My battery is Draining in CyanogenMod 10/10.1 . I have tried calibrating my battery, done battery cycles, used tons of different kernel with usage of different governors, but the battery doesn't last for even a day. Deep sleeps come about 96%-85%. I have even turned off WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS etc.
In Gingerbread the battery is very good and does not drain like in CyanogenMod. I have tried battery saving apps such as Juice Defender and noticed that battery drains more faster than usual. Is there any FiX?!
I just wiped my phone and started from scratch and decided to not add any tweaks at all. I am using Cm9 RC8 with Hursky kernel 2.6 and I've noticed a huge jump in my battery life. Before I was using RAM Manager with Cross breeder with XBurst on RC 6 with Chronos and I find my phone is actually faster without them. Before, with limited use, I was getting 16 hours maximum and now I was able to get a day and a half under the same conditions!
I wonder which change would make the biggest difference, but maybe give it a try. My phone feels more stable too.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
tebor8 said:
I just wiped my phone and started from scratch and decided to not add any tweaks at all. I am using Cm9 RC8 with Hursky kernel 2.6 and I've noticed a huge jump in my battery life. Before I was using RAM Manager with Cross breeder with XBurst on RC 6 with Chronos and I find my phone is actually faster without them. Before, with limited use, I was getting 16 hours maximum and now I was able to get a day and a half under the same conditions!
I wonder which change would make the biggest difference, but maybe give it a try. My phone feels more stable too.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So Cm has very good battery life....I see. But I dint install any tweaks but battery still drains..well I will give it a try.
Probably because CM 10/10.1 is still at its early stages? Cm9 is quite stable thus the battery is good.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
imadiu said:
Probably because CM 10/10.1 is still at its early stages? Cm9 is quite stable thus the battery is good.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted a solution on how to get good battery life in Jelly Bean...but I will try Cm9 with fresh apps.
If you want a even better battery life than tebor8 is having, use CM9 RC2 or RC3 with 2.6.35 kernel, or the older Slimbeam ROM with 2.6.35 kernel. The old 2.6.35 kernel is draining much less than the new 3.x kernel in CM9 and CM10.
honeyx said:
If you want a even better battery life than tebor8 is having, use CM9 RC2 or RC3 with 2.6.35 kernel, or the older Slimbeam ROM with 2.6.35 kernel. The old 2.6.35 kernel is draining much less than the new 3.x kernel in CM9 and CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to use the latest CyanogenMod, but still if the battery lasts for at least 1 and a half day, its somewhat enough.
Related
On juggernaut ROM and I don't know why but my battery drains faster than my vibrant with ics I have no widgets or installed any apps
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
post some screens of battery use.
mines pretty good. apart from the basics try disabling wifi/4g when your not actually using the internet.
Hercules was here
I tried JuiceDefender on the market (Free one) and I seem to be getting better bettery life.
airhop7 said:
On juggernaut ROM and I don't know why but my battery drains faster than my vibrant with ics I have no widgets or installed any apps
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel on juggernaut overclocks. this offers better performance, but drains the battery faster.
How long have you been using the juggernaut Rom?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Give eugenes rom a go, it has a custom kernel. Ill post some screenies of my battery life as soon as I hop on a computer
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
airhop7 said:
On juggernaut ROM and I don't know why but my battery drains faster than my vibrant with ics I have no widgets or installed any apps
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHOA it's rare to see someone say that the battery life is horrible in this forum. You should try a new fresh wipe and install, and try different kernels.
Try darksides super wipe then re install juggernaut ROM. Make sure not to run setcpu or any other cpu apps, I was having bad battery drain running setcpu.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App
Setcpu leaves a core on so I advise against it
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Teo032 said:
WHOA it's rare to see someone say that the battery life is horrible in this forum. You should try a new fresh wipe and install, and try different kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
From a galaxy better than yours.
What kernel are you using?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
vabeach454 said:
I tried JuiceDefender on the market (Free one) and I seem to be getting better bettery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i actually think those "battery saving" and task killer apps uses up more juice than saving ... i had juicedefender ultimate and i noticed my battery drain when it was enabled .. i deleted the app and ive noticed a great improvement on my battery .
Agree
I was also getting horrible battery life on the Juggernaut roms. I tried the bullet kernel, synergy, and faux kernels with all sorts of different ways to reduce battery consumption such as underclocking, undervolting, uninstalling bloat, and removing apps from startup. No matter what, my phone would always be dead by the time I came home from work/school (I'm usually away from home from 630am until 800pm).
I recently started using the DARKSIDE rom/kernel in the hopes that it would provide some better battery life and I am actually getting significantly longer usage times. As of right now after ~15 hours of time spent off the charger and with moderate use (~500 texts/day, XDA app, FB checking, random Internet usage), I have just under 40% battery life remaining. I must say I am very impressed with this rom and give the developer TDJ mad props.
So here's my battery life with Eugene's Macnut ROM:
Compared to this (Juggernaut 4.1 with ICS Ultimate Theme):
I run juggs with TDJ Darkside kernel, kernel makes huge diff
airhop7 said:
On juggernaut ROM and I don't know why but my battery drains faster than my vibrant with ics I have no widgets or installed any apps
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Juggs 4.1 as well previously with the FAUX123 kernel and decided to try out TDJ's Darkside kernel. Wow, huge difference, highly recommend. I use system tuner app to adjust my speeds but main thing in system tuner app is to go into boot settings and set screen-off to powersave governor and max frequence to 800, 500 etc.
I also run easy bettery saver and that helps as well. Battery life is best I have ever had with my G2 and I got it first day it came out and have run most all of the rom's kernels on it. If you can I would suggest running TDJ's Darkside rom as well. I would but just don't want to reload again at this point.
DK
I'll try darkside rom and see if it fixes my battery drain problem.
cashyftw said:
Setcpu leaves a core on so I advise against it
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for this, I wasnt aware of that, what do you use to change your clockspeed when your screen is off? I recently switch from an iphone and unfortunately battery life seems to be something I have to actually think about now. I know its a faster processor and a bigger screen so I get it, I just never had to worry about turning off wifi and things like that before. I currently am running beastmod 4.2 with darkside kernel. I have 9hrs on battery at 41% with 2 hrs and 15 min of display. Im not really interested in speed at this point so I thought setcpu was a good thing to use to underclock and use less battery. Can you recommend any good alternatives or should I not bother with setcpu type apps. Thanks in advance
On darkside... Not the current one but the one before it... I think it was version 1r2 or something like that. Battery is great, better than juggernaut. I have bluetooth and Wifi on all day
schgittyfour said:
i actually think those "battery saving" and task killer apps uses up more juice than saving ... i had juicedefender ultimate and i noticed my battery drain when it was enabled .. i deleted the app and ive noticed a great improvement on my battery .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They gobble up a TINY bit more CPU (probably no more than 1% throughout the entire charge) at the cost of managing your data settings. It saves juice primarily when your phone is idling. It pings, it checks data thresholds. The main idea is that it turns off 4g/wifi when you're not using it, and back on when you are. This requires a little but of CPU, but you end up having a battery that lasts much longer.
There's never be a time when you're using your phone 100% of the time on battery. There's ALWAYS idle time.
So my battery life is just not good, I'm wondering if there is something I'm doing wrong or not doing.... but even when the phone is off it loses battery life really quick.
Is there maybe something I'm missing or need to do?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Happens to me too...I tried calibrator apps and still no luck i actually left cm9 last night and to rujelus22 it was good but ended up running into problems but maybe you should try flashing a different rom or charge your phone fully then reflash cm9 let the battery drain all the way then charge it again fully...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Yeah I wasn't sure if there is some setting I can change, might just end up getting the bigger battery like I did my Evo and call it a day! Other then that I love my cm9
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Hey, I would try to flash an updated kernel for the cm9 alpha 3. Alpha3 comes with FD10 and I found that it made the Android OS drain my battery faster than it should. With FD26 the Android OS drain on my battery has been much lower. However, from what I hear which kernel works best varies on the phone, so I would try a couple others.
sorry because I'm new to Gnex, but I need some recommendation about the best ROM and kernel combination for battery life.. I'm now on stock 4.04 ROM & kernel.. •thanks if anybody can help me answer my question
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
I'm running gummy 101 and leankernel 340, nice and fast and i get anywhere from 12-24 hours on the 1850 mah stock battery
You touched a very sensitive part of gnex
Gnex battery sucks and everybody knows it
But all you get is an answer that: battery life for different users on a same ROM+kernel will always be different.
But I will tell you a secret No matter what rom or kernel you will use, you will still need to charge it overnight
Mine setup stock rom + franco kernel. Tried different kernel settings and seems that all I got is maybe +1hour of standby time. Screen time didnt increase a minute.
Joebob101 said:
I'm running gummy 101 and leankernel 340, nice and fast and i get anywhere from 12-24 hours on the 1850 mah stock battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so is it better than stock rom n kernel..
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
bullka said:
You touched a very sensitive part of gnex
Gnex battery sucks and everybody knows it
But all you get is an answer that: battery life for different users on a same ROM+kernel will always be different.
But I will tell you a secret No matter what rom or kernel you will use, you will still need to charge it overnight
Mine setup stock rom + franco kernel. Tried different kernel settings and seems that all I got is maybe +1hour of standby time. Screen time didnt increase a minute.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah it sucks indeed but sorry i don't understand your last sentence, what standby time and screen time? related to battery? i'm newbie sorry
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
crazyg4merz said:
yeah it sucks indeed but sorry i don't understand your last sentence, what standby time and screen time? related to battery? i'm newbie sorry
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
screen time refers to the time your screen is on. standby refers to the time your screen is off.
I am using the same combo as above - stock 4.0.4 ROM + franco kernel 3.0.8 M3. I am getting about 4 hours screen on time + 12-14 hours standby time with heavy usage.
i would also recommend you to install better battery stats and cpuspy to weed out any rogue applications preventing your phone to go to deep sleep.
I'm running winner00's cyanogenmod kang with the 551 Franco nightly, seems to be a very stable combination with pretty decent battery life.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Same topic yesterday
look into this thread answered already
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1627414
smokestorm said:
screen time refers to the time your screen is on. standby refers to the time your screen is off.
I am using the same combo as above - stock 4.0.4 ROM + franco kernel 3.0.8 M3. I am getting about 4 hours screen on time + 12-14 hours standby time with heavy usage.
i would also recommend you to install better battery stats and cpuspy to weed out any rogue applications preventing your phone to go to deep sleep.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see, so that's what he refer to..
I've better battery stats and cpuspy stuff, and I've no problem with deep sleep and rogue app.. but I'd like to try custom rom because I'm getting bored with stock.. any recommendation?
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
I would prefer AOKP or Liquid Smooth
But you have to try out your personal prefer, but starting with AOKP isn't a bad thing
klauhr said:
I would prefer AOKP or Liquid Smooth
But you have to try out your personal prefer, but starting with AOKP isn't a bad thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can u please explain it more clearly? like which one is more battery friendly, performance, and bugs..
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
Battery is mostyl kernel thing there i would prefer franco.kernel latest milestone is great for battery life if you are friend of testing you could install latest nightly. All explained into his thread in Developer section.
As stable ROM testing AOKP Milestone 5 release some days ago and it is very stable i think. It was also my first rom some months ago.
If you want compare this roms you should look into the threads, very helpful for me at begining.
Liquidsmooth is very clean and small only 80Mb compare to 140Mb they smalled the code an tried to be fastest an clean. If you try the latest release you get franco kernel milestone 3. Many users prefer this stock-kernel combination for battery life. But remeber it is only in english language if that is no problem try out.
If you are familar to testing something look at latest nigthlys from rom and kernel and testing it out.
klauhr said:
I would prefer AOKP or Liquid Smooth
But you have to try out your personal prefer, but starting with AOKP isn't a bad thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry double post
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
klauhr said:
Battery is mostyl kernel thing there i would prefer franco.kernel latest milestone is great for battery life if you are friend of testing you could install latest nightly. All explained into his thread in Developer section.
As stable ROM testing AOKP Milestone 5 release some days ago and it is very stable i think. It was also my first rom some months ago.
If you want compare this roms you should look into the threads, very helpful for me at begining.
Liquidsmooth is very clean and small only 80Mb compare to 140Mb they smalled the code an tried to be fastest an clean. If you try the latest release you get franco kernel milestone 3. Many users prefer this stock-kernel combination for battery life. But remeber it is only in english language if that is no problem try out.
If you are familar to testing something look at latest nigthlys from rom and kernel and testing it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for your very detailed explaination mate.. looks like I am going liquid+stock/franco kernel
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
crazyg4merz said:
sorry because I'm new to Gnex, but I need some recommendation about the best ROM and kernel combination for battery life.. I'm now on stock 4.04 ROM & kernel.. •thanks if anybody can help me answer my question
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is strictly a taste perspective. I am running Banf Paradigm 1.25 with the Jame Bond Kernel. Pretty sweet.
These threads need to stop. There's one of these daily. Invest some time into your phone and just flash the **** on your own and find one that suits your needs and demands. People love to play the noob card but its just pure laziness.
good day.
chopper the dog said:
These threads need to stop. There's one of these daily. Invest some time into your phone and just flash the **** on your own and find one that suits your needs and demands. People love to play the noob card but its just pure laziness.
good day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry if u think that this thread is useless, and u say u see it daily, but a newbie like me think that this thread is very useful because I can get information before flashing any rom and I had searched for at least 5 pages in the Q&A and got nothing so I started this thread.. and I'm asking not because of laziness, but not every people like to download everything like u do, especially for low speed internet users.. and this is a Q&A thread that is made for this.. so I don't think I'm wrong asking here.. good day
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1627414&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1623372&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1624629&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1605915&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1603740&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1595903&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1591442&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1571178&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1553836&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547920&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1543753&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1537663&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1531024&highlight=best+rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1520952&highlight=best+rom
That's just page one of the 5 returned. Yes, laziness I say.
good day.
I have been rocking Bamf with whatever kernel it comes with and I am not getting great battery life. Bamf is wicked, but only getting like 2 hours on screen time. What are other people using for a kernel with Bamf?
In your opinion, what is the best ROM you've used?
Sent from my LG Nitro, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged.
HO!NO! Full Throttle but I'm still testing pA 2.35. Wish we had a oc/uv kernel for JB/CM10.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
It would be nice. Tweaks are good for now but remember, nothing is impossible. It'll happen. Just give it time.
Sent from my LG Nitro, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged.
I use CM9 RC1. For some reason it works much better than RC2 and the stable version on my phone.
nightlimits said:
It would be nice. Tweaks are good for now but remember, nothing is impossible. It'll happen. Just give it time.
Sent from my LG Nitro, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I know. I came from the X2 that virtually had 0 dev but grew over time. I'm patiently waiting.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
X0dus said:
Oh I know. I came from the X2 that virtually had 0 dev but grew over time. I'm patiently waiting.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How was the x2 compared to the nitro?
Sent from my LG Nitro, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged.
Dual 1ghz w/ 512mb RAM. Pentile screen. Moto locked bootloader. Enough said. Lol This phone owns the X2 in all aspects
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
Nice.. I came from a mytouch 3g slide. 600 MHz Qualcomm processor, 3.4 inch screen and 100MB internal storage.
Sent from my LG Nitro, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged.
Miui from LU6200.
Screenshot. Feel free to post yours if you feel like it. I like to see the different ROMs and themes people have.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium
CyanogenMod 10 was just released as stable for us, I believe soon enough they will develop and overclock kernel and we'll be all set.
However, does anyone think that a downgrade to HONO Full Throttle is worth it for the ability to overclock? From what I understand, it is a small OC of about 20% to 1.86Ghz. Does it really make that big of a difference?
Technocian said:
CyanogenMod 10 was just released as stable for us, I believe soon enough they will develop and overclock kernel and we'll be all set.
However, does anyone think that a downgrade to HONO Full Throttle is worth it for the ability to overclock? From what I understand, it is a small OC of about 20% to 1.86Ghz. Does it really make that big of a difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want try it then make a backup and test it out. Full throttle is a step back and I prefer the JB ROMs. But its worth a shot. Just watch your battery stats with OCing, Typically a higher CPU uses more battery.
Sent from my LG-P930, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged, using xda premium
Technocian said:
CyanogenMod 10 was just released as stable for us, I believe soon enough they will develop and overclock kernel and we'll be all set.
However, does anyone think that a downgrade to HONO Full Throttle is worth it for the ability to overclock? From what I understand, it is a small OC of about 20% to 1.86Ghz. Does it really make that big of a difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Full Throttle is my daily driver. It's a small OC but it's better than nothing. My Antutu score hit 7200 and my Quadrant averages 3750. I also OC the GPU even though its default is already OC'd. The battery on Full Throttle is FAR better than any JB ROM I've used, so far. On a normal day (txting, couple calls, browsing, ect) I get about 20+ hours w/ 3hrs of 'Screen On' time. It may be a downgrade, but it's best I've used. I also have my UV settings set to best battery life w/out causing reboots. Love Full Throttle! Patiently waiting for HO!NO! to commence dev work and see what else he has to offer.
EDIT: I just leave the OC stock @ 1728Mhz as well. I tried 1836 but after playing a game for a bit it overheats and reboots. Also doesn't pass a stability test @ 1836, but every phone seems different on what clock it can handle..
Okay, I've tried both.
From a very limited usage, I am going to conclude that CM10 stable is currently the better ROM. Being able to overclock ~20% on an older ROM does not actually match the performance boost of upgrading to a new, more efficient ROM. Now if only we had more developers for the Nitro.
Technocian said:
Okay, I've tried both.
From a very limited usage, I am going to conclude that CM10 stable is currently the better ROM. Being able to overclock ~20% on an older ROM does not actually match the performance boost of upgrading to a new, more efficient ROM. Now if only we had more developers for the Nitro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait. So u asked today if it would be worth trying Full Throttle, and now you "have" and conclude cm10 stable is better simply b/c it's newer? JB is smoother, yes, but I seriously doubt you gave the Full Throttle ROM a proper run (2-3 days). My 4 days of cm10 "stable" was riddled with reboots and battery drain equal to about 7%/hr. Smooth, yes.
EDIT: If you haven't tried it, pA 2.5x is pretty cool. It's based on CM10 stable now. The battery life is horrible, but there wasn't any annoying reboots.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
X0dus said:
Wait. So u asked today if it would be worth trying Full Throttle, and now you "have" and conclude cm10 stable is better simply b/c it's newer? JB is smoother, yes, but I seriously doubt you gave the Full Throttle ROM a proper run (2-3 days). My 4 days of cm10 "stable" was riddled with reboots and battery drain equal to about 7%/hr. Smooth, yes.
EDIT: If you haven't tried it, pA 2.5x is pretty cool. It's based on CM10 stable now. The battery life is horrible, but there wasn't any annoying reboots.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I beg to differ on the reboots... actually, no. I call them random shut-downs. Had 3 since flashing 2.55, but I'm still sticking with it. X0dus, I just don't understand how you get so much better battery life on FT than any of the CM10 variants. I'm not disputing it, I just don't get it. If anything, the experience I had as far as battery life goes was about equal. In fact, the best battery life I've gotten so far was on an earlier, buggier version of CM10.
About an hr and half screen on time w/ stock battery. Not a normal use day due to 10hr shift but still use
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
X0dus said:
About an hr and half screen on time w/ stock battery. Not a normal use day due to 10hr shift but still use
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mother of God... that's absolutely insane. Even with the Hyperion extended battery I couldn't get that kind of time... I don't do much calls or texting, no games, but I do a good bit of web browsing. Even on FT I couldn't pull those numbers.
Although I did pull something like 1 day 6 hours on that CM10 version I mentioned earlier... had about 3 hours screen on time.. but again, extended battery.
lordcheeto03 said:
Mother of God... that's absolutely insane. Even with the Hyperion extended battery I couldn't get that kind of time... I don't do much calls or texting, no games, but I do a good bit of web browsing. Even on FT I couldn't pull those numbers.
Although I did pull something like 1 day 6 hours on that CM10 version I mentioned earlier... had about 3 hours screen on time.. but again, extended battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice. I love the performance of JB but I can't give this sort of battery life up. All JB ROMS drain is terrible for me. I swear it's the uv'n I do with FT that helps. If I go any lower with uv I get reboots.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
If its battery life you want, check this out.
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=160836703916
Sent from my LG-P930, ParanoidAndroid, Supercharged, using xda premium
Any help for that? I think it drains battery faster than the stock ROM
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
i tried it with franco kernel and battery life seemed better than stock to me...
k786 said:
i tried it with franco kernel and battery life seemed better than stock to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Placebo here...
Battery life on cm10.1 seemed just as good as stock to me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
To me it drains the battery very fast. Hmm
Batt drains fast
I've noticed a quicker drain on the batt as well. When I looked at the batt info it had Messaging using 67% of the battery. This is with the first release of CM 10.1
I am loading the latest nightly now. Lets see if that fixes it.
Battery on 10.1 cm with stock cm kernel was definitely worse than stock. With Trinity it wasn't so bad but was not stable. Aosp ROM with Trinity seems to be the best battery life right now.
I'm using rasbean jelly. And it's a beast man. Great in every aspect!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Batt drain
Spud_79 said:
I've noticed a quicker drain on the batt as well. When I looked at the batt info it had Messaging using 67% of the battery. This is with the first release of CM 10.1
I am loading the latest nightly now. Lets see if that fixes it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what the problem was but after loading a new nightly the batt life improved. Messaging doesn't even show up on batt statistics.