Just done small comparison between 2.1 and 2.2 using linpack. On 2.1 it comes out with an average os 2.2 Mflops while on 2.2 it comes out with about 3.7 Mflops. What's everyone else getting?
I got the same scores
i heard the linpack doesnt give accurate results...i may be wrong.
have you all been able to use the Neocore(Qualcomm benchmark app) or Open GL benchmark with this new ext2 builds? all of those wrked perfectly on the older system sqsh. now i cant get them to run on this new builds with ext2. also alot of live wallpapers from b4 not wrking. anyone with any insight into this? ill do a linpack on mine device, which is basically overclocked to the max, to post what scores i get.
Hi,
Not sure if this is mean't to go in here, so apologies firstly if it isn't.
My friend has a Samsung Galaxy S Android phone and from Stock 2.1 he gets a score of about 800 from Quadrant. He looked on the forums and noticed a post for a fix to do with application lagging here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=760571
This is an APK which appears to install a EXT2 partition on the internal SD card/memory. This increased the Quadrant score to over 2100, not so far from 3 times the score without the fix. The ROM itself has not changed, he still has stock installed, but his phone was rooted to do this.
My Desire now looks feeble in comparison to the Galaxy, with a score of around 1100 in Quadrant. I am running the LeeDroid ROM and have the latest radio installed.
I don't know enough about the make up of the two phones or enough experience of Linux to know if this is possible on the Desire. If someone can get a similar performance increase in the Desire, that would be amazing.... Any ideas?
Thanks
Jason
are you using Lee's 1.9a ROM? if so, it addded a new default governeur(sp?) for setCPU that's interactive.. when you first run quadrant, it'll always show a low score cause the CPU runs slow, then ramps up as it's needed.. Run the test a few times back to back, and see the score rise. I'm getting into the mid to high 1300's steady after running it a couple times to get the CPU up there.
Have you read the FAQ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7620940&postcount=2
There he explains what this fix is and why it works and why it probably only really works on the Galaxy
PS: your Quadrant score is pretty low, I get about 1500-1600 without overclocking. However the Galaxy S haas a faster hardware.
I've recently upgraded to the ARHD 5.0.0 Rom and my Quadrant score has dropped from an average of 4800 down to an average of 3800.
I realise quadrant is not the most reliable benchmark for realworld performance but that seems like a pretty big drop.
Anyone else know what could have happened?
Thanks.
What has happened is that it's meaningless Quadrant score has dropped. I'd just ignore it altogether.
Solaris81 said:
I've recently upgraded to the ARHD 5.0.0 Rom and my Quadrant score has dropped from an average of 4800 down to an average of 3800.
I realise quadrant is not the most reliable benchmark for realworld performance but that seems like a pretty big drop.
Anyone else know what could have happened?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People are reporting lower AnTuTu scores after 1.29 so if the ROM you're using is 1.29 based what you're observing could be a result of the update. Since Nvidia's code and drivers are proprietary the devs use it pretty much as-is.
Read this...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25601709&postcount=626
And this...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1632354
As Nvidia plays around with low-level code and drivers to address battery life and fix the graphics issues they'll be tweaking the behaviour of the CPU. There were some pretty odd changes to the CPU code in the Prime while Nvidia was tackling its launch issues.
You have to do quadrant in stock rom.
On 1.26 and 1.28 stock rom it's easily around 4,600 to 4,800. Should be around the same for stock 1.29. I'll see it when I get the Asia ota.
I've tried most roms around and some of their versions are low and some after their update becomes on par with stock in terms of quadrant. It's due to the fact that they are doing heavy tweaking on the rom thus affecting performance a bit (whether for better or worse) . Good thing is they can easily rectify the problem on their next releases.
Although benchmark is not a clear indication of real world performance but it's always nice to get high scores nonetheless. Lol.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Not sure if it's just me but Geekbench results for multi-core have dropped quite significantly after the final Nougat release.
With Marshmallow it scored around 4400, with Nougat it's around 3200 which is quite a big drop.
Anyone else getting the same?
i got 3039 for pixel c and my nexus 9 got 3340. both with interactive governor. i would guess if the govenor was some performance type it would register higher numbers.
dkryder said:
i got 3039 for pixel c and my nexus 9 got 3340. both with interactive governor. i would guess if the govenor was some performance type it would register higher numbers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most devices are set to interactive anyway, that wouldn't result in such a large drop in multi-core performance.
Good to know it's not just my PIxel C.
1408 single / 3138 multi here :/
I have stuttering when scrolling on Chrome, but i didnt have this problem on MM and Remix OS
gtaadicto92 said:
1408 single / 3138 multi here :/
I have stuttering when scrolling on Chrome, but i didnt have this problem on MM and Remix OS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for testing.
I'm assuming this isn't intentional from Google.
Same here
I'm on preview 5 and I have similar geekbench results. I am running a rooted pixel c and got similar results with the performance governor as well.
Shocky2 said:
Not sure if it's just me but Geekbench results for multi-core have dropped quite significantly after the final Nougat release.
With Marshmallow it scored around 4400, with Nougat it's around 3200 which is quite a big drop.
Anyone else getting the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe GeekBench isn't tuned properly for Nougat.
brando56894 said:
Maybe GeekBench isn't tuned properly for Nougat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing the last update for it was in Feb 2016, I would say this ^ makes sense.
I just tried out photo mate r3, which has a benchmark function as well. That is a raw photo editing app. In Marshmallow the benchmark takes 33 seconds. In nougat it takes at least 45 seconds. Very similar to the drop in performance seen in Geekbench. Unless photo mate and Geekbench are doing the exact same things, this seems like a performance regression.
It got even worse with Geekbench 4. I am now clocking 1200 single core and 2400 multi-core on Nougat. The individual stats are pretty pathetic compared to other devices. I wonder what happened?
Shocky2 said:
Not sure if it's just me but Geekbench results for multi-core have dropped quite significantly after the final Nougat release.
With Marshmallow it scored around 4400, with Nougat it's around 3200 which is quite a big drop.
Anyone else getting the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the reviews. Other people are having the same issues with these benchmark apps showing lower scores that are inconsistent. I don't think the Pixel C is by itself in these crappy scores.
bluestang said:
Read the reviews. Other people are having the same issues with these benchmark apps showing lower scores that are inconsistent. I don't think the Pixel C is by itself in these crappy scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. But I still get a ten second difference between Marshmallow and nougat in photo mate. I now get the same result as I do on my LG G4 (with its significantly worse processor). Nothing has changed except nougat. That's at least two apps where nougat performance is significantly worse than Marshmallow on the pixel c.
tim.malone said:
Yeah. But I still get a ten second difference between Marshmallow and nougat in photo mate. I now get the same result as I do on my LG G4 (with its significantly worse processor). Nothing has changed except nougat. That's at least two apps where nougat performance is significantly worse than Marshmallow on the pixel c.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Load marshmallow.
Sent from my Pixel C using Tapatalk
Thanks for the constructive reply. Next time I experience a problem in Android I will be sure to ignore it.
I think he may be saying the benchmarks FUBARed and just enjoy Nougat???
hey, i run geekbench 4 with the cpu bench and i got a really good score.
but with the compute bench (graphics) i got a really worse result.
i got 1216 points, the nexus 9 with the older soc gets 3689 points.
I think the problem is the graphics driver. some news pages says, android nougat will use a new graphic interface with the latest opengl version.
maybe nvidia hat not yet released a new driver and the older one can´t be use with the full power.
I also noticed this. I found another renderscript (the API Google uses for running computations on the GPU) benchmark and it show similarly bad results on pixel c. I also found this issue https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=204712
That indicates that the pixel c didn't ship with a Nvidia specific renderscript driver, which might be why the performance is bad. Just a guess, but I don't think it is even using the GPU. Which is a shame. The pixel c should fly in this test. I wonder if it's possible to load in the driver from the shield TV?
ravn83 said:
hey, i run geekbench 4 with the cpu bench and i got a really good score.
but with the compute bench (graphics) i got a really worse result.
i got 1216 points, the nexus 9 with the older soc gets 3689 points.
I think the problem is the graphics driver. some news pages says, android nougat will use a new graphic interface with the latest opengl version.
maybe nvidia hat not yet released a new driver and the older one can´t be use with the full power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you check the latest benchmark especially GeekBench 5 scores ? My phone works fine however my geekbench single core score has dropped to 1000 no matter what I do. It used to be 1200 + earlier. The multi-core score is same as before.
Can we post our scores here ? This is on Funtouch OS 12 .
Stable Funtouch 13
OriginOS Android 12.
Thanks a lot. I realized that these scores have a relation with Ultra Gaming Mode. Once I restored it , my scores are back to normal
Benchmark is means nothing you can do few time benchmark and everytime you will get different score.Gaming Mode increase score a lot so best way to do benchmark is trying how phone work in normal mode.Becuse two same phone and there not be same score..Many things depend on benchmark.