the original build.prop file which exists inside the /system folder and would be installed when Android is installed on the Kaiser.
Mind you, I live in a busy city with LOTS of cell towers and, since 3g works on the principle of multi-tower usage, YMMV. If you live way out in the country with maybe 2-3 towers nearby, this may not help you.
Also, this has been tested on a NAND-installed OS, not a HaRet install. I cannot verify or guarantee this will work with a HaReT install as I have no way to test it and I think of HaReT as the "slow cousin" to a NAND install.
On a side note: My Kaiser has not had one sleep of death, hard-lock, white screen or even an FC for 9 days now. Apps running out of memory can be a slight problem but they will just close on their own as opposed to FC-ing. at worst I've had one hot reboot called by the system, and the FCs' are few, even with heavy Facebook and Maps use.
n2, if this works on all Kaisers, is there a way to push it to SF and either add it as a mod or rebuild the "system_froyo" install files and incorporate it within?
I will try in early April. Until then please solicit Vogue and Polaris users to try it.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA
I am interested and willing to try this out!
Where is your " "Fixed" build.prop file for Kaiser "?
Tarball added to OP, please test and report back. Any problems should be reported here along with the bootlog from your phone.
Hi guys!
Problem occured when moving file to root folder. To solve I tried root explorer and z4root both. CM7 + Krazy-Killa's Kernel on tilt 8925.
Please talk what to do with it!
thanks!
Rename original build.prop file to "build.prop.old" or something you will remember, without the quotes, then paste the new build.prop file into the /system folder... it should go right in with no errors, unless you try it without read/write abilities.
CM7 may already have some of these fixes installed in the existing build.prop file. To check, open this build.prop with a text editor and check the entries under "additional build properties".
n2rjt said:
I will try in early April. Until then please solicit Vogue and Polaris users to try it.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vogue/Polaris users solicited, although I'm not sure if this can be used on a CDMA network. Last count shows about 15-20% of the "other" phones were Vogues, the rest were Polaris users.
It would be nice to start getting good feedback since this would be my first actual "hard" mod (one that is installed with the system, not modded through some other installer/program).
PoXFreak said:
Rename original build.prop file to "build.prop.old" or something you will remember, without the quotes, then paste the new build.prop file into the /system folder... it should go right in with no errors, unless you try it without read/write abilities.
CM7 may already have some of these fixes installed in the existing build.prop file. To check, open this build.prop with a text editor and check the entries under "additional build properties".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't rename. And can't change file attributions read only to read/write.
ZLodei said:
Can't rename. And can't change file attributions read only to read/write.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You probably need to remount /system read/write. I just wish I could remember how. Been a long time since I put my vogue down.
If you can get terminal emulator up on that phone, I believe all you would have to do is type in "su" then "mount /system".
All Kaiser/Polaris/Vogue Android builds are rooted and usually have superuser installed. I will take a look into Scoot's CM7 and confirm this. I know there is an update to superuser that leaves the old binary unable to be updated.
PoXFreak said:
If you can get terminal emulator up on that phone, I believe all you would have to do is type in "su" then "mount /system".
All Kaiser/Polaris/Vogue Android builds are rooted and usually have superuser installed. I will take a look into Scoot's CM7 and confirm this. I know there is an update to superuser that leaves the old binary unable to be updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi! Thank you!
What does exactly I have to do in terminal emulator?
I would hope you have superuser capability, if you don't then use another build that does have them...
Anyway, this is all I could figure out to remount the /system as RW. Type the following below into terminal emulator...
mount -o rw,remount -t yaffs2 /dev/block/mtdblock2 /system
(Where "mtdblock2" has /system, "mtdblock3" has /data, and "mtdblock4" has /cache.)
Hope this helps...
Please correct me if i'm wrong.
I installed this new build.prop from the bootloader using androidupdate.tar.
Because i made a tar archive this way: system/build.prop
Isn't it the easiest method? No mounting and hacking in terminal emulator.
Anyway, do anybody know which ROM contains hungarian language? I gave my Kaiser to my father and it would be great if he could use it in hungarian.
I thought VaniljEclair 11 has it, and it is almost true. It has hungarian language but when i set it nothing happens. Everything is in english as before.
Thanks!
Edit:
You can download it from here:
http://mattempus.sohasenem.hu/pub/androidupdate.tar
Related
I start this new thread because i want highlight only kaiser changes
Before posting use search button and look in this thread.
This is the kernel thread so all problem like "how to install","i can't install", "miss module", ecc ecc are not allowed. If you need to ask this probably you didn't read correctly the guide in atools.
Atools is multyplatform and need python.
2.6.32 kernel changelog
nand fixed
irq problem is now fixed
TODO:
finish battery support
rewrite camera driver
speed up gps
Latest releases are here
Atools thread
Maybe now kernel development will be a little easier to keep track of. I had a random freeze in the kernel before with a message i've never seen before. Didn't think about exporting the logs. I will upload if I see it again.
It was with the 11-29 .32 kernel and only happened after I just switched to it, installed my barebones build and rebooted for the 1st time. I have never seen it since so it could have been an anomaly. Like I said, it was an error I have never seen before and will catch a log if I ever see it again.
It would be helpful if someone could make a list of which types of problem are kernel related, which are build related and which could be either.
I am fairly new to android and not at all clear on what does what .
I belive it's kind of dificult to explain properly whats a kernel bug, and whats a build bug. At least with a few lines of text anyway...
We probably will have to deal with _no_kernel_related_ questions, but we must stick to the topic. If it's not kernel related, point to another thread. Or perhaps instruct to open a new one.
Also, it would be nice to have this stickied again, and if those asking questions would be so nice to inform about device ; kernel version+builddate ; type of instalation (nand VS sd img file VS sd partion VS whatever) ; radio, it would probably make it easier to understand why is the user facing issues.
IMHO of course
Ipv6 support in kernel
Hi Liquid,
Could you please include ipv6 support in kernel? It's needed by some apps, like google goggles, i compiled my own kernel with ipv6 and worked fine.
I hope there is enough kernel space to include ipv6 in the current kernel version
thanks
i try to compile a ipv6 6 month ago but i have some problems with wlan.
I change some part so i'm going to do new test on it
Question, not directly kernel related, but must start here.
If data using Yaffs is so unstable... why not another FS ?
I noticed that 2.6.25 kernel doesn't mount the partitions on relatime. Is there any chance we could do the same for 2.6.32 (which defaults to relatime). In 2.6.32, I tried to put it to atime but it doesn't work and just defaults to relatime. Could this possibly be the reason we have an unstable data partition in 2.6.32?
clemsyn said:
I noticed that 2.6.25 kernel doesn't mount the partitions on relatime. Is there any chance we could do the same for 2.6.32 (which defaults to relatime). In 2.6.32, I tried to put it to atime but it doesn't work and just defaults to relatime. Could this possibly be the reason we have an unstable data partition in 2.6.32?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you point me where are the partitions mounted ? normaly i would search /etc/fstab, but i fearin droid they're mounted elsewhere.
One thing i found in kerneltrap is nice...
"It's also perhaps the most stupid Unix design idea of all times. Unix is really nice and well done, but think about this a bit: 'For every file that is read from the disk, lets do a ... write to the disk! And, for every file that is already cached and which we read from the cache ... do a write to the disk!'"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is explaining why relatime is better than atime. But if we could force a write to the disk on every access...
daedric said:
Could you point me where are the partitions mounted ? normaly i would search /etc/fstab, but i fearin droid they're mounted elsewhere.
One thing i found in kerneltrap is nice...
This is explaining why relatime is better than atime. But if we could force a write to the disk on every access...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its on /system/bin/userinit.sh
clemsyn said:
its on /system/bin/userinit.sh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure ? i only find a remount there ... to fix su
Has anyone recently synchronized our yaffs2 tree with the main one on www.yaffs.net? I noticed there are quite a few differences. I'm testing, too soon to tell if there are any notable differences.
I think scooter synchronised it a little over a month ago? I know its been about that long.
daedric said:
You sure ? i only find a remount there ... to fix su
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can add this to userinit.sh
busybox mount -o remount,rw,nouid,nodiratime,nodev /data
I think it depends on the rom but my ROM have those options. I'll upload my userinit.sh
Here is a copy of my userinit.sh
BTW, I added noatime on 2.6.25 kernel (which is suppose to be stable) and I got a Reboot and data corruption. I think if we mount 2.6.32 like 2.6.25's default mount, it could be better but it has to be done in the kernel itself coz 2.6.32 defaults to relatime.
aceoyame said:
I think scooter synchronised it a little over a month ago? I know its been about that long.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I synchronized my yaffs sources yesterday. It survived several battery-pulls yesterday with no corruption, but one single clean shutdown modified email settings for one account and made Maps FC. A dalvik clear cured maps but not the email settings.
Yaffs has data recovery capabilities, as proven by the battery pulls that gave no corruption at all.
So i think yaffs is good and nand is good. The data corruption problem lies outside the kernel and is a subject for a different thread.
Sent from my Android on HTC Kaiser/Kaiser/Polaris using XDA App
n2rjt said:
I synchronized my yaffs sources yesterday. It survived several battery-pulls yesterday with no corruption, but one single clean shutdown modified email settings for one account and made Maps FC. A dalvik clear cured maps but not the email settings.
Yaffs has data recovery capabilities, as proven by the battery pulls that gave no corruption at all.
So i think yaffs is good and nand is good. The data corruption problem lies outside the kernel and is a subject for a different thread.
Sent from my Android on HTC Kaiser/Kaiser/Polaris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read this quote about atime since you had problems with email on reboot
1. atime – This option causes Linux to record the last (or latest) time when a particular file was accessed. This information is particularly helpful for sysadmins or some programs (specially mail programs) to know when a particular file was last used/accessed.
So I think here is were atime option would help (email programs)
clemsyn said:
I read this quote about atime since you had problems with email on reboot
1. atime – This option causes Linux to record the last (or latest) time when a particular file was accessed. This information is particularly helpful for sysadmins or some programs (specially mail programs) to know when a particular file was last used/accessed.
So I think here is were atime option would help (email programs)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're confused... the e-mail problem n2rjt was having was complete random. He had problems in e-mail and maps.. could be browser and settings. It's random.
Now:
1. atime – This option causes Linux to record the last (or latest) time when a particular file was accessed. This information is particularly helpful for sysadmins or some programs (specially mail programs) to know when a particular file was last used/accessed.
2. noatime – This option stops recording the last file access time when the file is just read. The noatime option eliminates all the writes to the disk each time a file was just read which previously used to happen with atime. However a write is made to a disk in case if a file is being changed/written.
3. relatime – A filesystem mount with this option causes the access time to be updated if they are (before the update has occurred) earlier than the modification time. This significantly cuts down the writes caused by atime updates. However not many people use this option because they are simply not aware of it.
source: http://linux.koolsolutions.com/2009...sb-part-4-noatime-and-relatime-mount-options/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed relatime is the most usefull option for us.
Yet... reading this for the 2nd time:
Yaffs has data recovery capabilities, as proven by the battery pulls that gave no corruption at all.
So i think yaffs is good and nand is good. The data corruption problem lies outside the kernel and is a subject for a different thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could it be... a proc atempting to unmount /data or remount,ro that causes a defect ?
One other thing... you're sync'ing to yaffs.net, would it be too bad/dificult to use the yaffs2 provided with usual HTC sources ?
I'm looking at Supersonic... it uses our 2.6.32 kernel....
daedric said:
One other thing... you're sync'ing to yaffs.net, would it be too bad/dificult to use the yaffs2 provided with usual HTC sources ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The yaffs in the kernel at the minute is from the official android source, so what all other HTC devices are using
I tried the yaffs.net latest just as a comparison. It didn't change anything one way or the other.
Sent from my Android on HTC Kaiser/Kaiser/Polaris using XDA App
Trying to setup 2.6.32 kernel over 2.6.25 on my tytnII with Warm Donut on board.
Using Atools. Doing everything step-by-step, but when i reach this steps:
33 then flash from sd (gray)
34 reset device when it finished
it's booting from sd, (gray), show "Loading.." and never complete :-(
have wait more than hour.
What's possible reason?
Using zImage-11-27-10 from l1qu1d sourceforge.net site.
Thanks in advance for help.
Is it possible to install Android on Kaiser without SD? Has anyone investigated bundling the /system partition with tinboot so the whole thing is installed with a single KAISIMG?
I ask because I have one Kaiser whose SD reader is broken. If I could install more than a kernel, I could try risky changes to fix the NAND driver. If I brick the phone or kill its flash, it's no big loss.
No, you can't do it now, maybe i can suggest you to look after a method do dump the nand after install and use it as kaiser image
Exactly what I was thinking, but how to negotiate the NAND into the proper size partitions? Write kernel for rom and hope you get the sizes right, or make a kernel that readjusts /system size based on install and leave remainder for /data?
PoXFreak said:
Exactly what I was thinking, but how to negotiate the NAND into the proper size partitions? Write kernel for rom and hope you get the sizes right, or make a kernel that readjusts /system size based on install and leave remainder for /data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think thats l1q1d idea... perhaps a complete nand dump, and reflash it to another kaiser.
The kernel and partitions must be configures before the dump...
I do intend to try, but have been distracted by Scoot's very stable kernel, and a very nice pre-beta that I'm testing on my HTC Wizards, Gandalf and Radagast.
This is possible, in fact there was a time where an empty img file was being incorporated into the NBH where on a windows NBH the system files would normally be copied. A windows NBH consists of a number of parts, I can't remember what they are all called right now, but they can all be merged using NBHmerge. I can't give you specific instructions but there's no reason why it can't be done, not sure it'll be much fun though!
n2rjt said:
I do intend to try, but have been distracted by Scoot's very stable kernel, and a very nice pre-beta that I'm testing on my HTC Wizards, Gandalf and Radagast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pre-beta that you're testing on HTC What ??
daedric said:
pre-beta that you're testing on HTC What ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC Wizard. I have two of them, which I have named Radagast and Gandalf. It's my all-time favorite smartphone, although it is obviously even more obsolete than the Kaiser. I use one of them as my primary phone whenever Android is giving me fits. Right now I'm testing H3r7 beta 2 preview where the cook has adeptly squeezed WM6.5 into a tiny, fast, stable package.
If I knew that I wouldn't have given my Wizard away...
I thought Ham3r was finished when he hit 6.1 but I stand corrected...pfft.
help androidinstall.tgz
please share for me : file androidinstall.tgz 2.1 or 2.2 but must run wifi and 3G.
Send for me by: [email protected] thanks i come from VietNam
I think with the proper memory map Android could be installed via FrankenKaiser or something of that sort. Something that addresses the NAND directly through OEMSBL, bypassing the need for a HardSPL. Of course the phone would have to be CID unlocked to do this, but I think it's possible to install via CustomRUU if the mapping was done beforehand.
I have read somewhere that NAND marked as bad in the map still gets "written" to, meaning whatever is supposed to go there is put there and never read. Once unmarked the written info comes back, but that requires a full format anyway.
I say very possible...
I have stopped trying to do this, but wanted to record my latest thoughts in case someone reads this in the future.
I think the best way to install Android on a Kaiser that can't read its sdcard is to edit the initrd then use recovery mode:
* install adbd so it gets started in recovery mode
* allow the menu when sdcard is not installed
* change scripts to look for /data/andboot
* change recovery mode to mount /data partition to usb
Then, of course, you boot the kernel, use the menu, enter recovery mode, transfer androidinstall.tgz and androidupdate.tgz to /data/andboot, then install system, install updates, clear data, and run. If something doesn't work, adb shell or adb push can help.
I think it's too much work to be worth it on this old phone.
Hi All...
Maybe a dumb question but I need an answer.
I was looking through the rest of the builds on kingshui's sourceforge site and something caught me off-guard.
Apparently he has some /system builds exceeding 100mb (the one I downloaded was 103mb, 98mb in a tarball).
I know with standard kernels we can slide the partition marker to the right and gain some /system space, but I'm currently using Scoot's cache kernel: No partition changing allowed (I guess), but the kernel is so smooth and fluid with my kingshui build.
I guess my question would be this...
Can I remove apps from the app folder to shrink this build to the 100mb limit, or will this cause issues in the build itself?
Edit; it appears to be CGM 5.0.8 RLS11, which is Android 2.1 -update1
DURRR!
Still... it's better to answer for future generations.
The androidinstall.tar has at least on folder in it, named System.
It might have another folder in it, named Data.
It might even have other folders, ignore them for now.
Inside both system, there might be alot of folders (expecially in system), but one of them is called "App". Now, all the apps will be there, along with perhaps a .odex file for everyone.
You can move certains apps from /system/app to /data/app. (if /data does not exists, create /data and app inside it.) You can also remove things from /system/app, if you're not going to use them. Like, CMwallpapers.apk.
PoXFreak said:
Hi All...
Maybe a dumb question but I need an answer.
I was looking through the rest of the builds on kingshui's sourceforge site and something caught me off-guard.
Apparently he has some /system builds exceeding 100mb (the one I downloaded was 103mb, 98mb in a tarball).
I know with standard kernels we can slide the partition marker to the right and gain some /system space, but I'm currently using Scoot's cache kernel: No partition changing allowed (I guess), but the kernel is so smooth and fluid with my kingshui build.
I guess my question would be this...
Can I remove apps from the app folder to shrink this build to the 100mb limit, or will this cause issues in the build itself?
Edit; it appears to be CGM 5.0.8 RLS11, which is Android 2.1 -update1
DURRR!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, I learn something new everyday!
I assume this would mean that if I needed to move apps from /system to /data, I would copy the files I wanted from /system/app and make a new folder for /data and put the apps in /data/app, along with the odex files if needed?
I did not know it was that easy. I always had a fear of ruining a build due o mis-matched apps being installed.
PoXFreak said:
Hey, I learn something new everyday!
I assume this would mean that if I needed to move apps from /system to /data, I would copy the files I wanted from /system/app and make a new folder for /data and put the apps in /data/app, along with the odex files if needed?
I did not know it was that easy. I always had a fear of ruining a build due o mis-matched apps being installed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be advised!!! Not every single package SHOULD/CAN be moved to DATA.
Examples:
Vending.apk -- Market... shouldn't.
Google*.apk -- Can't/Shouldn't
LatinIME.apk - I belive CAN'T.
Also... you never bumped into a release with the data folder already present ?
It's usually made so that you can remove apps by uninstalling them (Default launcher for example, in case you replaced it).
Also... why didn't you experiment ??
Sorry for the late reply, I got hung up in trying to memory map the HTC Raphael...
Anyway, I tend to think of it as "sacrelige" (sp) to mess with what others have already worked hard to build.
I will however take the "system_froyo_us_odex" package and modify it by changing the bootanimation.zip or wallpapers.apk to what I like. I have a CM theme pack (5.0.8 I believe), but I haven't gotten around to messing with it. It does however have a couple of certificates along with it, one being "manifest.cert", whic I really don't want to play with.
My Ubuntu machine doesn't like me since the latest kernel update to 11.04 and working on it has become a bear.
Que sera sera, another laptop needed...
PoXFreak said:
Sorry for the late reply, I got hung up in trying to memory map the HTC Raphael...
Anyway, I tend to think of it as "sacrelige" (sp) to mess with what others have already worked hard to build.
I will however take the "system_froyo_us_odex" package and modify it by changing the bootanimation.zip or wallpapers.apk to what I like. I have a CM theme pack (5.0.8 I believe), but I haven't gotten around to messing with it. It does however have a couple of certificates along with it, one being "manifest.cert", whic I really don't want to play with.
My Ubuntu machine doesn't like me since the latest kernel update to 11.04 and working on it has become a bear.
Que sera sera, another laptop needed...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be sacrilegio if you would dessecate a rom, and publish it as your own without credits. But for out own use, tweak away Just remember not to come asking on it's respective thread if the errors happening might be introduced with your tampering.
As for themes, it's not really my topic
About ubuntu... what machine are we talking about ?
An old Toshiba with an intel proc and realtek audio. I think it has to do with the touchpad (alps) because the system will freeze until I touch it.
As far as that CGM build, I can't use it becaus I'm set up for Froyo and that build is 2.1 update 1.
Should work for all Optimus V GB ROMs (aosp & IHO variants)
steps to modify:
extract
edit remove.sh script*
zip
sign
*works best in a unix editor. Notepad++ & Windows notepad sometimes screw with shell scripting handles new line something-or-other. In Windows I've used another free app Jedit for editing it and it seems to not give me 'installation aborted' msgs when installing the zip.
IHO Poo Remover rev5 (link updated)
comments on Email.apk: personally, I use it because it not only connects to Exchange servers but Hotmail email/contacts/calendar syncing can be set up directly in account settings with it there. instructions
Pls extract the zip & look at the remove.sh to see what I'm removing because I have my opinions. You can comment out & zip it back up to your tastes. If you have a variant you've made go ahead & post a link to it. Nice to compare what we each prefer.
In regards to ringtones & notifications I remove all but a basic ringtone. You can either add your own into the script- just drop them in the ringtones & notification subfolders or put additional ringtones on your sdcard in a folder made and named 'ringtones'.
Other notes is it removes a bunch of languages & adds a smaller English language.
I left in CMStats because I want Cyanogenmod to know we use it.
Don't know what Pacman.apk is so I have it commented out. May remove it if I figure out what it is.
Source on safe to remove apks and their purpose on Cyanogenmod wiki
rev5-
removed the sqlite tweaks as they didn't really do much on the IHO ROM
added removal of bootsound since it's an annoying idea
That SQLlite binary patch looks interesting. Looked at the source page, and they only have the /system/lib/libsqlite.so included, while your .zip includes /system/bin/sqlite3 too. I don't see a /bin/sqlite3 currently on my phone, what is the 2nd bin for?
jawz101 said:
Don't know what Pacman.apk is so I have it commented out. May remove it if I figure out what it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pacman is run one time only. When you first sign into the market. It offers to download all the google apps at once. i.e. Maps, Facebook, Voice, Youtube, etc. I find it useful; since I use most of what pacman offers up. Hope that helps. I'll defiantly have to try poo remover. Love that name BTW.
I guess I left that part out, Whyzor. I'm pretty sure it's useless on its own but among these tweaks is a command that will vacuum the sqlite databases contained on the phone. I guess those that use those scripts would benefit from it most. I may take that piece out since I don't think it's being added completely (maybe not chmoding) because I end up having to run the chmod by hand sometimes. I could be wrong though and it may work.
Anyways, to actually use the sqlite3 you'd need a script like this one from FranciscoFranco, adjusted by mmarz . there's a portion of this script that vacuums the phone's databases. real-world benefits? It's likely negligible at best but I just threw it in there.
If you are ever interested I'd follow anything FranciscoFranco & Ungaze do- they're Optimus One tinkerers but they're obsessed with performance. Really anything they do is applicable to Android in general. Franco's Optimus One ROM is insane (xda) (github source)
I just replaced the /system/lib/libsqlite.so from the source thread you posted, set permission to be same as the other binaries, rebooted. Ran RL Benchmark and got the same, around 93 seconds overall score (using 245-600 ondemand CPU, IHO CM7.1. Are you getting the same performance?
UPDATE: If I overlock to 806 Mhz, was able to drop the overall time to 71 seconds, went back to original libsqlite.so and at the same clock speed, takes about 81 seconds. The performance gain is negligable given the corruption risk (and according to Blarf in the IHO thread, properly written apps won't see much of a benefit anyway).
yeah I'll probably take that out. It gave a noticeable improvement when I ran aosp. May also be that I'm not applying it correctly with this zip.
on aosp the RL Benchmark went from around 80 seconds down to maybe 45 seconds for comparison.
Probably best just have this as purely a bloat remover. Regardless, having it in there isn't messing anything up so this is still safe to use.
First off I love the poo remover. However, every time i edit the script, zip the package back up again, and sign it and then try to apply it the installation keeps getting aborted with CWM.
I have followed the instructions for windows, including using Jedit, and i have even tried with my macbook using a terminal session with pico.
i do sign the zip files also.
should i not include the stock folder META-INF in the altered script?
any help is greatly appreciated
that's usually what gets me is the editor I use to edit it with. I'd assume a macbook would be fine for editing it.
I usually remove these 3 files from the meta-inf folder before resigning as they get regenerated with that signing program (cert.rsa, cert.sf, manifest.mf). I don't know if that would affect anything but I've just been doing that out of habit.
Fortunately we understand what we're trying to do and really the only thing that's hanging it up is whatever the hiccup is.
It came down to making one change at a time until I got install aborted errors to stop
thanks much i will give it a shot
may want to try just unzipping it and rezipping it to see if that works.
Make sure you're zipping up the contents of the iho zip and not the actual folder.
Try it with & w/o signing it. If it works w/o signing it I'd leave that step out just so you can concentrate on editing the remove.sh script.
Possibly use a command line editor if your mac can do that (never used a mac)
issue is with unix line endings vs. windows/mac line endings
just found something if you're using Notepad++ try going to edit- EOL Conversion & switch it to Unix
i will look for another terminal editor and try that too.
i was originally using pico in the terminal.
when i was doing the editing of the remove.sh, i wanted to install the default ringtones and notifications.
do you think the restore that runs at the end of the removal is conflicting with it? I will give everything a shot today and let you know later what happens.
I'd just take those remove lines and audio folder out, put them in that audio folder, or just have a ringtone folder on your SD card
The restore is just adding stuff back
got it working
it was my stupid mistake of zipping the IHO folder and not the contents of the folder
so when i was signing it it created the META-INF folder and a IHO folder
Everything flashed and worked great
thanks again
I was interested in looking at this, but it no longer exists on mediafire. Any chance you can put it back up?
-John
Yeah.I will put it up tomorrow. It's also good to pm on old threads like this
I've been lazy... updated the post with a new link to the file. Sorry... been really slacking lately :/
It's the same poo remover revision5 from before. again, read the stuff at the top if you want to make changes.
I've honestly not been using my script for a long time but it's nice to have around.
So i am here with a new idea. A rescue.zip which can be used to rescue any android device which have a recovery like the famous cwm.
So here is it..
Some times we people screw up our android os like hell, and to reboot the device we usualy do a recovery flash of a new os, flash back our nandroid backup ( both on worst conditions) or even do permission fix, clean cache or dalvic cache( those in 'not that worse' conditions) . So thats are all the options we got. Rit?
Although flashing recovery backups, new roms can fix all, it will also eatup our apps, current setups, contacts, msgs, etc( in case we dont have backups) and will probably screw us. All we can do is say " WTF..WTF..WTF.."
SO here is my idea,
Find out the causes of what causes a reboot, non-boot, hang,fc etc.
And keep a zip that can be flashed through recovery, that has a solution for our problem. They may be including..
1) fix permission of system, data, and user data.
2) zipalign the apps
3) fix the default clock speed of processor
4) defragment memory
5) flash a new copy of su and busy box
6)wipe data or system or ext or cache or dalvic cache
7) flash a new copy of framework.res, system-ui.apk, settings.apk with default permissions( those files are kept in separate "custom" folder on the zip, so that end user can put their own files to that "custom" folder for flashing., the reason behind it is known to all, yap. Not all devices have them in common, every device have its own files)
These are all i got for now, pls post ur ideas and knowledge for any possible cure about any problem u faced/ cured. So that we can make it an ultimate rescue.zip that have a cure for 99% problems android os have. The rest 1% will go with a clean flash.( well we cant avoid that if we did something that bad).
So my plan is to use aroma installer( now on hard learning to find how it works). Throw in some scripts, files etc. Into the zip.
And since its not a device specific .zip file, i want to know how and why any problems are caused in any device( there are many common problems, but that is not what i ask for. I ask for device/os specific problems, and not for a problem that we can cure after booting, but for a problem that can make the device un-bootable) . So u people may help me to find those problems and cures for it. For my knowledge i have experience with wildfire and hd2.
Well i will keep this thread for a week or two, so that u can post ur knowledge, and info. after that i will release the file for u.
To the admin. Of the forum, pls keep this thread as announcement so that all can take a look.
HYPERDROID EXTREEM EDITION-THE NEW BENCHMARK ROM FOR HD2.
If you plan to do this available to any android device, the file size will be so big that it will become useless. Every phone has different apk, and not only that, but those apk are different in different version of os. For example, CM9 framework should not work on google release. Worst, older CM9 framework might not work on newer CM9 and newer framework might not work on older. Also, one of the cause of bootloop that i have been experiencing since i have my GNexus is data corruption of apps. The only way i had was to wipe data. I dont think there is a way to know if your app are corrupted with script. I also seen a lot of strange problem on SGS II like the kernel being erased. Well, in this case this package would be useless. So i guess that having this package would be awesome, but wont happen. My best advice is that you could create a universal guide on how to recover from bootloop/fc/hang with the minimum of impact on the phone. This is just my opinion tho.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
You could add using flags in the updates filename, see some roms or themes for the lg optimus 2x for more information. It uses sed. For example, "update-wc-wd.zip" would wipe /data and /cache.
You could also merge these features in a customized clockwork mod recovery, the up side would be that you could automatically make a backup of the last flashed full ROM's systemui etc. this would also allow usage of the touch screen/volume keys to choose an repair option. You could even allow users to backup specific applications along with their data, and let users restore it later on after a fresh flash. I have some basic knowledge in modifying the recovery so I might help you out a little if you're interested.
chadouming said:
If you plan to do this available to any android device, the file size will be so big that it will become useless. Every phone has different apk, and not only that, but those apk are different in different version of os. For example, CM9 framework should not work on google release. Worst, older CM9 framework might not work on newer CM9 and newer framework might not work on older. Also, one of the cause of bootloop that i have been experiencing since i have my GNexus is data corruption of apps. The only way i had was to wipe data. I dont think there is a way to know if your app are corrupted with script. I also seen a lot of strange problem on SGS II like the kernel being erased. Well, in this case this package would be useless. So i guess that having this package would be awesome, but wont happen. My best advice is that you could create a universal guide on how to recover from bootloop/fc/hang with the minimum of impact on the phone. This is just my opinion tho.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I told it already, the "custom" folder is not filled. It will be kept empty. The user can put a file, which ofcourse is the file of the device he/she have or want to get repaired. All he has to do is copy and paste the file from the working zip( zip file of his currently installed rom, that encounter the problem) of his rom to the custom folder inside the rescue.zip.
And the things that are common will be scripts, but those too will contains device specific mound points, paths, etc. I think that will be common( ie, the working of script, once the mound is done). Am i right?
So all i have to figure out is mount points, paths etc.. i got a couple of them, about 15 or so. And pls help me to find the rest.
HYPERDROID EXTREEM EDITION-THE NEW BENCHMARK ROM FOR HD2.
a good idea to add is a file system chech like windows systems has. By installing a rom the installer should first check for bad sectors and mem blocks before installing the rom. After all blocks and sectors are scanned and the bad ones marked as "bad or corrupt" it should run something like defrag and place the bad blocks at the end of the file table. When all is done .. then the true rom install should start.
This will prevent heaps of problems since the curent installs just write over a bad block or sector creating the most weird problems. A fault checker/repair will take away a lot of strange forced closes and othere software/hardware failures.
Most phones wont last that long so that bad blocks or sectors can occure. But for the flashing junkies among us its a serious problem what can occure. I guess after 1000 or more installs bad sectors or blocks will occure and not all are being able to be repaired
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Mikevhl said:
You could add using flags in the updates filename, see some roms or themes for the lg optimus 2x for more information. It uses sed. For example, "update-wc-wd.zip" would wipe /data and /cache.
You could also merge these features in a customized clockwork mod recovery, the up side would be that you could automatically make a backup of the last flashed full ROM's systemui etc. this would also allow usage of the touch screen/volume keys to choose an repair option. You could even allow users to backup specific applications along with their data, and let users restore it later on after a fresh flash. I have some basic knowledge in modifying the recovery so I might help you out a little if you're interested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am totaly newbee to lg. I have experience with htc, few samsung, etc. So can u pm me the details? Also is it usable to create recovery? I think a zip file with selectable options is more friendly. The thing is building a recovery wont make it universal( or atleast common for a couple of devices) and we will have to port them for each and every device. Thats the problem.
But any way i want ur help in building it. Can u pm me an example for mounding script in lg devices? And any thing that may become useful. Thank you.
HYPERDROID EXTREEM EDITION-THE NEW BENCHMARK ROM FOR HD2.
wilwilwel said:
a good idea to add is a file system chech like windows systems has. By installing a rom the installer should first check for bad sectors and mem blocks before installing the rom. After all blocks and sectors are scanned and the bad ones marked as "bad or corrupt" it should run something like defrag and place the bad blocks at the end of the file table. When all is done .. then the true rom install should start.
This will prevent heaps of problems since the curent installs just write over a bad block or sector creating the most weird problems. A fault checker/repair will take away a lot of strange forced closes and othere software/hardware failures.
Most phones wont last that long so that bad blocks or sectors can occure. But for the flashing junkies among us its a serious problem what can occure. I guess after 1000 or more installs bad sectors or blocks will occure and not all are being able to be repaired
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pls pm me the idea how to make the checking script. Or links that have info in this. Thank u in figuring out such a prob. I am unaware of that.
HYPERDROID EXTREEM EDITION-THE NEW BENCHMARK ROM FOR HD2.
showlyshah said:
I am totaly newbee to lg. I have experience with htc, few samsung, etc. So can u pm me the details? Also is it usable to create recovery? I think a zip file with selectable options is more friendly. The thing is building a recovery wont make it universal( or atleast common for a couple of devices) and we will have to port them for each and every device. Thats the problem.
But any way i want ur help in building it. Can u pm me an example for mounding script in lg devices? And any thing that may become useful. Thank you.
HYPERDROID EXTREEM EDITION-THE NEW BENCHMARK ROM FOR HD2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll send this as a PM as well, but people might learn from this. I am not talking about any specific mount points for LG phones, I just pointed out that there are some roms which use sed to check the filename of its update.zip and do tasks according to that, you need to have one line in your updater script to run the script which detects what to do. That way a user of a Galaxy Nexus would rename it to update-maguro.zip and it would know to use mount points for the maguro, while if the exact same update.zip was to be named update-p990.zip, it would know to use the mount points for the LG optimus 2x. This way you could easily keep the zip up to date for any device, because they all use the same update.zip
About the recovery, you would need to build it for every phone once, but you could make one change to the recovery source and easily compile the recovery for all phones which are capable of running CWM. I believe this method to be more user friendly, as a recovery image has support for actually choosing what you want to do, instead of having to rename the file. A recovery image also has a better way of communicating with the user. Where a update.zip can only say "Hey, I had an error and I'm quitting now, I won't give you any details what the problem was because that's just how update.zips roll", a recovery image would be able to give more advanced outputs, like "An error occurred when trying to mount /data." And then give you the option to either try again, manually fix it by using a computer with adb, or quitting.
But that's just my personal opinion. The recovery would be way harder to make, but I was the original porter of CM6, CM7 and HTC Sense to the xperia mini pro and mini back in the days. I also made a custom recovery and roms for the HTC desire Z, maintain a CWM port for the HTC Chacha which I don't even own and have used the LG optimus 2x before. (currently a maguro owner) but I'm trying to say that I've been experimenting a lot with different phones and know what the possibilities of Android are. you could even make a live Android build, tailored for recovering your phone, which is ran by an update.zip! How cool is that? That would be VERY device specific though..
let me know what you think is the best way to do this. I was thinking of making a mobile time machine app for some time so it's good I saw this thread.