Another Asian firmware that runs nice. The build date 2010-09-08. Its branded with Taiwan Telecom Apps, just like ZUJP1.This firmware is that is read and write, this is the first september firmware i found that are. Try if you like
Download link:http://www.multiupload.com/FBLCZHQNYY
Its with root files (kernels, update.zip,PIT, Odin, firmware)
Nice to see some new FW, thanks
is it a froyo build??
racerboy3801 said:
is it a froyo build??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. seems its Eclair..
September firmware?! - that's good.
JPK has a 19th sept build date...
new_bember said:
No.. seems its Eclair..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, its Froyo
new_bember said:
No.. seems its Eclair..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. I saw the Froyo like rooting method inside (flashing back the original kernel etc.). This is a Froyo build.
Has anyone (else) tested it?
Honestly i am disapointed in voodoovkernel jm 8 plus lagfix plus OCLF 2 on top. Quadrant is skyrocketing, inside apps it eorks well, but everything else in beteeen takes much longer to load, lot of black screens inbeteeen apps. I am willing to try something new, or maybe i ll just get back to stock.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I suspect this is a branded or at least customised build off the release Froyo branch, which I suspect is the JPH / JP4 branch.
JPK is newer because it is a leak from the Froyo trunk.
My feeling is that what we're seeing now, and what will form the "official" releases, are optimised JPH /JP4 builds. They may be better / faster than JPK but as they're based on an earlier branch, their build dates won't be as new as JPK.
Rawat said:
JPK has a 19th sept build date...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ZUJP2 is 06 September build date which is older than JPK.
stuclark said:
I suspect this is a branded or at least customised build off the release Froyo branch, which I suspect is the JPH / JP4 branch.
JPK is newer because it is a leak from the Froyo trunk.
My feeling is that what we're seeing now, and what will form the "official" releases, are optimised JPH /JP4 builds. They may be better / faster than JPK but as they're based on an earlier branch, their build dates won't be as new as JPK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they're not recompiling anything (keeping the build date same) then what exactly are they optimizing? They can't even recompile the kernel without build dates changing.
I think all they do is test and custom apps/branding. For now everything is speculation and guesswork.
I think I will wait for official Froyo or flash it out of boredom.
man firmware release had really dried up lately
Why would they waste anymore time on Eclair builds if Froyo is a soon to be release.
We should be glad they have switched tactics to concentrate on Froyo which could mean a definate release by months end.
Question is, will it be released in all countries at the same time or specific countries first.
So, has anyone tried it?
just flashed..
first impressions good..
1. booted up in chinese language
2.contacts showing all alphabets in the side search
3. quite fast like dxjp1
4. comes pre installed with some bloatwareapps like hamiapps, hami... hami.. dont know what these are..
5. seems to me as being very close to an official build.
aswinm16 said:
just flashed..
first impressions good..
1. booted up in chinese language
2.contacts showing all alphabets in the side search
3. quite fast like dxjp1
4. comes pre installed with some bloatwareapps like hamiapps, hami... hami.. dont know what these are..
5. seems to me as being very close to an official build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is browser performance? Loading times, panning around etc.
its ok..not perfect..i went back to dxjp1..too much bloatware slowing up the phone..
anyone know if this uses hsupa?
This ROM seems to be de-odexed.
It starts in Chinese. You have to manually switch it to English.
Includes the Chinese keyboard.
If you don't want those carrier custom apps, just don't flash the CSC file. I didn't need to repartition (mine is the 803 pit) and it worked just flashing the PDA and MODEM sections.
TIP: When you are rooting, you don't have to "pull the battery out" after the first kernel flash. You can just press and hold the power button for around 20 seconds and the phone will shut down.
Related
If you like me have just upgraded to the 2.03 rom released in January and now HTC released a new rom with exactly the same changelog it may not be worth all the hassle with reinstalling / configuring all your stuff once again already.
I was pissed at HTC since they couldn't tell us what they changed since they told us to REAPPLY this update if we had installed it prior to february 27. So today I sent them this email:
Latest ROM update for HTC Touch Diamond. It took me over a week to customize my device after the 2.03 ROM released in january since I prefer to cleanly re-install everything instead of backups. Now a new ROM with the same changelog is already released & you say we should re-apply this ROM if we installed before february 27! Why? We are many people who don't wanna go trough all the hassle again. Why can't you just tell us what you fixed so we can decide for ourselves if it's necessary. The january ROM works just fine. Yours sincerely, ******.
And I just got an answer from them that I can't post here since it came with a confidentialy note. But I can tell you in short that they explained that there are lots of things and bugs for different time made devices and changes and that is why they can't say what is changed in the february 27 rom.
They also told me not to reapply the update if my device is working fine, there is no need to.
So you can without any worries stick with the january update for now if you don't experience any issues or don't feel like installing all your stuff from scratch
owziee said:
If you like me have just upgraded to the 2.03 rom released in January and now HTC released a new rom with exactly the same changelog it may not be worth all the hassle with reinstalling / configuring all your stuff once again already.
I was pissed at HTC since they couldn't tell us what they changed since they told us to REAPPLY this update if we had installed it prior to february 27. So today I sent them this email:
Latest ROM update for HTC Touch Diamond. It took me over a week to customize my device after the 2.03 ROM released in january since I prefer to cleanly re-install everything instead of backups. Now a new ROM with the same changelog is already released & you say we should re-apply this ROM if we installed before february 27! Why? We are many people who don't wanna go trough all the hassle again. Why can't you just tell us what you fixed so we can decide for ourselves if it's necessary. The january ROM works just fine. Yours sincerely, ******.
And I just got an answer from them that I can't post here since it came with a confidentialy note. But I can tell you in short that they explained that there are lots of things and bugs for different time made devices and changes and that is why they can't say what is changed in the february 27 rom.
They also told me not to reapply the update if my device is working fine, there is no need to.
So you can without any worries stick with the january update for now if you don't experience any issues or don't feel like installing all your stuff from scratch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to soft-reset my device everytime during an installation, then run the install again. The x-button doesn't work properly (turned "close programs using x" on). Never had to use the red soft-reset button as often as with this ROM (crashes easily). Plus it's much slower than my previous official ROM.
I think this ROM update is for people like me...
Well maybe... I don't experience any of the problems you mentioned.
owziee said:
...It took me over a week to customize my device after the 2.03 ROM released in january since I prefer to cleanly re-install everything instead of backups. Now a new ROM with the same changelog is already released & you say we should re-apply this ROM if we installed before february 27! Why? ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are u suggesting that htc should stop releasing updates for diamond?! dude, why using stock rom's, what's the fun in it anyway!?
No no, absolutely not!!!
But HTC released this rom (february 27) with the same changelog as the 2.03 rom they released in january and I've just gone trough reinstalling everything so the idea of installing virtually the same rom once again gave me a headache.
HTC urged us to reapply the update if we installed it before february 27 and I really needed to know why so I had to send them the email.
Of course I would be very happy to see new rom upgrades in the future as long as there are changes / fixes worth mentioning (They didn't even mention any fixes this time since they just posted the same changelog all over and it was only 1 month between the updates).
ROM info...
What's more... take a look at the version numbers:
January's ROM: v2.03.405.2
February's ROM: v2.03.405.3
When a version number change isn't even a point (i.e. the '.03' in the above example), believe me, not a lot has changed. But this is worse than that, a change from .03 to .04 would probably mean just correcting a spelling mistake... this change is so far down the points, it doesn't even make it past the 'what's the POINT' stage with me (get it... what's the POINT!!) - OK, rubbish joke
Maybe the newer ROM fixes problems that only appear under special constellations.
For my part it fixed a problem i had:
Sometimes TouchFlo 3D diddn't start correctly after a softreset (from Sprite Backup),
device kept powered on until battery was empty.
They don't list a newer changelog for this ROM, but i find it strange that the Jannuary
version is no more available on the website.
But i agree, if the Jannuary version runs fine absolutely no need to upgrade.
If i install the early leaked build of the 2.2 update will i get the final one as a ota when it is official
chrishornet said:
If i install the early leaked build of the 2.2 update will i get the final one as a ota when it is official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should, but only if the final isn't the same as the leaked one. You can also flash the final build once its released, manually.
You could just wait 1 day, too. I know it's killing you to get your hands on Froyo (it's killing me) but patience is a virtue. To be honest, I don't think it would have been as bad if Sprint didn't say we could initiate the update by downloading and installing it manually earlier. People have been hitting the "Check Now" button since last Friday (myself included). Why say that at all if you're not going to allow it?
BTW - your post title is very misleading... may want to change it to a question of some sort instead of statement implying what it isn't.
I highly doubt Sprint wouldn't allow the people that updated early to update again. That would be absolutely ridiculous. Either wait for the next update or for a root method on your current version.
Yeah, basically there is a new Android 2.1 firmware up on samsung-firmwares.com
http://samsung-firmware.webs.com/samsungi9000.htm
I don't want to install it, just letting you guys know as i'm happy on JM5
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=752059
DocRambone said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=752059
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is that about?
both not same ROM
hihihehe said:
what is that about?
both not same ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its same rom, but wrong topic name tho
I'm very happy with XWJM5 + one click lagfix v1. Not planning to flash to new firmware until Froyo is out next month.
Unless there are major breakthrough for this or up coming firmware.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Just revert from jp3, to jm5 very happy with jm5 now, minour bugs found in jp3,testing now jm5 lagfix
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I9000TGYJH1 is the following
PDA : I9000ZSJH1
PHONE : I9000ZSJH1
CSC : I9000ZSJH1
It is a China and HK firmwares.
Someone reported that it is pretty responsive for chinese input and being a JH1, is less laggy.
tested, very stable and snappy without any lagfix. much better than the other asian firmware. battery life has improved. however, i am yet to find out the performance over other european firmware.
c010 said:
tested, very stable and snappy without any lagfix. much better than the other asian firmware. battery life has improved. however, i am yet to find out the performance over other european firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tempting, I'm currently on jg4 w/ lagfix… pretty satisfied already…
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I had issues going from this JH1 firmware back to JM5.
Odin would basically hang and you would end up with a bricked phone (with connect to pc screen) and had to flash back to JH1 to get the phone going again.
If you do happen to load this FW, and decide to go back to JM5, when you flash in odin, do not check the "Partition" box, and do not insert the PIT file. Insert the PDA/PHONE/CSC from JM5 as usual, then flash.
If you have the PIT + repartition selected, it doesnt work.... strange..
JH1
I am running JH1 with One click lagfix 2.0. It is smooth and my GPS locking improved dramatically with the default settings (i.e. no change at all after flashed). Battery wise, it feels a bit worse but I can't be sure as I must admit I have been naughty and playing with the phone more due to it's improved response.
However, there were postings where others had indicated differently. So I guess it depends on what your are expecting.
However, I moved from the "out of the box" JF7 -> JG4 (by Kies) and then Odin the JH1. I had played with JH1 without rooted or lag fix first before I applied the one-click lagfix. The vanilla JF7 seems to be an improvement over JG4 and certainly over JF7.
Last but not least, I tried Launchpro (free version) with the JH1, it is not as good as the default TWlauncher.
My 2 cents.
Hi Folks, downloaded from samfirmware.com (http://www.samfirmware.com/WEBPROTECT-i9000.htm)
All thanks to samfirmware.com (hope they fix the links to correctly point to samfirmware.com rather than samfirmware-web.com).
Trying to flash. I would really appreciate if someone could share the kernel as when I tried to create a .tar file, didn't work for me.
If someone could help in creating the tar for the kernel, I can share the same.
In the meantime trying jpc kernel after root on this rom.
Thanks for keeping forum.xda-developers.com rocking.
Quadrant 1004 on stock. Looks smooth and much faster than JPC. Installing lagfix 2.3.3 update.zip
To Summarize:
I find this to be one of the best Froyo builds. Fixes some of the problems I had on JPC.
Exchange email integration seems buggy
GPS still needs to be tested
Build is from 08.2010
Root: http://hotfile.com/dl/68975058/295f167/I9000ZSJP3_Root.zip.html
Not significantly different from JPC and ZSJP2. So if you are happy with JPC, you are not really missing anything significant.
I am back to JPC as JP3 seems to be having a strange issue of increasing CPU utilization in idle! Also, the build date seems to be older than JPC.
you need to use GNU tar (or just make it from linux) doesntwork with eg 7zip
in case u can't make it easily here it is (i already removedthisjp3 tho it doesnt work very goodfor me)
http://www.multiupload.com/NPWZNFE6KX
ps:use the i9000 kernel + update.zip froyo root with this!
bilboa1 said:
you need to use GNU tar (or just make it from linux) doesntwork with eg 7zip
in case u can't make it easily here it is (i already removedthisjp3 tho it doesnt work very goodfor me)
http://www.multiupload.com/NPWZNFE6KX
ps:use the i9000 kernel + update.zip froyo root with this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW, thanks for the quick reply! What were the issues? How did you find it as compared to JPC?
EDIT: Your kernel doesn't work for me. Crashes at the first boot screen (tried after removing USB), however JPC kernel seems to work after root
it doesnt have all the new jpc stuff for starters, it's the old buttons and so on (i suppose its like the HKJP2 but i didnt look much more deeply)
then it started to freeze around a bit (prolly not more than jpc but still it annoys me) - ofc that's with lagfix on both.then titaniumbackup failed to restore many apps which worked for restore on jpc and hkjp2 so i gave up lol
so while i was at it i just went back to 2.1
is this full froyo or just partial like the last releases!?!?!?!
similar to previous releases at least
just look at build dates anyway. all that stuff is from august..
there'sJI2 or something like that from september for vibrant which seems really nice. 2.1 but has all the new froyo stuff from samsung (just no new JIT etc)
hatebreeder209 said:
is this full froyo or just partial like the last releases!?!?!?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please define "partial release". I see all the ROMs to be "full" like the official ones (these are alpha or beta versions at max, but have become much stable then the July Froyo builds).
"my" kernel is just SZJP3 ;p
u can untar it from their archive and tar it back it's what i did. just use GNU tar or odin will fail.
what languages are included ?
So anyone has the Kernel for this one?
1902 said:
what languages are included ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
english, korean, chinese
Noticed ZSJP3 in samfirmware that is using PIT 512 instead of 803, as ZSJP2, JPC all using 803.
Wonder any error on it.
Anyone has direct link from Samsung FUS server..as the download speed from there is much faster(> 1.5MBytes per sec).. of course ..providing the encryption key will be +++.
Hows the battery performance?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
anyone manage to root it?
There is some info here but I can't read Chinese
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=568&t=1751202&last=22318205
We need this this file:ZSJP3_Rootcan somebody downloading from kingmobi?
Downloading now-very slowly
I Flashed ZSJP3 - but My Exchange reply is not working. if i reply to the email message the receiver will not get my reply. Just receive blank email.
is there any work around solution for this problem? same exist on JPC and ZSJP2
still the same issue (like ZSJP2), once exchange sync start, the phone halted.
ZSJP3_Root from Kingmobi:
http://hotfile.com/dl/68975058/295f167/I9000ZSJP3_Root.zip.html
Regards
I'm posting this because I didn't see anybody with this build yet...
Okay, so here is my story, like most of you, I was pretty frustrated that my stock build wasn't getting ICS, I was running 2.007.04_EMEA_GB. First off I wasn't sure if the EMEA_GB version is designed for Canada (since I bought my A100 off of someone from Craigslist). I took many backups of my system by using the DD commands before trying the leaked versions of ICS that were posted by Vache, starting in March. When 14 was out, I loaded it up but really didn't think it was the "official" firmware, as there were still a few lingering issues with the ICS build, so I went back to HC (using the Gen2 HC full update package) rooted it, then and reimaged all of the partitions with the old DD images I kept from the original firmware that shipped with my device.
ICS was supposed to have been released yesterday, and I had in my mind from March that I was going to have ICS from Acer as my birthday present... and Today is my birthday (haha) so I had to make it happen! I didn't want that v14 on there, and I had read in a different thread that an A100 actually had a build 15 on it, which sort of verified hypothesis that v14 might not be the official firmware, so I went ahead and flashed the original GEN1 stock Honeycomb rom, Acer_A100_1.014.08_COM_GEN1 : http://vache-android.com/v1/download.php?fileID=109 .
Once that was flashed, (with a data reset) I immediatley tried to run an update check but it told me that the device was up to date (haha what a lie). Since this was about 2am and I was supposed to be sleeping, I let it sit for about an hour before trying the update check again. The device had 4 updates in total, after the second update, it changed to a PA_CA release, then before the 4th update came in, the update wizard warned me that Kobo and Adobe Flash wasn't part of the system, but could be downloaded. I figured this was the ICS update, and I wasn't wrong. Once everything was done updating (at about 3:30, the Acer update servers were really fast at that point LOL) I checked the system version and found that I was on v17_PA_CA. Attached is my screenshot.
After running this version for ~8 hours, I havent had any freezing, menu transitions are very smooth, no touchscreen bugs yet either. This build feels like it is a perfect match for my hardware. Also, it looks like the battery life is better, but only time will tell on it.
I have attached a screenshot of the build that I'm on as well, just in case anyone has any questions. It's really possible that since I used the original firmware that it checked in to the acer servers as a new device and it should send me all the updates in one shot.
danifunker said:
I'm posting this because I didn't see anybody with this build yet...
Okay, so here is my story, like most of you, I was pretty frustrated that my stock build wasn't getting ICS, I was running 2.007.04_EMEA_GB. First off I wasn't sure if the EMEA_GB version is designed for Canada (since I bought my A100 off of someone from Craigslist). I took many backups of my system by using the DD commands before trying the leaked versions of ICS that were posted by Vache, starting in March. When 14 was out, I loaded it up but really didn't think it was the "official" firmware, as there were still a few lingering issues with the ICS build, so I went back to HC (using the Gen2 HC full update package) rooted it, then and reimaged all of the partitions with the old DD images I kept from the original firmware that shipped with my device.
ICS was supposed to have been released yesterday, and I had in my mind from March that I was going to have ICS from Acer as my birthday present... and Today is my birthday (haha) so I had to make it happen! I didn't want that v14 on there, and I had read in a different thread that an A100 actually had a build 15 on it, which sort of verified hypothesis that v14 might not be the official firmware, so I went ahead and flashed the original GEN1 stock Honeycomb rom, Acer_A100_1.014.08_COM_GEN1 : http://vache-android.com/v1/download.php?fileID=109 .
Once that was flashed, (with a data reset) I immediatley tried to run an update check but it told me that the device was up to date (haha what a lie). Since this was about 2am and I was supposed to be sleeping, I let it sit for about an hour before trying the update check again. The device had 4 updates in total, after the second update, it changed to a PA_CA release, then before the 4th update came in, the update wizard warned me that Kobo and Adobe Flash wasn't part of the system, but could be downloaded. I figured this was the ICS update, and I wasn't wrong. Once everything was done updating (at about 3:30, the Acer update servers were really fast at that point LOL) I checked the system version and found that I was on v17_PA_CA. Attached is my screenshot.
After running this version for ~8 hours, I havent had any freezing, menu transitions are very smooth, no touchscreen bugs yet either. This build feels like it is a perfect match for my hardware. Also, it looks like the battery life is better, but only time will tell on it.
I have attached a screenshot of the build that I'm on as well, just in case anyone has any questions. It's really possible that since I used the original firmware that it checked in to the acer servers as a new device and it should send me all the updates in one shot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool beans...im on pa_ca as well...but sticking on HC for now to crack the darn sbk.
they must be planning future updates as your image version still looks like it could be a release candidate. :-D
glad to hear theres several builds being pushed tho!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I was on 3.2.1 COM_GEN2, and couldn't upgrade, so went back to 3.2 GEN1 from there going a similar path as you did: 4 updates, and the last being PA_CA. I that time I though "almost there", but found I no longer have spanish language as an option
My first impression: ICS is faster and better looking. But,
Do you know where can I download a language patch to it?
on a side note...fellow rogers user...you jumpin on the one x ?? i just ordered mine
rising power said:
I was on 3.2.1 COM_GEN2, and couldn't upgrade, so went back to 3.2 GEN1 from there going a similar path as you did: 4 updates, and the last being PA_CA. I that time I though "almost there", but found I no longer have spanish language as an option
My first impression: ICS is faster and better looking. But,
Do you know where can I download a language patch to it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've the same problem, not italian language and "PA_CA" Build.. WHY ??
i have Acer A100 in Russian
and yesterday it updated to 4.0.3
i lost my language in OS and apps
version PA_CA too
((((((((((
ptesmoke said:
on a side note...fellow rogers user...you jumpin on the one x ?? i just ordered mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe cool, when it comes to phones, I need a keyboard, so I actually picked up a bell Moto xt860 and unlocked it. I might be stuck with this one for a while since I hear keyboard android phones don't sell as well as blackberries up here. We will see what happens to RIM...
My other goal is not to sign another contract again, and I have a really sweet deal with Rogers now also...
Sent from my XT860 running ICS
devitos said:
i have Acer A100 in Russian
and yesterday it updated to 4.0.3
i lost my language in OS and apps
version PA_CA too
((((((((((
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really looks like PA_CA is geared towards Canada, with only English, French and Chineese (simplified and traditional). I don't know another way of pulling another language, unless you can grab them from the WW 014 package somehow... let me look at it
Sent from my XT860 running ICS
I am very interested - how Canada firmware got in Russia)))
acer have a bug in service
Isn't possible flash directly Acer_A100_AV041_1.014.00_COM_GEN1 ? (to gets languages)
This is the third post today I have read someone say that the build 14 is not official. I have myself and numerous other people received this update OTA from Acer. Unless Acer is beta testing on our devices, you can't call it anything but official. It is the exact same rom ZN posted.
devitos said:
I am very interested - how Canada firmware got in Russia)))
acer have a bug in service
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just buyed my own one here in spain and it comes with the PA_CA firmware as well