Related
Interesting link here guys wonder if One x can get some of this.
http://liliputing.com/2012/06/android-is-about-to-get-a-lot-faster-thanks-to-linaro.html
shankly1985 said:
Interesting link here guys wonder if One x can get some of this.
http://liliputing.com/2012/06/android-is-about-to-get-a-lot-faster-thanks-to-linaro.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm impressed.
shankly1985 said:
Interesting link here guys wonder if One x can get some of this.
http://liliputing.com/2012/06/android-is-about-to-get-a-lot-faster-thanks-to-linaro.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, bring it on!
What i would be interested in is whether battery consumption is therefor increased or if it remains the same? Either way, i hope this gets the attention it deserves. It doubles the fps, this is crazy!
nvidia is not involved in this project according to linaro website
the dev in the video mentioned they were only developing for ARM processors.. .. looks like the wait begins
AndrewJ41 said:
the dev in the video mentioned they were only developing for ARM processors.. .. looks like the wait begins
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
99,99% of all Android devices are ARM. Intel has just ported it to x86 but there has never been a worlwide release of an Intel-Android phone yet, so it makes a lot of sense to keep it on ARM. Needless to say that the HOX is ARM-based too. No need for sad faces...
basically if u use custom rom which is based on AOSP, AOKP & CM9 your in luck because these developers can use this now,
while sense have to wait for htc to update... thus us <---- right?
personally i dont see if happening anytime soon
Not happening on tegra just because Nvidia is a bad company and will not release any source for their drivers and so therefore there's no way to port the timizations over.
thunder07 said:
basically if u use custom rom which is based on AOSP, AOKP & CM9 your in luck because these developers can use this now,
while sense have to wait for htc to update... thus us <---- right?
personally i dont see if happening anytime soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't google have to implement this into their source or can this be done via kernel update from htc ?.
shadehh said:
What i would be interested in is whether battery consumption is therefor increased or if it remains the same? Either way, i hope this gets the attention it deserves. It doubles the fps, this is crazy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would guess less battery usage. It goes faster because the code is better optimised and therefore fewer instructions to achieve the same goal.
Hunt3r.j2 said:
Not happening on tegra just because Nvidia is a bad company and will not release any source for their drivers and so therefore there's no way to port the timizations over.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think the ABI is affected by these changes, so it should be possible to build the kernel and still use the prebuilt nVidia binary drivers.
Hunt3r.j2 said:
Not happening on tegra just because Nvidia is a bad company and will not release any source for their drivers and so therefore there's no way to port the timizations over.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aren't this changes made to the google code?
Linaro has been applied to CM9 Domination ROM [JUN14-Build3] today On any CM9 build I tried before this all I could acheive on quadrant was around 4300 now im hitting 5000+ with this build.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1692415
13pointseven said:
Linaro has been applied to CM9 Domination ROM [JUN14-Build3] today On any CM9 build I tried before this all I could acheive on quadrant was around 4300 now im hitting 5000+ with this build.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1692415
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting 5000 with stock ROM
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
13pointseven said:
Linaro has been applied to CM9 Domination ROM [JUN14-Build3] today On any CM9 build I tried before this all I could acheive on quadrant was around 4300 now im hitting 5000+ with this build.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1692415
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see in the users feedback opf this ROM lots of GPU acceleration issues
on the linaro website FAQ
its actually said they dont support Nvidia processors since NV didnt join the program
anyway ill keep my eyes on that ROM
To be fair I think nvidia will keep a close eye on this and work that has worth they will use internally, so its not all bad. It does however mean a long wait until users see anything from it though
Hunt3r.j2 said:
Not happening on tegra just because Nvidia is a bad company and will not release any source for their drivers and so therefore there's no way to port the timizations over.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely nvidia would like to release the source but can't because of non disclosure agreements with 3rd parties. Anyway acoording to the video most optimization is to the cpu so even on sense we could soon see some of the optimizations on custom roms.
Also a while ago I build custum RPM packages on Mandriva, when building on Mandriva by default it uses strict aliasing and many packages refused to build but adapting the code to compile was relatively easy, even for someone like me with little to no experience in coding.
This would do really, really great on the one x.
How hard is it to port the toolchain to tegra3?
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
oOzzy` said:
This would do really, really great on the one x.
How hard is it to port the toolchain to tegra3?
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To get a issue free port I would say it needs Nvidia to do this.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I can bet that the ppl who created Linaro will find errors in JellyBean.
What do u think this would mean if you were to Over clock the Nexus, have a JellyBean, and have a version of it in the form of Linaro???
Would it be like having a crazy fast phone on steroids???
Dragn4rce said:
I can bet that the ppl who created Linaro will find errors in JellyBean.
What do u think this would mean if you were to Over clock the Nexus, have a JellyBean, and have a version of it in the form of Linaro???
Would it be like having a crazy fast phone on steroids???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get the impression that you aren't familiar with what Linaro really is. It isn't about finding errors in Android. It is about (in this case) modifying Android to take advantage of newer GCC compiler flags. It was never about finding errors in Android.
adrynalyne said:
I get the impression that you aren't familiar with what Linaro really is. It isn't about finding errors in Android. It is about (in this case) modifying Android to take advantage of newer GCC compiler flags. It was never about finding errors in Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
....... can u explain it for a kid like me.
Dragn4rce said:
I can bet that the ppl who created Linaro will find errors in JellyBean.
What do u think this would mean if you were to Over clock the Nexus, have a JellyBean, and have a version of it in the form of Linaro???
Would it be like having a crazy fast phone on steroids???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) This:
adrynalyne said:
I get the impression that you aren't familiar with what Linaro really is. It isn't about finding errors in Android. It is about (in this case) modifying Android to take advantage of newer GCC compiler flags. It was never about finding errors in Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2) No. I tried Linaro and over clocking on ICS. The results were very minute. In fact, the only thing I noticed is that the recent apps button launched faster. That was it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
InvalidUsername said:
1) This:
2) No. I tried Linaro and over clocking on ICS. The results were very minute. In fact, the only thing I noticed is that the recent apps button launched faster. That was it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed differencees. Just depends what u do the device.
Wonder what level of performance you're expecting. I for one an extremely happy w/ the stock JB experience, quite amazing for a dev preview.
---------- Post added at 08:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 AM ----------
InvalidUsername said:
1) This:
2) No. I tried Linaro and over clocking on ICS. The results were very minute. In fact, the only thing I noticed is that the recent apps button launched faster. That was it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I have read the entire rom/kernel needs to be compiled form the Linaro TC in order to see the true benefits. Most roms just have bits and pieces baked into them.
zetsumeikuro said:
Wonder what level of performance you're expecting. I for one an extremely happy w/ the stock JB experience, quite amazing for a dev preview.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah me too. But when I clocked up to 1.4GHz on Franco and Ran Linaro, it was faster then a non linaro Rom on 1.2GHz.
Since JellyBean exceeds this, imagine how much faster it'll be.
Dragn4rce said:
....... can u explain it for a kid like me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, GNU/Linux is an open source project that is constantly evolving. Due to its OSS nature, there are constant changes from multiple sources. These changes bring things such as new features and in this case, improved performance. Some of these performance improvement have been made to compilers. However to take advantage of these compilers, flags have to be set in the source. Think of a flag as an optimization. However, if the code isn't coded to work with these optimizations, additional changes must be made. Thats what Linaro has done. They modified Android to accept compiler flags for gcc 4.7.x. Android is designed to be compiled with gcc 4.4.x.
There are some caveats to this. If not all of the code is ready for the optimizations, things can break. Some flags can destabilize an application.
Think of Linaro's optimizqations as bleeding edge. If you play with bleeding edge, you will bleed somewhere. Things will break at some point. This is the nature of the beast.
As a point of reference, most Linux distros are not bleeding edge for this very reason. Ubuntu uses old stuff by the time a new release rolls out.
Linaro handles several projects. In fact, Ubuntu uses Linaro GCC in their repos.
adrynalyne said:
Well, GNU/Linux is an open source project that is constantly evolving. Due to its OSS nature, there are constant changes from multiple sources. These changes bring things such as new features and in this case, improved performance. Some of these performance improvement have been made to compilers. However to take advantage of these compilers, flags have to be set in the source. Think of a flag as an optimization. However, if the code isn't coded to work with these optimizations, additional changes must be made. Thats what Linaro has done. They modified Android to accept compiler flags for gcc 4.7.x. Android is designed to be compiled with gcc 4.4.x.
There are some caveats to this. If not all of the code is ready for the optimizations, things can break. Some flags can destabilize an application.
Think of Linaro's optimizqations as bleeding edge. If you play with bleeding edge, you will bleed somewhere. Things will break at some point. This is the nature of the beast.
As a point of reference, most Linux distros are not bleeding edge for this very reason. Ubuntu uses old stuff by the time a new release rolls out.
Linaro handles several projects. In fact, Ubuntu uses Linaro GCC in their repos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You!!!
I tried the qualcomm optimized kitkat dalvik and bionic libraries, on cm 11 and mokee 44.2, and they install flowlessly. On mokee i saw an antutu benchmark increase of about 400 points, not so much on cm 11, but still even on cm11 I feel the system is much more responsive. So give it a try if you want, I haven't run into any issues yet.
satwantrana said:
I tried the qualcomm optimized kitkat dalvik and bionic libraries, on cm 11 and mokee 44.2, and they install flowlessly. On mokee i saw an antutu benchmark increase of about 400 points, not so much on cm 11, but still even on cm11 I feel the system is much more responsive. So give it a try if you want, I haven't run into any issues yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it is given that this affects only Qualcomm based devices, while ours isn't. Most likely it is the placebo effect at work.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
satwantrana said:
I tried the qualcomm optimized kitkat dalvik and bionic libraries, on cm 11 and mokee 44.2, and they install flowlessly. On mokee i saw an antutu benchmark increase of about 400 points, not so much on cm 11, but still even on cm11 I feel the system is much more responsive. So give it a try if you want, I haven't run into any issues yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:silly:
Please note, however, that this only is of benefit to Qualcomm-powered devices. Naturally, CAF’s optimizations will not have any beneficial effect on non-Qualcomm hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Defy isn't Qualcomm
hotdog125 said:
Well it is given that this affects only Qualcomm based devices, while ours isn't. Most likely it is the placebo effect at work.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes our Defy has as Chip from Texas Instruments (TI) the OMAP 3630
This is a booting CAF 3.10 kernel for none other than our shiny OnePlus One. Personally, I'm satisfied with my phone as it is with a 3.4 kernel (and 3.10 is a lot of work without proper firmware), so I've given up on developing this 3.10 kernel. This thread is just a free-for-all for anyone who wants to have a crack at developing 3.10.
I threw this kernel together pretty sloppily 2 months ago, so I apologize for the lack of full git history from CAF and some messy code from me. The kernel is based off of the LA.BF.2.1_rb1.xx branch from CAF. The kernel should boot as-is on the official CM nightlies, and it is confirmed to boot on my CM12.1 builds. All it requires is updated WCNSS configuration binaries to boot (flashable zip available in the downloads tab of the thread). The kernel currently only supports JDI command-mode panels, and I compiled the kernel with Google's GCC 4.8 toolchain.
Source code: https://github.com/sultanxda/android_kernel_oneplus_bacon-3.10
What works:
It boots (woo)
Display
Touchscreen
Modem (no mobile data though)
WiFi
Charger (not from wall outlets though)
Battery percentage/health reporting
Volume keys
Sensors
USB
Assume everything else doesn't work. Here's a fun screenie: http://imgur.com/H1UERfr
Good luck with haxing 3.10!
XDA:DevDB Information
CAF Linux 3.10.40 kernel for Bacon, Kernel for the ONEPLUS ONE
Contributors
Sultanxda
Kernel Special Features: It boots
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2015-07-05
Last Updated 2015-07-06
@Sultanxda Awesome work bro now if only the Cyanogen.org devs supported devices like Sony
arm: qcom: Add SONY Shinano platform, msm8974pro family - https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/kernel/commit/193c3345565d0c3a202f8feac62a21842b06e347
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...sh-a-linux-kernel-for-aosp-supported-devices/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...evices/how-to-build-and-flash-a-linux-kernel/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/201...ny-presentation-at-embedded-linux-conference/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/201...-xperia-devices-in-sonys-open-device-program/
Awsome work mate. Where can i find the original CAF branch? Somewhere at codeaurora cgit?
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
DerRomtester said:
Awsome work mate. Where can i find the original CAF branch? Somewhere at codeaurora cgit?
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/?h=LA.BF.2.1_rb1.39
Sultanxda said:
Yep. https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/?h=LA.BF.2.1_rb1.39
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. I am gonna create a full git history with that + your commits. If anyone wants access to it to push some code feel free to ask.
Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?
_ASSASSIN_ said:
any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.10
https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/ke...UX_ANDROID_LA.BF64.1.2.1_RB1.05.00.02.019.067
_ASSASSIN_ said:
any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.
RenderBroken said:
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
possibly collab with @DerRomtester?
_ASSASSIN_ said:
possibly collab with @DerRomtester?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man, that would be cool but it would be a massive undertaking then you would need a road map for other rom Devs to use to even use the work you have done let alone to even be accepted officially from major Roms out there like CM. This is something I have thought about alot but the work needed to put in doesn't match anything near what I would get out of it. This doesn't mean money necessarily but time, time away from family, etc.
This is still something I will take a look at. I wouldn't mind any input from @DerRomtester at all.
Added to OnePlus One index thread:
[INDEX] OnePlus One Resources Compilation Roll-Up
First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel
evronetwork said:
First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure that most devs would use this as a base if it had the proper driver support as it would provide quite the bump for security
evronetwork said:
First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Facts. We need way more collabs man. Unity gets a lot done. I personally know nothing about developing, but I'm a great tester. I'm willing to brick my phone.. Test, bootloop and brick it again lol. Everyone can play a part in the grand scheme of things.
@Sultanxda can you share your kernel with me?
I compiled it but i don't get it booting. You have made some ramdisk changes ? You added an dtb file ?
DerRomtester said:
@Sultanxda can you share your kernel with me?
I compiled it but i don't get it booting. You have made some ramdisk changes ? You added an dtb file ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No ramdisk changes, no missing dtbs. Just ran a mrproper and compiled it exactly as it is on my GitHub, and it boots. Compiled with GCC 4.8 from Google using almost the exact same script I use to compile my 3.4 kernel, with the only change being that the dtb path for the dtbtool is arch/arm/boot/dts/, not arch/arm/boot/ (though you probably already figured that out).
Sultanxda said:
No ramdisk changes, no missing dtbs. Just ran a mrproper and compiled it exactly as it is on my GitHub, and it boots. Compiled with GCC 4.8 from Google using almost the exact same script I use to compile my 3.4 kernel, with the only change being that the dtb path for the dtbtool is arch/arm/boot/dts/, not arch/arm/boot/ (though you probably already figured that out).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you mate. I think i know the problem
_ASSASSIN_ said:
Pretty sure that most devs would use this as a base if it had the proper driver support as it would provide quite the bump for security
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If companies released the drivers we would have 3.10.x, 3.18.x and even 4.2.x kernels(someone would try to do it even if it turned out a failure)
Released drivers also would have better optimised roms and would make a 5 year old device to live forever (new android e.g. android 7? no problem)
OmegaBlaze said:
Facts. We need way more collabs man. Unity gets a lot done. I personally know nothing about developing, but I'm a great tester. I'm willing to brick my phone.. Test, bootloop and brick it again lol. Everyone can play a part in the grand scheme of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm the worst kind of programmer, I mean I do own a degree but the programming language was my weakest link, so I can't help and kernel is one of the hardest parts it needs big ..knowledge to do it :silly:
Now lets not go off topic and wish for someone to work on 3.10.x I mean even if it's buggy and a bit unstable it will bring some new stuff and when it gets stable well then the fun will start
RenderBroken said:
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't exactly interested in 3.10 until i read yours comment. If this kernel can also make opo work like N6 i.e. running always on quad core mode and still maintain good battery lyf, man i would pray that either opo or cm releases 3.10 kernel.
Sent from OnePlus One
abhibnl said:
I wasn't exactly interested in 3.10 until i read yours comment. If this kernel can also make opo work like N6 i.e. running always on quad core mode and still maintain good battery lyf, man i would pray that either opo or cm releases 3.10 kernel.
Sent from OnePlus One
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will never happen. From a business perspective, it costs too much for little benefit, and only introduces the potential for more bugs.
However, here is a hint: Bacon's TrustZone firmware does not check metadata when loading firmware images, so you can technically load firmware from any device (ex: you can use Venus firmware from a totally different device).
If you know what you're doing and you have 3 months of your life to burn on this, then it should be possible to get everything working with the LA.BF.2.1_rb1.xx kernel branch.
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
How many of you are running stock? Would you like a custom kernel with optimizations, governors, schedulers and overclocking/undervolting? Would anyone use it if I released one? If so, what governors and schedulers would you like to see?
Thanks!
Personally, I love running stock. I would definitely like to see a kernel that focuses on battery saving.
Please release the kernel. This phone needs some overclock
I'm going to wait until Nougat source is released to build a stock kernel since I was accepted into the Beta.
A custom kernel for Nougat would push me even closer to the already close edge that is my wallet.
This phone seriously looks attractive for the ~$160 asking price on Newegg/Amazon. Coming from a Nexus 5/Spare GS4, I'm used to really poor battery life and average performance.
I'm currently eyeing the Moto G4 and the Robin. The Robin is much more powerful, but doesn't have a replaceable battery and has a much smaller battery (technically the G4's battery isn't replaceable but it can be done fairly easily). There's also this business with Razer, which isn't too big of an issue as I normally stick with custom ROMs (and stock is getting quite a few updates in the future).
Both are in the high ~$160-200 range. Any input? If the Robin's battery is somehow replaceable that would be amazing, and I'd like an OEM supplier.
negusp said:
A custom kernel for Nougat would push me even closer to the already close edge that is my wallet.
This phone seriously looks attractive for the ~$160 asking price on Newegg/Amazon. Coming from a Nexus 5/Spare GS4, I'm used to really poor battery life and average performance.
I'm currently eyeing the Moto G4 and the Robin. The Robin is much more powerful, but doesn't have a replaceable battery and has a much smaller battery (technically the G4's battery isn't replaceable but it can be done fairly easily). There's also this business with Razer, which isn't too big of an issue as I normally stick with custom ROMs (and stock is getting quite a few updates in the future).
Both are in the high ~$160-200 range. Any input? If the Robin's battery is somehow replaceable that would be amazing, and I'd like an OEM supplier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would also be amazing to see some voltage control to control the beast of an 808.
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
nexbit robin has volte support any one test ??????
variravitejareddy said:
nexbit robin has volte support any one test ??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know for T-Mobile US yes but idk for where you are at.
Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you need a tester, I would love to help.
Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any news on the electron kernel?
Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updates?
xBane_ said:
Updates?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be dead
Nope not dead. You can get weekly builds from here https://github.com/frap129/ether-weeklies
sykomaniac said:
Nope not dead. You can get weekly builds from here https://github.com/frap129/ether-weeklies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the kernel only compatible with Omni?
crian said:
Is the kernel only compatible with Omni?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest weekly build doesn't boot with Omni 7.1.2, so I'm not sure.
I believe the kernel is meant for Nextbit OS 7.0, not for custom roms. Not sure though.
Sent from my Robin using XDA
bmccoy11 said:
The latest weekly build doesn't boot with Omni 7.1.2, so I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So dirty flashing back to the latest Omni 7.1.1 build and then flashing the kernel should allow get the phone to boot?
Working on trying to get it to boot don't worry guys
sykomaniac said:
Working on trying to get it to boot don't worry guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried going back to the latest 7.1.1 build and couldn't get it to boot, so I gave up. Can you give updates in the future?