I have a canvas A1(4GB), I've rooted my phone, It is currently running CM13. I got to know about the ThunderZap kernel before I flashed CM13, So I've flashed the kernel along with CM13(*without booting), Now I have CM13 with ThunderZap kernel, I installed the ThunderZap app on my phone, but it acts weird, It opens camera when its locked, Can anyone tell me how to customize the ThunderZap on my phone to give best battery backup and good performance?
Thankas in advance.
singhaman1 said:
I have a canvas A1(4GB), I've rooted my phone, It is currently running CM13. I got to know about the ThunderZap kernel before I flashed CM13, So I've flashed the kernel along with CM13(*without booting), Now I have CM13 with ThunderZap kernel, I installed the ThunderZap app on my phone, but it acts weird, It opens camera when its locked, Can anyone tell me how to customize the ThunderZap on my phone to give best battery backup and good performance?
Thankas in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How i download cm13... Give a link plz
patelanish95 said:
How i download cm13... Give a link plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro dont use cm13 its laggy and battery backup is poor .. I m using rr 5.7.3 its awesome
Related
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
cm9 has the best battery life
dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
for me its cm9 or cm11
For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you
CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32
iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!
Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards
Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...
Dear friends,
I have flashed resurrection remix 5 on my N7100.But i have battery drain and Bluetooth earphone connection problems.Can i fix theese by installing original kernel on this custom rom?may them work togehter without any problems?Thanks.
I don't think so... since RRemix is not sammy based but AOKP/AOSP... so you will need to find another custom kernel.
cyberboob said:
I don't think so... since RRemix is not sammy based but AOKP/AOSP... so you will need to find another custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for your help.So,
Can anybody give a suggestion for a good and stable kernel for my ROM?I would like to use a kernel what doesnt have any bugs about battery draining or bluetooth connections.Thank you
stranger_88 said:
Thank you very much for your help.So,
Can anybody give a suggestion for a good and stable kernel for my ROM?I would like to use a kernel what doesnt have any bugs about battery draining or bluetooth connections.Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont have these issues with RR..!!
IF u want 100% stability try a touchwiz based rom.. That is your best bet..!!
Omni rom if you want to try a kitkat rom..!
I always use agni kernel..!
geekynoob said:
i dont have these issues with RR..!!
IF u want 100% stability try a touchwiz based rom.. That is your best bet..!!
Omni rom if you want to try a kitkat rom..!
I always use agni kernel..!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
I flashed Omnirom 4.4 Kitkat.Everything is ok exept bluetooth.There is a adaptation problem.And when i try to call or answer a call, phone freezes and i have to reboot it.So can i fix the problem by flashing AGNI kernel?I think it has two versions as Pure Stock and Pure CM.What is the difference between them, and which one do you advice me to flash?
stranger_88 said:
Thank you.
I flashed Omnirom 4.4 Kitkat.Everything is ok exept bluetooth.There is a adaptation problem.And when i try to call or answer a call, phone freezes and i have to reboot it.So can i fix the problem by flashing AGNI kernel?I think it has two versions as Pure Stock and Pure CM.What is the difference between them, and which one do you advice me to flash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course Pure CM.. Agni Pure Stock is for Stock based touchwiz ROM..
if problem still there, then maybe its a bug from the ROM itself..
Anypne can suggest me good ROM and kernel for battery life?
I dont need features, just battery life..
Thanks before
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Kaka88 said:
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Kaka88 said:
I dont need features, just battery life..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Kaka88 said:
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
pedromms86 said:
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow..
Thank you very much!
I will try mokee ROM and Fak Kernel..
Doea the ROM comes with its custom kernel?
I will root my device first before flashin custom ROM and Kernel..
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Loulou-13 said:
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using last version, get some random reboots (i think its because of fak kernel and undervolt...) i miss some launcher options like mokee have (i know i can change launcher...) i found the rom a little confusing, the way the settings are in config options, and there are too much thinks i dont use and dont like like (side app bar, pie control...etc) .
The rom is good, its just my PERSONAL taste, i like it clean,iam a big fan of mokee, and stock rom, just go to a custom rom for 4.4.4 and better battery like i like i say, just waiting for official 4.4.4 - the quality of camera we loss in custom rom its a big point for me to go back when its released
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much then
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means f4ktion kernel yes
Sent from my unknown using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Flatric said:
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see that ROM then
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Rackell said:
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Kaka88 said:
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Flatric said:
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9190 using Tapatalk 2
Update question
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
sammobile dot com/firmwares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys, first of all let me apologize up front for posting this question without knowing whether it has been answered billion times before. It's my first Samsung phone after having Motorola for a long time and the transition to the new apps and vocabulary is not that straightforward.
I've got an I-9190 running 4.2.2 from a carrier and they still haven't upgraded to 4.4. But when I entered to the website above, there's a 4.4.2 firmware for my country and my device. The upgrade seems rather easy, but I'm not sure whether it will run or not. I would really like to upgrade to 4.4.2 and I'm quite confident I'd be able to do it using Odin, but my question is if that firmware could run on my device. Any tips are welcome.
Thanks!
I am looking for best battery backup kernel for Yureka official CM12.1
Any suggestions?
Please also attach screen shots of the battery back up.
If some ROM with some kernel will give better battery backup please suggest that as well.
ASAP.
Yureka is screwed coz of official 12.1 update
rheairis said:
I am looking for best battery backup kernel for Yureka official CM12.1
Any suggestions?
Please also attach screen shots of the battery back up.
If some ROM with some kernel will give better battery backup please suggest that as well.
ASAP.
Yureka is screwed coz of official 12.1 update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try GOD'S KERNEL SABER VERSION.. i 'm on cos cm 12.1 nd god's kernel and battery backup is very good and also install greenify app from play store.
kethaprathap said:
try GOD'S KERNEL SABER VERSION.. i 'm on cos cm 12.1 nd god's kernel and battery backup is very good and also install greenify app from play store.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro
Will try it.
Hi,
Please, can anyone help to choose CM13 based rom with working custom kernel. Right now, I try CM13 unofficial with god's kernel. I really have a hard time to working with this kernel because the settings didn't stick with synapse. Actually, I try Phantom and Neon kernel with CM13 unofficial and all of them didn't stick with its settings.
I try Temasek and with god's kernel and the settings is stick, but I have a problem with the rom itself because its too laggy. I found out that newly flashed Temasek in redmi 1s consumed 800+mb of ram.
You can suggest with other rom to try.
Thank you so much in advanced.
CM13 + CM13 kernel
win-win
Vynikal said:
CM13 + CM13 kernel
win-win
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean sir CM13 + CM13 default kernel?
vhick said:
You mean sir CM13 + CM13 default kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, less features, more stabillity.
Vynikal said:
Yup, less features, more stabillity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the suggestion., but how to acquire double tap to wake? I really like that feature.