Low quadrant score on AOSP - T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4

Hey how come when your on a TW ROM your quadrant score is about 12k but on a AOSP ROM its about 8k?
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app

sargentmajord said:
Hey how come when your on a TW ROM your quadrant score is about 12k but on a AOSP ROM its about 8k?
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't attest as to why the scores are higher on TW, but I CAN say that AOSP/etc feels much snappier than TW. That's what matters to me.
Also, how did you get 8k in Quadrant? I only got around 6500 on Quadrant and 24229 in AnTuTu...

lordcheeto03 said:
I can't attest as to why the scores are higher on TW, but I CAN say that AOSP/etc feels much snappier than TW. That's what matters to me.
Also, how did you get 8k in Quadrant? I only got around 6500 on Quadrant and 24229 in AnTuTu...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I got just running carbon an ktoonez kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app

Related

Fb17 Benchmark

This leak is pretty dam good
Heres FB17/ICS launcher and forced 2d
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Anyone who is worried need not be get some ice cream
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
AnTuTu 6190
Nice!! I had gotten my device up to 7148 when I was running Blazer 3.9 and Rogue 1.5 Hitman Kernel. Now I'm around 5100. Posting screenshot soon
FB17 (Rooted) Specs
Here the results from the Antutu Benchmark Test:
Considering this is still a bit sluggish and out of whack... I think it'll great much better
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Those are great benchmarks without overclocking!
This is with sprint id
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Still waiting for Calkulin's ROM with ICS... numbers are nice, but I need something that works super good with perfect operations- I use my phone for work and play. I will wait for that or an official CM9 Rom... no experimental stuff. I don't want bloat/TW stuff or as little as possible.
P.S. I just logged in for the 1st time since yesterday afternoon so if he did help in something and I don't know about... I might try it depending on the progress. I already made some donations, but I am waiting to make more.
Just waiting patiently for the best of the best of the very best.

What's everyone's favorite kernel for AOSP Jelly Bean so far?

Didn't see a thread on this so I thought I would ask everyone's opinion on their favorite kernel for 4.1.1
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
shadowstewie said:
Didn't see a thread on this so I thought I would ask everyone's opinion on their favorite kernel for 4.1.1
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's only like 100 of these threads....
But here's my kernel comparison.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I haven't tried other than stock, Trinity alpha 28 and Franco #210-220. So far my favorite is Franco #220.
Trinity Kernel
exzacklyright said:
There's only like 100 of these threads....
But here's my kernel comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
those all are some lousy scores. are you sure that youre holding it right
Sorry guys, I scrolled down the threads in the Q and A section through 100 of them and didn't see anything about best/favorite kernels.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Benchmark results

Just wondering what a good benchmark test result for our phone would be... I've never really used it and I just it right now and it was 4232. Is that good???
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
v3rsatile23 said:
Just wondering what a good benchmark test result for our phone would be... I've never really used it and I just it right now and it was 4232. Is that good???
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on the rom you use, the kernel, and the benchmark app as differents apps generate different scores... and try to oc your cpu to the max when testing to get the best of it...
For me I'm on CM9 rom with DarkSide Venom 06 Kernel and using antutu benchmark I got this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Can you beat it
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Here's mine. On Jedi mind trick no other system tweaks.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
This is my new one...
On CM9 final
DarkSide Venom 06 Kernel
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Mine with Jedi V7
Sent From My Galaxia with The Jedi

Is 9950 really a good antutu score?

On PAC rom with Nova kernel running 1.7ghz and yes it seems like a good impressive score for the phone.
But... Why does my Chinese tablet ( cube U30GT) score ridiculously higher @ 1.6GHz. Both are on JB 4.1
The cube gets -
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My XS gets -
Sent from my Jellybean Xperia S
optimisation.....optimisation.....
You're scores are what you get under best circumstances. Try running your phone all day using it as you normally would then run a test. You're score wont be that high I'm sure, what you get while doing your daily tasks is what really matters because in the end that's your typical situation, not all apps closed data off brightness low cpu ocs and gpu ocs set to full
Sent from my LT28at using xda app-developers app
My guess is that AnTuTu sucks, so use Quadrant...
AnTuTu gave my old Archos 10000 and my Xperia S about 8000, while Quadrant measures precisely and, most important, it measures the stuff that really matters WITHOUT crashing...

Just wanted to share what can be done with no CPU OC

There is a kernel out there that performs fast as hell - with NO cpu overclock
figured I would share some screen shots
The point of this is to show what can be done without touching the CPU clock speeds
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks.
.so can you share the kernel too
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
There was no point to making this thread if you don't even link people to the kernel.
Also, lern2adaway
No kernel no care..
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
92drls said:
No kernel no care..
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol!!!
Sent from my SGH-M919GE using Tapatalk 2
Thread needs moar kernel linx.
"the point of this"........ is pointless.
OP is an OC PETA activist.
I can underclock (mildly) and with a few adjustments to the right governor, achieve 800+ MFLOPS in Linpack. 14000 isn't really "fast" for this phone in Quadrant either. That's easily done with the stock kernel.
Can we get this thread closed? Seems the schools are letting out early this year for Christmas and the kids are getting bored.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
You got that right!!!
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Worthless thread is worthless

Categories

Resources