[Q] Apps2SD vs Data2Whatever vs data2SD - Desire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

What is the differences with
Apps2SD vs Data2Whatever vs data2SD etc... or if there are anymore that i may had missed out.
Which one is the best to use and most efficient to use?
Are there any instructions for the best way to free up internal memory? as it is near enough full having 15mb remaining.
HTC-Desire
Rom - Running GingerBread 2.3 GingerVillain 1.1

I can't really explain the differences too well, but there's loads of threads to read about it if you look.
For me, using Gingervillain, I find A2SD+ to be great.
I have a 750MB ext3 partition on my SD card, of which I have used approx 250MB (approx 35 - 45 apps plus the Dalvik cache), so I have loads of this left to use, meanwhile my actual free phone memory stands at about 110MB.
Gingervillain has A2SD+ built in, so if you make sure all of your apps are saved to internal memory, not SD card, they'll actually be on the ext partition of your SD card.
I followed this advice to move the Dalvik Cache to the SD card:
"For those off you who do not understand any off all the above about moving dalvik cache it is as follows. You got two options to move your dalvik-cache.
the first requires you to have the Android-SDK (or at least ADB) installed on your computer. If you don't have this, leave it.
What you do is as follows: in windows command prompt:
> adb (-d) shell
a2sd cachsd
you will see some rolling text and phone will reboot.
The second option is on the phone itself. This is the fastest way in my opinion. For this you need to download the app: Android Terminal Emulator from the market.
Start up terminal after download and punch in as follows:
# su
after that terminal will ask for superuser permissions. Allow these.
# a2sd cachesd
and again some rolling script and phonme reboots
I can't break it down easier then this.
Good luck
MOVING BACK TO PHONE:
If you are using Darktremor A2SD, just enter an ADB Shell, or terminall emulator on phone, enter su and type a2sd nocache."
Hope this helps
: )

Woww... my click on right app2sd app. Thanks for pool. keep sharing.

Hi!
I´m using RCMixHD Data2ext version, it´s very fast and smooth.
Also i tried A2SD+ and Data2WE, but with A2SD+ ihad to less free space and Data2WE was very laggy.
When using Data2ext it´s recommended a class 6 SD Card (I´m using class 10)
With class 2 or 4 you can get problems.

Data2SD performance
I'm using Data2SD with the Gingerburst ROM on my HTC Desire. I've just got a Vivacity and having looked into App2SD I'm going to load Data2SD on that too.
Data2SD is an elegant solution which uses the ext4 filesystem to create a single large internal memory space of over 2Gb (2Gb is the maximum size of the ext4 partition on the SD card, plus the internal partition) which the OS addresses seamlessly. The two separate partitions are addressed by the OS as a single ext4 space. So no need to move apps around, or problems if the wrong apps are moved. Speed is fine, but benefits from a fast SD card - as I'd expect any apps run from SD cards would irrespective of the software solution.
I recently upgraded from a 4Gb Samsung Class 6 micro-Sd card, to a 16Gb SanDisk Class 4 card. I have around 2Gb of internal memory, 70% of which is still free and performance is good - better since I got the SanDisk.
Class isn't a good guide to performance since it relates to the sequential access speed - continuous access typically relevant to big files like video or images. High sequential speeds seem to be achieved at the expense of lower random speeds and many Class 10 cards have very low random access speeds for small files. Phone apps frequently access small files therefore random access is a better guide to performance in a phone and I would avoid cards with any low performance in this area.
Here are the results for my SanDisk Class 4, whose lowest random read/write speed is the highest I could find:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 22.204 MB/s
Sequential Write : 4.845 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 20.493 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 0.538 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.456 MB/s [ 843.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.337 MB/s [ 326.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.111 MB/s [ 759.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.499 MB/s [ 121.8 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [G: 0.0% (0.0/14.8 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2012/02/08 12:59:34
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Both my Samsung 4G Class 6 card, and the SanDisk outperform the unbraanded 2GB card which came with a T-mobile Vivacity I recently bought.
My SanDisk Class 4 is slightly quicker in use than my SanDisk Mobile Ultra - the phone boots and most apps load more quickly - around 10%.
Whichever approach you take to extending the internal memory of your Android, it's going to benefit from a faster random access memory card - I'd be interested to see if anyone else has found a card with better results.

Please use the Q&A Forum for questions &
Read the Forum Rules Ref Posting
Moving to Q&A

In GB, I really enjoyed Data2Whatever but unstable in ICS Rom.
I'm using Apps2SD on Sandvold's ICS until now.

Related

Very slow USB transfer after root

Before root with original Eiclar 2.1 and Kingston 16GB Class 10 transfer write at 9+mb/sec.
After root with Modaco R6 riskfree only max 2mb/sec. ROM Pays BS 2.3 - FAT+ext4
Now tested AuraxTSense 7.4 Official HTC 2.2 , identical result.
Tested with FAT+ext and only FAT, identical result.
Exist any solution this issue after root?
Strange... with my 4gb class 4 (3gb fat32 + 1gb ext3) I get 9 mb/s with windows 7... firmware 2.2 same your kernel...
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
I'm on MoDaCa R8 and I have a very slow write-performance (up to hangs) on my desire using the USB connection (using Apps2SD+). I copy 70 MB first with 4 MB/s (Class 6 Card). Then it suddenly drops to below 1 MB/s, hangs and may even stop copying anything. Now the windows explorer may hang. Nothing happens for minutes (up to 15 minutes).
Maybe it's because of the custom SD-Card IO-Handler of MoDaCo which speeds up reads. I have no idea.
Anyway, when I take out the SD-Card and put it into my PC, it works perfectly and pretty fast
System of a pWne!^ said:
I'm on MoDaCa R8 and I have a very slow write-performance (up to hangs) on my desire using the USB connection (using Apps2SD+). I copy 70 MB first with 4 MB/s (Class 6 Card). Then it suddenly drops to below 1 MB/s, hangs and may even stop copying anything. Now the windows explorer may hang. Nothing happens for minutes (up to 15 minutes).
Maybe it's because of the custom SD-Card IO-Handler of MoDaCo which speeds up reads. I have no idea.
Anyway, when I take out the SD-Card and put it into my PC, it works perfectly and pretty fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, transfer in PC perfect.
Its issue independent version ROM. Before root ok, after very slow write to sd card < 2mb/s.
independent partition card.
Only FAT32 partition < 2mb/s, FAT32 + ext4 < 2mb/s
Why?
wrong hack via root? I use R6 riskfreeroot, loader 0.80

LBA mode MicroSD problems - no LBA: +14MB/s on Patriot LX 16GB

Summary:
I bought a Patriot 16GB LX Series Class10 MicroSD and had huge problems with it. Freezes etc.
After partitioning with FAT32 without LBA the Patriot Class10 is superfast, 14MB/s write speed under Android Froyo. LBA mode was the culprit.
I have not tested this over several days, but so far things seem to be fine.
Problem description:
Phone: Motorola Defy on Froyo Orange. Problem also exists with LG P500
The Patriot 16GB LX Series Class10 MicroSD seemed to lock up, apps were freezing. Speed tests with SD Tools from the Market also locked up.
The Patriot worked however fine when put into a card reader with a PC. Write speeds are consistently over 12MB/sec. I tested also with Check Flash, google for "chkflsh misha"
I reformatted with the official SDFormatter Tool V.2.0. from the SD Association. No go, same problem.
How to solve:
1. Remove existing partition on MicroSD and make a new partition with FAT32 without LBA mode.
I used the Check Flash low level initialization function for partitioning, google for "chkflsh misha"
2. Format MicroSD under windows, command line with:
format X: /fs:fat32 /a:32K
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(DO NOT use SDFormatter from the SD Association to format as the program repartitions the MicroSD in FAT32 LBA Mode!)
With FAT32 no LBA 32k allocation size the Motorola defy blazes away with the Patriot 16GB LX. Write speeds + 14MB/s are shown by SD Tools.
Thoughts:
My humble guess is that the Motorola Defy accesses the MicroSD in non-LBA mode and that leads to problems if the partition is LBA. This is either caused by the MicroSD controller or the Defy.
I also suspect that various MicroSD problems of other phone/card combinations are caused by LBA partitions.
As far as I can see LBA is anyway superfluous as Android can only access 32GB SD Cards currently.
Cheers
Geejay
Usually class 2 and 4 cards are better for use with phones and for running OS's or apps off of. Class 10 cards are designed to have fast sequential write speeds, but sacrifice their random read/write speeds and access times to achieve their fast sequential speeds. It's because they they initialize the section of the card that they are about to write to, which gives great speeds in sequential writes, but will cause delays and freezes when doing things that need quick access to different parts of the card or tasks that will read/write small bits of data from different parts of card.
Many people assume that higher class cards are better, but it really depends on what you're using the card for. For digital cameras, higher class is better, but for cell phones, where you will running apps or parts of the OS are store and accessed from the card, you want a lower class with better access times and random read/write speeds.
Different cards are better for different tasks.
Thanks for your comments. I bought the card because it was the cheaper than Kingston, the only other alternative in that shop.
Here is an interesting article, with detailed info of what you mentioned.
Google for "Working Groups Kernel Consolidation Projects FlashCardSurvey", I cannot post links.
It seems that these Patriot cards are indeed linear write. The author mentions a superior SanDisk algorithm for access.
Interesting benchmark which seem to confirm this: google for "MicroSD card performance test results"
Looking at the table Kingston seems to be slower than Patriot.
In any case there seems to be an LBA problem with the Froyo/Patriot combo.
Yeah, Kingstons are terrible for access speed and random read/write from the tests I've done. I'll never buy a kingston again. I usually stick with Sandisk... it's usually worth any extra money they cost to know you're getting a quality card. I have 8 different sandisk cards now... 2 32gb, 2 16gb, 2 8gb, 1 6gb and 1 4gb, and haven't had a problem with any of them and all except one has worked flawlessly with WP7 and all have worked great running android off of on my HD2.
I was interested in buying this patriot memroy card, is there anyone who can tell me whish access time ? ( you can use hd tune 2.55 to check it ! )
please delete
HD2 with cLK and clockworkmod recovery on Patriot 16gb class 10
geejay2 said:
Summary:
2. Format MicroSD under windows, command line with:
With FAT32 no LBA 32k allocation size the Motorola defy blazes away with the Patriot 16GB LX. Write speeds + 14MB/s are shown by SD Tools.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much for the idea. Seems to have fixed the problems I was having with the card. My problem is that the ext3 partition is automatically formatted by the recovery program I'm running (clockworkmod 4.0.0.0), so I can't do the same for that partition.
I'm still not getting great write times, but read times are good for sequential:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 12.588 MB/s
Sequential Write : 3.915 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 16.033 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 1.103 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 1.782 MB/s [ 435.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.129 MB/s [ 31.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.024 MB/s [ 494.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.111 MB/s [ 27.1 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [H: 11.5% (1.6/13.9 GB)] (x9)
Date : 2011/09/20 14:23:51
OS : Windows XP Professional SP3 [5.1 Build 2600] (x86)
Thanks!
Just singned up to say thanks.
Just followed your instructions for an 8 GB Verbatim Class 10 card. Seems to work. It was laggy and buggy before that.
Thanks
Wow! This LBA thing seems complicated, is it really needed...? Heard that formatting in different cluster sizes can solve the problem already, maybe this LBA thing is not needed...?
BTW, Chkflsh doesn't seem to have a partition function at all...?
Cheers.
And how do we format in non LBA mode? I cannot find any instructions anywhere...
Please, help!
florin20032003 said:
And how do we format in non LBA mode? I cannot find any instructions anywhere...
Please, help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My thoughts/problem as well...
Mac option for non-LBA formatting??
Hello everyone...
Was wondering if anyone knew of a Mac option to format in non-LBA mode. Does the internet formatting utility is the Mac OS ("Disk Utility") use LBA or no??
THANKS!!

[Q] Slow USB speed?

Hi All,
I am running teppic74's rooted, A2SD+ but otherwise stock HTC/Sense/Froyo ROm.
I have a Lexmark, 16GB Class 6 SD card. It came from a reputable source, and I've tested it thoroughly on my PC and it really does perform above and beyond class 6 (ie, 6MB/s sustained write).
However, when I have my desire connected to my PC over USB, and copy files to the SD card, I sustain about 0.75 MB/s
I don't know why it's so slow.
Does anyone else have this problem?
thanks
Slip
Please use the forum search next time, what you describe is a well-known bug seen on latest kernels.
Strange. Have you compared USB transfer speeds on different ROMs?
I have a class 2 sd card that does maintain a decent 2MB/s transfer.
GingerVillian and Miui Roms tested.
I read somewhere that using A2SD/+, D2EXT/W etc does cause sd card to read/write slower over time.
This is it, i've nothing to compare against. I've been through several roms recently and i didn't bother syncing multiple gigabytes of music (keep repartitioning my sd card) until the last couple of days.
Reluctant to switch roms again do to the hassle of installing all my apps etc.
Changing the SD readahead speed makes no difference. "SD Tools" from the market measures write speed at a pretty constant 4 MB/s - but still i can only write over USB at less that 1 MB/s. Makes me think that the problem is with USB rather than SD.
Initial testing in Windows
I have done some testing with this and I really think this is a bug or something that NEEDS to be fixed.
I have a 8GB SDHC Card. It's A class 4 card, meaning transfer speeds should never be lower than 4 MB/s.
When I put my SD Card in my SD slot of my computer using the little adapter that came with it, the transfer speeds are awesome. Now they were as follows:
Read: 6,4 MB/s
Write: 1,1 MB/s
These values are atrocious so I searched for possible reasons. I found out Windows Vista used a very low cluster size when formatting the SD card, it used 1024KB (I think). After manually choosing to format using 64 KB clusters and testing again, this is what I got:
Read: 19 MB/s
Write: 9,2 MB/s
Explaining Cluster Sizes
Now making the cluster size this big has a disadvantage. The size of every file on the card will be rounded up to the nearest 64kb. This is because of the way the SD cards works, which I'm not going to explain here.
This means that a lot of space will be wasted. Read about it in the link to Wikipedia. In short:
Large cluster size ->Less usable space, faster transfer rates.
Now I put my cluster size at 16 KB as a compromise between storage loss and speed gain, resulting in these speeds:
Read: 17 MB/s
Write: 8,9 MB/s
Testing in Android
I put my SD Card back into my Android phone, and plugged in the USB Cable. I copied some files to the SD Card. Guess what:
Read (Max, not average): 2 MB/s
Write (Max, not average): 1,44 MB/s
Which does not make any sense at all. I used the "SD Speed Increase" app to change the cluster size within Android (which is 128kb by default) and it still did not help.
This is a serious issue in my opinion, I lost some data and want to restore a backup, If I leave my SD card in my phone it would take 23 hours according to Windows! If I put my SD Card in the computer, the same task only takes 12 minutes!
Workaround
While searching around on XDA I found a workaround to this problem. This is by no means a real fix, but it enables you to get proper read and write speeds without the need to take the SD Card (and thus the battery on some devices) out. Reboot your phone in recovery. I have CWM-AlphaRev Recovery, but it should work for other recoveries too.
In AlphaRev recovery, go to
"mounst and storage"
"mount USB Storage"
The phone will be connected to the PC, and what do you know?
Read: 17MB/s
Write: 8,7 MB/s
Which is basically the same as I would get if I wouldn't have used the phone at all!
Sources:
SD Speed Increase:
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.sdincrease.it&feature=search_result
Measure SD speed from within Android:
https://market.android.com/details?id=ales.veluscek.sdtools&feature=search_result
Information on cluster size:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_cluster
SD Card Class rating:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital#Speed_Class_Rating
Reboot into recovery for proper speeds:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11671350&postcount=2
just flash a different kernel
Tried many many kernels, not one really helped unfortunately
Being reminded about this issue yesterday evening while copying over a bunch of music, I went for a search again, and stumbled across this post:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/15003-ultra-slow-usb-transfer-speed-on-desire/ which lead me to this post: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=883598
The problem came with the .37 kernel, but wasn't fixed in the .38 kernel apparently. The Manu kernels are based on .35, so from what I've read it will solve the slow write speed. Since I'm at work atm, I can't write to USB (security policy ), so couldn't test it yet.
Right, using the Manu kernel (havs-axi), I can now transfer data (music...) at 1,6MB/s instead of 0,75MB/s. Not a significant increase, but at least an increase I can live with.

[Q] SD card speed

I'm getting the following results on my stock SD card:
SD Tools- w:11mb / r:114mb
Root System Tool- w:8mb / r:11mb
AnTutu- w:9mb / r:15mb
Obviously SD Tools is whacked. Why are all of these results so different? Did I get lucky and get an amazingly fast stock card? I just ordered a class 10 card and wondering if I wasted my $$$.
(running latest MIUI without any major tweaks)
Lol that's not possible for the stock sdcard ha. None of those speeds dont come close to whats correct. You should try this app its free and very accurate.
http://db.tt/Mvtw8u2
Also if you want to run this script to increase speeds on the stock sdcard you should try this. Just flash it in recovery and reboot. I can confirm that it works I'm using this right now.
http://db.tt/ImVQxt3
It's not your SD card, it's a silly limit built into the Evo. There are fixes floating around here though (check the Overall Android section)
I have manually changed the read_ahead_kb on my Evo from 4 to 2048 and it does wonders. Pictures load almost instantly and apps on the SD run faster, or at least load faster. This tweak works. The only problem I have run into is that I have tried to create that script manually and flash it from recovery, Amon-Ra v2.3 and neither has kept the change through a Reboot. I deleted the manually created file before I flashed with recovery. It is not a hard thing to change with Root Explorer, I just hate having to re-edit the file every time the phone is rebooted. Also my Evo is still running the Stock Rom only thing I have done is get root.
dirkyd3rk said:
Lol that's not possible for the stock sdcard ha. None of those speeds dont come close to whats correct. You should try this app its free and very accurate.
http://db.tt/Mvtw8u2
Also if you want to run this script to increase speeds on the stock sdcard you should try this. Just flash it in recovery and reboot. I can confirm that it works I'm using this right now.
http://db.tt/ImVQxt3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the useful info. MIUI already has a the same fix that zip does except it sets it to 128. I was playing around and got slightly better results at 256 than at 128. 512 was about the same and higher actually slowed it down.
Here are my results with the app you suggested:
test 1) w:8 / r:18
test 2) w:8 / r:22
test 3) w:8 / r:20
These were @ 256 rather than the 128 I was testing at before.
Those results are similar to a class 6 am I correct?
My new class 10 should be in tomorrow. I'll post results when I get it.
From Calkulin's script.
Code:
-=}type 10sdreadahead_128kb
#!/system/bin/sh
if [ -e /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb ]
then
/system/xbin/echo "128" > /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/179:0/read_ahead_kb;
fi;
# Tweak to increase sdcard read ahead buffer
# Credit: frankoid @ forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=815557
Change the 128 to what ever # you want.
FINALLY got my new Patriot class 10 sd card today. So much for 4-7 days delivery.
Ran 3 tests:
w: 17 r: 24
w: 14 r: 24
w: 15 r: 24
What size is this card? Keep us informed of any issues you encounter. If it's the 16 or 32GB, feedback on newegg doesn't seem overly promising. Hopefully you have no issues.
I got the 16gb Patriot Class 10 from Newegg. I saw that the reviews included a lot of cards gone bad and low r/w speeds but hey at $35 I figured not much to lose Plus MOST of the reviews were positive and it appeared that those that did have problems with the card had no problems with returns. I did notice that the ADATA card was slightly cheaper and had higher r/w guarantees than Patriot's though the reviews seemed similar so I got the Patriot just cuz I know the name better than "ADATA"

Using Link2SD with Directory Bind.

Hi,
I have a couple of questions.
Question 1:
So, to increase the available memory on my C1904, I installed Link2SD, works beautifully, but the app(which we have to move to the card) must be in the phone memory first, which is my problem, my phone just has 600MB left! I installed 'Directory Bind' for that, it basically links the app's data folder (phone memory/Android/data/app.something.something) to the SD Card in a way that the phone is tricked into "thinking" that the folder we create on the SD card(SD Card/Android/data/app.something.something) is a part of the internal memory, I. E. It binds the two.
But, directory bind has this problem where you have to select the "bind" option whenever you want to use that app data from the SD Card.
So, how about we use DB(Directory Bind) to download big files into the main partition of the SD card and then use Link2SD on it(while still bound), which will take the files to the ext2 partition on the SD Card(used by Link2SD), well, most of them. Then, the leftovers (very small in size) can be moved to the phone memory.
The benefit will be that we won't have to bind it again and again and won't have to worry about USB Connection with a computer as the ext2 partition is never disconnected!
What do you guys think? Will it work ?
Question 2:
I am going to put the game/app files in the SD Card, that means I'll need a fast SD as well.
What class will be the best to buy? 10 OR 6? OR will class 4 do good enough?
TY.
Sent from my C1904 using Tapatalk
POST IN THE Q&A SECTION, THAT'S WHERE QUESTIONS GO. NOT HERE
Press Thanks If I Helped!!
koolentx said:
Hi,
I have a couple of questions.
Question 1:
So, to increase the available memory on my C1904, I installed Link2SD, works beautifully, but the app(which we have to move to the card) must be in the phone memory first, which is my problem, my phone just has 600MB left! I installed 'Directory Bind' for that, it basically links the app's data folder (phone memory/Android/data/app.something.something) to the SD Card in a way that the phone is tricked into "thinking" that the folder we create on the SD card(SD Card/Android/data/app.something.something) is a part of the internal memory, I. E. It binds the two.
But, directory bind has this problem where you have to select the "bind" option whenever you want to use that app data from the SD Card.
So, how about we use DB(Directory Bind) to download big files into the main partition of the SD card and then use Link2SD on it(while still bound), which will take the files to the ext2 partition on the SD Card(used by Link2SD), well, most of them. Then, the leftovers (very small in size) can be moved to the phone memory.
The benefit will be that we won't have to bind it again and again and won't have to worry about USB Connection with a computer as the ext2 partition is never disconnected!
What do you guys think? Will it work ?
Question 2:
I am going to put the game/app files in the SD Card, that means I'll need a fast SD as well.
What class will be the best to buy? 10 OR 6? OR will class 4 do good enough?
TY.
Sent from my C1904 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ans1: use swap sd script...and link2sd....u dont ever want to bind ever...u can download apps directly from playstore[even if it is 1.5gb]
Ans2:buy class 10 or above for lagless gaming
and please post questions on Q&A thread section
Swapping will work on all firmwares.
I am using XMD LB 4.3 JB
But, I had made many efforts to make work link2sd with swapping. still no hope....
mods:- please change this thread's location
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ansebovi said:
Ans1: use swap sd script...and link2sd....u dont ever want to bind ever...u can download apps directly from playstore[even if it is 1.5gb]
Ans2:buy class 10 or above for lagless gaming
and please post questions on Q&A thread section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops... I'm sorry for posting in the wrong section, will keep that in mind from now on.
I did use the swap sd script, but it still used to save the data in the internal memory even though it recognized the card as the internal memory!
Are faster cards than class 10 even available!? According to a few articles 4 or more than 4 will do just fine. True?
koolentx said:
Woops... I'm sorry for posting in the wrong section, will keep that in mind from now on.
I did use the swap sd script, but it still used to save the data in the internal memory even though it recognized the card as the internal memory!
Are faster cards than class 10 even available!? According to a few articles 4 or more than 4 will do just fine. True?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
game data will goto sdcard,but game apk goes to internal...thats y use link2sd...link apk to 2nd partition of sd...problem solved..
see my internal space with 90+ apps....many big sized games
not like class 12 but in class 10 there is advanced version..
Class Minimum performance Application
Class 2 2 MB/s SD video recording
Class 4 4 MB/s High-definition video (HD) recording including Full HD (from 720p to 1080p/1080i)
Class 6 6 MB/s
Class 10 10 MB/s Full HD (1080p) video recording and consecutive recording of HD stills (high-speed data bus)
UHS Speed Class 1 (U1) 10 MB/s Real-time broadcasts and large HD video files (UHS bus)
UHS Speed Class 3 (U3) 30 MB/s 4K video files (UHS bus)
uhs1,uhs3 are also class 10 but with more speed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital
uhs-1 32gb---->here
normal class 10---->here
see speed difference is 20mb+...but price just 300-400 more
i have seen lag on class 4 8gb in my phone..now using class 10...no lag
Thanks for the info. I seriously didn't know that! I'll buy a class 10 now for sure.
Also if I swap the storage now, will it conflict with Link2SD?
Sent from my C1904 using Tapatalk
koolentx said:
Thanks for the info. I seriously didn't know that! I'll buy a class 10 now for sure.
Also if I swap the storage now, will it conflict with Link2SD?
Sent from my C1904 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it wont conflict
ansebovi said:
no it wont conflict
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Allrighty, thanks a lot.
Directory bind not working
Im currently running on cm11 unofficial build (fxp322).
Directory bind gives me the following error: "enter a valid target directory".
I know that the system mount points have changed but what should i do now!

Categories

Resources