screen grap solution? - Touch Pro2, Tilt 2 Windows Mobile General

doos anyone experience a screen gap where the top layer is 1-2mm away from the resistive layer? creating a spoungy feeling. i had this on my last tp2 and had it replaced bit am looking for any crazy home made solutions for my newer one :s

There's no solution because this isn't a problem per se. It's a characteristic of all resistive touch screens.

ohyeahar said:
There's no solution because this isn't a problem per se. It's a characteristic of all resistive touch screens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fair comments, but its untrue imo.
both tp2's i have had have not had this when i first received them - they both felt like capacitive screens the 2 layers were so close. it is a problem that has developed over a few weeks.

With any resistive screen, you're going to be able to feel the screen flex, especially in areas farthest from the border. This is even more noticable with large screen devices like our TP2 and the Touch HD. There's no way around it. (Our screen is basically 2 thin layers one on top of the other. The screen registers a tap in the area where these 2 layers are pushed together)
That being said, the screen flex should be noticable but not so extreme that it feels uncomfortable to use. If it's unusable, you should return it.

Related

Screen coming away from phone....

Had the TP2 for a week now, really impressed with it, but.......
the plastic screen on top of the touch sensistive screen has come away so when i click I can feel the plastic screen move about 1-2mm before it hits the touch sensitive part.
Has anyone else experienced this, if so is there a fix (heating it or something lol?) or am I in a possition to send it back?
Is this the screen protector that has come away or part of the screen itself?
If it's the screen protector that you have applied, then apparently you can take it off, wash it and air dry it then reapply. Having said that I've never managed to do it, I always end up buying a new one!
If it is part of the screen then DO NOT fiddle about with it, send it back!
I have the same problem.
In my opinion in the middle of the screen + left/right, there is less sensity than under and above he screen.
I think in this part of the screen the space between lcd and his plastic cover is bigger than elswhere.
I have tested it with resco explorer.
I have tried to marked some files from up and down and with a slightly pressure, the upper and under area recognized the input, but in the middle it does not.
Perhaps my Rhodium lacks,
and perhaps it is overstated?
No idea.
It would be nice to get some statements from you guys.
Sorry for my english
Bub3d said:
I have the same problem.
In my opinion in the middle of the screen + left/right, there is less sensity than under and above he screen.
I think in this part of the screen the space between lcd and his plastic cover is bigger than elswhere.
I have tested it with resco explorer.
I have tried to marked some files from up and down and with a slightly pressure, the upper and under area recognized the input, but in the middle it does not.
Perhaps my Rhodium lacks,
and perhaps it is overstated?
No idea.
It would be nice to get some statements from you guys.
Sorry for my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same problem as me, I don't think it was like it when I first got it, lets give it some time and see if others experience the same problem - not sure if this will be covered by warrenty or not.
same problem for me. i can press the screen for about 1-2mm down. but only in the center of the screen.
sometimes there is a click noise, when pressing the screen in the center and under the speaker at the htc logo.
did anyone send it back?
do you mean ?
Do you mean that the screen in the middle is "wobbly" ?
I think I have the same Issue In the middle it feels like if there is some space between the plastic covering the screen and the lcd.
and no, I dont have a screen protector on it atm...
This "issue" that is being discussed here is known as the screen flexing. Unfortunately, this is an attribute of all resistive touch screens.
ohyeahar said:
This "issue" that is being discussed here is known as the screen flexing. Unfortunately, this is an attribute of all resistive touch screens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im a bit relieved now. So it is normal to be like that or a problem with the screen that happens sometimes due to the nature of the resistive screen _
bonevbs said:
Im a bit relieved now. So it is normal to be like that or a problem with the screen that happens sometimes due to the nature of the resistive screen _
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's normal. All resistive touchscreens are like that (check out your/someone else's Nintendo DS, it's the same). The flexing is pretty good (ie, minimal) on the TP2. It's much worse on older generation devices.
thanks
ohyeahar said:
It's normal. All resistive touchscreens are like that (check out your/someone else's Nintendo DS, it's the same). The flexing is pretty good (ie, minimal) on the TP2. It's much worse on older generation devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the information.. I didnt knoiw that

screen not sensitive: manufacturing fault or unreal expectations ??

every review i've read online before i bought the unit was boasting about how "finger-friendly" the TP2 was, and that you could lightly swipe your finger across it to navigate the menu and that the touchscreen was very sensitive and whatnot
however after 2 weeks of use i find that to be relatively untrue. i've got to apply a fair amount of pressure on the screen to get it to register my input. of course, i'm posting this because i'm afraid that i might be damaging the screen in the process
i have no basis for comparison actually, my only 2 other touchscreen devices at home are an iphone and a cowon s9, both use capacitive screens. i always knew there was a big difference between capacitive screens and resistive screens, i just didn't know it was THIS huge. i can actually slide my finger lightly over the iphone's surface and its registered properly. the sliding probably feels smoother as its glass, but i can live with the TP2's plastic. what do you guys think ? should i get it checked out at the HTC store ?? its on the other side of town, don't wanna waste a trip as if its not a problem
oh yeah and just to get this out of the way, the screen is a membrane and not a hard surface right ?? everytime i press on the screen using my finger or the stylus, i can feel the screen slightly moving down, can also see the surface getting slightly dented at the point my finger pushes it if looking at it from a certain angle.
ps before somebody asks: i only got to test the keyboard at the telco store, some punk had cracked the screen of the display set, so i didn't know about this screen issue until i actually purchased the set
sorry for the long post, but i'd really appreciate any comments
TIA
Well, I don't have an Iphone so i can't tell you about how it compares with the TP2, however, i found the display to be much better than the one on my old XDA. It will probably never as good as a capacitive device like the touchpad on my laptop, but I found it to work very well. You have to apply a certain amount of pressue to the display, because it reacts on pressure, so I guess there is nothing wrong with that. I also see a small dent when I use the stylus and press the display. I cannot confirm the screen slightly going down when pressing it.
To summarize it, i use the Stylus 90% of the time. It glides much better on the display than my finger does so the overall experience is slightly better when using a stylus. Plus i don't get any greasy fingerprints on my display.
However the 10% I use my fingers to work on it (and 25% of that 10% is spent on polishing I found it to work pretty well, so in general I don't think that the reviews were off when it comes to finger usability.
What you are describing is probably normal. Resistive screens do require pressure. The TP2 tends to require less pressure than others, but nonetheless it does require it. There's no comparison if you compare it to a capacitive screen device because those don't require pressure at all.
The flexing of the screen that you described is something all resistive screens have. Again, if you compare the screen flex of the TP2 to earlier HTC devices, it's greatly improved.
To be on the safe side, go to a store and try out other resistive screen devices and see if you experience the same thing as your own. Then you'll know what is considered "normal".
thanks for the replies, i'll probably head down to my telco's store and see if they've replaced the display set then.
any other comments ??
You know I thought the same, waiting for a cab to increase the sensitivity because at the moment its quite annoying pressing buttons more than once...
From a few years to nowadays i´ve always used QTEK/HTC devices, my latest one is, ofcourse, HTC RHODIUM, the rom it has installed is RUU_Rhodium_HTC_PTG_1.19.410.0_Radio_Rhodium_3.44.25.27_Signed_Ship, and the screen is very sensitive and responsive, i´m just very pleased with it overall, it´s the best.
Cheers.
eXceed said:
You know I thought the same, waiting for a cab to increase the sensitivity because at the moment its quite annoying pressing buttons more than once...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you don't need .cab
just change in registry...
HKLM/drivers/Touch Driver/pressurethreshold, (default=10000)
(I might not remember perfectly, but it's something like that)
try this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=469865
this might help just re align your screen again using little pressure then your screen will not need some much pressure to work.
I have found the this not only aligns the screen but the pressure as well.
mine I just have to lightly touch it and dont have to press very much at all.
Cheers

Tilt 2 Screen Bounce

Just out of curiousity, do any of your screens have a kind of bounce or mushy feel to them when you press on them? I look at mine from the side and there is clearly a movement up and down when I push on it. I also have the screen protector on it too, but that should be firmly emplaced. It looks like from looking at it side on at the center of the screen is sort of unattached whenever I depress on it. Is this normal?
Same here
My mesage should not be to short to post now BOARD
It's perfectly normal that your touchscreen dips a little when pressed on; In fact, that's how resistive touchscreens work. From Wikipedia:
Resistive touchscreens are composed of two flexible sheets coated with a resistive material and separated by an air gap or microdots. When contact is made to the surface of the touchscreen, the two sheets are pressed together, registering the precise location of the touch. Because the touchscreen senses input from contact with nearly any object (finger, stylus/pen, palm) resistive touchscreens are a type of "passive" technology.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems to happen on all phones where the screen is on a slider. I've seen it on the Fuze and Kaiser, too.
3waygeek said:
It seems to happen on all phones where the screen is on a slider. I've seen it on the Fuze and Kaiser, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think the OP is about the screen itself, not the top half of the phones. the screen thing is inherent and i've got no issue with that, but a shifty sliding mechanism is annoying, though not present on my tp2
DaveTheTytnIIGuy said:
It's perfectly normal that your touchscreen dips a little when pressed on; In fact, that's how resistive touchscreens work. From Wikipedia:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, however, I would have thought the screen would have been a little tighter in terms of it's air gap between the resistive layer and the LCD itself. I used to have an 8525 and there was never the kind of airgap between the touch screen and the LCD at all. With this there is a noticable gap in the touch screen layer to the LCD. Especially in the middle. I just would have thought it would have been a flatter tighter stretched across the screen.

Another WP7 Hate Thread: MultiTouch

I HATE using the iphone that my friends have because i cannot use my nail. I am so used to using my nail since 2004. I wish they would have used resistive multi touch instead of capacitive.
Guess i will be keeping my TD 2 for a long long time.
Guess you are.
What's the point of this thread and why couldn't you just post your opinion in the "WP7 is complete fail" thread?
Capacitive are much better than resistive screens for touch screen phones and that's a fact(you just need to get used to them). For tablets it's the other way around.
It would be awesome if someone figured out a way to utilize both techs.
Toss3 said:
It would be awesome if someone figured out a way to utilize both techs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read through the feature list of this touchscreen technology: http://www.atmel.com/products/touchscreens/default.asp?family_id=701
The eleventh bullet point states: "Supports stylus, fingernails, and gloves". BTW this touchscreen technology is used on the HTC Droid Incredible and the HTC EVO. Maybe you could test if it works on those screens if you come across either of those phones.
Helmore said:
Read through the feature list of this touchscreen technology: http://www.atmel.com/products/touchscreens/default.asp?family_id=701
The eleventh bullet point states: "Supports stylus, fingernails, and gloves". BTW this touchscreen technology is used on the HTC Droid Incredible and the HTC EVO. Maybe you could test if it works on those screens if you come across either of those phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't work according to owners of the incredible.
There are resistive screens that support both nails and multitouch.
They are not supported by Microsoft however. But we might see them in other (e.g. Android) phones in the future.
shaundalglish said:
There are resistive screens that support both nails and multitouch.
They are not supported by Microsoft however. But we might see them in other (e.g. Android) phones in the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't expect any Android phones with resistive screens from any of the bigger Android supporters in the industry, like HTC for example. HTC has said that they learned from the HTC Tattoo to never do an Android phone with a resistive touchscreen again. It's simply too much of an inferior experience and that makes the higher cost of a capacitive touchscreen worth it.
The problem with a resistive touchscreen is that it reacts to pressure and not to contact. That's precisely what you need if you want to operate the touchscreen with your nails, but it just doesn't work well for all other touchscreen user interface manipulations. It's just a much more pleasant experience if the screen reacts to your input without having to barely do anything, it makes using the touchscreen a much more delightful experience.
Another problem with a resistive touchscreen is the fact that because it reacts to pressure, the screen need to be flexible. This means that you can't use a tempered glass screen or something similar on a resistive touchscreen device and you can't (or it's very very hard to) make a device with a touchscreen that's flush with its bezel. The former means that your screen a more prone to scratching and also that it makes the underlying screen a bit more vulnerable to damage.
Now I agree that a capacitive touchscreen also has its drawbacks, but for a mobile phone or a PMP a capacitive touchscreen and a finger friendly user interface is preferable in my opinion compared to a resistive touchscreen. There are other market segments and usage scenarios where a device with a resistive touchscreen is preferable to a capacitive touchscreen, for example in Postal Services where the mail man can collect a signature from you on his portable device that features a resistive touchscreen or in restaurants. But for a mobile phone I'd prefer a capacitive touchscreen simply because it's much easier to use and I don't need a stylus (too cumbersome) on a mobile phone.
This is not a resistive vs. capacitive discussion. I much prefer capacitive on phones, but here's a user who wants to use his fingernails. Hence I was just stating the facts: Microsoft does not support anything but capacitive, but we might see new resistive panels on other phones (that are different from and much better than what was used in the tattoo).
Whether you like resistive screens or not is another story.
xboxhaxorz said:
I HATE using the iphone that my friends have because i cannot use my nail. I am so used to using my nail since 2004. I wish they would have used resistive multi touch instead of capacitive.
Guess i will be keeping my TD 2 for a long long time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer resistive as well. I like to use my fingernail. I also like to draw and using a stylus on a resistive screen feels better.
But we're pretty much the odd men out, so we'll just have to get used to it.
gom99 said:
I prefer resistive as well. I like to use my fingernail. I also like to draw and using a stylus on a resistive screen feels better.
But we're pretty much the odd men out, so we'll just have to get used to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never used a capacative screen so I don't know if I will like it or not. I don't have fingernails but I do like using my pencil or stylus in class while doing math problems on my spacetime graphic calc software so It'll be interesting to see how I feel about a capacative screen.
Resistive great for sweaty palms
For a guy who's hands sweats alot, I actually had to give up my blackberry storm for a Touch pro 2... Now, I agree that the capacitive screen is very easy to manipulate but when my hands sweat 85% of the time, a resistive screen is a godsend. While the percentage of sweaty palms vs normal palms is probably very small, capacitive screens turn to shyte when water gets on it.... and when that happens, it's like I have a brick...i cannot do anything... even if my hands get clammy, the difficulty in typing or navigating the screen is "hair pulling" awful.
To be honest... I really love using my nails and a stylus... plus you have to admit...pullng out a touch pro 2 in a meeting and then using the stylus...It just brings a green hue to the room (envy) lol!
scattaman said:
For a guy who's hands sweats alot, I actually had to give up my blackberry storm for a Touch pro 2... Now, I agree that the capacitive screen is very easy to manipulate but when my hands sweat 85% of the time, a resistive screen is a godsend. While the percentage of sweaty palms vs normal palms is probably very small, capacitive screens turn to shyte when water gets on it.... and when that happens, it's like I have a brick...i cannot do anything... even if my hands get clammy, the difficulty in typing or navigating the screen is "hair pulling" awful.
To be honest... I really love using my nails and a stylus... plus you have to admit...pullng out a touch pro 2 in a meeting and then using the stylus...It just brings a green hue to the room (envy) lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't feel bad, I have Hyperhidrosis too. Probably the main reason I hate capacitive, anything I touch turns to a smudgy mess. I know you can use a stylus with a capacitive screen, but it really feels awkward with the 1cm^2 tip and the lack of precision of a real stylus. Also it's not contractable and easily stored in the device since it's not the norm to have a stylus with a capacitive screen.
I reckon y'all have got girl fingernails.
Come on guys, trim those nails, and would it kill you to use the fingernail brush every once in a while?
Capacitive screens Feck The World!
elyl said:
I reckon y'all have got girl fingernails.
Come on guys, trim those nails, and would it kill you to use the fingernail brush every once in a while?
Capacitive screens Feck The World!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you don't need a long fingernail to touch your fingernail against something...just turn your finger more so your nail makes contact with the surface before your tip does. Unless of course you have unsightly hands where your meaty part of your finger encapulates your fingernail.
Looks good , very well done!
I know they have resistive multi touch but its probably too expensive. I might end up switching to another company for phones and i would hate too as i have been a HTC user since the wing. The capacitive glassy feel is not for me, and a stylus is a must especially for drawing and hw recognition which the hd2 and iphone have none of.
xboxhaxorz said:
The capacitive glassy feel is not for me, and a stylus is a must
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, no stylus, no ability to use small, space efficient text....no interest.
gom99 said:
I prefer resistive as well. I like to use my fingernail. I also like to draw and using a stylus on a resistive screen feels better.
But we're pretty much the odd men out, so we'll just have to get used to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I'd also rather use my stylus because I want my phone like a mini-computer. It can't use a mouse for pin-point accuracy, but a stylus sure suffices.
I understand the world is going to capacitive touchscreens and it's a shame. I always liked resistive better. It's more accurate. I know that people want to use their finger tips to swipe and sweep and whatever, but there are plenty of limitations out there to it.
Helmore said:
Read through the feature list of this touchscreen technology: http://www.atmel.com/products/touchscreens/default.asp?family_id=701
The eleventh bullet point states: "Supports stylus, fingernails, and gloves". BTW this touchscreen technology is used on the HTC Droid Incredible and the HTC EVO. Maybe you could test if it works on those screens if you come across either of those phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wish I had 16 fingers...
You guys could always use a capacitive stylus. Remeber capacitive screen works by detecting a change of charge in the screen. Basically things that can conduct electricity should be usable as a stylus. If you're smart, you wouldn't find it hard to modify any stylus to make it work with a capacitive screen.
Else, you could buy any of the capacitive styluses online, which usually cost 3-20 dollar-ish. The fluffy tip is the best as you don't need to hold it at an angle.
I'm still waiting for my HD2 currently, and I already ordered that stylus in advance
jo_iii said:
You guys could always use a capacitive stylus. Remeber capacitive screen works by detecting a change of charge in the screen. Basically things that can conduct electricity should be usable as a stylus. If you're smart, you wouldn't find it hard to modify any stylus to make it work with a capacitive screen.
Else, you could buy any of the capacitive styluses online, which usually cost 3-20 dollar-ish. The fluffy tip is the best as you don't need to hold it at an angle.
I'm still waiting for my HD2 currently, and I already ordered that stylus in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but the capacitive stylus feels nothing like the resistive ones.

[Q] Are resistive screens dead?

Will Ms only sanction the use of capacitive screens?
imaginarynumber said:
Will Ms only sanction the use of capacitive screens?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thankfully resistive screens are a thing of the distant past. I am only too glad to never have to change another digitizer.
Ms will only sanction capacitive screens since multitouch is a requirement for OEM's
Probably. Resistive touchscreen's aren't practical for touch-friendly interfaces.
And if you want to use a stylus (with really good precision), you'll just get a screen that has a Wacom Digitizer in it, which usually also supports Capacitive touch (like the HP Touchsmart TM2).
thanks for the replies I thought that was the case but just wanted to double check.
Yeah my gf is pretty annoyed that all the new phones won't let her use her fingernails to swipe and stuff, lol.
ericc191 said:
Yeah my gf is pretty annoyed that all the new phones won't let her use her fingernails to swipe and stuff, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These days when I use my fingernail for precision on my touch diamond 2, the digitizer gets stuck to the glass. So glad that resistive touch screens are dead
For me resistive is absolutely superior because you can navigate with anything on it.
Capactive is just "stupid".
But there are styluses for capactive, right?
doministry said:
For me resistive is absolutely superior because you can navigate with anything on it.
Capactive is just "stupid".
But there are styluses for capactive, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well capacitive screens are much better than resistive and yeah there are a few styluses for capacitive screens.
Phone Titan said:
Well capacitive screens are much better than resistive and yeah there are a few styluses for capacitive screens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's an HTC one, but it looks really weird.
Link
Video Demonstration
I actually prefer the precision of the resistive screen. Sure, image quality is lower but my phone is a work tool rather than a portable dvd player or games console.
I liked being able to scrawl notes with my finger nail rather than using the (where's my screen gone) keyboard.
I had always thought that the need for the abiltiy to input "chinese" characters etc, would keep the resistive alive.
Frankly I don't see the big deal about multi-tap other than game playing
Oh well at least there will be more money for the third party companies that make replacement glass screens...
imaginarynumber said:
I actually prefer the precision of the resistive screen. Sure, image quality is lower but my phone is a work tool rather than a portable dvd player or games console.
I liked being able to scrawl notes with my finger nail rather than using the (where's my screen gone) keyboard.QUOTE]
I've always been partial to resistive for exactly those reasons. My wife says I look silly tapping on my handset with a stylus, but I don't mind looking like a geek from 2005. I always thought the sylus was the best thing about having a smartphone/PDA (OK, maybe I REALLY AM a geek). I used to have an aftermarket stylus for my PPC6700 with a minature pen hidden inside it - so I'd always have a pen handy. You'd be surprised how often that'll come in handy. And the stylus is handy whenever you need to reset anything with a recessed reset button.
I like getting the most amount of information on my screen at one time as possible, so I don't have to keep scrolling around. Working with a spreadsheet or word doc when you've got it zoomed out to 75% (on a WVGA screen like the touch pro 2) is simply not feasible with a fingertip.
Of course, larger screens will make a big difference, but it's going to be pretty d*mn hard for me to give up my stylus. Eventually I'm going to have to get with the program, but I don't have to like it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The largest screen size I have had to date was the 5" on the Ameo, albeit at a lower resolution. The smallest was the touch pro
As far as I am concerned the touchflo worked well on both and I didn't need a stylus as i had trained my finger nails. I don't believe that a capacitive screen would have improved my experience in any way
I like resistive screens did you try to brake one?
I dropped a Touch Diamond 2 of my motorbike on motorway at just over 70mph. It hit a car behind me. I stopped, spend 30 min looking for it. Found battery and phone and except all cover being broken all was fine.
Resistive screens on WM devices often s**k, probably because of the OS. On the other hand resistive screen on SE Satio is great. It is solid, not mushy, and very responsive.
The logical step for manufacturers would be to market both technologies, but current marketing trend dictates capacitive because... uh... I don't know. Most people I know can't distinguish between them anyway.
Btw, I had some capacitive phones to test and I really don't understand the hype around capacitive screens. It's like using a 5cm round mouse cursor...

Categories

Resources