Related
Hello Everyone!!
So here is a new ROM I compiled yesterday, it does have a lot of features and it is called SONIC OPEN KANG PROJECT
I didn't open a new thread for it because I'm not gonna be updating it unless many users encourage me to do so...
Anyway I thought I should share it with you guys, for who ever wanna test it
Here is this ROM's features:
http://sonic-developers.com/?page_id=160
Also here is a quick review for the ROM:
And for more info visit their website:
http://sonic-developers.com
Download Link:
I've started uploading my files to androidfilehost.com , hoping you like it more than Dev-host
SOKP-MS-04-KK444-KTU84Q-20140726-amami.zip
Here are my screenhots as well:
Hello Guys,
Since our lovely Z1C is relatively new, it doesn't have many CM based ROMs, so I thought why not porting some
from the closest phone to ours (which is obviously Xperia Z1).
So I'll be presenting five ports for five ROMs as mentioned in the title, but I'm gonna start with a simple guide for how to port the ROM yourselves
All you have to do to port a CM11 based ROM from Z1 is:
Download the Z1 ROM and extract it wherever you want
Open META-INF\com\google\android\updater-script with any text editor and remove first five lines (assert)
Download This for old builds, and This for new builds, then unzip it
Copy and replace "boot.img" from the previous zip to your Z1 ROM
Copy and replace "modules" folder to system\lib\modules in your Z1 ROM
Open system/build.prop with any text editor and change this value:
Code:
# Graphics
ro.sf.lcd_density=480
to become:
Code:
# Graphics
ro.sf.lcd_density=320
that is it, although there are optional things you may do before compressing the ported ROM:
In system/build.prop search for honami and replace them with amami
And then search for C6903 and replace them with D5503
Also you may wonna add "Compact" here:
ro.product.model=Xperia Z1 Compact
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may also open META-INF\com\android\metadata and do the same replaces
Resign the ROM.zip after compressing it
Important Notes:
DO THIS ON YOUR OWN RISK
You must be running KK ROM before flashing these ROMs down below
This method won't work on Slimkat, although you can grab it from Here
All bugs in these ROMs are related to the original ROM not issues caused by posting
Fell free to report any bugs you face though, and I'll enlist them in known issues
PacMan ROM and MoKee ROM are officially supported, so there is no need to port them
Instructions for all ROMs down below:
Copy the zip to your device
Reboot into recovery
Backup of your system (optional)
Do a factory reset and format [/system]
Flash the Zip
XenonHD & BeanStalk
:::The XenonHD ROM:::
This was built in (2014-04-02) [Build 5]
It contains CM11 FXP312 Kernel
Zip is resigned
Screenshots:
Download link:
update-XenonHD-04-02-14-signed-amami.zip - 238.44 MB
New build's port can be found here: (Not tested by me)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=53365536
For more info and screenshots, visit the Original Thread
:::The BeanStalk ROM:::
This was built in (2014-03-11) [Build 3]
It contains It contains CM11 FXP312 Kernel
It has random reboot bug
Zip is resigned
Screenshots:
Download link:
BeanStalk-4.4.255-20140311-amami.zip - 251.39 MB
For more info and screenshots, visit the Original Thread
:::Gapps:::
GApps Standard 4.4.2 (10/5)
Removes AOSP Camera and AOSP Gallery and Replaces it with the Google variants
Removes AOSP Launcher2/Launcher 3 and CM Trebuchet and Replaces it with Google Now Launcher
Adds Google Search aka Google Now
All necessary syncing apks and libs
GApps Minimal 4.4.2 (10/5)
~20 MB
Playstore
Syncing apks and libs, etc.
Google Camera 4.4.2 (16/1)
Automatically removes AOSP Camera/Gallery and adds Google Camera/Gallery
FaceLock 4.4.2 (10/5)
Adds Face unlock
GenieWidget 4.4.2 (10/5)
Adds stock news and weather widget
AOSP Calendar Sync 4.4.2 (16/1)
Adds syncing ability for AOSP Calendar (not in Core or Standard packages)
AOSP Browser Sync 4.4.2 (16/1)
Adds syncing ability for AOSP Browser (not in Core or Standard packages)
This was copied and pasted from Original Thread (you can find more Gapps mirrors here)
Personally I prefer [and have tested] the minimal Gapps package, it is the best
Great work!
I wonder if you would do Slimrom also, it is a mainstream ROM with many innovations that other ROMs have copied.
[edit] Duh I just read your comment about slimkat. That'll learn me to read OPs properly...
wow, this looks good, i think ill try MoKee, just one question, is everything working ?
Just flash rom and some gapps ?
juried said:
Great work!
I wonder if you would do Slimrom also, it is a mainstream ROM with many innovations that other ROMs have copied.
[edit] Duh I just read your comment about slimkat. That'll learn me to read OPs properly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually, just today; @akshaybz has opened a thread for slimkat (not ported, compiled) here:
[ROM][4.4.2][KOT49H] SlimKat - Amami [Build 4][Alpha][UNOFFICIAL]
Enjoy
xhizors said:
wow, this looks good, i think ill try MoKee, just one question, is everything working ?
Just flash rom and some gapps ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I didn't test everything, but the ROM was flawless, wifi is OK
Yes just flash rom and some gapps, try it and give a nice feedback
Might be a dumb question, but will updating them through the rom settings mess anything up?
RevokOne said:
Might be a dumb question, but will updating them through the rom settings mess anything up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't expect updates to appear in the ROM's settings, but if they do,
yes updating that way should mess up a lot, it should make a bootloop.
anyway if you see an update for the ROM you're using, just tell me and I'll port the new release right away
omarainea said:
I don't expect updates to appear in the ROM's settings, but if they do,
yes updating that way should mess up a lot, it should make a bootloop.
anyway if you see an update for the ROM you're using, just tell me and I'll port the new release right away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I been building ROMs on linux trying and testing build from source..Im new to it and the device has been a long time HTC user. So guess all are from Z1 with afew changes you posted similar to the stock port way. I built a few roms so apart from the one I'm supporting. Carbon and PAC ROM has shown
Sent from my Xperia Z1 Compact using Tapatalk
Thread Updated
Ported MoKee 2014-03-31 Release
Ported Carbon 2014-04-01 (Build 2)
Also updated kernel in OP and in these two builds to 3.4.0 CM11 gb37510f From FXP313
I think I'll be updating the thread every week from now on, until these ROMs get a compiled version
Enjoy
How are the cameras qualities on these roms?
---
Sendt fra LG G Pad
slonn said:
How are the cameras qualities on these roms?
---
Sendt fra LG G Pad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly like in CM11.0
omarainea said:
Exactly like in CM11.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how exactly is the quality in CM11, I can't seem to find a definitive answer in either CM thread?
Any updates on the roms btw?
Cheers! :good:
Thread Updated
e2zippo said:
And how exactly is the quality in CM11, I can't seem to find a definitive answer in either CM thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know how to describe its quality, I think the best way to know is by trying
e2zippo said:
Any updates on the roms btw?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it's been a week, so here are the Updates of this week:
Updated Carbon ROM to build 4 (2014-04-09)
Updated MoKee ROM to build 2014-04-04 (its kernel was updated to FXP314)
Added XenonHD ROM latest release build 5 [2014-04-02] (download link in second post)
it is very customizable (can't describe it enough)
you can check more info about it in its main thread
about the kernel update, it seems like FXP team have messed up thier kernel a little
so when I tried it on Carbon and XenonHD I got some sort of bootloop,
but it worked fine on MoKee, so MoKee is the only ROM that has FXP314 kernel,
I don't recommended anyone to use it for porting so I didn't upload it
omarainea said:
about the kernel update, it seems like FXP team have messed up thier kernel a little
so when I tried it on Carbon and XenonHD I got some sort of bootloop,
but it worked fine on MoKee, so MoKee is the only ROM that has FXP314 kernel,
I don't recommended anyone to use it for porting so I didn't upload it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the problem is not much with the latest kernel, but rather with the ROMs:
Recently there was a huge changeset merged in CM tree, among other things it took in kernel a lot of CAF code\blobs from 4.4 Sony sources, and Xperia CM ROM was rebased on this CAF kernel.
It means, that the ROMs based on CM must be rebuild using latest sources, otherwise they'll have a bootloop with the new CAF kernel =)
TheQwertiest said:
Actually the problem is not much with the latest kernel, but rather with the ROMs:
Recently there was a huge changeset merged in CM tree, among other things it took in kernel a lot of CAF code\blobs from 4.4 Sony sources, and Xperia CM ROM was rebased on this CAF kernel.
It means, that the ROMs based on CM must be rebuild using latest sources, otherwise they'll have a bootloop with the new CAF kernel =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh, Thanks for the info bro,
seems like I should read more very now and then to know this kind of stuff.
Thread Updated
Added Paranoid Android ROM
This was built in (2014-04-15)
It contains CM11 20140410-Nightly kernel
Updated MoKee ROM
This was built in (2014-04-14)
The ROM was deodexed (original ROM was odexed)
It contains CM11 20140410-Nightly kernel
hi, should i have a unlock bootloader for test this roms? i can´t unlock it
canteo said:
hi, should i have a unlock bootloader for test this roms? i can´t unlock it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unfortunately yes, if you want to flash a custom kernel, you have to have an unlocked bootloader (and that is required to flash custom ROM)
Hello, everyone!
Dunno if it was asked before or is it thу right place to ask this, but anyway:
Is CM team going to release official CM rom? May be even someone know how soon it will be? I don't like samsung stock rom because of the bloatware it has, but I think I am not the only one.
Thanks in advance!
kortik9 said:
Hello, everyone!
Dunno if it was asked before or is it thу right place to ask this, but anyway:
Is CM team going to release official CM rom? May be even someone know how soon it will be? I don't like samsung stock rom because of the bloatware it has, but I think I am not the only one.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know if there will be an official build, but unofficial build by crpalmer works great.
Rutr said:
Don't know if there will be an official build, but unofficial build by crpalmer works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, I saw that, just wondering if we will get official anytime soon.
kortik9 said:
Hello, everyone!
Dunno if it was asked before or is it thу right place to ask this, but anyway:
Is CM team going to release official CM rom? May be even someone know how soon it will be? I don't like samsung stock rom because of the bloatware it has, but I think I am not the only one.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never quite figured out why people get so hung up on "official"... When there is an official build of CM, it will still be me maintaining it and the only differences will be that:
* you'll get nightly and M builds which makes them more frequent
* you'll get slower device specific updates to the core software (right now I change it and build it, when it's official it can take weeks to get a change in the frameworks approved and you won't see it until it's approved).
that said, it will be official but doing so takes effort from me and from other people that are very busy and so all I can say is it isn't official yet.
crpalmer said:
I've never quite figured out why people get so hung up on "official"... When there is an official build of CM, it will still be me maintaining it and the only differences will be that:
* you'll get nightly and M builds which makes them more frequent
* you'll get slower device specific updates to the core software (right now I change it and build it, when it's official it can take weeks to get a change in the frameworks approved and you won't see it until it's approved).
that said, it will be official but doing so takes effort from me and from other people that are very busy and so all I can say is it isn't official yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually before creating this thread I saw your "unofficial" build thread and checked your profile to see if you are somehow connected to CM dev team, but you have no information in your profile. I don't like unofficial builds because often they have something tuned\installed\uninstalled, but I like how CM works and I don't want anything else, this is why I want official build. But in this case I think I should try your build, as you maintain official ones anyway.
Thanks for clarifying this!
kortik9 said:
Actually before creating this thread I saw your "unofficial" build thread and checked your profile to see if you are somehow connected to CM dev team, but you have no information in your profile. I don't like unofficial builds because often they have something tuned\installed\uninstalled, but I like how CM works and I don't want anything else, this is why I want official build. But in this case I think I should try your build, as you maintain official ones anyway.
Thanks for clarifying this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily having visibility into any framework changes I've made is a pretty reasonable concern. There's only one change that I have already submitted for review so nothing too magical going on behind the scenes. Everything else is available in my public git repos for anyone to verify.
Most of the time official builds start out as unofficial builds. At least that's what I've noticed.
Presenting CM13 unofficial. Built from mostly pure CyanogenMod sources, with a few tweaks that I try to keep updated on my github. This is only possible due to the work of Ziyan and MWisBest.
Instructions
First time flashing CM13 to your toroplus (or coming from another ROM)?
Unlock & install a recovery
Wipe data & cache partitions
Flash CyanogenMod.
Optional: Install the Google Apps addon package.
Updating from a previous build?
Just install the latest ROM zip. If you had Google Apps installed, they will be reinstalled automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloads
Latest cm-13.0 build: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24588212152305191
Final cm-12.1 build: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24438995911970260
All builds: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=23531
Unofficial TWRP recovery: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24459283995311440
Google Apps: http://opengapps.org/
- Platform: ARM
- Android: 6.0
- Variant: pico (recommended), or nano
Bugs
LTE Data does not work. (3G works)
XDA:DevDB Information
UNOFFICIAL CyanogenMod 13.0 (DDK 1.9), ROM for the Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Contributors
musical_chairs
Source Code: https://github.com/CyanogenMod
ROM OS Version: 6.0.x Marshmallow
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.0.x
Based On: CyanogenMod
Version Information
Status: Beta
Created 2014-09-25
Last Updated 2016-07-15
now with Marshmallow!
Will this be updated to work with the new GPU drivers? Thank you!
Sent from my LG-LS980 using XDA Free mobile app
illinoissparks18 said:
Will this be updated to work with the new GPU drivers? Thank you!
Sent from my LG-LS980 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Short answer: yes. I'm going to try grabbing the relevant code from MWisBest's githib. If it turns out to be too involved for my limited skills, it will have to wait until Ziyan submits the changes to CM.
musical_chairs said:
Short answer: yes. I'm going to try grabbing the relevant code from MWisBest's githib. If it turns out to be too involved for my limited skills, it will have to wait until Ziyan submits the changes to CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK I am going to be on board with testing for sure. I left a post in the now no longer current official thread that I flashed the last official build yesterday and I had perfect 3G to LTE to 3G handoff, rock solid WiFi strength, basically everything seemed to work very well. I am looking forward to seeing how things progress. I haven't been able to keep any of the official CM builds from bootlooping until now. Hopefully you stick with it because I am getting better performance from this device than I have seen in a long while
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Gray Tapatalk 2
musical_chairs said:
Short answer: yes. I'm going to try grabbing the relevant code from MWisBest's githib. If it turns out to be too involved for my limited skills, it will have to wait until Ziyan submits the changes to CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!! Thank you!!
Sent from my LG-LS980 using XDA Free mobile app
I should've had a machete to hack through the jungle of build errors from pulling a modified OmniROM device tree into a CyanogenMod build. Looks like the build is rolling now though, with any luck it might just complete successfully - who knows, it might even boot.
The only thing slower around here than me is my poor old computer.
Its kind of ironic that the Galaxy Nexus was the first official LTE device for Sprint and I am only just recently starting to get LTE on a semi regular basis.
@musical_chairs, take your time with your builds. I assure you that they are appreciated. Now that this device is actually getting decent (for Sprint) signal and still has current builds makes it more enjoyable to use than just about any time I can remember....I just miss Imoseyon's Lean kernels. I got GREAT battery on those. They were compiled in the now deceased (I think) CMRemix ROMs but the LTE is definitely a plus
Update: For now, I have stopped working on building CyanogenMod with the DDK 1.9 drivers. I was ending up with a completely unsustainable mess of a device tree, and was still running into build errors. If new drivers are what you want, use FML. I'll focus on keeping the regular CM builds updated for the time being.
musical_chairs said:
Update: For now, I have stopped working on building CyanogenMod with the DDK 1.9 drivers. I was ending up with a completely unsustainable mess of a device tree, and was still running into build errors. If new drivers are what you want, use FML. I'll focus on keeping the regular CM builds updated for the time being.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link to toroplus build for fml?
Zeinzu said:
Link to toroplus build for fml?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm following its developements, but haven't had time to try it personally yet.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-nexus/sprint-develop/rom-fml-fork-life-10-13-2014-t2903695
Thanks for trying anyhow. I'm glad cm11 still has a fighting chance with the GNex, thanks to you, and all the others who are able to help out.
We're all waiting for cm12 to get to a buildable state. In the meantime, I've been working on upgrading my build box. My old machine was just barely capable of building android, the 'new' one isn't new but it was a real beast in its day. Time for a clean build has dropped from a day and a half to two and a half hours. I'm happy...
jd14771 said:
just curious, how difficult is it to compile roms? Do you need to know how to write your own code or is it over glorified copy and pasting with packages and stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do a lot of copying and pasting, a lot of reading guides, and a whole lot of google-ing. I don't know how to write my own code, but I have lots of experience with applying patches. Compiling roms is not that hard if you're a Linux user, have a working knowledge of the command line, and have a basic understanding of git. Take away any one of those things and it becomes a whole lot harder.
jd14771 said:
Yeah i haven't gotten to play with linux, nor do i know what git's are (i think they are large batch's of code posted in plain text?) . always wanted to try but don't have the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
git is the software the devs use to keep track of changes in the code. Most Android devs have their git repositories on Github, those are probably what you are thinking of. Every little change (called a 'commit') has its own unique hash number. It's pretty amazing, you can look through somebody else's commits and find one that fixes a bug you are working on, or split tens of thousands of changes in half, then in half again, then in half again, etc., and pinpoint the exact commit that causes a bug on your system - though that's more useful in Linux kernel development than in Android.
I don't really have the time either, but it's such a fun hobby...
Using quickboot?
Coming from Vanir. Really like the facility quickboot gives. Anyone "enabled" it? I can't seem actually show the field to turn it on. Settings search finds it, but that's it... Noticed Dev options is hidden also. What's up?
Props for keeping CM11 updated. Really like I can actually use SMS in Hangouts.
I haven't been following the nightly changes since toroplus went dark, but I ran a build today--nothing special, just the latest cm...whatever changes they are. I could post it but don't know if I should make another thread or just link to it in here.
Anything substantial get added to general cm in the last few months?
I tried to run a build of cm12 but it looks like things still aren't ready for building yet, either that or I'm not sure how to switch back and forth between the cm11 repo and cm12 without getting repo update errors.
yotvb531 said:
I tried to run a build of cm12 but it looks like things still aren't ready for building yet, either that or I'm not sure how to switch back and forth between the cm11 repo and cm12 without getting repo update errors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got cm12 built and booting for toro for the first time today. I'm trying to get mobile data working on that, then I'll give toroplus a shot. Looks like it shouldn't be too much trouble. Feel free to post any of your builds here, or start your own thread if you prefer.
Here's my cm11 build from yesterday--equivalent to a plain nightly. It's been running fine since I dirty flashed it last night. Md5sum is linked as well and noted below.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lp4j3yayuktmlot/cm-11-20141227-UNOFFICIAL-toroplus.zip?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1b72j7oh70eg5w/cm-11-20141227-UNOFFICIAL-toroplus.zip.md5sum?dl=1
MD5 Sum: e6c265c57e00b4949362d6ff53c9a799
Well I got cm12 built and booting on toroplus, unfortunately the RIL is completely borked, so no cell service at all at this point. I'll keep working on that, in the mean time check out the updated cm11 build in the post right above this one.
Hello! I'll be posting pure AOSP builds whenever there are new versions of android released (providing I have the time).
If you choose to use these builds, please ensure you have unlocked your bootloader and have custom recovery installed. I have also noticed that TWRP seems a little wonky at this point, so in order for me to flash it correctly, I had to wipe, then restart recovery, then flash. Hope that's not the case for everyone else.
3/18/15
Added ability to change DPI.
3/15/15
No longer messes with recovery at all. Bluetooth working, data does not force encrypt.
3/13/15
Android 5.1.0_r1 (LMY47D)
This release will wipe your recovery. If anyone needs this changed let me know and I will build another.
1/3/2015
Android 5.0.2_r1 (LRX22G)
Data is now encryptable, meaning your unencrypted data should stick going forward.
Included my own build of stock kernel with Linaro 4.9.3 toolchain.
Fixed bluetooth (thanks Lollipopalooza/Craig)
No longer need to re-flash recovery.
12/6/2014
Android 5.0.1_r1 (LRX22C)
You will need to install separate gapps
You will need to re-flash your custom recovery after you install (you all let me know if I should change this or not, I think I will on future builds)
I am not responsible for anything that happens to your device or to you, yourself while flashing this.
Latest DL Links will be in post #2.
XDA:DevDB Information
Pure AOSP Flounder, ROM for the Nexus 9
Contributors
gchild320
ROM OS Version: 5.0.x Lollipop
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Stable
Created 2014-12-06
Last Updated 2015-01-03
Downloads
3/18/15
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934543409
3/15/15
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934541983
3/13/15
5.1 - https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934540786
1/3/14
Flounder Android 5.0.2_r1 build LRX22G https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95864024717074545
Future FAQ if necessary (let's hope not).
Thank you!!!!
Will test it tomorow
I hope cm12 will build on arm64 soon
Just a few questions. What gapps do you recommend? What twrp ? There is the mainline version and the one @USBhost did. Thanks for the ROM!! Really appreciate seeing this show up.
mpmilestogo said:
Just a few questions. What gapps do you recommend? What twrp ? There is the mainline version and the one @USBhost did. Thanks for the ROM!! Really appreciate seeing this show up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't realize that there were two versions of twrp...I used the one from twrp website.
gchild320 said:
I didn't realize that there were two versions of twrp...I used the one from twrp website.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep
https://s.basketbuild.com/devs/USBhost/Nexus 9/recovery
I fixed some things
in it
Factory reset will not encrypt data
fixed the device name
look bit better
custom built FIRE-ICE kernel for recovery
USBhost said:
Yep
https://s.basketbuild.com/devs/USBhost/Nexus 9/recovery
I fixed some things
in it
Factory reset will not encrypt data
fixed the device name
look bit better
custom built FIRE-ICE kernel for recovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hell yes checking this out tomorrow.
build
Awesome !!!! Been waiting for this. How did u build? Last week since their are little options for roms decided to build one on my own and i did a repo sync to Google source but when i did lunch flounder wasn't listed in the build options ?
Flounder still isn't listed just lunch it anyway
Made a video running the ROM. Works very well!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVQW-PMepn0
Hello,
can anyone provide a minimal gapps pack? I would like to avoid too much bloatware
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
This maybe what you are looking for.
Hiro Nakamura said:
Hello,
can anyone provide a minimal gapps pack? I would like to avoid too much bloatware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
belair56 said:
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=banks&device=gapps
This maybe what you are looking for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Hiro Nakamura said:
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I understand the apps themselves need to be optimized for 64 internally. These are all Google apps so they are if Google did so. As you update from the play store you don't choose if you're running 64bit or not.
As always I can be wrong.
Hiro Nakamura said:
Well i don't think it's 64bit version or is it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is actually a great question.
Adaptive brightness doesn't work. Other than that everything seems to be working.
Edit: Okay so I used an app to look at which sensors were working and which ones weren't... The proximity sensor is not working at all.
omvir said:
Adaptive brightness doesn't work. Other than that everything seems to be working.
Edit: Okay so I used an app to look at which sensors were working and which ones weren't... The proximity sensor is not working at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adaptive brightness is working flawlessly. Maybe you had a bad download or flash.
gchild320 said:
Flounder still isn't listed just lunch it anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use USBhost's version of TWRP. I tried to flash the rom following directions in OP. It wouldn't flash. First it said for flounder and this device is flounder. Also said something about updater binary. I got this with the other rom also. I tried un-mounting and mounting system, but I still got the error messages. Any ideas?
jlokos said:
I use USBhost's version of TWRP. I tried to flash the rom following directions in OP. It wouldn't flash. First it said for flounder and this device is flounder. Also said something about updater binary. I got this with the other rom also. I tried un-mounting and mounting system, but I still got the error messages. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I manually changed it to work with official twrp... Not sure why twrp is calling it volantis instead of flounder but that's why. Also, to get anything to flash in twrp at the moment, I have to reboot recovery after wiping. Hope this helps.
OmniROM
[#KITKAT]
for Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Unified)
[#WHATSOMNI]
[#WARRANTY]
Downloads:
[#DLGITHUBIO]
[#INFOOMNI]
Specials added on top of Official OmniRom Source
All in One Animation Control
Battery Saver mode
On-The-Go mode
Implement App circle sidebar
follow dark 4.4 UI
Those features have never been ready for official Omni, but people spend a lot of time writing those features and i really like those.
I am trying to release an security update monthly after google publish android security bulletins.
Support development
[#DONATETOME]
XDA:DevDB Information
[unified][4.4.4] OmniROM, ROM for the Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Contributors
Android-Andi, Ziyan
Source Code: https://github.com/omni-security
ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.0.x
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: Final Build availabl
Created 2017-08-12
Last Updated 2017-08-18
Hello everyone, first of all, great work @Android-Andi thank you to take the time to support our old device !
And then sorry for my noob questions but :
- I didn't quite understand the difference between device specific and unified builds and I don't want to make a mistake flashing the wrong one.
- What is the main difference between Omni 4.4, Omni 6.0 or Slim 6.0? I want to use one of those but I don't know which one I think Omni 4.4 is the closest from what I had with the official Jelly Bean ROM and the 2 others are optimized version of Marshmallow. And is Slim 6.0 faster than Omni 6.0?
Thank you again
Radder124 said:
I didn't quite understand the difference between device specific and unified builds and I don't want to make a mistake flashing the wrong one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unified builts are for all types of tuna: Maguro, Toro, Toro+. When booting only the needed (device specific) drivers are loaded, but the drivers fir all supported devices are on board...
Unified works on all tuna variants: maguro, toro and toroplus at same time. It detects your variant on first boot and places needed files. That's the one I'll compile in future too.
Which rom is the best? Use the power of your TWRP and try it out. Test one, check if it fits your needs. If not, make a backup and try a different rom.
Android-Andi said:
Which rom is the best? Use the power of your TWRP and try it out. Test one, check if it fits your needs. If not, make a backup and try a different rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can ask you a different question With all the new ROMs, I don't know which ROM you would like to receive bug reports from. Crash logs, etc. I know there is no point giving you CM12.1 crash logs. Which ROM would you like us testing and reporting bugs from?
Thank you for providing this ROM! I finally found a ROM with a working camera for the Gnex with security patches (from 2017-07).
...anyone gotten Xposed Framework installed/working with this? Halp
JLsoft said:
...anyone gotten Xposed Framework installed/working with this? Halp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's somewhere an updated version flying around on XDA, maybe you'll find it (i don't have it anymore)
JLsoft said:
...anyone gotten Xposed Framework installed/working with this? Halp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try this
@Android-Andi is it possible to use this ROM with F2FS file system? Which DDK version is included in this ROM? Thank you for your contribution.
Those who are on 4.4:
AOSP Browser was removed for security reasons. Most lightweight Browser use KitKats webview which isn't up to date any more and there's ATM no proper way to update it.
You should use a browser which has its own webview implementation like Chrome, Firefox or Chromium.
From what I have tested Chromium seems to be a good solution. Here's my self compiled Chromium:
https://github.com/andi34/prebuilt_chromium/raw/master/ChromePublic.apk
(It's only missing h264 encoder for legal reasons...H.264 is not a free codec and I don't have the license for distributing)
For Android 5+
https://github.com/andi34/prebuilt_chromium/raw/master/ChromeModernPublic.apk
For Android 7+
https://github.com/andi34/prebuilt_chromium/raw/master/MonochromePublic.apk
New builds are up.
Switched to default libion, thx to @Ziyan and @amaces !
Note: don't flash any custom kernel on this build (also AnyKernel isn't compatible ATM)!
I've been away from the scene for a while so please catch me up. Does this rom bypass carrier limitations when using usb tether?
madspeed said:
I've been away from the scene for a while so please catch me up. Does this rom bypass carrier limitations when using usb tether?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, these custom ROMs have nothing to do with carriers
March update is online. Enjoy!
Dear developer,
firstable many thanks for your Rom
I was using OMNI 4.4.4 dated 2015 but I was living issue with GMAIL, HANGOUT and GDRIVE
Today I discovered your product and Installed it on my MAGURO with a clean installation
Unfortunately after few hours I am suffering reboot
The system boots well but after few seconds it reboots itself ... continuosly ...
I am using omni_tuna-4.4.4-20180311-1556
I used GAPPS open_gapps-arm-4.4-pico-20180427
I rooted with SUperSU 2.82 R5
I tried to wipe cache, dalvik-cache, system and reinstall the rom and the gapps wo success
I tried to remove root wo success
HAve you some idea to help me ?
Thanks
Paolo
[EDIT]
I wiped all (clean installation) and installed the older version of rom (omni_tuna-4.4.4-20180128-0005)
[I noted that this version is bigger than the newer of around 30MB ...)
Same GAPPS af above
Same root of above
It runs well now ... cross the fingers and stay tuned
People having issues on latest build could try https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=76429699&postcount=188
The request from root was one of my suspect
Do you suggest to flash new kernel after last updated ROM, gapps and root and so before the first boot ?
Do you confirm that this workaround is not necessary with the previous version ?
Are you able to identify which version needs and which didn't ?
For instance I am using the January version .... Did I need to flash new kernel ?
Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus utilizzando Tapatalk
It could be it's needed on all KK roms since end of last year. But only works for latest builds using default libion.
Android-Andi said:
It could be it's needed on all KK roms since end of last year. But only works for latest builds using default libion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse my noob ... What does it mean default libion ?
Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus utilizzando Tapatalk