Develop Bugs

something weird with processor

I detected something strange with their processors when one sleeps after a period of 10 or 12 hours can see that both processors start work and take so many batteries, and another thing a friend of mine has the i9100 handset it can use it for about 4-5 days Moderate use while the t989 can not even 1 day what else our work with this phone is there anyone who can do I9000 t989 rom be used in or is there someone I do possible 2nd core (tegrak) something similar to this apk

I'm sorry man. You ask this question a lot. I think your expectations of your battery are too high. No one is going 4-5 days on one charge. If they are, they must not use their phone at all.
Anyway, what rom and kernel are you running?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

am stock but really his phone can make a 4-5 day

gazmendf said:
am stock but really his phone can make a 4-5 day
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he lies, my brother has the international sgs2, he is also about the least social person in the world and he still may get 1 to 1.5 days top in the best of circumstances.

And also the S3 chip we have shuts down cpu1 when its not being used.. you do not need an app for that.
The only way I see 4 - 5 days happening is of you had and hour of screen on time the entire 5 days...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA

ok ok but really a see with my eyes and have better sleep mode a realy love my phone the design dipslay 4.5 bot is strange somethin does new update fill fix some thin pls am just ask sory for bad english

gazmendf said:
ok ok but really a see with my eyes and have better sleep mode a realy love my phone the design dipslay 4.5 bot is strange somethin does new update fill fix some thin pls am just ask sory for bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only way it would last that long is with the phone in a drawer with all syncing and data off

this guy concept of time is very much off just like his English, i personally own the same phone its stock n with only the original apps on the phone, no gmail account added n the brightness at its lowest setting n the most battery time i can squeeze out of it is 2 days at the most

[Q] T-Mobile S3 - Low Benchmark Scores/Processor not going 100%?

I've had my Galaxy S3 from T-Mobile now for about a week. The phone seems to run perfectly fine. However when I attempt to run Quadrant for example my friends are averaging anywhere from 4900 - 5300 for their stock T-Mobile S3. My same phone, stock, everything closed/killed from task manager, only manages to score 3100 - 3600.
When I check system information in Quadrant sometimes it says my current clock speed is 912Mhz, 1134Mhz etc.. Rarely do I see it at the full 1512Mhz..
Power saving mode is definitely turned off. Even after doing a factory reset and running quadrant on a fresh install it still scores the same. Beginning to get frustrated this phone isn't living up to the hype.
Ideas anyone? Thanks.

I did a battery pull, killed all my apps, cleared my memory, waited a few seconds, ran Quadrant again and still can only manage to score 3100.

No offence but who cares about benchmarks...... the phones soooo smooth and awsome

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

Don't have mine yet but I have seen someone have the same problem on here and what was wrong with theirs was they didn't know they could set the CPU Max mhz in the settings. Perhaps yours is not set to Max? Not sure where exactly in the settings it is but I'm sure it isn't hard to find
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA

I've been through the settings menu in the phone numerous times. Have not seen an option like that nor do I think it exists? For the most part the phone runs smooth I do notice it lags/hangs up sometimes but I'm guessing that's because the processor isn't going to full potential.
Anyone else have any ideas or where I can find this mysterious setting?

I've noticed on my sprint phone that as the phone gets warm the upper limit that the CPU can scale to seems to be reduced. The day I got it the first quad run was about 5k, but after 30min of nonstop usage the next run was down to 3.5 or so. Check it yourself with setcpu, it will start capping at 1100-1200.

OgremustCrush said:
I've noticed on my sprint phone that as the phone gets warm the upper limit that the CPU can scale to seems to be reduced. The day I got it the first quad run was about 5k, but after 30min of nonstop usage the next run was down to 3.5 or so. Check it yourself with setcpu, it will start capping at 1100-1200.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will check it out but considering even after a battery pull and letting the phone sit power off for an hour I still get crappy scores. Then theres others who can run Quadrant back to back to back to back to back and achieve 4500 - 5100 constantly. I can't even get it on one try! I'll download SetCPU and see.

If you are that concerned, wipe and try it all over again.
EDIT - Damn my spotty reading, you already tried that. Sorry. Not much else to do, unless you try to restore the OS through Kies. A fresh install from a fresh source?
Or sell it on craigslist :laugh:

The phone works fine. Everything is very smooth and responds fast. It's pretty much just the benchmark scores that are throwing me off. I'll see what happens with the second S3 I will receive tomorrow. I can't imagine the heat playing a factor because this S4 is supposed to be one of the coolest running processors out there. There's a huge video on it somewhere where they did a butter melting test. Anyways time will tell I suppose.

Why do you care so much about benchmarks? Also the phone won't ramp the processor up to 1500 if it has no reason to..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

joshnichols189 said:
Why do you care so much about benchmarks? Also the phone won't ramp the processor up to 1500 if it has no reason to..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?

Chicago281 said:
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is why I buy awesome phones. I love bleeding edge hardware lol.
Sent from my Axiom MAXX!!

Chicago281 said:
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering you say it works just fine and are basing these problems that you have off of Quadrant..
Also I guess I will try and help since you are from Chicago they're should definitely be a setting somewhere that allows you to change the CPU settings. I'm not positive where but I did read in a review this was the first phone out of the box able to adjust governors. I would look but I'm on CM9
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

I've searched AndroidForums, Here, Google, can't find anything on being able to change the cpu speed without rooting.

Someone have the setcpu xda download page need the link, thx.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app

Chicago281 said:
I've searched AndroidForums, Here, Google, can't find anything on being able to change the cpu speed without rooting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might only be the international version.. I read it in a review from one of the tech sites.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Do you perhaps have the CPU Power Saving option on in the Power Saving menu?

Diviance said:
Do you perhaps have the CPU Power Saving option on in the Power Saving menu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First post last paragraph.. No
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

Chicago281 said:
I've been through the settings menu in the phone numerous times. Have not seen an option like that nor do I think it exists? For the most part the phone runs smooth I do notice it lags/hangs up sometimes but I'm guessing that's because the processor isn't going to full potential.
Anyone else have any ideas or where I can find this mysterious setting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a setting for this, it's actually incorporated in the power savings mode. If you read through it, there is an area that says the max cpu speed is actually lowered when it's enabled. But, if you're not using the power saver mode, then it's irrelevant to your situation. It could have to do with the bloat though, and also the international is almost double the scores as ours yet there is minimal difference in speed presented in side by side real usage testing. I wouldn't get too hung up on the benchmarks, it kind of ruins the enjoyment you get from just using the phone, and seeing how smooth and flawless most everything is. Also, once debated and tweaked, those scores will most definitely improve and will probably ease your mind a bit.

My guide for 18 hours battery life on Jelly Bean

I am here to share my experience to get 18 (around 5-8 hours screen time depend on your usage) hours normal usage, browsing chatting, facebook and calls.
2 days if you are not touching your phone at all, standby.
follow my guide, I think it's all about the Kernel but I shared the rom I used too just in case.
this guide is for GSM, might work on others just download the proper rom and kernel.
Optional, you can underclock to 1ghz but I didn't and got 18 means more if you underclock it.
http://nexus-hacks.blogspot.com/2012/08/how-to-increase-galaxy-nexus-battery.html

How many screen hours?
Sent from my GT-P3113 using xda app-developers app

Which Trinity kernel and AndroidMe rom version have you been using?
TNP1536-307-JB-STABLE35
TNP1420-307-JB-STABLE35
TNP1344-307-JB-STABLE35. Do you think this one would be a good choice to save battery?
Thanks.

wissamidrissi said:
I am here to share my experience to get 18 hours normal usage, browsing chatting, facebook and calls.
2 days if you are not touching your phone at all, standby.
follow my guide, I think it's all about the Kernel but I shared the rom I used too just in case.
this guide is for GSM, might work on others just download the proper rom and kernel.
Optional, you can undervolt to 1ghz but I didn't and got 18 means more if you undervolt.
http://nexus-hacks.blogspot.com/2012/08/how-to-increase-galaxy-nexus-battery.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
point 1: when you go to 1GHz , it's called underclocking. undervolting is when you lower the voltage for the corresponding processor frequencies.
point 2: 18h , but what about screen ON ? how much is the "normal usage" equivalent to, in terms of screen ON and the stuff that you're running on your phone.
it's nice to see you trying to contribute and thumbs up for the effort, and i really don't want to sound like an a-hole, but this is not a guide. flashing a custom rom + kernel, and letting the battery go through a few cycles cannot be considered as a guide with battery saving tips. Cheers mate.

shinydesert said:
which trinity kernel and androidme rom version have you been using?
Tnp1536-307-jb-stable35
tnp1420-307-jb-stable35
tnp1344-307-jb-stable35. Do you think this one would be a good choice to save battery?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tnp1536-307-jb-stable35
rayiskon said:
point 1: when you go to 1GHz , it's called underclocking. undervolting is when you lower the voltage for the corresponding processor frequencies.
point 2: 18h , but what about screen ON ? how much is the "normal usage" equivalent to, in terms of screen ON and the stuff that you're running on your phone.
it's nice to see you trying to contribute and thumbs up for the effort, and i really don't want to sound like an a-hole, but this is not a guide. flashing a custom rom + kernel, and letting the battery go through a few cycles cannot be considered as a guide with battery saving tips. Cheers mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, but I learned now ^^
well around 8 hours normal usage of screen time (screen awake), and when I am on a phone call and the screen is off it toke 1% every 10mins
pardon my English

delete this reply cuz I don't find how.

Yah I hate to be that guy but where's the guide? Everyone uses their phone different. You should at least show your battery usage screen shot so we can see screen time etc.

What? Are you telling me that you get 8hrs of screen on time? Is this trolling or just a language barrier?
wissamidrissi said:
tnp1536-307-jb-stable35
You are right, but I learned now ^^
well around 8 hours normal usage of screen time (screen awake), and when I am on a phone call and the screen is off it toke 1% every 10mins
pardon my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

lightsout said:
Yah I hate to be that guy but where's the guide? Everyone uses their phone different. You should at least show your battery usage screen shot so we can see screen time etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, I wiped stats but you can study this.
just look at my charge time compared to the times I am using phone, and because it last longer I don't care when its red and low, I was in 5% from 9pm to 11pm chatting from time to time and facebook, and btw my wifi is always on.
and pardon me I am new Xd I am just sharing something not an expert or something but next time I will make sure : it's called underclocking <- I though both are same, and post screenshot and screen on time
EDIT: I think I should charge it to 100% and make it drain then share pics with you guys, that's the proper way for screenshot right Xd? cuz mine looks like a mess XD

My guide for 18+ hours:
Stock.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

El Daddy said:
My guide for 18+ hours:
Stock.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice XD but I love messing around my phone stock is just... normal XD

Your phone was plugged in multiple times throughout your screenshots. So yes, you should redo screen shots from 100% and include display on time.
It doesn't really matter though, as no one will see your same results unless they use their phone the exact same way.
And under clocking is unnecessary on the nexus, it doesn't spend hardly any time at 1200mhz anyway. I use mine for a lot of game play and still don't spend much time over 691mhz (Trinity kernel). So if my phone decides it does need to ramp up to 1190mhz to remain buttery smooth I'm not going to interfere.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

Nice. Will check this out.. I run my phone down pretty quick these days heh

I'm not understanding why you prefer 1.5 trinity kernel and 307 gpu. What benefit are you seeing versus the other trinity kernels with higher gpu and lower overclock limits? Are you running your phone at 1.5?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

El Daddy said:
My guide for 18+ hours:
Stock.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. I have no problem getting 18 hours out of my stock battery using the stock ROM and kernel, including just shy of 6 hours of screen on time.

I dont know that I would call this a guide. Its saying to use a certain rom and kernel and to charge the phone. . . . .

hey thanks for the write up... i used it alone to change the colors! now my screen isn't yellow.
question though... when I adjust my colors manually, when I go to 0 percent brightness, everything goes like super green... like crazy looking lol.. but at 3 percent it's fine again... any idea why this happens and how I can fix it to get true 0 percent? thanks!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I'm using a stock one and all I can say is: Just dont use Nexus as a videogame.
I got 3 days and some hours of battery talking some minutes and using wifi for some time (probably 4 hours overall).
Playing sucks up the battery life. At least for me.
A normal day of use, with wifi active, many calls, auto bright and SetCPU profiles gives me 'bout 18-24 hours of use.
A intense play day gives me 8 hours. And I think its generous.
:victory:

jayochs said:
hey thanks for the write up... i used it alone to change the colors! now my screen isn't yellow.
question though... when I adjust my colors manually, when I go to 0 percent brightness, everything goes like super green... like crazy looking lol.. but at 3 percent it's fine again... any idea why this happens and how I can fix it to get true 0 percent? thanks!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Finally I helped one person, thanks man I love you XD
and this guide is just experience, because most people are wondering what is best rom and kernel combination, well this was best for me at least.

full stock

Seeder Entropy Program found to be USELESS

stated by google employees and disproved by CyanogenMod's Acree
http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile...rooted-android-phones-proven-useless-2013014/

Figured as much but I was hopeful this was a real break threw for android.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Nothing with that cool of a name can be useless.
But seriously I do notice a clear improvement the moment I turn it on no matter what these people say.
For instance the app I am using to type this on, Tapatalk can lag badly loading forums. I have noticed when the Seeder is turned on this never lags at all. YMMV.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

I. Don't care what android Dev says. It works. I bet it doesn't make much difference on a new device, but on a lower speced device' it does wonders.
Sent from my SX-SP715A using xda app-developers app

Boy this app is causing some discussion. Running on HP Touchpad on cm9. Battery burns faster, but improvement outways that loss. Works for me.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2

mitchellvii said:
Nothing with that cool of a name can be useless.
But seriously I do notice a clear improvement the moment I turn it on no matter what these people say.
For instance the app I am using to type this on, Tapatalk can lag badly loading forums. I have noticed when the Seeder is turned on this never lags at all. YMMV.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
masondoctorjt said:
I. Don't care what android Dev says. It works. I bet it doesn't make much difference on a new device, but on a lower speced device' it does wonders.
Sent from my SX-SP715A using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
milski65 said:
Boy this app is causing some discussion. Running on HP Touchpad on cm9. Battery burns faster, but improvement outways that loss. Works for me.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you didnt happened to read the article, it only improves performance by continuously invoking all cores at the highest clock speed available on your kernel. this IS NOT a good thing.
" the app is forcing the CPU to stick to higher clock frequencies due to the constant I/O use. For many users, the processor running faster offers a smoother experience at the cost of your battery. As many users began to notice, Seeder was causing otherwise full day smartphones to die in four hours."

I read the article a few times. What I got from it is if constantly on, we will see a significant decrease in battery? So, can this decrease the life of the processor or is is it strictly related to battery performance? If just battery performance, I would give that up especially in the evenings when my phone is on a charger when I catch up on all the forums and rom development or searching websites that run videos or load alot of pictures. I can see not using while mobile but if I have a charger readily available I would run this as I am now and seeing significant differences.
Sent from my SCH-R950 using Tapatalk 2

t3project said:
if you didnt happened to read the article, it only improves performance by continuously invoking all cores at the highest clock speed available on your kernel. this IS NOT a good thing.
" the app is forcing the CPU to stick to higher clock frequencies due to the constant I/O use. For many users, the processor running faster offers a smoother experience at the cost of your battery. As many users began to notice, Seeder was causing otherwise full day smartphones to die in four hours."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it lowers battery life and thus you say it is USELESS? How about those of us with spare batteries who want performance and don't care about lowered battery life? We want our rigs to scream and this mod seems to help.
Hardly useless. Better to update your OP to say, "If battery life is your number one consideration then this may not be the mod for you, but if you want to phone to run at it's fastest and don't care so much about battery life, you may enjoy this ..."
Users can turn it on when they have access to AC power and turn it off when they are going to be away from the juice for a while.

there are easier ways of boosting performance at the cost of battery life.
Performance governor does the trick just fine. (or setting min/max to the same clock speed.

m4xwellmurd3r said:
there are easier ways of boosting performance at the cost of battery life.
Performance governor does the trick just fine. (or setting min/max to the same clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already do all that. This mod makes it even faster for me.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

mitchellvii said:
I already do all that. This mod makes it even faster for me.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's called the placebo effect. The app doesn't do anything beyond keeping your cpu at higher clock speeds.if you're already doing this, then is doing nothing for you.
Tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever performance gains you perceive, are likely due to network issues.
I think your quad core phone with 2gb of ram can handle tapatalk.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2

finalhit said:
That's called the placebo effect. The app doesn't do anything beyond keeping your cpu at higher clock speeds.if you're already doing this, then is doing nothing for you.
Tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever performance gains you perceive, are likely due to network issues.
I think your quad core phone with 2gb of ram can handle tapatalk.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please stop trying to tell me what I am experiencing and what I am not. I have been using smart phones for many years. I KNOW whether something is having a real effect or not.
I don't have the Seeder mod turn on by default. The other day after changing out my battery I opened Tapatalk and noticed that it was loading a half page of threads and then hanging. I turned the Seeder mod on and it immediately started loading the entire page. I turned it off and again it lagged.
There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that this mod is making at least certain apps run faster.
The all powerful experts don't say it doesn't work they just say it burns battery (which is fine with me). Please stop projecting your apparent obsession with battery life onto the rest of us.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

mitchellvii said:
So it lowers battery life and thus you say it is USELESS? How about those of us with spare batteries who want performance and don't care about lowered battery life? We want our rigs to scream and this mod seems to help.
Hardly useless. Better to update your OP to say, "If battery life is your number one consideration then this may not be the mod for you, but if you want to phone to run at it's fastest and don't care so much about battery life, you may enjoy this ..."
Users can turn it on when they have access to AC power and turn it off when they are going to be away from the juice for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i say it is useless because it doesnt do anything you cant already do better. it's being marketed as if it is some new miracle program when it isnt. perseus at 1.8ghz w/ performance gov on will outperform this everyday, simply because the program is writing to your nand constantly, whereas, any kernel overclocked can do this without writing to nand. battery life wasnt really what i was talking about.
i pretty positive the continual writing/erasing of things from your nand is not a good thing and will significantly decrease the life of the emmc/nand on your phone as well as the life of your cpu.

I tried it and It works great on my one. I'm using icy snap 1.5 and it was little bit lagy but now 2x faster than before... :thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2

I thought it was snake oil when I first saw it as well. Such a minor change would have been found long ago. Kinda like you won't see a minor tweak that anyone can do to fuel injectors that will improve gas mileage by 10mpg.
-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

I think I might slap a Vtec sticker on my phone. I'll see if it gives me a performance bump too.
Sent from my Galaxy Note II using XDA Premium.

mitchellvii said:
Please stop trying to tell me what I am experiencing and what I am not. I have been using smart phones for many years. I KNOW whether something is having a real effect or not.
I don't have the Seeder mod turn on by default. The other day after changing out my battery I opened Tapatalk and noticed that it was loading a half page of threads and then hanging. I turned the Seeder mod on and it immediately started loading the entire page. I turned it off and again it lagged.
There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that this mod is making at least certain apps run faster.
The all powerful experts don't say it doesn't work they just say it burns battery (which is fine with me). Please stop projecting your apparent obsession with battery life onto the rest of us.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you don't. Even the most experienced developers can't tell if their own applications are running faster specifically due to any one thing just by running them.
To make a causal connection, you not only need to do proper benchmarks, but also understand why.
The mod does have a side effect of keeping your clock speed higher, which can speed up your device...but if you said you've already set your governor to performance, then the mod is doing nothing for you.
And again, tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever improvement you see is much ado with network congestion that anything this mod can do.
...but c'mon, really though...tapatalk is your benchmark? My evo shift can handle tapatalk without lag.
Any lag you see in tapatalk is network related. And any improvement you see in tapatalk is network related.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2

Oh well. I continue to be amused by the fact that individuals who are not in possession of my phone seem to know better how my phone is performing that I do.
Let me say it again. My phone JUST RUNS FASTER with this mod enabled. Period, end of sentence.
And you claim that SetCPU does exactly what this mod does if I set it at 1.8 performance? But you admit that this mod does it in a completely different way? So how do you know this doesn't add an extra benefit since it is doing something differently? You don't.
You keep talking about how tapatalk is network based and therefore this mod could have no effect. Did you consider that this mod may cause network data to be parsed faster and more efficiently? Image heavy web pages also load faster. The improvement is undeniable.
I promise you I will have sold or thrown away this phone long before the memory gets burned out.
Many many people feel this works for them yet you assume its all in our heads. Its not. Stick to your own head.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------
The time I notice the most improvement is after I have been multitasking for a while. Without this mod I have noticed my GN2 kind of bogs down unless I clear memory. With this mod things seem to stay refreshed on their own.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

I'm convinced that by constantly having bowel movements that my toilet flushes faster.

mitchellvii said:
Oh well. I continue to be amused by the fact that individuals who are not in possession of my phone seem to know better how my phone is performing that I do.
Let me say it again. My phone JUST RUNS FASTER with this mod enabled. Period, end of sentence.
And you claim that SetCPU does exactly what this mod does if I set it at 1.8 performance? But you admit that this mod does it in a completely different way? So how do you know this doesn't add an extra benefit since it is doing something differently? You don't.
You keep talking about how tapatalk is network based and therefore this mod could have no effect. Did you consider that this mod may cause network data to be parsed faster and more efficiently? Image heavy web pages also load faster. The improvement is undeniable.
I promise you I will have sold or thrown away this phone long before the memory gets burned out.
Many many people feel this works for them yet you assume its all in our heads. Its not. Stick to your own head.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------
The time I notice the most improvement is after I have been multitasking for a while. Without this mod I have noticed my GN2 kind of bogs down unless I clear memory. With this mod things seem to stay refreshed on their own.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it doesn't. It didn't claim to do that. It claims to do one thing and thing only: it keeps /dev/random primed. Read the description of the app.
As a side effect, it keeps your clock "awake" and at a higher level. This is equivalent to switching to performance governor...but doing so in a manual way. (Less efficient way)
I think that's the problem with your over confidence. You are so sure that it's working...You don't even understand what the app does.
And the app definitely has no effect on memory management. Priming /dev/random will do nothing of the sort.
Also,You may not have noticed, I have the same phone as you. Of course, it's possible the app doesn't work for non-believers.
Yes, I know your next argument...it's not placebo because this makes things just seem faster.
I can't argue against that logic, but causality is definitely against you.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2

Now that the moto x dump is out...

Can we get or port the new Google now ???
Like when you say "OK Google...."???
I'll put a bounty up for this to work
SeNt FRoM thE 4th GalaXy of the AnDroid uNiVerSe™

I would like to see thus
If I actually did help, how bout a Thanks for 'ol times sake

But honestly tell me that wouldn't make this phone more amazing than it already is?
Plus I was reading an article saying that Paul O'Brian from modaco
Was gonna release the dual boot like the HTC one has
SeNt FRoM thE 4th GalaXy of the AnDroid uNiVerSe™

jaestreetss said:
Can we get or port the new Google now ???
Like when you say "OK Google...."???
I'll put a bounty up for this to work
SeNt FRoM thE 4th GalaXy of the AnDroid uNiVerSe™
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldnt see why not. I'll DL the dump tonight (hopefully) trying to download Firefox source code. But if i get the dump it should be a simply apk transfer if not some smali coding will have to be done. Not sure yet till i get the stuff. I know S-Voice was ported to other devices but had some issues and needed smali edits. So i wouldnt see why not. To save me time, a link to the dump would be helpful i will still search for it but i prolly wont have time. Gotta work tomorrow.

Doesnt the X have a dedicated low power processor just for this voice command? Otherwise wouldnt it eat battery power always listening for OK GOOGLE!

stevessvt said:
Doesnt the X have a dedicated low power processor just for this voice command? Otherwise wouldnt it eat battery power always listening for OK GOOGLE!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S voice is always listening for commands. It's just only in the lock screen though. It's prolly a simple service I don't see it eating up that much power. Plus how would a dedicated CPU save power??
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2

elesbb said:
S voice is always listening for commands. It's just only in the lock screen though. It's prolly a simple service I don't see it eating up that much power. Plus how would a dedicated CPU save power??
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This article explains the new X8 processor, and how separate low power processors runs the show when in stand by.
"If we did not have the contextual computing processor and our natural langauge processor in place, we would need two additional batteries," he said. The X8 also performs 50 percent better than "our competition" on gaming battery rundown benchmarks and can push higher graphics frame rates, he said.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2422513,00.asp

stevessvt said:
This article explains the new X8 processor, and how separate low power processors runs the show when in stand by.
"If we did not have the contextual computing processor and our natural langauge processor in place, we would need two additional batteries," he said. The X8 also performs 50 percent better than "our competition" on gaming battery rundown benchmarks and can push higher graphics frame rates, he said.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2422513,00.asp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats pretty cool. It looks to me like a dedicated core or thread for "low power" processes. noticed how its only in standby though. Thats neat.

elesbb said:
I wouldnt see why not. I'll DL the dump tonight (hopefully) trying to download Firefox source code. But if i get the dump it should be a simply apk transfer if not some smali coding will have to be done. Not sure yet till i get the stuff. I know S-Voice was ported to other devices but had some issues and needed smali edits. So i wouldnt see why not. To save me time, a link to the dump would be helpful i will still search for it but i prolly wont have time. Gotta work tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the dump
SeNt FRoM thE 4th GalaXy of the AnDroid uNiVerSe™

Can't wait to see progress on this
If I actually did help, how bout a Thanks for 'ol times sake