Develop Bugs

[DEV] [FAQ] NKC - Native Kernel Compile

This is ONLY a sketch.
This method (and others based on it) will be further developed in due time.
You DON'T need to setup YET another environment on your PC just to compile an Android kernel, or whatever utility/program you want to use.
The downside? A slow CPU and limited RAM (to circumvent this, repartition your sdcard and allocate some swap)
Now, WHY gentoo?
- because it's the distro I've been using @home for ~5 years?
- it's a good distro for dev. default includes development tools and headers.
Quick instructions:
1: Download the gentoo stage 3 from here
http://gentoo.prz.rzeszow.pl/releas...at-linux-gnu/stage3-armv5tel-20091023.tar.bz2
EDIT: For some reason, none of the gentoo arm stages want to run.
Devving in debian for now. Link here: http://www.filefactory.com/file/af5g7eg/n/debian_v21_zip
Thanks to ghostwalker for the package.
2: make a new folder (chroot) untar the stage along with kernel sources to the new folder (be sure it's on an ext partition - CHECK for noexec etc !!)
3: chroot & play around, that is, make menuconfig && make && make modules, whatever.
4: build kernel as usual (merge with ramdisk)
5: You can try other distros for arm6 optimisations, or build your own.
;]

[KITCHEN] Minimal kernel building VM with scripts

I added some convenience scripts to the config. Read the new tutorial here
The old one still works:
I put together a small virtualbox vm with a very minimal debian config with which I was able to compile a working kernel. This is for all the people who are running Windows, and want to try modifying kernels/initramfs's. As this is a minimal config there are some drawbacks (like it doesn't have a graphical interface), but you can always install additional packages, if you want to.
The VM includes: debian, build essentials, git, vb guest additions, mc, vim and codesourcery 2010q1 gnu-eabi. (it's larger than the simple eabi version, but can be used to compile non-kernel applications too)
First of all I hate both SunOracle VirtualBox and debian, but VB is free, and debian is lean, so they'll do the job.
To get the image running do the following:
First download and install VirtualBox
Next download the VM image: http://android.sztupy.hu/dl/KernelCompilerVM-1.1.7z and extract it. (it's a large download. If you can please put it up a mirror)
Mirrors: (thanks to the people mirroring it)
- http://www.multiupload.com/THJV19BJ9X
- http://bote.ro/sztupy/KernelCompilerVM-1.1.7z
After this run virtualbox, and import this VM.
Run the VM. The username/passwords are: root/root and kernel/kernel. Login with kernel. (you can always switch to root using sudo)
Next choose what kernel/initramfs you want to compile.
Here are some links to kernels:
The original sources can be found at supercurio's git:
Code:
git://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000.git
froyo-samsung branch
The kernel of the voodoo project can be found at the same place:
Code:
git://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000.git
froyo-voodoo branch
The ULTK kernel can be found at my account:
Code:
git://github.com/sztupy/universal_lagfix_kernel.git
Here are some links to initramfs files:
The original froyo initramfs can be found at supercurio's git page:
Code:
http://github.com/project-voodoo/samsung_ramdisks.git
afaik the voodoo initramfs is build using scripts from these images, so you have to apply them.
The ULTK initramfs can be found here:
Code:
git://github.com/sztupy/universal_lagfix_kernel_initramfs.git
For the rest of the tutorial I'll be showing how to compile ULTK:
First get the kernel sources using git:
Code:
git clone git://github.com/sztupy/universal_lagfix_kernel.git kernel
Unfortunately no copy-paste function is available, so you have to write this manually...
Next get the initramfs using git:
Code:
git clone git://github.com/sztupy/universal_lagfix_kernel_initramfs.git initramfs
If everything goes well you'll have two directoryes, called kernel and initramfs. Next we have to modify some values in the kernel configs.
Nano, mcedit and vim are installed, use the one that suits you best. (mcedit is the most user friendly)
Switch to the kernel directory and edit the Makefile there:
Code:
cd kernel
nano Makefile
Find the row that says
Code:
CROSS_COMPILE ?= some value
Replace it to
Code:
CROSS_COMPILE ?= /home/kernel/arm-2010q1/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-
(if using nano make sure it won't add a line break into the row)
Next load the default config:
Code:
make aries_eur_defconfig
And edit it:
Code:
nano .config
We have to supply the directory of the initramfs. Search for the line:
Code:
CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=some value
and replace it to
Code:
CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=/home/kernel/initramfs/out
(this is for the ULTK. For voodoo the initramfs locations are "froyo-xxjp6" and "froyo-xxjpm" instead of "out")
if you've managed to do that too, let's compile the kernel:
Code:
make
If everything goes fine after a while you will have your shiny new kernel. Now let's get it to your computer, so it can be flashed:
First, you have to create a shared folder in VirtualBox. Simply create a directory somewhere on your computer, and add it as a shared folder in virtualbox. The name of the shared folder should be simple, for example "shr".
Next, you have to mount that directory inside the VM. To do this enter:
Code:
sudo mount -t vboxsf shr ~/share
After it has been mounted you can copy the fresh kernel to your host OS:
Code:
cp arch/arm/boot/zImage ~/share
If everything goes well you have a zImage ready at the folder you've just shared. TAR it, fire up odin, and flash.
---------------------------------
Now that you've succesfully compiled a working kernel try to modify it. You can use "make menuconfig" in the kernel directory to switch some kernel functions (like filesystem supports) on and off. You can edit .config by hand to add or remove some configuration values. And you can edit the files in the initramfs directory. After modifications you only have to enter "make" in the kernel directory to get your kernel inside the "arch/arm/boot/zImage" dir ready.
You can also copy files from your host OS, to the guest OS, by putting the file inside the shared folder and copying it:
Code:
cp ~/share/thefile ~/initramfs/copyithere
Hope this guide was useful.

Impressive, thanks. Even a noob like me can try this.

Oh god, not only a talented developer, but a community helper!
STICKY!!
Gonna try it laters <3

oh yea, nice!

DocRambone said:
Impressive, thanks. Even a noob like me can try this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're a noob, then I'm a baby

Darkyy said:
If you're a noob, then I'm a baby
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
high time you start compiling kernels

tnx
its very usefull

Magnificent!
I just came to take a quick look, but the thread deserves a closer one.
Thank you for sharing knowledge.

Worthy of a sticky.
Hopefully this will solve all those "I want this in a kernel but not that" scenarios.

This is VERY nice for the devs.. but.. i think this will make this forum spammed with 69 diff kernels with just minor changes.. as with the roms

Its better to let other people brick their phone than you brick your own
Just kidding! I for one will try and compile different versions with different lag-schemes to find the fastest combination. Including /system with fastest reading. I think I will add a benchmark to the recovery menu directly. Benchmarking each mount for read and for write speeds. Maybe I can use backup/restore code and just time it without writing (cp to null). Lets get to work
Thanks sztupy!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

_JKay_ said:
Its better to let other people brick their phone than you brick your own
Just kidding! I for one will try and compile different versions with different lag-schemes to find the fastest combination. Including /system with fastest reading. I think I will add a benchmark to the recovery menu directly. Benchmarking each mount for read and for write speeds. Maybe I can use backup/restore code and just time it without writing (cp to null). Lets get to work
Thanks sztupy!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot brick your phone with a bad kernel

@sztupy
I am impressed how productive master mind and kind person you are sharing all your knowledge and developments with us.
Congratulation, with you contributions you push Android Development forward.
Thank you

this is really cool, if i need minimal GUI, what would you suggest? xfce ? or there is something smaller and lighter? thx again.

avary said:
this is really cool, if i need minimal GUI, what would you suggest? xfce ? or there is something smaller and lighter? thx again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fluxbox/Openbox. However I don't see the need for one, if you're running the machine just for compiling.
Also, shouldn't gpm+guest additions solve the copy-paste problem?
E: Apparently not. Meh, stupid virtualbox.. sshd+putty then!

Awesome! Thanks for this sztupy! The more people we can get involved in this stuff, the better the end result will be. Always!

aziztcf said:
Fluxbox/Openbox. However I don't see the need for one, if you're running the machine just for compiling.
Also, shouldn't gpm+guest additions solve the copy-paste problem?
E: Apparently not. Meh, stupid virtualbox.. sshd+putty then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actullay i was looking for something light and minimal (with GUI, or at least something like PCman FM and gedit or kedit, im not good with emac, vi ) to play and compile AOSP, for now i do this with Kubuntu dual boot on my laptop. if i put a litghweight desktop on top of szytup's image and use it with VB, that would be great.
thank you !

avary said:
actullay i was looking for something light and minimal (with GUI, or at least something like PCman FM and gedit or kedit, im not good with emac, vi ) to play and compile AOSP, for now i do this with Kubuntu dual boot on my laptop. if i put a litghweight desktop on top of szytup's image and use it with VB, that would be great.
thank you !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd use a shared folder+IDE/editor/whatever on windows. But that's just because I have so awful experiences about X in VMs, things might be better nowadays

Thanks a lot sztupy, will try it now. Sunday is enough time for testing
Each morning i have a look at XDA and you have brought out a new very helpfully posting, kernel, rom or else!
So let me ask you one question: when do YOU sleep?

avary said:
actullay i was looking for something light and minimal (with GUI, or at least something like PCman FM and gedit or kedit, im not good with emac, vi ) to play and compile AOSP, for now i do this with Kubuntu dual boot on my laptop. if i put a litghweight desktop on top of szytup's image and use it with VB, that would be great.
thank you !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The advantage of using X is that afaik guest additions has copy-paste support, that would make modifying easier.
I also plan on making some simple scripts inside the default home directory one can run to communicate with the shared folder. After that we could provide simple scripts that you only have to put inside the shared folder, which will download, modify and run the compilation.

FTDI kernel module unknown relocation

Hey guys,
I've spent a few days now researching and attempting to build the FTDI kernel module for my Archos 70b. After following this guide I managed to get a successful compilation. I uploaded it to my device (which was rooted via Paul's root and rebooted into sde). When I attempt to use insmod, I get the following error: insmod: cannot insert '/sdcard/ftdi_sio.ko': Invalid module format (-1): Exec format error. I ran 'dmesg -c' and got the following output: [ 684.472290] ftdi_sio: unknown relocation: 27. I have the usbserial module installed already as well. What is the problem here? I'm assuming by relocation it means it's loading the module into the wrong part of the address space? I could be very off I'm new to this process. I just want to thank everyone in advance for their help, this is my first post and I've used these forums extensively over the last few days. You have a great community here.
A little extra information:
I'm using the toolkit from the android-ndk-r8. My makefile looks like this:
obj-m := ftdi_sio.o
KDIR := ~/bin/gen8/archos-gpl-gen9-kernel/
PWD := $(shell pwd)
CCPATH := ~/android-ndk-r8/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin
default:
$(MAKE) ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=$(CCPATH)/arm-linux-androideabi- -C $(KDIR) M=$(PWD) modules

whistlinwilly said:
Hey guys,
I've spent a few days now researching and attempting to build the FTDI kernel module for my Archos 70b. After following this guide I managed to get a successful compilation. I uploaded it to my device (which was rooted via Paul's root and rebooted into sde). When I attempt to use insmod, I get the following error: insmod: cannot insert '/sdcard/ftdi_sio.ko': Invalid module format (-1): Exec format error. I ran 'dmesg -c' and got the following output: [ 684.472290] ftdi_sio: unknown relocation: 27. I have the usbserial module installed already as well. What is the problem here? I'm assuming by relocation it means it's loading the module into the wrong part of the address space? I could be very off I'm new to this process. I just want to thank everyone in advance for their help, this is my first post and I've used these forums extensively over the last few days. You have a great community here.
A little extra information:
I'm using the toolkit from the android-ndk-r8. My makefile looks like this:
obj-m := ftdi_sio.o
KDIR := ~/bin/gen8/archos-gpl-gen9-kernel/
PWD := $(shell pwd)
CCPATH := ~/android-ndk-r8/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin
default:
$(MAKE) ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=$(CCPATH)/arm-linux-androideabi- -C $(KDIR) M=$(PWD) modules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi !
First be sure that you have the same version kernel->module , run modinfo module.ko and vermagic need to be the same with kernel version !
- if it's ok you can try strings module.ko and than insmod module.ko !
( but can be many things wrong in your process of compiling module !!! ) Good luck ...

I can confirm that the versions are the same, I was using an incorrect version before and dmesg was complaining. I've since compiled the module for the right kernel version and now dmesg only gives me the "unknown relocation: 27" error.
I ran the strings command, it outputted over 4000 lines. I'm not quite sure what you could gain from the output but I can attached the text file I piped it to if that will be helpful.

whistlinwilly said:
I can confirm that the versions are the same, I was using an incorrect version before and dmesg was complaining. I've since compiled the module for the right kernel version and now dmesg only gives me the "unknown relocation: 27" error.
I ran the strings command, it outputted over 4000 lines. I'm not quite sure what you could gain from the output but I can attached the text file I piped it to if that will be helpful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok!
May be you have a problem when your module "export symbols" -> take a look into Module.symvers ... and see if something export !

I looked around and couldn't find Module.symvers either in the source code or on the actual device. Do you know where I might be able to find it or how I can create the file myself? When the module is compiled, make throws a warning about not being able to find it. I think this is the problem.

whistlinwilly said:
I looked around and couldn't find Module.symvers either in the source code or on the actual device. Do you know where I might be able to find it or how I can create the file myself? When the module is compiled, make throws a warning about not being able to find it. I think this is the problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi !
...maybe it help you => http://tldp.org/LDP/lkmpg/2.6/html/lkmpg.html
( module.symvers is created after you run make ( for make module) in directory where you compile module )

I'm not quite sure I understand. I get a warning
WARNING: Symbol fakepath/kernel/Module.symvers
is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.
when I run make in the modules folder. There IS a file created called Module.symvers after I run make, but it is empty; I'm assuming its just a copy of whatever Module.symvers file it is actually looking for.
Has anyone compiled the archos gen9 kernel that might have created this file and can pass it along to me?

whistlinwilly said:
A little extra information:
I'm using the toolkit from the android-ndk-r8. My makefile looks like this:
obj-m := ftdi_sio.o
KDIR := ~/bin/gen8/archos-gpl-gen9-kernel/
PWD := $(shell pwd)
CCPATH := ~/android-ndk-r8/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin
default:
$(MAKE) ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=$(CCPATH)/arm-linux-androideabi- -C $(KDIR) M=$(PWD) modules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi whistlinwilly
Are you sure you've grabbed the right kernel source - your KDIR says gen9, if your compiling for the 70b you probably need the gen8 kernel source code as I think it's on the Gen8 product line
you can check which kernel version you have by running the following from a command prompt.
Code:
adb shell uname -a
Hope that helps

Hey whistlinwilly,
i don't know if you were successful in the meantime, but here's what i suggest for simple kernel module compilation...
You might refer to my custom kernel thread and check my toolchain, which is ready to rock (only 32bit linux right now):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328027
To compile custom kernel/modules only, look here as well:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=19134490&postcount=8
The archos specific toolchain uses uclibc and is used for kernel and userland.
So if you use stock kernel, but choose a different toolchain (e.g. libc based) to compile your modules, you might run into trouble at some point.
BTW, is it correct that you talk about this device:
http://www.archos.com/products/ta/archos_70b/index.html?country=de&lang=de
Not sure which family it exactly belongs to
If you're talking about this one:
http://www.archos.com/products/ta/archos_70it2/index.html?country=de&lang=de
...the kernel should be 2.6.35 then.
http://gitorious.org/archos/archos-gpl-gen9-kernel
I'm not aware of any config for the A70IT2 though.
Please refer to trevd's suggestion and find out your kernel release first...
Good luck!
scholbert

I had the same problem (Relocation error: 27) when trying to compile a custom kernel module for my Moto xoom running Honeycomb.
I was able to compile successfully by rolling back to Android NDK 5b. I also had to force the vermagic string to read ARMv7 so I know this isn't the right way to solve the problem, but when I compiled with the 5b toolchain, the relocation error goes away and I am able to insmod without error on the tablet.
I would love to know why this works and the right way to get NDK 7 to work with this, if anyone can shed some light??
EDIT:
On further digging and testing- I realize it is not necessarily NDK 5b, but rather the toolchain "arm-eabi-4.4.0" as opposed to using the "arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3" toolchain, that makes the difference with the "unknown relocation 27" error. It just so happens that NDK 5b is the last NDK that shipped with both toolchains, AFAIK.
It still for some reason likes to compile under ARMv5 unless I force it to use ARMv7 but this issue is probably unrelated- I didn't mean to confuse things with the ARM v5/v7 versus NDKr5 /NDKr7 which don't correlate...
Anyway I hope this helps, or maybe someone else who knows more can help us both!

Well, I solved my toolchain issue- I just needed to add an EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fno-pic to get the arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3 toolchain to compile without seeing an unknown relocation error on the tablet.
Hope this helps someone!

the_zuck said:
Well, I solved my toolchain issue- I just needed to add an EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fno-pic to get the arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3 toolchain to compile without seeing an unknown relocation error on the tablet.
Hope this helps someone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a million, finally got past the relocation 27 error now. Insmod doesn't complain anymore and the drivers load successfully, now to just figure out why I'm getting a backtrace on device insertion.
Thanks for solving my major headache tho

Exec format error
the_zuck said:
Well, I solved my toolchain issue- I just needed to add an EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fno-pic to get the arm-linux-androideabi-4.4.3 toolchain to compile without seeing an unknown relocation error on the tablet.
Hope this helps someone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for the answer. My first post here.
After this got solved. I still have "Exec format error". And! and no errors are display in dmesg. Are there any other places where the error might be displayed? I just created a simple printk("hello world") project.
If i remove the printk it doesn't show the error.
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I dabbled my self to the brink of madness to solve this. I couldn't find a solution anywhere. Finally solved it after 6 weeks of my time. Probably my boss at work will not be happy if he finds I was working on this instead of working.
And I find the solution here 2 days after I solved it. WOW!!!:crying::crying:
But my saga still continues...

[Guide] Building from sources [Kernel only for now]

Hello everyone.
This guide will help you in building a kernel from source for your Nexus 10
Later, when 4.2 hits AOSP, i'll add a guide for building that too
You will need a computer running Linux / OSX to build the kernel, natively, or via a VM.
This guide assumes you’re running any Linux distro.
Getting a toolchain:
You need a toolchain to build the kernel.
The preferred one is Google’s toolchain, the same they use to build AOSP.
In a terminal, type:
Code:
git clone [url]https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/[/url]
export PATH=$PATH:$(pwd)/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/bin
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-androideabi-
TIp: paste the export statements in your ~/.bashrc to have them exported each login.
Getting the kernel source:
The kernel source for Nexus devices is available from Google’s servers.
Source : https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/exynos
Github Mirror: https://github.com/chirayudesai/android_kernel_exynos
Open the terminal, and type the below commands to get the kernel source on your computer.
Code:
mkdir -p android/kernel
cd android/kernel
For Nexus 10, we get the exynos kernel sources.
Code:
git clone [url]https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/exynos[/url]
Next, we change our directory to the newly fetched source.
Type
Code:
cd exynos
Figuring out what to build:
Now, we need to figure out which revision to build.
You need to be exactly sure about this, otherwise there are chances that the compiled kernel won’t work.
The commit to build upon can be found by a few ways.
To get the kernel sources matching the device tree, type the below in the device tree.
Code:
git log kernel
Then type the below in the kernel tree
Code:
git checkout <commit>
The commit of the version running on the current review units is 52f6ab1 (probably), which is same as branch android-exynos-manta-3.4-jb-mr1-fr .
Compiling:
Name of defconfig: manta_defconfig
cd to the directory of the kernel source, then type the below in a terminal.
Code:
export ARCH=arm
export SUBARCH=arm
Code:
make <name_of_defconfig>
make
The kernel image will be ready at arch/arm/boot/zImage
To flash it, you need to make it into a boot.img, more on that later. when we have more sources.

Nice work, it's been nice to see some instructions on building additional kernel modules too.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Great guide! I look forward to seeing your tutorial on compiling 4.2 from source .
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium

Super awesome! I'm currently thoroughly:good: learning the rom building process with my nexus... ill get to this!

looking forward towards the development

Great! This is very helpful and useful

hey man, i got stuck at this point
Code:
git log kernel
it gives me this error
Code:
fatal: ambiguous argument 'kernel': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
didn't really get that point... thanks :good:

matt95 said:
hey man, i got stuck at this point
Code:
git log kernel
it gives me this error
Code:
fatal: ambiguous argument 'kernel': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
didn't really get that point... thanks :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has to be typed in the device tree, which hasn't hit AOSP yet, but should soon.
Sent from my GT-P1000

cdesai said:
It has to be typed in the device tree, which hasn't hit AOSP yet, but should soon.
Sent from my GT-P1000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, now i get this :good:

i was able to make a build tonight from aosp, waiting for my device to arrive & then ill be able to test. but as far as i could tell the output sizes were pretty on compared to the factory image files i extracted http://renzy.me/aoi
...just realized i didnt extract proprietary binaries.

Hello, Cdesai.
Thanks for your guide!
I will do my best to learn it.

so you say that you need to make the zImage into a boot.img (being a noob about this...) on my SGSII, I can flash zImages and boot.img, so I'm confused, lol

jrod091 said:
so you say that you need to make the zImage into a boot.img (being a noob about this...) on my SGSII, I can flash zImages and boot.img, so I'm confused, lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think it depends on how youre flashing. with the sgsii youre prob using odin/heimdall & it might just overwrite the kernel. flashing with fastboot might require the boot.img cause it contains a ramdisk image after the kernel & is writing a partition. thats just my guess at least, someone else might have a better/more accurate answer for ya

renzyyy said:
i think it depends on how youre flashing. with the sgsii youre prob using odin/heimdall & it might just overwrite the kernel. flashing with fastboot might require the boot.img cause it contains a ramdisk image after the kernel & is writing a partition. thats just my guess at least, someone else might have a better/more accurate answer for ya
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah that's true, but for instance with HTC S-OFFed devices you don't even need to flash the boot.img....

cdesai said:
... To flash it, you need to make it into a boot.img, more on that later. when we have more sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can extract the contents from the factory image & use getramdisk.py to get the ramdisk.img out of the current boot.img (or use this ramdisk.img)
then once youve compiled the kernel successfully, use mkbootimg from android_bootimg_tools.tar.gz to repack your boot.img.
if you want to just test...
fastboot boot [new-boot.img]
and flash if satisfied...
fastboot flash boot [new-boot.img]
just tested out if anyone wants some verification... screenshot

@cdesai, shouldn't we be using arm-eabi- instead of arm-linux-androideabi- as CROSS_COMPILE
Code:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6/
export PATH=$PATH:$(pwd)/arm-eabi-4.6/bin
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
Building with arm-linux-androideabi- causes issues with kernel modules... here's an example of such an issue https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/android-kernel/dzEIOVuxtEo
And the most updated kernel branch is android-exynos-manta-3.4-jb-mr1 not android-exynos-manta-3.4-jb-mr1-fr

Is there any chance of this becoming an OC kernel in the future?

craigacgomez said:
@cdesai, shouldn't we be using arm-eabi- instead of arm-linux-androideabi- as CROSS_COMPILE
Code:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-eabi-4.6/
export PATH=$PATH:$(pwd)/arm-eabi-4.6/bin
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
Building with arm-linux-androideabi- causes issues with kernel modules... here's an example of such an issue https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/android-kernel/dzEIOVuxtEo
And the most updated kernel branch is android-exynos-manta-3.4-jb-mr1 not android-exynos-manta-3.4-jb-mr1-fr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I couldn't get md4 and cifs modules to load with arm-linux-androideabi-4.6:
<3>[ 1250.492203] md4: unknown relocation: 27
<4>[ 1260.230901] cifs: Unknown symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ (err 0)
However, with this:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilt
export PATH=$PATH:$PWD/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.4.3/bin
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
The modules load okay:
[email protected]:/mnt/shell/emulated/0 # lsmod
cifs 269223 0 - Live 0x00000000
md4 3442 0 - Live 0x00000000
(Now I have to work out why neither mount nor cifsmanager are working as expected...)

sam3000 said:
Yes, I couldn't get md4 and cifs modules to load with arm-linux-androideabi-4.6:
<3>[ 1250.492203] md4: unknown relocation: 27
<4>[ 1260.230901] cifs: Unknown symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ (err 0)
However, with this:
git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilt
export PATH=$PATH:$PWD/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.4.3/bin
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-
The modules load okay:
[email protected]:/mnt/shell/emulated/0 # lsmod
cifs 269223 0 - Live 0x00000000
md4 3442 0 - Live 0x00000000
(Now I have to work out why neither mount nor cifsmanager are working as expected...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the reason... busybox needs to be patched... i guess it's something new in 3.4.5 kernel... I haven't done the patch yet
https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/commit/f66041febdb07d13a158dab5da901d208cf4fff9

craigacgomez said:
I know the reason... busybox needs to be patched... i guess it's something new in 3.4.5 kernel... I haven't done the patch yet
https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/commit/f66041febdb07d13a158dab5da901d208cf4fff9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had actually just got to the point of realising I could make it work by explicitly setting the unc path in mount command options. The missing patch would explain it.

Terminal binaries

So I must be missing something here. On armel devices, a very simple (unrar compiled from source) binary would run as long it was properly built for armel.. This doesn't seem to be the case for x86_64. What am I missing? I even tried a x86-32 build (despite uname -a saying it is indeed running on x86_64). Any pointers? I usually bring aria2, 7z, and unrar at the very least.. 7z is a bit more complicated than unrar due to it not being a static binary. Despite the awesome X86ness, this phone is irritating; over-willingly catering to stupidity it seems.. Lollipop is awful.

At least it should give you some error message...

data/local/unrar <
tmp-mksh: /data/local/unrar: not found
data/local/bin/unrar <
tmp-mksh: /data/local/bin/unrar: No such file or directory
This is all the error I get. The second output is where the correct location of the file, the first input is just to show the difference between an incorrect location and the binary failing to run. I'm a bit rusty but I believe this is similar behavior to trying to run an armel compiled program that relies on external libraries.

So I just tried aria2 pre-built for android to see if it had an x86 variant. To my surprise, it ran.. To my further surprise:
Compiler: gcc 4.9 20140827 (prerelease)
built by x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
targetting arm-unknown-linux-androideabi
on Feb 23 2015 23:55:54
System: Linux 3.10.20-x86_64_moor-g9f2abf6 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 15 16:07:23 CST 2015 armv7l
Yeah, you see that target? Or perhaps the bit at the end? ARM, yet my device is clearly x86_64. Should I be pissed or impressed? Perhaps this is a Term em thing? Couldn't mount loop device either.. But that's a tangent. I really wish this phone ran Ubuntu. I'm going to try compiling unrar for armel, it'll probably run.. While x86 won't.. That'll piss me off. I knew I recognized that "No such file or directory" error..

Ugh, I forgot about PIE requirements for lolli. (Un)fortunately, unrar works (armel)... But both (armel) 7z and par2 throw an error about not being PIE. Again, unrar for _compiled for armel_ works, while x86_64 does not. Also, there's an entire folder for doppelganger armel libs in /system/lib/ . I though I bought an Intel-based device, not an Intel based armel emulator. It's so irritating how many layers of junk are added to formerly decent OS/UIs just to cater to windowlickers..

Like anyone cares.. heh. I managed to bork up my linker binary by trying to remove PIE check.. Whoops, kind of essential.. Result is same as when I try to run x86_64 compiled programs. Adorable. I fixed it by booting into the fugazi-CWM for this phone (that does not have root access?!).. creating a flashable zip that restored previous linker binary.. but not before having to find a proper x86 binary-updater binary that wasn't a script (SuperSU you sneaky).

Blades said:
So I must be missing something here.
I even tried a x86-32 build (despite uname -a saying it is indeed running on x86_64). Any pointers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any further discovery ?
I'd need some binaries working inside ZE551ML terminal (ssh sessions)... for instance:
zip/unzip (full), rar/unrar, md5deep, dcfldd, nano, ...
Is there any way statically compiled ones from a std linux x86_64 distro will work ?
Any hint/guide to cross compile for Intel and not for ARM ?
Thanks

I also tried to remove PIE security check and phone would boot into recovery. I was trying to disable cellular radiomodem and bins were not executing.
You only need to replace linker file with oem to boot again.