To increase the file system cache: ( There is more than 1 entry regarding this. so look into it)
HKLM\System\StorageManager\FATFS\CacheSize = 4096 (DWORD decimal)
enable Power management for sdcard
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Comm\AsyncMac1\Parms]
"DisablePowerManagement"=dword:0
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\SDCARD\ClientDrivers\Class\MMC_Class]
"DisablePowerManagement"=dword:0
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\SDCARD\ClientDrivers\Class\SDMemory_Class]
"DisablePowerManagement"=dword:0
Enlarge the block transfer size for SD card ( multiple entries under the section)
\\registry\HKLM\Drivers\SDCARD\ClientDrivers\Class\SDMemory_Class\BlockTransferSize=4096
Auto data disconnect ( cant be edited at the moment)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Comm\ConnMgr\Planner\Settings\
SuspendResume = ????
Disable HSPA , Operate only on 3G mode
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Internet Settings
Value name: MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server
Value data: 32
Base: Decimal
Value Name: MaxConnectionsPerServer
Value data: 16
Base: Decimal
Disable hardware acceleration for Internet explorer
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\software\Microsoft\windows\INTERNET explorer\main\feature control/Feature GPu Rendering/ (set Dword to 0)
here you have more:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=907971
what is it with this tweaks? have you checked the improvements with baterry meter? or do you only spamming a second tweak thread....
ahlMAR said:
what is it with this tweaks? have you checked the improvements with baterry meter? or do you only spamming a second tweak thread....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this values are from xboxmod
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21983831&postcount=2
and are similar tp WM 6.5 values
Old tweaks
I am afraid that all those tweaks are already in practicaly every custom rom.
but not in official interop unlocked rom.
updated with another major tweak, disable HSPA
Why would anyone want to implement the 3G tweak as standard? I can understand making the option available for the very few that might desire that, but shipping a custom rom like that with it implemented already would turn off the vast majority as most people actually use and like HSDPA. You can't screw over the masses to cater to the select few.
returned4good said:
Why would anyone want to implement the 3G tweak as standard? I can understand making the option available for the very few that might desire that, but shipping a custom rom like that with it implemented already would turn off the vast majority as most people actually use and like HSDPA. You can't screw over the masses to cater to the select few.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using the tweak i dont see any data speed differences.
but possible battery life savings if u default to 3G, 3G is slower i know but it isnt that bad, iphone 3G users had great battery life because the phone does not use HSPA
given the 1ghz processor and 512 mb ram on most wp7 phones , surfing on 3G will be still be faster than iphone 3G
Multiple Entries?
What do you mean by "multiple entries in this section"? Does that mean that the change you indicate may not be the only one required? Or do you just want people to know that there are other entries and just be aware and no need to change these?
As an example, for your first recommendation, "Increase file system cache" I have "CacheSize (0)" and EnableCache (1). Do both need to be changed?
Magpir said:
Using the tweak i dont see any data speed differences.
but possible battery life savings if u default to 3G, 3G is slower i know but it isnt that bad, iphone 3G users had great battery life because the phone does not use HSPA
given the 1ghz processor and 512 mb ram on most wp7 phones , surfing on 3G will be still be faster than iphone 3G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to aply that tweak? i would like to try it !
nickislauw said:
how to aply that tweak? i would like to try it !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is for hd7 . U need to install the intrinsic custom Rom and registry editor 1.2.
Magpir said:
Using the tweak i dont see any data speed differences.
but possible battery life savings if u default to 3G, 3G is slower i know but it isnt that bad, iphone 3G users had great battery life because the phone does not use HSPA
given the 1ghz processor and 512 mb ram on most wp7 phones , surfing on 3G will be still be faster than iphone 3G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do. I get nearly 6 Mbps on HSDPA and about 2.75 on 3G. That's a difference I wouldn't give up for anything and it's highly noticeable. It's nice to be aware of the tweak, but a lot of people like HSDPA to have it being disabled a default setting.
Also, the iPhone 3g had a comparable battery with a cpu that's half as powerful. Keep in mind that your comparing it to a phone that's now 4 years old, which also happened to be a time when 3G+ wasn't out very long yet.
returned4good said:
I do. I get nearly 6 Mbps on HSDPA and about 2.75 on 3G. That's a difference I wouldn't give up for anything and it's highly noticeable. It's nice to be aware of the tweak, but a lot of people like HSDPA to have it being disabled a default setting.
Also, the iPhone 3g had a comparable battery with a cpu that's half as powerful. Keep in mind that your comparing it to a phone that's now 4 years old, which also happened to be a time when 3G+ wasn't out very long yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to ask, is this ony r hpone which is a wp7? how do u know the exact figures?
if i am not wrong, HSPA doesnt automatically mean u get higher speed. on some networks there is this "throttle" effect where unless u are downloading a huge file like 50 MBs , u will not see the speeds like 6mb . Means the speed adjusts according to the size off data/ if u are surfing webpages, at the most u may get 1mbps even on HSPA which is more or less the same as 3G speed.
HSPA is a layer which operates on top the regular 3G. IT require the cell tower to be configured for HSPA
On some win mobile phones u get the options to disable HSPA. what i may be doing is just adjust power of radio or it may do the max connections thing
In fact APPle did not want to use Hspa in iphone 3G , it was around at the time, due to power requirements.
Magpir said:
Just to ask, is this ony r hpone which is a wp7? how do u know the exact figures?
if i am not wrong, HSPA doesnt automatically mean u get higher speed. on some networks there is this "throttle" effect where unless u are downloading a huge file like 50 MBs , u will not see the speeds like 6mb . Means the speed adjusts according to the size off data/ if u are surfing webpages, at the most u may get 1mbps even on HSPA which is more or less the same as 3G speed.
HSPA is a layer which operates on top the regular 3G. IT require the cell tower to be configured for HSPA
On some win mobile phones u get the options to disable HSPA. what i may be doing is just adjust power of radio or it may do the max connections thing
In fact APPle did not want to use Hspa in iphone 3G , it was around at the time, due to power requirements.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used Bandwidth, one of the bandwidth testers on the marketplace. I notice the difference when I browse as well; pages do load faster. I understand what HSDPA is and how it works.
returned4good said:
I used Bandwidth, one of the bandwidth testers on the marketplace. I notice the difference when I browse as well; pages do load faster. I understand what HSDPA is and how it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so yr testing is with regards to my tweak ??
on my mozart both values are: 6 should I change both to:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Internet Settings
Value name: MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server
Value data: 32
Base: Decimal
Value Name: MaxConnectionsPerServer
Value data: 16
Base: Decimal
majkeljj said:
on my mozart both values are: 6 should I change both to:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Internet Settings
Value name: MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server
Value data: 32
Base: Decimal
Value Name: MaxConnectionsPerServer
Value data: 16
Base: Decimal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes..........
JamesAllen said:
What do you mean by "multiple entries in this section"? Does that mean that the change you indicate may not be the only one required? Or do you just want people to know that there are other entries and just be aware and no need to change these?
As an example, for your first recommendation, "Increase file system cache" I have "CacheSize (0)" and EnableCache (1). Do both need to be changed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No only change the CacheSize to 4096. EnableCache still 1 because if zero the cache is disabled.
MrPappy86 said:
No only change the CacheSize to 4096. EnableCache still 1 because if zero the cache is disabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there are mutiple instances saying cache size for fatfs and exfat.
so u need to change all of them since we dont know what each does.
Related
Hi
Is there an area on the xda2s where you can maximise your processor speed? On my old Dell x3 you could choose 'max perfromance' or 'conserve battery' etc.
It's just for a 400mhz product it gets quite slow sometimes..........
Apologies if this has already been asked....I did search for it but couldn't find anything...
Thanks in advance,
HPJ
HPJ said:
It's just for a 400mhz product it gets quite slow sometimes..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right for a 400Mhz it's sometimes slow ... d'ont understand it ...
My previous device was a 400Mhz aswell, and was much faster.
Maybe it has something to do because it has a build-in phone?
Have you tried
http://www.handango.com/PlatformPro...4§ionId=3287&catalog=30&topSectionId=3274
won't it damage the cpu of our pda?.
regards
Not if you dont push it too far! It defaults to 472MHz max, you can switch off this limit and take it further. Mine is stable at 472MHz, never tried to take it further. Overclocking generally wont damage the CPU unless you are daft. As a rule, the PDA will just crash if you take the clock speed too far. The crash may mean a hard reset if you are unlucky!
In short you can kill the proc through overclocking, but its unlikely.
One point to note is that the 'auto scale with cpu load' option on xcpuscaler is a load of [email protected] Does not seem to work at all.
I mainly use xcpuscaler to slow down my proc to 200MHz, dont need 400 MHz to read avantgo or an ebook, or listen to an MP3, but running at 200MHz does give a reasonable increase in battery life.
Nigel
I have installed the xcpus..., do I configure it so that it varies the speed automatically, but is it always constant to 400 mhz??
does somebody know because??
thank you
XCPU2.85
Anyone has a copy of XCPU2.85 which is not trial version. Mine has expired.
2.82 does not work in 2nd edition.
Try using Pocket Hack Master from Anrom Tomov. Runs good on the QTEK 9090. See www.handango.com
A little note
Dunno if any of you realize this but be careful should you decide to remove pocket hack master..
i noticed that it does not clear the registry of its CPU settings... i found this out by uninstalling the software (after setting cpu speed to 472)... and when i reinstalled it again.. the software defaulted to 472 mhz..
make sure you go to the registry to get rid of some of the settings... just do a registry search for anton and remove the reg entries..
sorry if you guys already know this.. and i don't know if left behind registry keys mean anything if the software is not active but better be safe than sorry right? and i'm a noob here so just trying to help out
HLCM->System->GDI->GLYPHCACHE
click values
highlight and chose limit
change value
default is 16384
change this to 32768 or 65536
Also what does omaping do and what is safe level to change it to on tornado? I have kavanna 6.1 and my dash is made in china i believe.
stats555 said:
HLCM->System->GDI->GLYPHCACHE
click values
highlight and chose limit
change value
default is 16384
change this to 32768 or 65536
Also what does omaping do and what is safe level to change it to on tornado? I have kavanna 6.1 and my dash is made in china i believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that changing those values will speed up the performance of the Dash in some capacity. I don't know exactly what speeds up, but there's a noticeable difference.
OMAPing (or overclocking) speeds up your phone's processor speed. The processor is set to 200mhz by default. Overclocking pushes the phone to perform at speeds higher than the suggested mhz of the processor. There's a BIG difference in the phone's performance, but there's also a RISK that your phone will lock up if set too high. I have mine set to 240mhz--and it runs beautifully. For a couple of days, I had it set to 252mhz--but it began to freeze at random times. Thus, I set it back to 240mhz. Just be careful going above 240mhz. I own a Dash/Excalibur, so I don't know what a safe clock speed will be on your Tornado.
Does increasing glyphcache maintain an application's normal running speed? i.e. does a video run faster, or normal?
Regarding overclocking, it would be nice if there was some level of dynamic switching. There was a tutorial for setting a different clock speed for when the screen's backlight is on or off. That would maximize battery usage and performance transparently. Anyone still running this scheme?
I have performed the Gyphcache tweak, but not sure how to re-set the processor speed. My system info says 201 Mhz, but tcpmp says it's running at 180. How can I raise it? I have T-mob 6.0 Standard (...I know...)
Thanks!
runningerin said:
I have performed the Gyphcache tweak, but not sure how to re-set the processor speed. My system info says 201 Mhz, but tcpmp says it's running at 180. How can I raise it? I have T-mob 6.0 Standard (...I know...)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not quite sure how to overclock the 6.0 ROM. I'm running Kavana's 080408 6.1 ROM, and it has a pre-installed OMAPClock program which allows you to overclock. Just look for the standalone OMAPClock program on Google or some other search engine.
Download Rickys Extras
Go to the page for Ricky's remade ROM and download his extras. The OMAP clock should be in there. Once installed open it and it will set you processor to whatever speed you want, but make sure to not go over 240 like stated earlier. Don't trust the TCMP's info. Just listen to the OMAP clock. It works perfectly. Later.
runningerin said:
I have performed the Gyphcache tweak, but not sure how to re-set the processor speed. My system info says 201 Mhz, but tcpmp says it's running at 180. How can I raise it? I have T-mob 6.0 Standard (...I know...)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi folks!
How can the HTC Hermes overclock. Did it with some tools tried, but rather less successful. Batteerystatus no, xcpuscalar, overclocked but not really at 472-500 MHz. And with the PHM I can overclock well, but then does my GPRS connection to the Internet no longer work.
Is there a way to change this?
Translated by Google
This has been gone over numerous times and no, you can't overclock the Hermes reliably....
f21270 said:
Hi folks!
How can the HTC Hermes overclock. Did it with some tools tried, but rather less successful. Batteerystatus no, xcpuscalar, overclocked but not really at 472-500 MHz. And with the PHM I can overclock well, but then does my GPRS connection to the Internet no longer work.
Is there a way to change this?
Translated by Google
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i overclock before to 500mhz using XCPUScalar
ov2rey said:
i overclock before to 500mhz using XCPUScalar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it reliable?
f21270 said:
Hi folks!
How can the HTC Hermes overclock. Did it with some tools tried, but rather less successful. Batteerystatus no, xcpuscalar, overclocked but not really at 472-500 MHz. And with the PHM I can overclock well, but then does my GPRS connection to the Internet no longer work.
Is there a way to change this?
Translated by Google
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although it is possible to overclock Hermes it cannot be done relyabily or without damaging the CPU...
Some utilities may allow an active and practical overclock but I wouldn't advise it...
As you may know, if wou want your Hermes to be more responsive, performant, you can increase your ROM page pool size prior to flashing.
Cheers.
it might not be able to overclock.. but, should be able to keep the cpu locked at 400mhz and not throttle to lower speeds.. which would make it much more responsive.. I've been meaning to test this
Black6spdZ said:
it might not be able to overclock.. but, should be able to keep the cpu locked at 400mhz and not throttle to lower speeds.. which would make it much more responsive.. I've been meaning to test this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU is always at 400mhz. Wtf are you talking about?
no its NOT always at 400Mhz.. it has auto speed scaling built in. something is not right with both tcpmp and gxmark benchmarks.. using the newest PHM I manually set the lowest possible speed of 251Mhz, and disabling built-in scaling thinking of past knowledge that it doesn't do anything to our devices. I should not see any difference right? well visually it is MUCH slower than setting it at 400Mhz with both programs showing the same score at both speeds.. this CANNOT be correct.. I can see it with my eyes a night and day difference.. 420 seemed stable but the scores were showing slower than factory clock.. whats going on here?
this has been gone over so many times in the forum its not even funny any more.
use the search facility...
yes I know, I've read the overclocking threads from two years past.. ever considered newer software might change things? It does identify the processor correctly as a S3C2442A. I still want to know the answer to why benchmarks aren't reporting correctly.. BTW this thread should be moved
here are some results.. with a fresh boot I loaded a 39306KB AVI movie in CorePlayer 1.2.4. I ran its benchmark and also timed it with a stopwatch. The benchmark reported 1.60Mbit/s @ 3 Minutes and 21 seconds, also correct on the stopwatch. 321994752 bits divided by 201 seconds comes out to 1.601 Mbit/sec just like their calcs. Now I opened pockethackmaster 4.33 and set the clock to 420Mhz and reran the coreplayer benchmark. Here's the wierd part, the test reported that it took 4 minutes and 2 seconds with a 1.33Mbit/s rate but in actuality it only took 2 minutes and 58 seconds according to my stopwatch. Do the match, thats 1.809 Mbits/sec real throughput. So overclocking DOES work.. pretty significantly if I might add, but it appears that the timers used in these benchmarks are skewed and not reporting accurate numbers. Someone else try some tests and back me up here.
silly post ;0
When i get a tilt I want to overclock my hermes 100 to 900MHZ and see how fast it will melt!! Just kidding
joshkoss said:
When i get a tilt I want to overclock my hermes 100 to 900MHZ and see how fast it will melt!! Just kidding
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried to overclock my oven but after that it keeps buning all my food
Is this process reverseable?
I need too cook a roasted chicken tonight and i will get nothing but a pile of coal...
Please help me!
I searched both the forum and the wiki but couldn't find any answer.
Cheers.
Kevlar-Source said:
I tried to overclock my oven but after that it keeps buning all my food
Is this process reverseable?
I need too cook a roasted chicken tonight and i will get nothing but a pile of coal...
Please help me!
I searched both the forum and the wiki but couldn't find any answer.
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just take it out really fast, lol.
6 months ago, i tried to overclock my hermes and then it was broken. i mean touch screen cant be touched=)) but i dont know is it about overclocking. just share my experiment
Kevlar-Source said:
As you may know, if wou want your Hermes to be more responsive, performant, you can increase your ROM page pool size prior to flashing.
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But then you lose Ram, and when you only have 30 or so mb's of it to start its a crapshoot.
sure, it might make some of your videos or games faster but you'll most likely have problems with any data connection
PHM can brick your phone to an irreversable state, and xcpuscalar falsely shows an increase in processor speed. Battery status will not work for the hermes, and I don't think there is a program that will overclock a hermes CPU. As for the not constantly running at 400mhz, that is not a bad thing. Think of it as a P.C., when you are not running apps, there is a system idle process that occupies the majority of the processor, meaning that not all of the speed is utilized. If this is the case, that means that the processor is not running at full speed. Same goes for the Hermes, however there is no system idle process, just a slower clock speed. When you open an app it will reach, but not go over 400mhz.
pleas see attached zip file
this program give you the ability to overclock the hermes up to 420Mhz
i tested it - and at 420Mhz the device becomes slower and some minor flicks of the screen
i went back to 400Mhz and the device went back to usual operation
regards
edward
I too have tried various clock speeds but at the end of it all i left it default as the device was too unstable.
Also I have of course continue my attempts to overclock Hermes, but I am no satisfactory conclusion. At the moment I use xcpuscalar have all possibilities of tuning 500mhz switched on and it is stable. A benchmark I have not done, so I do not know exactly whether he has speed. But the belief puts mountains.
translated by Google
Anyone know (with our phones running 2.2) what the optimal heap size should be? The leaked 2.2 came with 24m preset. Some ROMs run 32m. Bigger always seems better, but I've been reading other sites/forums and get conflicting thoughts.
That's why I thought I'd ask here.
I ran Linpack with both and average about 37.5 - 37.9 with either 24m or 32m.
I ran a few test increasing it to 48m and seen a decrease in performance. Bigger does not me better. I can not speak for anyone else but the best results i've seen was on 32m
theoneownz said:
I ran a few test increasing it to 48m and seen a decrease in performance. Bigger does not me better. I can not speak for anyone else but the best results i've seen was on 32m
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, 32 seems to be the optimal size for me, I didn't see any difference with linpack but my quadrant went up when I set the heapsize from 24 to 32
Is there a way to patch the original leaked 2.2 to run its vm heap size at 32m?
I have my vm heap at 40 amd it runs smooth
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
xvenom89 said:
Is there a way to patch the original leaked 2.2 to run its vm heap size at 32m?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like to find this out myself. I've seen that this can be modified in the Cyanogen rom using Rom Manager, but not sure how this can be done via stock 2.2 rom.
I am by no means "good" at android yet, but im pretty sure there is an option to change the vm heapsize in build.prop in the /system directory. Just use adb to pull the one on there and then push the edited one (that u edit urself) to the phone. Also from what i can remember reading the heapsize basically is just how much ram/memory an app is allowed to use before android has to start "trash collecting" or "tidy up" the app usage. Setting it low will give the best linpack scores i think, but it will completely screw up regular app usage. Best to keep it at default to 32 imo. Setting it higher really wont do anything i dont think except maybe boost ur quadrant score but that may not transfer over to real app usage. My .1 cent
# This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
dalvik.vm.heapsize=24m
That is what u would be editing in your build.prop
chris61292 said:
I am by no means "good" at android yet, but im pretty sure there is an option to change the vm heapsize in build.prop in the /system directory. Just use adb to pull the one on there and then push the edited one (that u edit urself) to the phone. Also from what i can remember reading the heapsize basically is just how much ram/memory an app is allowed to use before android has to start "trash collecting" or "tidy up" the app usage. Setting it low will give the best linpack scores i think, but it will completely screw up regular app usage. Best to keep it at default to 32 imo. Setting it higher really wont do anything i dont think except maybe boost ur quadrant score but that may not transfer over to real app usage. My .1 cent
# This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
dalvik.vm.heapsize=24m
That is what u would be editing in your build.prop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Modified and updated.
I had a feeling it was the build.prop file I needed to edit.
Thank you sir!
But remember that bigger is not alwaus better. Im ising 40m and it is not better or worse than 32 or 24.:although i did notice some nice difference in the general speed of the os itself
chris61292 said:
I am by no means "good" at android yet, but im pretty sure there is an option to change the vm heapsize in build.prop in the /system directory. Just use adb to pull the one on there and then push the edited one (that u edit urself) to the phone. Also from what i can remember reading the heapsize basically is just how much ram/memory an app is allowed to use before android has to start "trash collecting" or "tidy up" the app usage. Setting it low will give the best linpack scores i think, but it will completely screw up regular app usage. Best to keep it at default to 32 imo. Setting it higher really wont do anything i dont think except maybe boost ur quadrant score but that may not transfer over to real app usage. My .1 cent
# This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
dalvik.vm.heapsize=24m
That is what u would be editing in your build.prop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
chris61292 said:
I am by no means "good" at android yet, but im pretty sure there is an option to change the vm heapsize in build.prop in the /system directory. Just use adb to pull the one on there and then push the edited one (that u edit urself) to the phone. Also from what i can remember reading the heapsize basically is just how much ram/memory an app is allowed to use before android has to start "trash collecting" or "tidy up" the app usage. Setting it low will give the best linpack scores i think, but it will completely screw up regular app usage. Best to keep it at default to 32 imo. Setting it higher really wont do anything i dont think except maybe boost ur quadrant score but that may not transfer over to real app usage. My .1 cent
# This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
dalvik.vm.heapsize=24m
That is what u would be editing in your build.prop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803470
chris61292 said:
I am by no means "good" at android yet, but im pretty sure there is an option to change the vm heapsize in build.prop in the /system directory. Just use adb to pull the one on there and then push the edited one (that u edit urself) to the phone. Also from what i can remember reading the heapsize basically is just how much ram/memory an app is allowed to use before android has to start "trash collecting" or "tidy up" the app usage. Setting it low will give the best linpack scores i think, but it will completely screw up regular app usage. Best to keep it at default to 32 imo. Setting it higher really wont do anything i dont think except maybe boost ur quadrant score but that may not transfer over to real app usage. My .1 cent
# This is a high density device with more memory, so larger vm heaps for it.
dalvik.vm.heapsize=24m
That is what u would be editing in your build.prop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you use Root Explorer (which is an invaluable app, IMO), then you don't even have to go through the trouble of adb push and pull. With RE, you an simply just edit the file and be done with it.
Does anyone else get that issue where the web browser closes for no reason (no error or anything) when heap size is set to 24m? Only when I switched to Sadowrom and changed the heap to 32m did it stop this annoying issue that was present in every rom that I've tried. It mostly happened on heavy script/flash websites so I assumed it was a memory issue (happened a lot on this forum as well). 32m should really be default, this seems like a common issue from what I've read.
blakeem said:
Does anyone else get that issue where the web browser closes for no reason (no error or anything) when heap size is set to 24m? Only when I switched to Sadowrom and changed the heap to 32m did it stop this annoying issue that was present in every rom that I've tried. It mostly happened on heavy script/flash websites so I assumed it was a memory issue (happened a lot on this forum as well). 32m should really be default, this seems like a common issue from what I've read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I've seen, the common denominator seems to be that the majority of phones experiencing this are overclocked. Some phones can handle it whereas others cannot. My last Inc would do this if oc'd to 1.15 but was fine at lower speeds. My current Inc rarely does this even when pushed to 1.19.
najaboy said:
From what I've seen, the common denominator seems to be that the majority of phones experiencing this are overclocked. Some phones can handle it whereas others cannot. My last Inc would do this if oc'd to 1.15 but was fine at lower speeds. My current Inc rarely does this even when pushed to 1.19.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine did it with 100% stock 2.1 and 2.2 w/ no root or overclocking and was actually the main thing that motivated me to install roms (my work bought me the phone so I was hesitant).
All kinds of apps close if I overclock it to unstable levels (AOSP goes unstable much more dramatic for me at 1.15, sense is mostly stable up to 1.19) but I believe this is a different issue. Bits are lost so apps go boom, much like the artifacts when I overclock my graphics card too far. Overclocking is the issue when other apps close as well but with the lower heap size only my browser closes after many days of up time without any other issues. I have no issues since heap has been 32m, it would happen daily at 24m.
There is one website that can still bring it down however, that is viewing the full google images page. It seems to have a recursive issue where things load over and over again and the browser eventually vanishes. I can load 500 page pdf files and run stress tests all day and never get them to close or error so I'm pretty sure it's a browser specific issue (does it in all other browsers that I've tried as well).
martino2k6 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803470
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you!
I changed the build.prop, but left the 'm' off at the end of the line, now it won't boot up. I can adb shell into it, adb pull, but su doesn't work, segfaults, can't push the file back to /system. How do I fix it??
Think it's good for both S8500 and S8530.
By default CPU frequency is 800Mhz on Bada 2.0
To set higher frequency, on keyboard make this code: *#197328640#
After select 8 common, 8 DVFS Configuration, 1 static level 0 (800mhz), 1 static level 0 (800mhz) and then # to validate.
If you want to go back to default, same manipulation but select 5 dynamic level.
To see frequency CPU: *#197328640# then 4, then 8, then 1.
Thanks to Badaforums.net
Advantage: You got 1Ghz CPU, what you paid for when you buy your wave.
It's a little smoother like that.
If you need much battery life, you can also underclock the speed.
Idea: What about making an app?
Larioteo if you read this post...
But this will eat my battery even faster that SHP
Thanks for the tip
Best Regards
Erm, not quite sure I understood you there. How exactly do we push the performance to 1ghz. Setting a static speed is as mylove90 points out is very bad for battery life.
Web browser seems much faster with this tip.
You can try, if you see you have problem with battery life, you go to default settings.
But you can also underclock the CPU speed if you want better battery life
lasentenza said:
You can try, if you see you have problem with battery life, you go to default settings.
But you can also underclock the CPU speed if you want better battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's very nice if you know that you would be out for a day or two.
At real !!!!!!!
hmm.... after every restart you have to redo these steps, otherwise the cpu is set back to dynamic level
lasentenza said:
Think it's good for both S8500 and S8530.
By default CPU frequency is 800Mhz on Bada 2.0
To set higher frequency, on keyboard make this code: *#197328640#
After select 8 common, 8 DVFS Configuration, 1 static level 0 (800mhz), 1 static level 0 (800mhz) and then # to validate.
If you want to go back to default, same manipulation but select 5 dynamic level.
To see frequency CPU: *#197328640# then 4, then 8, then 1.
Thanks to Badaforums.net
Advantage: You got 1Ghz CPU, what you paid for when you buy your wave.
It's a little smoother like that.
If you need much battery life, you can also underclock the speed.
Idea: What about making an app?
Larioteo if you read this post...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey lasentenza & mylove90 can u give info like how to underclock the speed like can i do the tweak u have mentioned and at the sametime can get reasonably good battery life...???
tapan15in said:
Hey lasentenza & mylove90 can u give info like how to underclock the speed like can i do the tweak u have mentioned and at the sametime can get reasonably good battery life...???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check num 1 for 1ghz num2 for 800Mhz num3 for 400Mhz and 4 for 200Mhz on Menu
when you executed games 3d then he came's auto in Dynamic's mode !!!
Then maybe it's possible to make setcpu's program