Hi,
I have started research about overclocking Ace 2.
In GT-I8160 default config there is UX500 use-case governor option enabled.
So we have various CPU configuration functions in usecase_gov.c file such as set_cpufreq or set_cpu_config.
I think that's the point where we should look for overclocking our Aces. Am I right?
Try it
crossing fingers
Enviado desde mi GT-I8160 usando Tapatalk 2
Hmm, first I will try to diff GT-I8160 and GT-I9070 kernels, these are very similar phones and one of few differences is CPU frequency.
But now I need mirror for GT-I9070 sources (downloading from Samsung at 15kB/s)
https://github.com/diego-ch/android_kernel_samsung_janice
This?
Fine, fine, but for now it's discussion which suppose not to be here. This is Development thread, where placeholder topics are forbidden
Wysyłane z mojego GT-I8160 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
judas1977 said:
Fine, fine, but for now it's discussion which suppose not to be here. This is Development thread, where placeholder topics are forbidden
Wysyłane z mojego GT-I8160 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i believe that dev discussion or wip projects aren't forbidden in the dev section..
I've done some coding today, tomorrow compile and flash. We'll see...
ccnky said:
I've done some coding today, tomorrow compile and flash. We'll see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope it works :good:
Ok, that's what I know at the moment:
-CPU frequency tables in devices-db8500.c file are the same for GT-I8160, GT-I8190 and GT-I9070 with 800MHz max so we can't do nothing here.
-frequency tables are modified by PRCMU driver (/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c) as we can see in db8500_prcmu_update_freq() function
Code:
static void db8500_prcmu_update_freq(void *pdata)
{
freq_table =
(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *)pdata;
if (!db8500_prcmu_has_arm_maxopp())
return;
switch (fw_info.version.project) {
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U9500:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8420:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8420_SYSCLK:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_A9420:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500_MBL:
freq_table[3].frequency = 1000000;
break;
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500_C2:
case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8520:
freq_table[3].frequency = 1150000;
break;
default:
break;
}
}
Unfortunately, db8500_prcmu_has_arm_maxopp() function returns false for our device (it may be caused by hardware) so frequencies are not modified. I'd like to check how is it on GT-I9070 or GT-I8190 but I don't own these devices.
I'm also afraid to manually change frequencies (don't want to brick phone).
Greetings.
Maybe you doesn't have to overclock kernel, just improves performance to make our ace 2 better
Sorry for my bad english
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk 2
yeah thing ace 2 has a fast enough prozessor for me my old phone was a galaxy 3 so i know how a slow phone feels
My previous phone was LG GT540 so I know how a slow phone feels too
OC is the best way to improve performance. Look at benchmarks:
ours 800MHz: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=2869
1GHz: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=1632
ccnky said:
My previous phone was LG GT540 so I know how a slow phone feels too
OC is the best way to improve performance. Look at benchmarks:
ours 800MHz: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=2869
1GHz: http://www.antutu.com/view.shtml?id=1632
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay it's up to you
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk 2
If You have sources for NovaThor chipset (https://www.change.org/petitions/st-ericsson-release-the-sources-for-the-nova-thor-chipset#share) it could be easier to do something for our CPU, right?
I don't think so. Whole source code (including parts made by ST-Ericsson) needed to build kernel are provided by Samsung.
I don't really know what kind of sources they want to get from ST-Ericsson.
ccnky said:
I don't think so. Whole source code (including parts made by ST-Ericsson) needed to build kernel are provided by Samsung.
I don't really know what kind of sources they want to get from ST-Ericsson.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if that was the case then why aren't more ux500 socs are OC'ed
"You know you're rooted when Samsung's sales reps are in awe when they saw your phone running Jelly Bean and has Note II's Lockscreen"
Hi, I need some volunteers
http://d-h.st/WGO that's my kernel. ONLY FOR ADVANCED USERS! INCREASES FLASH COUNTER
It don't blow up your phone but GSM is not working, and there's some bug with shell root permission.
I want you to flash it (via Odin), wipe data (so do it only if you have backup!) and try it in benchmark.
Effect won't be so large because of shell bug but I want to try it on more devices.
Here's stock kernel http://d-h.st/vjM
EDIT: THANKS FOR TESTS. DO NOT FLASH THIS KERNEL ANYMORE
ccnky said:
Hi, I need some volunteers
http://d-h.st/WGO that's my kernel. ONLY FOR ADVANCED USERS! INCREASES FLASH COUNTER
It don't blow up your phone but GSM is not working, and there's some bug with shell root permission.
I want you to flash it (via Odin), wipe data (so do it only if you have backup!) and try it in benchmark.
Effect won't be so large because of shell bug but I want to try it on more devices.
Here's stock kernel http://d-h.st/vjM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GB or JB ??
cbolumar said:
GB or JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JB MC8
Related
Extremely Alpha Code
Hey everyone...
I've developed what I think is the first 1.2ghz overclock for the Galaxy tab Sprint ONLY.
WARNING: THIS KERNEL MAY NOT WORK ON YOUR DEVICE, MIGHT DESTROY YOUR DEVICE, MIGHT PUNCH YOUR CHILDREN, I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THIS KERNEL, USE AT YOUR OWN RISK
Whew... now that the warning is out of the way I present a 1.4/1.2 overclock based off of the details here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=943669
Quadrant Score: 1129
Linpack Score: 19.29
You will want to unpack the zImage and push it over with Heimdall, while in download mode (hold down power + vol-down until you get the download mode screen).
FOR OTHER DEVELOPERS
------------------------------------------
As I stated before, if you follow the link above and modify the exact same lines you can add this to you kernels as well.. however the file names are different, the files you want to modify are..
arch/arm/plat-samsung/max8998_consumer.c
arch/arm/plat-samsung/s5pc11x-dvfs.c
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
The last one took me forever to grep and find...
This is just the first of many versions, I will look into other CPU frequencies and voltages, lets see how far we can push this baby.
Donate!
V3.3 --- EXT4 ONLY Kernel... only use this if you are on ext4
V3.1 --- Fixed Ext4(?) NOPE
V3.0 --- Based on EA24 Source - untested with older software. Adds EXT4 (broken)
V2.0 --- 1.4/1.2 GHZ OC, reverted previous changes, NO EXT4 (yet..) ONLY FOR SPRINT, USB FIXED - based on koxudaxi's patch
You'll want to use the voltage control app here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=943669
V1.2 --- 1.2 ghz OC, 1.35 Overvolt (for stability), ext2/3/4/rfs
V1.1 --- Added 1ghz back in as a choice, reset your setcpu to select it.
V1.0 --- Added 1.2ghz overclock (replaced 1.0ghz default, will fix later)
would you be willing to do one for us gsm users if we provide kernals for you
Testing now but awesome work!! Works like a charm! I would take it it would run stable about the same speeds as the other Hummingbird processors at normal voltage ( 1200 ) and lower voltages at 1440 just fine but who knows
This is with this Kernel and OCLF.
(LinPack 17.5)
(Quad Score 2369)
(SmartBench 1469 3344)
Damn you, sprint users. . At least there is hope for pushing the Tab now, cheers
How about just setting #define USE_1DOT2GHZ 1 in s5pc11x-dvfs.c and in linux/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu-freq.c?
That should switch everything to 1.2GHz tables that Samsung nicely prepared for us?
it seems to work for me just fine.
how to update?
Are you sure it works without altering clock.c? Until I changed that file my device was reporting 1.2ghz but it was still super slow.
EDIT: nvm, you're right. Changing that would change clock.c as well. I don't plan on using the default tables, but it's a good place to start if you want to stick to default values. I know this thing can do more than 1.2ghz.
Sent from my galaxy tab
b0ricuaguerrero said:
would you be willing to do one for us gsm users if we provide kernals for you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone could do it easily, but I"ll see what I can do. I've gotten ahold of roto's initrd, I just need to grab the source from Samsung. I don't get home until very late in the evening so I can't promise that someone won't beat me to it!
Please, someone beat him to it.
I've never flashed a kernel before, but it worked without a hitch. Thanks!
This sounds awesome, I'm curious if it makes a big difference in performance and how it affects battery life, those of you that use it please post your experiences! Thanks! I know using custom kernels on my N1 makes a huge difference though so I'm hoping this does too...
Looking forward to seeing how much difference this makes, my n900 i clock to 1.2ghz from the default 600 clock (downclocked cortex A7 @ 600mhz default). so pretty sure the tab should do 1.4 or so faultlessly?
Looking forward to GSM revisions, hopefully Roto may even include this in his roms later (well i'm wishing ^^).
Nice to see someone brave enough to start the ball rolling
futuregerald said:
This sounds awesome, I'm curious if it makes a big difference in performance and how it affects battery life, those of you that use it please post your experiences! Thanks! I know using custom kernels on my N1 makes a huge difference though so I'm hoping this does too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance increase is definitely noticeable, a lot less lag all around.
Sent from my galaxy tab
had my first lockup with it trying to play 1080p file in vplayer since vplayer don't use gpu to render. But basic video player plays fine just guessing voltage is a little high but who knows still awesome: )
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
Any word on if this will work for vzw?
I just bought a Galaxy tab and I've never built an Android Kernel before but I spent yesterday tearing through the how-to from the CM guys. I'm familiar with C pretty well, so I was glad to see that I'd be building C and not some Java I'd be totally illiterate to. I'm hoping stepping up to these crazy ARM cores from my usual embedded work with AVR's and 32mhz ARMs shouldn't have too terrible a learning curve.
Anyone who's done kernel building for android before: Is it pretty much a straight forward build process? For some of the embedded work I've done with RTOS systems I've spent days digging through memory maps, linker files and assembly code to trouble shoot issues... Just curious if those will be useful skills for android?
TheCodeBenders said:
Any word on if this will work for vzw?
I just bought a Galaxy tab and I've never built an Android Kernel before but I spent yesterday tearing through the how-to from the CM guys. I'm familiar with C pretty well, so I was glad to see that I'd be building C and not some Java I'd be totally illiterate to. I'm hoping stepping up to these crazy ARM cores from my usual embedded work with AVR's and 32mhz ARMs shouldn't have too terrible a learning curve.
Anyone who's done kernel building for android before: Is it pretty much a straight forward build process? For some of the embedded work I've done with RTOS systems I've spent days digging through memory maps, linker files and assembly code to trouble shoot issues... Just curious if those will be useful skills for android?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually used the Verizon kernel configuration, since there is no sprint one. I think it should work on Verizon.. make a kernel backup first!
The only difference could be in the initrd but I have no way of knowing until someone tries it.
Bauxite said:
I actually used the Verizon kernel configuration, since there is no sprint one. I think it should work on Verizon.. make a kernel backup first!
The only difference could be in the initrd but I have no way of knowing until someone tries it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You used the .config file? I spent a few hours trying to get a config file setup right.. then u posted which thank you! Lol
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
The configuration files are stored in arch/arm/configs
There is one for every type of tab
Sent from my galaxy tab
Bauxite said:
The configuration files are stored in arch/arm/configs
There is one for every type of tab
Sent from my galaxy tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Files, sources, app:
www . Der Kernel . com
Source: http://www.bitbucket.org/morfic/
Off-Topic discussions are encouraged in this thread.
You are welcome if you can accept that.
Off topic posts can't be reported as per kennyglass123 mod par excellence.
4.2.2 kernel will not boot 4.2.1 roms or hybrid roms like CM due to need for newer gpu drivers!
If your hybrid rom doesn't boot with a real 4.2.2 kernel, you need these libs. (Thanks j3r3myp)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TNP1 and TNP2 4.3 kernels are first 4.3 builds running at 1344 CPU / 384 GPU matrix of 9 will come after TNP2 has reached a few days of testing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featuring:
Offering lowered voltages
Build optimizations
Performance through research
Removed wasteful debugging
Optimized ext4 mount options
VM, Filesystem, governor tweaks
Color Control
Contrast Control
Sound Control
Vibration Control (3/15/2012)
307MHz to 512MHz GPU as indicated in filename
1344 to 1728MHz as indicated in filename or any in between or above
Bull**** Free (Not pushing buzzwords to drop them later like others)
Tabs on the site:
Release: Kernels that have passed the experimental stage and matured in "Prerelease" (Full 3x3 kernel sets typically)
Prerelease: New kernels deemed to now be ready for stabilizing, consider this the Release sandbox (Full 3x3 kernel sets typically)
! Experimental !: The latest ideas, tweaks, features, test builds for users get tried here in limited sets to help speed development.
Useful Trinity & Rasbean FAQ
(Contributed by GideonX)
Why you want Trinity Colors
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First! Yay yay....awesome morfic!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Finally!
Great work as always and thank you for letting me enjoy the journey from the start..
Hope we have phone in your hands in no time now.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
vel1m1r said:
Finally!
Great work as always and thank you for letting me enjoy the journey from the start..
Hope we have phone in your hands in no time now.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like you are getting off this ride, the trip starts now.
morfic said:
Sounds like you are getting off this ride, the trip starts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah!!!!! TRINITY on GN!!!! Amazing!
And damn, ... i have not the 2nd post!
Hopefully you´ll get your GN soon!
morfic said:
Sounds like you are getting off this ride, the trip starts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, just need to recuperate for a night and will be F5ing for Trinity-NP-Purgatorio15.zip in the morning.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
NOOOO!!!!! i missed first post
haha
Good work!
let the crack flashing begin everyone!
512mhz gpu ? OMFG bsum;$**&2?#98$
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I came from sgs, so I never used Trinity, which I believe had a nexus s version.
But i've heard nice things about it.
Thanks for all the efforts
and morfic arrives....512 mhz gpu soundz interestings...try now yours work!thanks man!
bk201doesntexist said:
I came from sgs, so I never used Trinity, which I believe had a nexus s version.
But i've heard nice things about it.
Thanks for all the efforts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Vibrant, Trinity was DoW.
But there are more SGS flavors than stars in the sky, so that might not change anything
Sent from my RW Sensation.
Based on feedback received over the past week+ I would probably prefer the 384MHz inferno.
Sent from my RW Sensation.
If you are benchmarking be sure to force gpu rendering and edit file in /system/lib/egl and delete first line totally, so only the second line stays (thanks bigxie )..
Here are another 2 build.prop tricks your rom might or might not use:
ro.kernel.android.checkjni=0
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=240
Paste anywhere in build.prop. it won't change benchmarks, but real feel.
Hope this helps
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Morfic, I have thorough enjoyed testing your kernels and im glad it has progressed this far! You don't even have a Galaxy Nexus yet! Hopefully once people get a taste. Of your kernels, more people will donate!
Even though you just started developing for the gnex, your kernel is already amazing! Thanks for all the hard work!
Now I'm jealous that I did not get to try them out
Morfic I gotta say helping you test these was a pleasure. This thing at 512 MHz gpu is super smooth and quick. My battery life over the past day has also been stellar. Can't wait for you to get the phone so you can run the fruits of your labor lol. Amazing work man.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Morfic. I have just tryed your kernel with the 512Mhz gpu and am curiuos, have you increased the voltage as well as the cycles or is it set the same as standard?
simms22 said:
Now I'm jealous that I did not get to try them out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simms, you got gnex too? I read you were trying to sell your ns? It was fun, my phone likes new things.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
512mhz gpu oh my..hope that this doesnt burn up anyone's phone lol..that said probably gonna test boot it.
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not noticing any GPU performance increase with Inferno512. Playing games and running benchmarks seems to yield the same results (CDMA LTE version).
Thanks for your hard work!
I found this overclocking tip from this site http://galaxyygamingarena.blogspot.in/2012/08/1ghz-overclock-simply.html Can anyone verify this is legit or fake?????????????????????????????????
l0lh4rd said:
I found this overclocking tip from this site http://galaxyygamingarena.blogspot.in/2012/08/1ghz-overclock-simply.html Can anyone verify this is legit or fake?????????????????????????????????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you flash this kernel or not i avoid t flash this and lost my mob
I want to know whether its fake or not? I don't want to take the risk of damaging my phone
l0lh4rd said:
I want to know whether its fake or not? I don't want to take the risk of damaging my phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont try it bro. Look at meruk kernels thread in development section.there is no feature called overclocking.
I have heard in past that he made a overclocking kernel which was abandoned.
My advice.most the developers are in xda.most blogs copy paste their work.do a search in xda before doing something risky.
send from Gods Own Country........
It works, you can overclock to 900MHz and also, 1GHz, but it drains battery like anything, almost 5x times, mines over at just 3 hours with normal usage, and some fcs with multi tasking, it isnt stable. So better not use it and btw, if something like this comes, it comes first at xda, dont waste your time reading other blogs.
BTW, its copied from merruk kernel thread from development section.
I overclocked with this kernel
Improved benchmark score
But drains battery very fast
Better use a good kernel....
Sent from my GT-S5360 with chobitsv2 and white kernel...
Hi guys !
Whenever i do install any app from the market the whole SystemUI lag's (Too much of lag ) for 2-3 sec .
Is there any way to fix that ? , does it happen all the time to CM base roms ?
Please any help would be thankful .
Ashtrix said:
Hi guys !
Whenever i do install any app from the market the whole SystemUI lag's (Too much of lag ) for 2-3 sec .
Is there any way to fix that ? , does it happen all the time to CM base roms ?
Please any help would be thankful .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Happens in all ROMs because the system is writing to memory.. Thus reducing IO performance for any other process.
This has happened in all android devices I've ever owned.. And I've owned a lot of them.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
akira02rex said:
Happens in all ROMs because the system is writing to memory.. Thus reducing IO performance for any other process.
This has happened in all android devices I've ever owned.. And I've owned a lot of them.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree.
I feel it much smaller in Nexus 7 device. But on every device that I used there was something like this and it was there on almost every android version I tried. Just have to live with this.
actually mine doesnt lag at all. or at least doesnt bother me as you said 'too much lag'.
try this app and check if your emmc chip is sane: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1693704
there is a batch of bad emmc'd nexus out there, it might happen to you too.
bad one is: V3U00M chip
or you could try to change your i/o sheduler from any kernel control app, it might help.
check this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2029246
akira02rex said:
Happens in all ROMs because the system is writing to memory.. Thus reducing IO performance for any other process.
This has happened in all android devices I've ever owned.. And I've owned a lot of them.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had it on my Moto Droid & SGS too, i thought it was due to the CPU cores / GPU perf...
drmxmyt said:
actually mine doesnt lag at all. or at least doesnt bother me as you said 'too much lag'.
try this app and check if your emmc chip is sane: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1693704
there is a batch of bad emmc'd nexus out there, it might happen to you too.
bad one is: V3U00M chip
or you could try to change your i/o sheduler from any kernel control app, it might help.
check this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2029246
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay mine is VYL00M - FwRev-0x25 , but where did you get to know about these Faulty NAND chips in our Nexus phones ?, though heard about the faulty ones in SGS2 / Note due to the eMMC cap-erase Firmware revision update irreversible bug but none mentioned about the hardware faults.
My nexus's MTP transfer speeds are well + even then TWRP backup avg speeds would be around 7-12MB/s , i use Fiops / Deadline / row as my I/O schedulers and the ROM works pretty well, though the lag is the touch response do happen <= 1 sec & some times <= 2 sec .
I think it does depends on the kernel itself as Trinity has that lag for lesser time while the AK / AIR do have greater lag than that of Trinity's and not due to the ROM, well the Android writes the data onto the system and there's a drop in I/O perf that's very unfortunate .
EDIT : Okay found this Nexus's eMMC issues !
drmxmyt said:
actually mine doesnt lag at all. or at least doesnt bother me as you said 'too much lag'.
try this app and check if your emmc chip is sane: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1693704
there is a batch of bad emmc'd nexus out there, it might happen to you too.
bad one is: V3U00M chip
or you could try to change your i/o sheduler from any kernel control app, it might help.
check this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2029246
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upload a video.. I don't believe you.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Pretty sure this is just normal with every ROM
No it's true. I went back to stock based 4.2.1 cause the lag in CM 10.1 and based ROMs was a little too much for me. Specially after installing an app . Had to wait for a long time
I'm now in Purity 2.1 and it's running smooth again. Of course the phone is a tad slower but not as bad as CM10.1
eezdva said:
No it's true. I went back to stock based 4.2.1 cause the lag in CM 10.1 and based ROMs was a little too much for me. Specially after installing an app . Had to wait for a long time
I'm now in Purity 2.1 and it's running smooth again. Of course the phone is a tad slower but not as bad as CM10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, had to test it on Xylon also...my CM10.1 kang powered nexus makes me wait for a long time !
i think there's an I/O coding difference in these ROMs as always and this JB release made it even worse....still there are much more intuitive features in Xylon , CM , AOKP over the closer to stock ROM types.
Ashtrix said:
Hmm, had to test it on Xylon also...my CM10.1 kang powered nexus makes me wait for a long time !
i think there's an I/O coding difference in these ROMs as always and this JB release made it even worse....still there are much more intuitive features in Xylon , CM , AOKP over the closer to stock ROM types.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree but still I hope they fix it . I love CM and showing it off to other people or to Iphone users is even better but for the moment I'm always a little scared to show it cause there might be a huge delay lol. But on Purity for example it's great . For daily use and for showing off
Can I in any way whatsoever disable thermal throttling?
It just bugs me that I can't play any intense game due to severe frame drops. I would love to have the option of disabling the thermal throttling, but I got no idea how. Could you please help me?
Use Franco kernel (also available for KitKat) + Franco Kernel Updater.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Nexus @ CM11
AndyYan said:
Use Franco kernel (also available for KitKat) + Franco Kernel Updater.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Nexus @ CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any other way?
I can't understand how to flash my device or install custom ROMs, and Im afraid that I'll accidentally damage something.
Ecto17 said:
Is there any other way?
I can't understand how to flash my device or install custom ROMs, and Im afraid that I'll accidentally damage something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so, thermal throttling definitely has to do with the kernel and you certainly have to face that.
Just saying, why have a Nexus in the first place if you're afraid of / can't understand flashing?
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM11
AndyYan said:
I don't think so, thermal throttling definitely has to do with the kernel and you certainly have to face that.
Just saying, why have a Nexus in the first place if you're afraid of / can't understand flashing?
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess you're right.
Would those three guides be a proper start for me? I just dont want to brick my phone.
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-get-install-correct-driver-for.html
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-install-clockworkmod-recovery-on.html
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-flash-install-custom-romsthemes.html
Ecto17 said:
Well, I guess you're right.
Would those three guides be a proper start for me? I just dont want to brick my phone.
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-get-install-correct-driver-for.html
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-install-clockworkmod-recovery-on.html
http://www.androidrootz.com/2012/08/how-to-flash-install-custom-romsthemes.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...I think it would be better off to start from the stickies in the dev subforum.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Nexus @ CM11
Ecto17 said:
Can I in any way whatsoever disable thermal throttling?
It just bugs me that I can't play any intense game due to severe frame drops. I would love to have the option of disabling the thermal throttling, but I got no idea how. Could you please help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you can disable thermal throttling BUT you need a custom kernel. Also even with the throttle off , once your phones CPU hits a certain temp 120°c I believe , it'll shut down . and I guarantee that playing any game that taxes your phone will hit this temp if the throttle is off .
Simply put its not really a good idea , start with a custom kernel that can over clock the CPU and GPU and you should be OK , leave the throttle alone :thumbup:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk