For audiophiles, the GS1 was a good phone with the Wolfson DAC. I currently use a variant of the GS1 - the Epic, which I imported from the US.
Anyways, the GS2 was a let down - the Yamaha DAC was not up to par.
Any ideas what the DAC is on this phone?
- The Wolfson one (I hope)
- The Yamaha one (probable, but I hope not)
- A TI DAC perhaps? (probable given that this phone was made with a TI SOC)
Edit:
We now have an update:
The Texas Instruments TWL6040 8-Channel High Quality Low-Power Audio Codec
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-Teardown/7182/2
Will probably have to wait closer to when it launches in u.s. and some people break it down like ifixit or the like to find out.
I voided my warranty and your mum.
I think this post answers your question -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18599287#post18599287
chris10230 said:
I think this post answers your question -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18599287#post18599287
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really... Audio codec: Texas Instruments TWL6040
From what I've read below it looks like the TWL6040 is for PCM passthrough but I'm not sure what that means for the headphone output. Other sites list the TWL6040 as a power management device. The BB playbook has the TWL6040 and a Wolfson Micro WM8994E: Audio codec.
http://lwn.net/Articles/462732/
fair enough will have to wait for a more detailed specification to leak out then...
The DAC will make or break my decision to upgrade my SGS1. The reason why I didnt upgrade to SGS2 was because of the ****ty DAC.
XmDXtReMeK said:
The DAC will make or break my decision to upgrade my SGS1. The reason why I didnt upgrade to SGS2 was because of the ****ty DAC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't have a smart phone yet so I jumped on the SGS2 but the audio quality is horrible. Really frustrating.
pastuch said:
I didn't have a smart phone yet so I jumped on the SGS2 but the audio quality is horrible. Really frustrating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I had to return my SGS2 and go back to the Nexus S. If they keep this up again I'm getting an iPhone.
Supercurio had a breakdown on engadget no mention of wolfman or yoohoo or whatever sound chips people are looking for or avoiding.
Audio codec: Texas Instruments TWL6040
USB Audio DAC (digital-to-audio converter with USB input and stereo outputs) should also be supported
The amp is more important than the DAC.
Audio quality
Does anybody have any idea what to expect for the audio quality compared to the Galaxy S2? That is my only gripe with that phone, the audio is low when I have my wired headset in for calls.
someone ought to tell supercurio, the TWL6040 is only a power management chip, not a DAC. (per this TI document http://www.ti.com/lit/sl/slyy028/slyy028.pdf )
bcpk said:
The amp is more important than the DAC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both are extremely important but hardly anyone pays attention. Every time I see someone wearing cheap headphones I want to slap them.
10nisman94 said:
someone ought to tell supercurio, the TWL6040 is only a power management chip, not a DAC. (per this TI document http://www.ti.com/lit/sl/slyy028/slyy028.pdf )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, why don't you tell him? I won't tell him because of this:
http://www.ti.com/product/twl6040
TWL6040
8-Channel High Quality Low-Power Audio Codec For Portable Applications
tjtj4444 said:
Yes, why don't you tell him? I won't tell him because of this:
http://www.ti.com/product/twl6040
TWL6040
8-Channel High Quality Low-Power Audio Codec For Portable Applications
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an inaccurate description, see the TI parts summary document I linked. Proof: The playbook has this chip for power management of its Wolfson DAC. The wording on TI's site is incorrect.
EDIT: I don't contact him because I don't have a twitter
pastuch said:
Both are extremely important but hardly anyone pays attention. Every time I see someone wearing cheap headphones I want to slap them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know, not everyone cares about the sound quality as much as you do.
On the other hand, if they were wearing expensive headphones that are ****, then that feeling might be more appropriate since they would then be thinking they were getting great audio quality but would be wrong.
pastuch said:
Both are extremely important but hardly anyone pays attention. Every time I see someone wearing cheap headphones I want to slap them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol...
blunden said:
You know, not everyone cares about the sound quality as much as you do.
On the other hand, if they were wearing expensive headphones that are ****, then that feeling might be more appropriate since they would then be thinking they were getting great audio quality but would be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most dont care AT ALL. Which is why we often end up with ****ty audio parts. If people cared as much about there audio as they did there screens all our phones would be alot better.
xManMythLegend said:
Most dont care AT ALL. Which is why we often end up with ****ty audio parts. If people cared as much about there audio as they did there screens all our phones would be alot better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed.
I'm still with a variant of the original Galaxy S phone for that reason.
In fact, it's of so little importance that when listing specs, manufacturers don't bother listing it. [Groans].
Edit:
One reason why I strongly suspect that there may not be a Wolfson DAC is the lack of press releases from Wolfson:
http://www.wolfsonmicro.com/media_centre/press_releases/
More info regarding the audio codec specs:
http://www.omappedia.org/wiki/Audio_Drive_Arch
The Phoenix codec in OMAP4 is the analog part of the audio architecture. It consists of the following components:
Audio output:
Headset
Handsfree
Vibrator
Auxiliary
Earphone
Audio input:
Mic left input (Can be Main mic, HS mic or AUX/FM left input)
Mic Right input (Can be Sub mic, HS mic or AUX/FM right input)
Line In
The Phoenix codec renders samples at 88.4 KHz and 96 KHz. Handsfree speakers and other paths can only work at 96 KHz, but heaphones has two modes of operation:
Low power mode (88.4 KHz and 96 KHz). Consumes less power but the audio quality may be affected.
High performance mode (96 KHz only). Good for applications in which quality of audio is desired.
There are eight digital input channels on the Phoenix that can be used for rendering audio out to nine different analog outputs. There are 5 McPDM channels (DL0 -> DL4), an I2C channel, and two auxiliary inputs that can be used for the FM radio (AFM0, AFM1).
Possible. Any idea how good the audio quality is - mainly how well does it drive good cans?
Hello Guys,
iam new here and i need help.
since one Week i have a Dasaita HU with PX5, 4GB RAM, 32GB and it is bulid into my Mitsubishi Lancer with orignal Rockford Fosgate system.
And there is the Problem, how can work the Radio like the OEM Radio with the Rockford System? Maybe here other People with Mitsubishi and Rockford System and they using a Radio like mine?
Hope you can help me, it is a big Problem for me that it not work right
Thank you!
Robert
Is Nobody here with a Mitsubishi and Rockford and an Android Radio?
Nudelsose said:
Is Nobody here with a Mitsubishi and Rockford and an Android Radio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the Rockfors....an amplifier? a Subwoofer?
Did it have some RCA inputs?
Hey,
the Rockford Fosgate Systen is a complete OEM Soundsystem from Mitsubishi.
It Contains Speaker in all 4 Doors, in the Front Doors with Tweeters and in the Rear is a Subwoofer.
Did you buy your unit with Canbus decoder?
According to Dasaita, you need the canbus CB001 for models 2007-2013 and CB003 for models 2014-2017
The can bus is needed for Rockford Fosgate System to work with the headunit
You should buy harness with canbus
Ok,
but did you can change the punch of the subwoofer?
I am in a 2013 X and have a Dasaita PX3 unit. Subwoofer controls when you have the canbus box attached are not the sub bar in the Amplifier app but the far left 60hz bar.
Hope that helps.
It's like this one... But Dasaita may have it on their site Hot-Audio.
https://www.google.com/search?q=das...rome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#lbl=OVERVIEW&pie=plaji-i
I have the same issue controlling the subwoofer on the PX6 with outlander and fosgate system. Controlling the sub with 60hz on the eq is hardly a fix as it is just lowering 60hz over all the channels . It would benefit to be able to adjust the sub volume as it seems to be louder than it should be. I am in contact with dasaita so will see what they say.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
Hi
So I have a PX6 from navifly or whatever. Anyway had probs as well, went to a place called audiocity and now it works because(still cant control the sub punch but at least now it does punch) the wiring for the amp behind the radio was wrong. The amp gets its signal from the front speakers and behind the radio the driver side front speaker wiring was wrong. Its supposed to be both the same +/- but one speaker was the other way around and the signals were working against each other rather than working together. I think now you guys mby can try to find that. Now the punch was real gooooooood.
If needed I can do few pics or a video about this.
I cant control the sub that much but I can control the bass still. So it is punching good.
Hi, if it's not a strech for you I would really appreciate some details about this.
My problem is that balance does not work (if I put 100% on rear the volume goes to 0) and most annoying probleme is that I have a bass delay, which means that when the bass should kick in it actually fades in from 0 to whatever...and it takes like 5 seconds to be at the volume it's supposed to be. This i annoying because it does not only happen at the start of the song, but also on the entire track. From factory settings I chose the sound option without amplifier because the other two options (with amplifier and auto detect) don't care about amplifier settings after restart, so choosing a customized present (or rock, classical etc) does not make any sound changes. Any ideas?
I installed this unit in wife's 2018 Highlander today. It sounds great if wifi is switched off, or if it's on and no data is flowing. I am using Network Mini to monitor data, and as soon as data is going up/down, the crackling starts.
I've reached out to Dasaita and am awaiting a reply
I have grounded the black wire with the ringlet directly to the frame but it makes no difference. I have NOT grounded the radio chassis yet. Also the noise goes away when the unit isn't crammed into the dash. When all the wires are in close proximity to radio is when it picks up
Anyone seen this issue. Love the radio otherwise...
Video:.
https://youtu.be/NhSzLh7CD_0
Wow - that's REALLY bad... I'm starting to get a little fed up with the interference noises from my Eonon MTCE-WWW unit as well. I don't have any issues when using the internal amp, but if I connect to an external amp with the line-out RCAs, I get interference from USB devices, the LED backlighting on the unit, etc. It's shame becuase I love the idea of an Android unit, but not sure I can deal with the subpar quality issues....
Going to try connecting to my amp via speaker-level outputs next and see if that helps at all.
Do you have a stock or aftermarket amp in your vehicle?
Cracks and noises for me as well with my Belsee BP3 PX5 unit.
For me too the noises seem to fade away when I turn off WiFi.
I upgraded the firmware of the unit with a Cs-x sound mod one (there's an recente one for Dasaita too) and it seem to have reduced the issue
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...ent/mod-cs-x-mod-mtcd-e-mcu-firmware-t3816042
Maybe you can check this out ?
TheDiB said:
Cracks and noises for me as well with my Belsee BP3 PX5 unit.
For me too the noises seem to fade away when I turn off WiFi.
I upgraded the firmware of the unit with a Cs-x sound mod one (there's an recente one for Dasaita too) and it seem to have reduced the issue
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...ent/mod-cs-x-mod-mtcd-e-mcu-firmware-t3816042
Maybe you can check this out ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suppose I could try updates, but I don't hold out much hope given that the problem seems to be related to proximity to the wifi antenna. It did this on the stock rom, as well as the Hal9k variant.
I'll update this thread if I manage to find an improvement.
The alternate sound-patched MCU's didn't make any difference whatsoever on my Eonon MTCE-WWW unit. I tried both the cs-x version and the wazdio verion. Same noise-related issues. You may help "hide" them a little by turning down the pre-amp value, but you can also do that with the stock MCUs, under the Factory Settings "Voice" tab.
To put it simply, I think they just use low-quality components with limited R&D - which is why these units are so inexpensive compared to more premium brands of plug-and-play units like Rosen, Dynavin, etc (they run WinCE though).
If using speaker-level outputs on the Eonon doesn't help in my case, I'll probably be going back to a WInCE unit, just becuase they seem to have much higher-quality audio components (better DAC's, 4V pre-outs, BBE processor, real 9-band EQ, time-delay, etc). I was really looking forward to an Android head-unit, but I'm just not willing to sacrifice sound quality to get the Android interface. Viper4Android helps a LOT in terms of sound-quality, but it can't help with the noise-related issues, which are more of a hardware thing...
Maybe some day they'll get there. I really wish they made low- and high-end versions of these radios - that way people had a choice between low-cost and high-quality.
That's a shame, as there is so much potential. I have a Hizpo PK5 in my (JBL-equipped) Sequoia, and it's completely noise-free. But this Dasaita for the Highlander is just very loud. It seems like it's a shielding issue. As stated previously, if I keep the head unit out with all the cables extended, the sound stops. I'm halfway tempted to buy an SMA wifi antenna with a cable long enough to get the RF signal away from the wires. The sound is exclusive to the left channel (both front and rear).
@TheDiB, missed your prior question. It's a JBL-equipped vehicle.
Yeah, your particular noise is REALLY bad (mine is more of something that you only hear if the music is muted or during really quiet parts of the music - and only in certain cases (but it still bothers me knowing that it's there).
Being that you can stop the noise by pulling the radio out, you may be able to figure out what is causing it. Maybe try disconnecting the AM/FM antenna to see if that has anytihng to do with it - I've read some cases where hte antenna was causing interference. Or just re-routing some of the wiring - or something along those lines.
In my case, the noises are present no matter what - but only if I use the RCA line-level outputs and an extrnal amp. If I use the stock built-in amp, there is no noise whatsoever. So mine seems to be related to the RCA line-level output hardware (shielding related, I'm guessing).
I would experiment some more if you are happy with the radio and sound-quality otherwise.
I'm hoping I hear something helpful back from Dasaita in the coming days. On this particular unit, the wifi antenna comes out about 1/2" above the main ISO plug for the radio. I suppose I could relocate the antenna by running the existing bulkhead SMA fitting through a screw hole elsewhere on the case to provide more distance. I'm not giving up yet The other issue is that it's the wife's car, so my access to it is limited.
I'm not using line-level outputs. The four pairs for the speaker output comes out of that ISO plug, and goes straight to the Toyota harness. Fader control (as well as a bunch of other controls/data) goes through the can bus adapter. But ultimately, those four speaker pair end up at the factory JBL amplifier.
Aside from the noise, the audio quality is equivalent to the stock radio. But, I'm not an audiophile, and I have the opposite of OCD...
So your stock JBL amp actually accepts speaker-level inputs? Usually, amps take line-level inputs. With the Eonon MTCE-WWW units for GM's, if your car has a stock Bose amp, there is a special "Bose adpater" that connects to the same port where you would connect the line-level RCA jacks for aftermarket amps, which is line-level - but instead of having RCA jacks at the other end, it just connects into the main wiring harness, so I guess it sends line-level signals through the speaker wires, to the Bose amp - and then the Bose amp amplifies them (that is just a guess though, based on the fact that the audio is coming from the same port that is used for an external aftermarket amp, which is line-level).
So the wiring harness you use for yours is exactly the same regardless of whether the car has a stock amplifier or not? Or maybe it's not an option on your car and they ALL come with JBL amps? Just trying to understand your setup a little better. Do you have a link to the unit you purcahsed?
jtrosky said:
So your stock JBL amp actually accepts speaker-level inputs? Usually, amps take line-level inputs. With the Eonon MTCE-WWW units for GM's, if your car has a stock Bose amp, there is a special "Bose adpater" that connects to the same port where you would connect the line-level RCA jacks for aftermarket amps, which is line-level - but instead of having RCA jacks at the other end, it just connects into the main wiring harness, so I guess it sends line-level signals through the speaker wires, to the Bose amp - and then the Bose amp amplifies them (that is just a guess though, based on the fact that the audio is coming from the same port that is used for an external aftermarket amp, which is line-level).
So the wiring harness you use for yours is exactly the same regardless of whether the car has a stock amplifier or not? Or maybe it's not an option on your car and they ALL come with JBL amps? Just trying to understand your setup a little better. Do you have a link to the unit you purcahsed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must, because I'm not using any coax/low-level outputs. In fact, I haven't hooked up most of the pigtail connectors. The ISO harness has about 5 or 6 connectors that are used, and about as many that aren't (presumably for the non-JBL vehicles). I think the Toyota JBL set up is much like the Bose you described. In a previous Tundra, I had to buy an adapter that would convert the two-pair per speaker wires to RCA plugs which I could then use to connect my aftermarket radio (to use the low level outputs). That converter (made by Metra or Scoche, IIRC) also somehow tied into the canbus to power the amp and control the fader.
Ultimately with this PX5, I'm using the purple/green/gray/white speaker level outputs to go directly to the factory harness. No adapter in between. I can only assume the JBL amp is designed to accept this somehow. Both my Sequoia and now this Highlander are set up the same way.
Well, I am happy to report that I was able to resolve the noise by replacing the Dasaita wifi antenna with a full-sized SMA-equipped antenna from an old Asus router. The antenna was a female SMA, so I had to slip a small copper conductor into it so it would interface with the female SMA bulkhead on the radio - but once I did that, ALL the noise disappeared! So either something is wrong with the antenna they provided, or it's simply dumping too much RF right on top of the ISO connector with all the speaker outputs. Whew!
Very cool! Glad to hear that you got it resolved. So is the antenna now further away from the ISO connector - or is it just becuase it's a different antenna? You may to get an adapter or an antenna with the right connecter for long-term use (instead of using the wrong gender anteanna with a piece of copper wire installed).
Regardless, glad to hear that you figure it out! I wish my noise-related issues were so easy to solve.
Although, I did some brief testing this morning and it seems that using the speaker-level outputs is better than using the line-level outputs on mine (for connecting external amp). The noises are still there, but they aren't as loud when using speaker-level outputs for my external amp (usually, it's the other way around with higher-quality head-units).
These units are so close to being really good - it's a shame they have these noise-relasted issues...
jtrosky said:
Very cool! Glad to hear that you got it resolved. So is the antenna now further away from the ISO connector - or is it just becuase it's a different antenna? You may to get an adapter or an antenna with the right connecter for long-term use (instead of using the wrong gender anteanna with a piece of copper wire installed).
Regardless, glad to hear that you figure it out! I wish my noise-related issues were so easy to solve.
Although, I did some brief testing this morning and it seems that using the speaker-level outputs is better than using the line-level outputs on mine (for connecting external amp). The noises are still there, but they aren't as loud when using speaker-level outputs for my external amp (usually, it's the other way around with higher-quality head-units).
These units are so close to being really good - it's a shame they have these noise-relasted issues...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't move the bulkhead SMA fitting. I would have had to break the factory seal, and I didn't want to jeopardize warranty just yet. The antenna I added is about 4x longer than the stubby they provided, so I suppose it is spreading the RF over a larger area. It has a hinge on it and if I aim it straight back the noise is still present. Bending it 90° away from the harness makes it totally silent - and there is no depreciation in the signal strength.
I have ordered a gender changer and a 3" SMA extension cable from Amazon, but I probably won't install it unless the problem returns. I figure why rock the boat.
Is the noise you're experiencing related to data transmission? Does it stop if you disable the wifi? I'm wondering if wrapping the first few inches of the wiring bundle with copper tape wouldn't provide shielding against induced RF noise.
Ah - I see. Interesting - so just a different antenna resolved your issue. Like you said, I guess it's spreading out the signal enough to avoid causing the interference. I'm sure someone else will find that info very useful in the future!
My noise issues are not realted to wifi. I have interference noises in the following situations:
1. If car is not running and radio LED backlighting is on (cuases a hum through the speakers). Mainly only noticeable when no music is playing (between songs, for example) or when there are very quiet parts of the music.
2. When using my headrest monitors.
3. Anytime the system accesses USB devices. The interference is pretty noticeable when reading/writing USB thumb drives - especially if they have LEDs on them.
4. If I my Eonon USB dashcam is active, it makes a strange intference noise from the speakers. Again, really only noticeable when no music is playing, but...
None of these are huge issues in of themselves, but at the same time, it just bothers me knowing that the interference exists. I've also noticed that the overall sound quality just isn't as good as my previous WinCE-based head-units - (much more expensive units - they have 4v preouts, higher-quality DAC's, etc) - even when using an external amplifier. Never had interference noises with them, so the Android unit is really a downgrade in terms of sound-quality, which is more important to me than having Android, I guess. I was hoping that there woulnd't be much difference in sound quality when using an external amp, but there still is...
At first, I thought the Android head-unit was awesome while testng "on the bench" - until I connected it in-car and used it for a few days, then I started noticing all of the "cons" (warning chimes and turn-signal sounds are horrible, button backlighting doesn't dim with the rest of the interior lights when dimmed, screen isn't as nice or as bright as previous units, super-reflecitive screen, the noise issues mentioned above, no true dual-zone for my headrest monitors, no XM tuner, having to jump through all kind of hoops just to get music to continue playing where it left off when restarting the car, etc). When I add up all of these "cons", I'm just not sure the Android unit is worth it for me. I'll probably be going back to my WinCE head-unit very soon (Dynavin N7 or Rosen GM1010/1210). The WinCE units are not as flexible as the Android units, but the sound quality is more important to me.
I'd *gladly* pay more for a higher-quality Android head-unit, but right now, they just don't seem to exist - which is unfortunate...
jtrosky said:
Ah - I see. Interesting - so just a different antenna resolved your issue. Like you said, I guess it's spreading out the signal enough to avoid causing the interference. I'm sure someone else will find that info very useful in the future!
My noise issues are not realted to wifi. I have interference noises in the following situations:
1. If car is not running and radio LED backlighting is on (cuases a hum through the speakers). Mainly only noticeable when no music is playing (between songs, for example) or when there are very quiet parts of the music.
2. When using my headrest monitors.
3. Anytime the system accesses USB devices. The interference is pretty noticeable when reading/writing USB thumb drives - especially if they have LEDs on them.
4. If I my Eonon USB dashcam is active, it makes a strange intference noise from the speakers. Again, really only noticeable when no music is playing, but...
None of these are huge issues in of themselves, but at the same time, it just bothers me knowing that the interference exists. I've also noticed that the overall sound quality just isn't as good as my previous WinCE-based head-units - (much more expensive units - they have 4v preouts, higher-quality DAC's, etc) - even when using an external amplifier. Never had interference noises with them, so the Android unit is really a downgrade in terms of sound-quality, which is more important to me than having Android, I guess. I was hoping that there woulnd't be much difference in sound quality when using an external amp, but there still is...
At first, I thought the Android head-unit was awesome while testng "on the bench" - until I connected it in-car and used it for a few days, then I started noticing all of the "cons" (warning chimes and turn-signal sounds are horrible, button backlighting doesn't dim with the rest of the interior lights when dimmed, screen isn't as nice or as bright as previous units, super-reflecitive screen, the noise issues mentioned above, no true dual-zone for my headrest monitors, no XM tuner, having to jump through all kind of hoops just to get music to continue playing where it left off when restarting the car, etc). When I add up all of these "cons", I'm just not sure the Android unit is worth it for me. I'll probably be going back to my WinCE head-unit very soon (Dynavin N7 or Rosen GM1010/1210). The WinCE units are not as flexible as the Android units, but the sound quality is more important to me.
I'd *gladly* pay more for a higher-quality Android head-unit, but right now, they just don't seem to exist - which is unfortunate...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, have you found a solution, how you fix noise ?
jtrosky said:
Ah - I see. Interesting - so just a different antenna resolved your issue. Like you said, I guess it's spreading out the signal enough to avoid causing the interference. I'm sure someone else will find that info very useful in the future!
My noise issues are not realted to wifi. I have interference noises in the following situations:
1. If car is not running and radio LED backlighting is on (cuases a hum through the speakers). Mainly only noticeable when no music is playing (between songs, for example) or when there are very quiet parts of the music.
2. When using my headrest monitors.
3. Anytime the system accesses USB devices. The interference is pretty noticeable when reading/writing USB thumb drives - especially if they have LEDs on them.
4. If I my Eonon USB dashcam is active, it makes a strange intference noise from the speakers. Again, really only noticeable when no music is playing, but...
None of these are huge issues in of themselves, but at the same time, it just bothers me knowing that the interference exists. I've also noticed that the overall sound quality just isn't as good as my previous WinCE-based head-units - (much more expensive units - they have 4v preouts, higher-quality DAC's, etc) - even when using an external amplifier. Never had interference noises with them, so the Android unit is really a downgrade in terms of sound-quality, which is more important to me than having Android, I guess. I was hoping that there woulnd't be much difference in sound quality when using an external amp, but there still is...
At first, I thought the Android head-unit was awesome while testng "on the bench" - until I connected it in-car and used it for a few days, then I started noticing all of the "cons" (warning chimes and turn-signal sounds are horrible, button backlighting doesn't dim with the rest of the interior lights when dimmed, screen isn't as nice or as bright as previous units, super-reflecitive screen, the noise issues mentioned above, no true dual-zone for my headrest monitors, no XM tuner, having to jump through all kind of hoops just to get music to continue playing where it left off when restarting the car, etc). When I add up all of these "cons", I'm just not sure the Android unit is worth it for me. I'll probably be going back to my WinCE head-unit very soon (Dynavin N7 or Rosen GM1010/1210). The WinCE units are not as flexible as the Android units, but the sound quality is more important to me.
I'd *gladly* pay more for a higher-quality Android head-unit, but right now, they just don't seem to exist - which is unfortunate...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also wanted to hear if you found out the problem .. since I myself have the same...
Hello, I just installed a new PX5 MTCE MX V.3.32_1. I do not use an additional amplifier. Only use internal one. At first, no sound at all coming from the speakers. After having let my car shut down for one hour, I tested again. Now weak sound from rear speakers but still nothing from front one. Try to play with sound settings. Don't know what I'm doing. Don't seems that sound wants to come out front speakers. Before removing the unit and testing the wires, I would like to know if it has a setting to check.
PS.: My car is a Kia Forte 5 2016.
Tank you for your help.
In Factory Settings, there're 3 sections where you can play with attenuation: the section where you can define the volume level for each audio source (radio, main board, DVD if you have one), the section where the CanBus decoder is defined, and the general / other sections.
Also, make sure you are NOT using RCA connectors but the CANBUS connector. At least on my unit, the RCA outs are NOT amplified.
If all fails, you might have an issue with the amplifier chip. It is easy to replace if you have some soldering skills
Hope this helps
Max
I'm also curious on this problem.
I had a PX5, android 9, 4GB RAM. Right after installing to my Mercedes W203 car, it played well until one day. All the speakers have no sound.
I shut down the car for few hours, factory reset the head unit. After that, the sound come back at normal, except when playing FM radio. The sound for radio only come from right side speakers, no sound from left side speakers. Other apps play normal sound (music, maps, call...)
Please help if you guys have some experience on this problem.