Recently I've tried a few ROMs, including the Cool Z ROM, the ReflexTSenseHD ROM and the Starburst Lite ROM. I've noticed that the Cool Z ROM and ReflexTSense ROM are all based on Android 2.2.1, while the Starburst Lite ROM is based on Android 2.2 FroYo.
For all 3 ROMs I flashed Richard Trip's kernel v5f, and set the frequency to 1190MHz on smartass scaling and run Quadrant benchmark.
The results showed a magnificent difference between Android 2.2.1 and 2.2. With Cool Z and ReflexTSenseHD the CPU score can sometimes be higher than the total score of Nexus One 2.2+ in Quadrant Advanced. However, when I run the benchmark with Android 2.2 in the Starburst ROM, it would be a miracle to see the CPU score higher than the CPU score of Nexus One 2.2+, although the frequency is set at 1190MHz.
There is another difference between the Starburst ROM and the other 2 ROMs, though. I did a Data2SD with Data2Whatever on the Starburst ROM(the one flasher given in Starburst didn't work for me), while I didn't do that on the two Android 2.2.1 ROMs.
So I'm wondering: Is there a difference between Android 2.2 and 2.2.1? If yes, what is it? Or is the difference simply caused by Data2SD?
It's simply because Data2SD. You would get the same results with other roms with Data2SD. But in most cases it won't be any faster then the ones with no Data2SD. It's a known thing that Quadrant would give you higher scores.
2.2 is the latest version of Android for the Desire, 2.2.1 is the latest for the Desire HD/Z - which Cool Z is based on
Related
Hi,
Are there any UV Kernels that can be used on Sense 2.2 ROM?
I'm looking to get a little more life out the battery.
Thanks
Lee
Guys, is there any undervolt file that we can flash for Gingerbread sense roms to make it more battery efficient?
I guess you are talking about rooted phones with custom sense roms?! Newest version of setcpu can also undervolt:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
Which one should i get? which one is more stable and fast? i know gingerburst have sense 2.1, is that unstable and slow? cuz now im on supernova and i wanna move to gingerburst, so is there a speed difference and stability difference? do i nid wipe all my stuff when i flash gingerburst on top of supernova?
Superman vs Batman, who wins ?
This is also something I'm wondering. Just flashed to Supernova having only recently rooted my phone. Gingerburst seemed a little too new for me to use for a first ROM. Would be interested to see feedback on how stable it is though.
I've tried both, Gingerbust was simply too slow/laggy for me; Supernova worked like a charm.
If you aren't interested in having Sense 2.1, go with Supernova; for Sense 2.1 on Gingerbread I'm actially using Unofficial BravoS and it's really great.
I've been using the new Synergy ROM for a few days now and everything is awesome, but I really want to flash a better kernel. I'm not sure if I should be using a kernel using BFS or CFS and am unsure which would be best suited for the ROM. I'm still calibrating my battery, but I want my battery to be at its max capacity. Any suggestions?
Note: used heyitslou while on the Warm Z ROM but I don't know how well his kernels will hold up with a ROM that has a lot of sense 3.0 elements.
There are no kernels available that are compatible with gingersense roms. We only have the one kernel from our test gingerbread leak until or rather if HTC releases the official gingerbread ota for our phones. That is when kernel development will expand for gingersense roms.
sent from an Inc with a hint of Business Gingersense
Is there a stable Kernel for the stock 2.3.5 ROM? I want to overclock my Wildfire S but I want to be stable. Because before flashing 2.3.5 I tried to put custom Kernel for 2.3.3 from here but when I overclocked it, it freezes on screens and I need to pull out the battery. So is there stable custom Kernel for 2.3.5 stock ROM?
Maybe your CPU couldn't handle the overclock.
Each yield of processors are different some better than others especially when overclocking.
I had stock rom 2.3.3 with overclock kernel and I was running at 806mhz no problems.
Wait for a overclock kernel, theres none available yet, then try it.