Develop Bugs

Questions about porting Froyo to Desire and porting in general

The last couple of hours I've been frantically trying to cook together a working ROM.
So far, this is what i've done:
*Replacing 2.6.33 kernel with Paul's "Custom Kernel" which is 2.6.29.
*Replacing&editing init scripts
Especially with the init scripts, my question is, are these the main parts of concern regarding a port?
In other words, am i on the right track, or is this much harder than i think? :S
Btw i don't think i'll get done with this before a ROM gets released, its just for interests sake

I thought the main problem was Froyo needing a 2.6.33 kernel and having to port Desire specific code into a 2.6.33 kernel so replacing it with 2.6.29 wouldn't work

Se the other froyo thread, I posted some quick instructions on how to boot a semi-working rom. There's no service and graphics are glitchy, also no wifi but that is just a matter of copying the right module, I didn't bother doing that.
There should be no dependency on a specific kernel version, but 2.6.33 is faster. I have also been trying to port cyanogen's 2.6.33 kernel but it's not as easy as it seems, there are many caveats and it did not boot yet.

deovferreira said:
Se the other froyo thread, I posted some quick instructions on how to boot a semi-working rom. There's no service and graphics are glitchy, also no wifi but that is just a matter of copying the right module, I didn't bother doing that.
There should be no dependency on a specific kernel version, but 2.6.33 is faster. I have also been trying to port cyanogen's 2.6.33 kernel but it's not as easy as it seems, there are many caveats and it did not boot yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could the fact that MoDaCo's boot.img from rootedupdate.zip works, be related to it having an extra stage attached besides kernel and ramdisk?

I tried unpacking & repacking the boot.img you mention. And it doesn't boot

deovferreira said:
Se the other froyo thread, I posted some quick instructions on how to boot a semi-working rom. There's no service and graphics are glitchy, also no wifi but that is just a matter of copying the right module, I didn't bother doing that.
There should be no dependency on a specific kernel version, but 2.6.33 is faster. I have also been trying to port cyanogen's 2.6.33 kernel but it's not as easy as it seems, there are many caveats and it did not boot yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you post a link to this kernel?
I have managed to make it boot other kernels, by writing my own boot.img packing scripts.
edit: uploaded wrong file -_-

froyo kernel is 2.6.32
i'm almost sure this is the source code http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/android-msm-2.6.32-nexusonec
cyanogen have also used 2.6.34

Kali- said:
froyo kernel is 2.6.32
i'm almost sure this is the source code http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/android-msm-2.6.32-nexusonec
cyanogen have also used 2.6.34
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the link.
So, as the Desire source code is available, it's mainly a matter of porting kernel code? What about RIL and "acoustic" libraries htc ? hmm.... When i booted Froyo with r1.1 MCR custom kernel, 3G/EDGE and calling worked fine. There was graphic glitches though. Framebuffer port?

gr0gmint said:
Thanks for the link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i made a mistake,
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/android-msm-2.6.32
this is "probably" the right kernel (with few patch to bcm 4329 wifi) i have just compared to the nexus config.gz (2.6.32.9, CFQ Scheduler ...)
sorry but there is no froyo tag in the git

[HOWTO] tun.ko to run OpenVPN on Froyo xxJPK Galaxy S I9000

NOTE: there is no guarantee this will work, because without access to the corresponding kernel source I can't be sure. It may wipe out your device if there's memory corruption! You're warned, use it only at your risk!!
Over the last weekend I wanted to familiarize with the arm assembly, buildsystem, SDK so I created a tun.ko module for kernel running in the JPK ROM. But lots of the time was also wasted trying to guess their config (things like disabled DMABOUNCE and removal of the dummy they added in 2.6.29 from struct net_device, I hope I got it all right).
I encourage to release the kernel source along with the ROM images in the future (it'd be much simpler if there was a git tree that they can just tag with the name of the ROM), and to include the tun device into the modules/tun/tun.c (as in the tarball) so that it is included by default in the future. I won't be doing this process again.
I had to install openvpn with the openvpn installer a second time with openvpn in xbin, busybox in xbin/bb and I created the bb directory and two symlinks from xbin/bb/{ifconfig,route} to xbin/busybox (after mounting /system rw). The DNS to change during VPN must be set by long pressing on the left of the openvpn config slot in the OpenVPN settings GUI.
The tun.ko I keep it in /sdcard/openvpn/tun.ko and the path has to be configured in the openvpn settings advanced settings menu and I choose to load it with insmod.
This JPK rom works great for me, so I'll likely keep using it for a long while now that I've got openvpn running fine.
252ae6e655fa08774f32f67dd76dad3a tun.ko
EDIT: the same tun.ko module works for JPM too

Great job!!!
I use vpnc daily, so I couldn't even think to upgrade to JPK without an available tun module.. now I can!
Would you share your .config, so other devs can use it? Maybe we can hope in a Froyo-voodoo in a short time..

I'm confirming that it works.
Here is how I did it (I garantee that THIS IS NOT THE MOST ELEGANT WAY to make it work)
Install Openvpn from Openvpn Installer
openvpn in /system/xbin
route and ifconfig in /system/bin
At this point, Openvpn could connect and create a tun device, but route are not pushed so it's not very usefull
So, I downloaded this version of Openvpn
http://github.com/downloads/fries/android-external-openvpn/openvpn-static-2.1.1.bz2
As superuser
Code:
su
I remounted in rw /system
Code:
mount -o remount,rw /system
I renamed /system/xbin/openvpn into openvpn_old
Code:
mv /system/xbin/openvpn /system/xbin/openvpn_old
I put that new openvpn binary in /system/xbin
I created symlinks from /system/bin/route and ifconfig to /system/xbin
Code:
ln -s /system/bin/route /system/xbin/route
ln -s /system/bin/ifconfig /system/xbin/ifconfig
I also created a symlink os /system/xbin to /system/xbin/bb, just in case
Code:
ln -s /system/xbin /system/xbin/bb
Here we go

captive said:
Would you share your .config, so other devs can use it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
i tried to complie cifs.ko and tun.ko for the JPC kernel and couldnt get it to work. i ultimately went back to eclair because of this so would like to be able to compile modules and other filesystem support.
thanks.

kanemari said:
+1
i tried to complie cifs.ko and tun.ko for the JPC kernel and couldnt get it to work. i ultimately went back to eclair because of this so would like to be able to compile modules and other filesystem support.
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
config attached, but the config is not enough and it may not be fully correct (it is enough as far as the data structures used by tun.ko are concerned, I checked them all against the zImage assembly). The diff of the v2.1 image, has to be applied too but with DMABOUNCE removed from Kconfig of the subarch of the galaxy as far as I can tell and the placeholder added to struct net_device in their v2.1 diff, has to be removed too. cifs.ko may be more complicated than tun, good luck. Unless you've personal interest to familiarize with the enviroment and the arm assmbly like I had, I would wait the source to released, it has to be released eventually to comply with the GPLv2.

Thankyou Newmail!!
I've tryed VPNC 0.99 and works great!!
You have only to type from terminal: insmod /system/folder/tun.ko
After that you can use VPNC...
I've found an issue with the FQDN of the VPN gateway... solved setting the IP address
Just a question:
when I'll update my JPK.. what I have to do to recompile the tun.ko?
Can you write here the procedure?
Cheers
Paolo

newmail said:
config attached, but the config is not enough and it may not be fully correct (it is enough as far as the data structures used by tun.ko are concerned, I checked them all against the zImage assembly). The diff of the v2.1 image, has to be applied too but with DMABOUNCE removed from Kconfig of the subarch of the galaxy as far as I can tell and the placeholder added to struct net_device in their v2.1 diff, has to be removed too. cifs.ko may be more complicated than tun, good luck. Unless you've personal interest to familiarize with the enviroment and the arm assmbly like I had, I would wait the source to released, it has to be released eventually to comply with the GPLv2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, but is the placeholder field at the end of the net_device struct?
If so it shouldn't matter and a module cross compiled from the 2.6.29 source should be OK. The absence of DMABOUNCE shouldn't matter for tun.ko either.
In theory you should be able to clone the AOSP git kernel repo and use that kernel for building a module, as long as the module itself doesn't actually use changes that have been made by Samsung (unlikely).
The .config used probably does deserve some attention though, as you have done.

foloap said:
Thankyou Newmail!!
I've tryed VPNC 0.99 and works great!!
You have only to type from terminal: insmod /system/folder/tun.ko
After that you can use VPNC...
I've found an issue with the FQDN of the VPN gateway... solved setting the IP address
Just a question:
when I'll update my JPK.. what I have to do to recompile the tun.ko?
Can you write here the procedure?
Cheers
Paolo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad it works great for you too. So the tun.ko has to be recompiled if they alter .config. It may work but it's not guaranteed. The procedure is nasty and hard to document and I don't have enough time for that sorry. But I'm sure we'll get the source when there will be an official Froyo release that is shipped to all phones so I wouldn't worry.

raven-au said:
OK, but is the placeholder field at the end of the net_device struct?
If so it shouldn't matter and a module cross compiled from the 2.6.29 source should be OK. The absence of DMABOUNCE shouldn't matter for tun.ko either.
In theory you should be able to clone the AOSP git kernel repo and use that kernel for building a module, as long as the module itself doesn't actually use changes that have been made by Samsung (unlikely).
The .config used probably does deserve some attention though, as you have done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The .config is the fundamental part, and it may be enough I'm not sure. There was a placeholder was a samsung customization done in the middle of net_device and that was removed in the Froyo ROM (initially I applied it). the DMABOUNCE removal affects the struct device that is part of net_device so a lot of stuff goes off by 4 bytes by tweaking that arch config option. That gets set in some Kconfig patched in by samsung. You're right that probably tun isn't affected by the DMABOUNCE but I tried to get the net_device size right (just in case) and it may affect other net modules.

Hi newmail, thanks so much for the tun.ko file, this is the first time I've managed to get VPNC working on my SGS!! One question though, I find I'm having to run insmod everytime I reboot the phone to make tun.ko available again, does anyone know if there's a way around this please so it stays permanently available? Many thanks!!

@bdl1969
I made a subdir in /system/lib called "modules" and placed my tun.ko there.
Now it's insmodded automagically..

newmail said:
The .config is the fundamental part, and it may be enough I'm not sure. There was a placeholder was a samsung customization done in the middle of net_device and that was removed in the Froyo ROM (initially I applied it). the DMABOUNCE removal affects the struct device that is part of net_device so a lot of stuff goes off by 4 bytes by tweaking that arch config option. That gets set in some Kconfig patched in by samsung. You're right that probably tun isn't affected by the DMABOUNCE but I tried to get the net_device size right (just in case) and it may affect other net modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh crap, that is bad news.
Then both the DMABOUNCE and the net_device are likely a problem.
That's a stupid way of doing things.

raven-au said:
Oh crap, that is bad news.
Then both the DMABOUNCE and the net_device are likely a problem.
That's a stupid way of doing things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The smart way of doing things I already mentioned in the first post (public git tree tagged at every ROM release .

captive said:
@bdl1969
I made a subdir in /system/lib called "modules" and placed my tun.ko there.
Now it's insmodded automagically..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm I tried and it didn't work for me... are you sure? openvpn GUI runs insmod for me so it's no big deal.

That worked great for me, thanks for the suggestion! The only problem I found was that it caused my Good for Enterprise app to crash so I uninstalled and reinstalled it and then it was all fine. Only problem I'm left with now is when using VPNC, I make the VPN connection fine but I can't disconnect via the app, I have to bounce the network connection (eg. toggle WiFi) to drop the tunnel!

I compiled tun.ko using the 2.6.32 kernel from android git and your .config, but it won't load with dmesg saying "Unknown symbol mem_map". May I ask which kernel version did you use, and what arm toolchain are you using?

sztupy said:
I compiled tun.ko using the 2.6.32 kernel from android git and your .config, but it won't load with dmesg saying "Unknown symbol mem_map". May I ask which kernel version did you use, and what arm toolchain are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably you have discontigmem off in the .config. The platform of the galaxy isn't in the android kernel, it's in arch/arm/plat-s5pc11x (it's the thing that sets DMABOUNCE in v2.1 roms and I guess it doesn't on the JPK kernel).
You need to make a diff between android 2.6.29 and their tree, and apply it to the 2.6.32 kernel, then you need to solve enough rejects so that it can build external module. I didn't port the whole diff of course, just enough so make can start with the headers and .config all right. Then I built the module externally (adding the tun/ directory to their modules/ directory) but it should also work with just make modules setting CONFIG_TUN=m if you want to build it in-tree.
It's a bit tricky.. If you really need I can give you the broken diff to apply to the 2.6.32.9 android kernel. That is enough to build some module including tun.ko

newmail said:
Probably you have discontigmem off in the .config. The platform of the galaxy isn't in the android kernel, it's in arch/arm/plat-s5pc11x (it's the thing that sets DMABOUNCE in v2.1 roms and I guess it doesn't on the JPK kernel).
You need to make a diff between android 2.6.29 and their tree, and apply it to the 2.6.32 kernel, then you need to solve enough rejects so that it can build external module. I didn't port the whole diff of course, just enough so make can start with the headers and .config all right. Then I built the module externally (adding the tun/ directory to their modules/ directory) but it should also work with just make modules setting CONFIG_TUN=m if you want to build it in-tree.
It's a bit tricky.. If you really need I can give you the broken diff to apply to the 2.6.32.9 android kernel. That is enough to build some module including tun.ko
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'd be great. I've already tried to do the patching. It compiles, but crashes the phone when loaded. Maybe your version is a bit better.

sztupy said:
It'd be great. I've already tried to do the patching. It compiles, but crashes the phone when loaded. Maybe your version is a bit better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you find the source now that JPM has been released officially with Kies? I upgraded to JPM now, in the hope we get the source....
BTW, my tun.ko and my rfs_async.ko also works fine on JPM. I don't know about my ext4 build but I assume that will work too.
I used one CSC of this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=802909 and I deleted the KOR /efs/nv_data* created by the JPK ROM (leaving the .nv_data.bak*). So with this combination of CSC from that thread, and MODEM and PDA from the JPM rar, I apparently restored the original product_id (SGSToolbox also says I'm back to the original product_id). Not that product_id matters but I thought I'd try that next time I flashed and apparently it worked fine...

newmail said:
Did you find the source now that JPM has been released officially with Kies? I upgraded to JPM now, in the hope we get the source....
BTW, my tun.ko and my rfs_async.ko also works fine on JPM. I don't know about my ext4 build but I assume that will work too.
I used one CSC of this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=802909 and I deleted the KOR /efs/nv_data* created by the JPK ROM (leaving the .nv_data.bak*). So with this combination of CSC from that thread, and MODEM and PDA from the JPM rar, I apparently restored the original product_id (SGSToolbox also says I'm back to the original product_id). Not that product_id matters but I thought I'd try that next time I flashed and apparently it worked fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The JPM source was avialable for a few hours on the samsung's site, did grap it. You can find it on megaupload somewhere. I couldn't manage to compile a working module from that source either (it now loads fine, but does a kernel panic when I try to mount a loop device formatted with ext4), but I'm sure that's my fault.

[Q] Google goggles ipv6

Hi all,
I have Fat Free Froyo installed with the latest 14th Jan 2011 kernel voguimg-240x320-2.6.32-froyo-14-01-11_14.nbh edited to froyo & panel type 2 from t029000.massey.ac.nz but Google Goggles needs ipv6 support.
Is this a kernel problem or a problem with the build itself? I am experienced in linux, so can modprobe or insmod the ipv6.ko but I don't know where to get it from
Any help would be appreciated!

(message for kernel's developers) take this man! he can dev ipv6!

Jumping the gun there a bit
I triage bugs and work on stuff for Ubuntu. Have also ported a few linux bits to ppc64 (PlayStation 3).
I'm pinching the ipv6.ko from slayhers latest kernel build, hopefully that will work insmod-ding or modprobing it into the kernel thru the terminal on the Kaiser itself.
So, fingers crossed, this may be solved in 5 minutes!!

Didn't work, it must be compiled for a different platform...
Anyone have or know where to get a kernel for the Kaiser with ipv6 support, or failing that the correctly built ipv6.ko for the Kaiser so that it can be insmodded?

Getting it compiled in the kernel is the easy bit, although it does use up a lot of space which is limited in the kaiser's kernel so a little tweaking is needed. Getting it to work with the Kaiser's modem and the builds we currently use is a different matter unfortunately. It will take a bit of modding for it to work but it's more then achievable with a bit of free time. Wish i could buy that stuff!!If i get a chance i will get you the ipv6 module for the kaiser's kernel or a kernel with support for it so you can have a play.

I definitely look forward to it! If I knew how and what to modify I'd do it myself, but I thought arch-specific kernels had to be compiled on the arch itself? If that's the case, I can see how free time would be needed, it'd take hours or days to compile the linux kernel at 400MHz
I have compiled kernels before so if/when I learn how to do it myself, I could start to use my own git repo for more recent daily builds or something.
I'm also thinking about starting working on some *buntu stuff (I know Ubuntu is there for the Kaiser, but soem tweaks would help if I get a chance.)

Hmm, a little Googling goes a long way http://www.androidonhtc.com/wiki/Get_Involved << was hard to find that,so hopefully I can add ipv6 somewhere in the 'make menuconfig' options for the kernel.
Are the standard kernel options used by "make vogue_defconfig" ok to use, i.e. will it build a normal useable kernel so that everything works?

xteejx said:
Hmm, a little Googling goes a long way http://www.androidonhtc.com/wiki/Get_Involved << was hard to find that,so hopefully I can add ipv6 somewhere in the 'make menuconfig' options for the kernel.
Are the standard kernel options used by "make vogue_defconfig" ok to use, i.e. will it build a normal useable kernel so that everything works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that is th correct make file to use. I have built the kernel with IPV6 support, haven't tested it but have attached the module to the post for you to try

Brilliant! I'll try it sometime within the next couple of days, although I might myself be working on a blazing fast kernel specifically for the HTC Kaiser, and it is SERIOUSLY!!!! fast, even at 400MHz I can notice a massive increase in speed with the exact same build, but I haven't economised too much.
I can see the the options for ipv6 in the ncurses menuconfig, so I guess it's just a case of enabling it and building the zImage right?
I seem to be having the old problem with the wifi though, and I know it's kernel related, but there are only patches for it, i.e. the wlan.ko, but can't see how to implement it myself so it's an all-in-one solution
When I get the hang of the Kaiser hardware properly, I might just push through a newer kernel from the armlinux site so watch this space

xteejx said:
I might myself be working on a blazing fast kernel specifically for the HTC Kaiser, and it is SERIOUSLY!!!! fast, even at 400MHz I can notice a massive increase in speed with the exact same build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How have you managed that??? What have you done?

I have no idea how it happened, perhaps the other devs add a load of useless options, but all I did was follow the instructions at that link above and compiled a zImage from the 2.6.32 arm branch, using the 2010 arm tools. Used NBHeditor to edit it for Kaiser, panel 2, froyo, flashed it and bang (not literally thank god).
I can't answer any better than that. I used the default options (for now at least) that the vogue build script uses for the kernel, but bluetooth, camera and gps work. No internet connection as yet either through the network or wifi, dumno what I've missed there, and no ipv6 (but can add that easily enough). Wifi doesn't work either, but I'm working on it, although that MAY be the reason why it's so fast...maybe it's missing a few options...still unsure at this point.
I notice that although this is an open community, and people attach NBHs, there are no changelogs or anything showing what the people have done with the kernel to implement some options, so it's kinda holding me back at the minute.

xteejx said:
I notice that although this is an open community, and people attach NBHs, there are no changelogs or anything showing what the people have done with the kernel to implement some options, so it's kinda holding me back at the minute.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That isn't true, all tested changes are pushed to git, you can see what has been changed and how from here: http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.n....git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/htc-vogue-2.6.32

*facepalm!*
Didn't see that, will bookmark it and keep an eye on it, perhaps work with it. Thanks for the link

the androidhtc.com site is not related directly to the develop project because no developer is connected to it. Also the git repository it not hosted in linux to go but on sourceforge (so download the correct git). That site is very outdated.
wifi works if you use the correct branch (on sourceforge) and modules.

Am I right in thinking that http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.n...7c0bf5edc4f5c6d64ce4df29254e8332ce26b;hb=HEAD is the prebuilt kernels and nbhs from the source at http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.n...og;h=62f075ddd13f378fd252be94c77e4f93d12584fb ??
I think I'm looking at the right tree now.
Flashing the latest NBH: VOGUIMG-320-FROYO-01-16-11.NBH still gives me the wifi error. Do I need to manually add the wlan.ko to it or ??
I could've sworn that an NBH I flashed before had all that in the NBH and it worked fine.

Ok, got it back to how I had it:
Flashed latest.NBH from http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.n...7c0bf5edc4f5c6d64ce4df29254e8332ce26b;hb=HEAD and dropped androidupdate.tgz to the /andboot folder of the SD card, installed update thru the boot menu and done.
So in reality there's nothing stopping me grabbing the same kernel source, building it and adding ipv6 support in the ncurses kernel config menu and making an NBH from it and flashing that over, and then doing the androidupdate.tgz, although I think with HTCFlasherGUI you can flash a zImage directly right??

Is there something wrong with the git at http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=androidhtc/kernel.git;a=summary I can't get access, it's showing old stuff. It looks closed since git clone rejects me

xteejx said:
Is there something wrong with the git at http://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=androidhtc/kernel.git;a=summary I can't get access, it's showing old stuff. It looks closed since git clone rejects me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, nothing wrong with it. Just do:
git clone git://androidhtc.git.sourceforge.net/androidhtc/kernel.git
You then need to set it to the correct branch using 'git checkout -b <branch you want> '
It's the 2.6.32 branch you are interested in, you can find out exactly what it's called using 'git branch -a' which will list the available branches.

Cool. Knew something went wrong somewhere, had to be me lol!
I added that ipv6.ko to the NAND via a androidupdate.tgz (only way I could do it), and it didn't work, something about incorrect module format (or something like that).
Are there any prebuilt kernels or NBHs for the Kaiser that include ipv6? Either as a module that I can insmod it in the terminal or built-in?
I hate being upstaged by people that can use Goggles without any problems.
I know slayher's kernels have ipv6, but I flashed the new stock one from http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/4434-froyo-kernels-by-slayher/ and it didn't work. I mean the kernel did, but Goggles didn't - couldn't insmod it either - same invalid module format as the ipv6.ko scooter did for me

Also the git clone didn't work:
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/name/android-git/kernel/.git/
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

[REF] Source code: Unified git repo for GT-I9000 Gingerbread kernel source

Here we go
Common gingerbread-samsung git branch for all of us
This branch contains the fixed Gingerbread source (compiling and working) everyone of us may use as reference git repository.
Fixed in this source:
- all cleaned up gitignores
- missing FSR in Makefile
Take also a look at the updated README.txt that will explain you how to compile and get it working with modules
Also: makes sure you disable, in .config:
[*] Automatically append version information to the version string in menuconfig or CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO in .config
It will help each developer to exchange patches easily because of the common starting point.
bilboa1 said:
What supercurio means, is that he's offering to have a common GIT repository for the official Samsung kernel of the GT-I9000 (and similar phones).
The GIT tree would contain only Samsung drops and possible other upstream fixes/changes (the kernel being loosely based on the Nexus S kernel, there's at least Samsung and Google as different upstream), as well as bug fixes. No new features etc except maybe Voodoo.
The advantage of that is that the ones not using GIT yet could fork it and make their own kernel variation on a STABLE base. They could also issue pull requests for fixes they made, which would profit everyone. That's the open-source spirit and way of doing things efficiently by the way.
Note that the current GIT already contains fixes for compiling and using Samsung's GB sources with Samsung's firmwares (and binary modules).
I certainly support this idea.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you can fork this repository:
- clone it via github directly
or, if you prefer keeping only this gingerbread branch directly, on your dev computer:
Code:
git clone git://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000.git -b gingerbread-samsung
cd linux_gt-i9000
git remote rm origin
git remote add origin git://your-new-remote-repository.git
git remote add common git://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000.git
This way, for people re-using Vodooo sound for example, it will be as easy as:
Code:
git fetch common
git merge gingerbread-voodoo-sound
If you have more idea of collaboration like that, express yourself
FAQ:
Q: Bleh! I hate this Kernel/ directory.
A: Yes, this was the case for the original commits but now it's a standard Linux repository with everything on its root.
But it didn't worked as expected, so I had to make the change, sorry for the inconvenience to the early adopters.
Q: What happens when Samsung update their source code tarballs
A: I'll update the common git repository accordingly (hopefully fast enough for you)
On your side, all you'll need to do will is.
Code:
git fetch common
− or git fetch git://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000.git
git merge gingerbread-samsung
Say good bye to messy tarballs!
PS: if you're looking to initramfs, take a shot at https://github.com/project-voodoo/samsung_initramfs − contribution welcome.

Good idea, I second that, it will be easier

wrong link
Github reads http://project-voodo.org/

What supercurio means, is that he's offering to have a common GIT repository for the official Samsung kernel of the GT-I9000 (and similar phones).
The GIT tree would contain only Samsung drops and possible other upstream fixes/changes (the kernel being loosely based on the Nexus S kernel, there's at least Samsung and Google as different upstream), as well as bug fixes. No new features etc except maybe Voodoo.
The advantage of that is that the ones not using GIT yet could fork it and make their own kernel variation on a STABLE base. They could also issue pull requests for fixes they made, which would profit everyone. That's the open-source spirit and way of doing things efficiently by the way.
Note that the current GIT already contains fixes for compiling and using Samsung's GB sources with Samsung's firmwares (and binary modules).
Forking in git hub is VERY VERY easy btw.
I certainly support this idea.

Awesome! - I also support this idea

United Galaxy S Developers
Nice idea! Perfect spirit of open source

I hope good things come out og this.

Great move Supercurio - once again !

Simply awesome men

Will the github include the multitouch fix(SGS only using two fingers rather than multiple fingers) that affects Google Maps rotation?

pikachu01 said:
Will the github include the multitouch fix(SGS only using two fingers rather than multiple fingers) that affects Google Maps rotation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The gingerbread-samsung branch promoted here will only contain Samsung kernel sources and won't interfere with other developers modifications.
Only exception is if this source is broken and needs something to work, like nikademus's patch: https://github.com/project-voodoo/linux_gt-i9000/commit/6c8f989f58999770d23236bb172c3a4e1c80586b

It seems that JVK and JVB was pulled from Kies because of an update problem. Looks like we're going to have new ROMs to play with in a week or two (maybe less)
Edit: What about the SSL fix (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1040005)

Great, good idea. That's how community development should work!

zorxd said:
Great, good idea. That's how community development should work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed! Thanks for getting things started Supercurio! Now I have to start making a Vibrant branch.

Any chance this code will boot with preempt enabled? Does the MTD driver work with the OneNAND partitions like the NS code does? I'd kind of like to get away from FSR/RFS and such....
Still cloning...

ttabbal said:
Any chance this code will boot with preempt enabled? Does the MTD driver work with the OneNAND partitions like the NS code does? I'd kind of like to get away from FSR/RFS and such....
Still cloning...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The code has many similarities with Nexus S one (build from it IMO) and is preempt too

Just a note, I had to edit the Makefile to set the crosscompile variable to the right path
Question: is the generated zImage flashable through ODIN? Don't we need to add the initramfs?

supercurio said:
The code has many similarities with Nexus S one (build from it IMO) and is preempt too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent! I just did a defconfig to check it out and saw the preempt in there.. Nice to see Samsung fixing things up a little. Now I need to get a GB ROM to install so I can try to boot.
Thanks again. I'll send a pull request when I have a Vibrant branch ready. Going for minimal modifications, fix touch button mapping and such. People can add whatever they want after that. Now I need to learn the new code tree... wheee! Hopefully the basics are the same, getting the changes into an i9k froyo kernel is pretty easy.

zorxd said:
Just a note, I had to edit the Makefile to set the crosscompile variable to the right path
Question: is the generated zImage flashable through ODIN? Don't we need to add the initramfs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will need an initramfs... anyone have a default one we can start with for 2.3?
zImage will have to be in a TAR file to flash with Odin. Heimdall can flash a bare zImage, as can the SGS Kernel Flasher tool for Android.
Oh... think I saw a setting in "make menuconfig" for the cross-compiler prefix. Might be able to avoid Makefile mods....

Sorry for the newb question, but how do we generate the initramfs? I guess we could take the one from stock JVB. But how do we extract it and how do we combine our compiled kernel with it?
On a side note, I noticed that CFQ is the default scheduler. Isn't it better to use No-op for flash memory?

[DEV][Kernel] Newer Kernel for Galaxy Tab P1000

Hi fellows,
I was thinking, why should we stuck on 2.6.35 kernel? If we want to have a possibility to update our devices, we must have our kernels up-to-date, right?
Last night, I did a couple of scripts that can generate patches from a git tree from a start commit until an end commit. And another that can apply these patches to another tree and list the ones that wasn't applied correctly.
So, I thought if I get all patches from, let's say, 2.6.38 android kernel_common tree from 2.6.35 version commit until the HEAD and apply it to our 2.6.35 kernel, then we should get something like a 2.6.38 kernel, am I right?! I know that our kernel tree is something like a Frankenstein tree, it is a 2.6.35 with some patches from newer kernels, but these patches we can just ignore.
Last time I try to update 2.6.35 to 2.6.36 using this approach, I saw that I need to apply more than 10k patches and it will take something like a day to do here in my machine. After, the patches that wasn't applied correctly should be check. So, firstly, I want to verify if anyone see something wrong in my approach, it will save me a lot of time
Let's discuss!!!
Thanks,
Ronan

Wont porting over Kernel 3.x a be a better thing
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git;a=summary
We can diff out this n our current source(2.6.35 GB Update2), and then patch

The overcome kernel is patched with latest patches (as far as I can remember) however it wont't boot therefore it had to be spoofed with 2.6.35 to get boot. Maybe Alterbridge86 can shed more light on this.

DarkPal said:
The overcome kernel is patched with latest patches (as far as I can remember) however it wont't boot therefore it had to be spoofed with 2.6.35 to get boot. Maybe Alterbridge86 can shed more light on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's right. My kernel is patched up to 2.6.35.13 BUT I have to spoof the kernel version as 2.6.35.7. I suspect no matter what you patch the kernel to, it will always need to be spoofed because of Samsung's proprietary crap. The RFS drivers, amongst other things, are proprietary so we use the precompiled modules from an existing initramfs. Obviously Samsung is using the 2.6.35.7 source, so those modules will not load if the source is reporting a higher version than 2.6.35.7.
I imagine you could patch the kernel up to whatever you want, however the hard part is getting the patches. I don't believe an incremental patch exists to go from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36, 37, etc.
The only thing I think you could do is get full source trees for 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 and then do a manual diff on them, creating your own patch, then try and patch that in to the samsung kernel source.

alterbridge86 said:
I imagine you could patch the kernel up to whatever you want, however the hard part is getting the patches. I don't believe an incremental patch exists to go from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36, 37, etc.
The only thing I think you could do is get full source trees for 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 and then do a manual diff on them, creating your own patch, then try and patch that in to the samsung kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Patches used to be availabe before kernel.org went down, i have all patches for 2.6.32.x(incremental), or maybe they are still there are i just overlooked them
Telling my point again, porting Kernel 3.0 would be better than 2.6.3x

Alterbridge86,
I wrote a script that can take all patches from a kernel tree from a specifc commit up to HEAD. It uses the log and format-patch. So, it is easy now to clone android kernel common tree, switch to, let's say, 2.3.38 branch, and take all the patches from 2.6.35 release until HEAD.
I actually got it from 2.6.36 branch (+ 11000 patches). Basically, I have the incremental patch. Now i just need some time to apply it all using another script rejecting everything that can't be patched flawlessly, built it, and verify if this "2.6.36" version works.
Now, why doesn't try 3.0? Well, i need to test the concept. The number of patches to go from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36 is more than 11000. I just can imagine how many patches exist from 2.6.35 to 3.0. I just don't have the computational power here to do this...
Anyway, I am a little out of time by now. When I have news, i will post here.
Thanks for all the advices,
Ronan
Sent from my GT-P1000L using xda premium

Bringing the thread back to life
Over days, i've tried to port 3.0, but before that, we'll have to get MTD working with 2.6.35
Tree :
https://github.com/sgt7/p1000-kernel-cm9/tree/mtd
Kernel panic
<3>[ 0.418810] samsung-onenand s5pc110-onenand: cannot get clock
<4>[ 0.418936] samsung-onenand: probe of s5pc110-onenand failed with error -2
Logs : http://pastie.org/3275285 (Thanks @ Techomancer)
Any ideas ? (havent been able to focus on this lately due to studies)

Hello, any News on porting the new Kernel?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA