Develop Bugs

[REF] cifs.ko for samsung galaxy s [including froyo 2.2]

This is the kernel module for smb/cifs mount.(windows shares)
You need it for example for this: hxxp://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=756158
I didn't found a compatible cifs.ko for samsung s anywhere so I had to compile it.
[recommended] cifs.zip - Eclair(2.1)
[recommended] froyo.zip - Froyo(2.2) - cifs.ko & slow-work.ko (insmod slow-work.ko first)
cifs_froyo_slow_work.zip - Froyo(2.2) - cifs & slow_work in one .ko Do NOT use this because its buggy (slow, reboots when rmmod)

could you pls explain what is this for? Experts needn't, but there're lots of newbies hangin aroud here, like me . Thanks

It's a kind of file system like ext2/3/4, for example.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

This is the kernel module for smb/cifs mount.(windows shares)
You need it for example for this: hxxp://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=756158
I didn't found a compatible cifs.ko for samsung s anywhere so I had to compile it.

Awsome. We can now mount samba shares! Freakin awsome
Sent from my Apple Newton 2100

You have my gratitude

Very usefull! thank you!

i'm back, when i'm trying an insmod i have cifs.ko : invalid module format
i use a jm5 samset 1.9f roms.

I use jm5 (mimocam's fix + root) and I've compiled the module from source-code provided by samsung (opensource.samsung.com) using arm-none-eabi-(Sourcery G++ from codesourcery.com). Maybe samset used something else which is incompatible.

ickyboo said:
Sent from my Apple Newton 2100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bwahahahaha

ethanfel said:
i'm back, when i'm trying an insmod i have cifs.ko : invalid module format
i use a jm5 samset 1.9f roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Setenza said he'll add Cifs in the next SamSet release.

can you make one that is compatible with the Vibrant version? Either stock Vibrant kernel or any working kernel compatible.
Greatly appreciated

I've tried the module, but also get the "invalid module format" message.
However, I'm using JM5 + root using kernel 2.6.29 built on Fri Jul 30 15:12:44 KST 2010 armv71 GNU/Linux
Can you tell us for which kernel you've build this module?

thoriam said:
I've tried the module, but also get the "invalid module format" message.
However, I'm using JM5 + root using kernel 2.6.29 built on Fri Jul 30 15:12:44 KST 2010 armv71 GNU/Linux
Can you tell us for which kernel you've build this module?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've compiled for kernel 2.6.29.2 using samsung's sources
my phone says he has kernel 2.6.29 [email protected] #1
I'm attaching the module compiled with latest toolchain I could find(binutils-2.20.1, gcc-4.5.1,newlib-1.18.0)

ctran81 said:
can you make one that is compatible with the Vibrant version? Either stock Vibrant kernel or any working kernel compatible.
Greatly appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No idea if will work bc I don't have a Vibrant.

In the mean time I've also compiled my own version of the cifs.ko module.
I've used the Samsung sources and used the Sourcery G++ Lite 2010q1-188 for ARM EABI toolchain.
I've only enabled cifs in the kernel config and compiled the module.
I've attached the compiled result.

Thanks for your effort. I'm using JM5 +samset1.9f and couldn't get the cifsmanager to work with all 3 of your cif.ko . I've just dont know why the size the last 2 versions are huge compare to the first one? Thanks anyway. Hope you can come up with something.
thoriam said:
In the mean time I've also compiled my own version of the cifs.ko module.
I've used the Samsung sources and used the Sourcery G++ Lite 2010q1-188 for ARM EABI toolchain.
I've only enabled cifs in the kernel config and compiled the module.
I've attached the compiled result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

darkbyt3 said:
no idea if will work bc i don't have a vibrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you very much. It's working on my stock vibrant kernel! YOU ROCK SIR! (using attached vibrant.zip)
Now I can stream all my media files!
(I'm vary curious how you did this, if you can point me to some guides that would be awesome, (I can write some C/C++ code))

Works great for me - had been looking around to see if anybody had compiled the CIFS module for the Galaxy S. I started reading up on how to cross compile kernel modules myself but didn't get very far.
Anyway; I have a slight problem. while mounting and browsing from the terminal as root and through adb as non-root work, I can't seem to browse in any mounted folders actually on the device using either the stock 'My Files' or Astro which was what I was aiming to do.
What I do to mount said:
\\\\192.168.0.0\\Directory /sdcard/smbshare -o user=Username,pass=password,uid=1000,gid=1015
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without setting the user and group settings I can't browse unprivileged as everything in the share is 'owned' by root.
I also tried using mount -t smbfs //192.168.0.0/Directory /sdcard/smbshare with the same result.
Anybody else having a similar problem? Maybe it's just something obscure about my setup.

thoriam said:
In the mean time I've also compiled my own version of the cifs.ko module.
I've used the Samsung sources and used the Sourcery G++ Lite 2010q1-188 for ARM EABI toolchain.
I've only enabled cifs in the kernel config and compiled the module.
I've attached the compiled result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the noob questions:
- Can you please give more details on how to enable cifs in the kernel config?
- Is there a specific plate to copy the cifs.ko module?
- Is there a simple (one-click) way to install this?
- is the module dependent on the kernel version? has to be exactly the same?
- is there a easy way to check if it's working (I'm using cifsmanager and get some error saying cannot access device / folder not found -not sure about the exact message text)
Thanks in advance

[HOWTO] tun.ko to run OpenVPN on Froyo xxJPK Galaxy S I9000

NOTE: there is no guarantee this will work, because without access to the corresponding kernel source I can't be sure. It may wipe out your device if there's memory corruption! You're warned, use it only at your risk!!
Over the last weekend I wanted to familiarize with the arm assembly, buildsystem, SDK so I created a tun.ko module for kernel running in the JPK ROM. But lots of the time was also wasted trying to guess their config (things like disabled DMABOUNCE and removal of the dummy they added in 2.6.29 from struct net_device, I hope I got it all right).
I encourage to release the kernel source along with the ROM images in the future (it'd be much simpler if there was a git tree that they can just tag with the name of the ROM), and to include the tun device into the modules/tun/tun.c (as in the tarball) so that it is included by default in the future. I won't be doing this process again.
I had to install openvpn with the openvpn installer a second time with openvpn in xbin, busybox in xbin/bb and I created the bb directory and two symlinks from xbin/bb/{ifconfig,route} to xbin/busybox (after mounting /system rw). The DNS to change during VPN must be set by long pressing on the left of the openvpn config slot in the OpenVPN settings GUI.
The tun.ko I keep it in /sdcard/openvpn/tun.ko and the path has to be configured in the openvpn settings advanced settings menu and I choose to load it with insmod.
This JPK rom works great for me, so I'll likely keep using it for a long while now that I've got openvpn running fine.
252ae6e655fa08774f32f67dd76dad3a tun.ko
EDIT: the same tun.ko module works for JPM too

Great job!!!
I use vpnc daily, so I couldn't even think to upgrade to JPK without an available tun module.. now I can!
Would you share your .config, so other devs can use it? Maybe we can hope in a Froyo-voodoo in a short time..

I'm confirming that it works.
Here is how I did it (I garantee that THIS IS NOT THE MOST ELEGANT WAY to make it work)
Install Openvpn from Openvpn Installer
openvpn in /system/xbin
route and ifconfig in /system/bin
At this point, Openvpn could connect and create a tun device, but route are not pushed so it's not very usefull
So, I downloaded this version of Openvpn
http://github.com/downloads/fries/android-external-openvpn/openvpn-static-2.1.1.bz2
As superuser
Code:
su
I remounted in rw /system
Code:
mount -o remount,rw /system
I renamed /system/xbin/openvpn into openvpn_old
Code:
mv /system/xbin/openvpn /system/xbin/openvpn_old
I put that new openvpn binary in /system/xbin
I created symlinks from /system/bin/route and ifconfig to /system/xbin
Code:
ln -s /system/bin/route /system/xbin/route
ln -s /system/bin/ifconfig /system/xbin/ifconfig
I also created a symlink os /system/xbin to /system/xbin/bb, just in case
Code:
ln -s /system/xbin /system/xbin/bb
Here we go

captive said:
Would you share your .config, so other devs can use it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
i tried to complie cifs.ko and tun.ko for the JPC kernel and couldnt get it to work. i ultimately went back to eclair because of this so would like to be able to compile modules and other filesystem support.
thanks.

kanemari said:
+1
i tried to complie cifs.ko and tun.ko for the JPC kernel and couldnt get it to work. i ultimately went back to eclair because of this so would like to be able to compile modules and other filesystem support.
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
config attached, but the config is not enough and it may not be fully correct (it is enough as far as the data structures used by tun.ko are concerned, I checked them all against the zImage assembly). The diff of the v2.1 image, has to be applied too but with DMABOUNCE removed from Kconfig of the subarch of the galaxy as far as I can tell and the placeholder added to struct net_device in their v2.1 diff, has to be removed too. cifs.ko may be more complicated than tun, good luck. Unless you've personal interest to familiarize with the enviroment and the arm assmbly like I had, I would wait the source to released, it has to be released eventually to comply with the GPLv2.

Thankyou Newmail!!
I've tryed VPNC 0.99 and works great!!
You have only to type from terminal: insmod /system/folder/tun.ko
After that you can use VPNC...
I've found an issue with the FQDN of the VPN gateway... solved setting the IP address
Just a question:
when I'll update my JPK.. what I have to do to recompile the tun.ko?
Can you write here the procedure?
Cheers
Paolo

newmail said:
config attached, but the config is not enough and it may not be fully correct (it is enough as far as the data structures used by tun.ko are concerned, I checked them all against the zImage assembly). The diff of the v2.1 image, has to be applied too but with DMABOUNCE removed from Kconfig of the subarch of the galaxy as far as I can tell and the placeholder added to struct net_device in their v2.1 diff, has to be removed too. cifs.ko may be more complicated than tun, good luck. Unless you've personal interest to familiarize with the enviroment and the arm assmbly like I had, I would wait the source to released, it has to be released eventually to comply with the GPLv2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, but is the placeholder field at the end of the net_device struct?
If so it shouldn't matter and a module cross compiled from the 2.6.29 source should be OK. The absence of DMABOUNCE shouldn't matter for tun.ko either.
In theory you should be able to clone the AOSP git kernel repo and use that kernel for building a module, as long as the module itself doesn't actually use changes that have been made by Samsung (unlikely).
The .config used probably does deserve some attention though, as you have done.

foloap said:
Thankyou Newmail!!
I've tryed VPNC 0.99 and works great!!
You have only to type from terminal: insmod /system/folder/tun.ko
After that you can use VPNC...
I've found an issue with the FQDN of the VPN gateway... solved setting the IP address
Just a question:
when I'll update my JPK.. what I have to do to recompile the tun.ko?
Can you write here the procedure?
Cheers
Paolo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad it works great for you too. So the tun.ko has to be recompiled if they alter .config. It may work but it's not guaranteed. The procedure is nasty and hard to document and I don't have enough time for that sorry. But I'm sure we'll get the source when there will be an official Froyo release that is shipped to all phones so I wouldn't worry.

raven-au said:
OK, but is the placeholder field at the end of the net_device struct?
If so it shouldn't matter and a module cross compiled from the 2.6.29 source should be OK. The absence of DMABOUNCE shouldn't matter for tun.ko either.
In theory you should be able to clone the AOSP git kernel repo and use that kernel for building a module, as long as the module itself doesn't actually use changes that have been made by Samsung (unlikely).
The .config used probably does deserve some attention though, as you have done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The .config is the fundamental part, and it may be enough I'm not sure. There was a placeholder was a samsung customization done in the middle of net_device and that was removed in the Froyo ROM (initially I applied it). the DMABOUNCE removal affects the struct device that is part of net_device so a lot of stuff goes off by 4 bytes by tweaking that arch config option. That gets set in some Kconfig patched in by samsung. You're right that probably tun isn't affected by the DMABOUNCE but I tried to get the net_device size right (just in case) and it may affect other net modules.

Hi newmail, thanks so much for the tun.ko file, this is the first time I've managed to get VPNC working on my SGS!! One question though, I find I'm having to run insmod everytime I reboot the phone to make tun.ko available again, does anyone know if there's a way around this please so it stays permanently available? Many thanks!!

@bdl1969
I made a subdir in /system/lib called "modules" and placed my tun.ko there.
Now it's insmodded automagically..

newmail said:
The .config is the fundamental part, and it may be enough I'm not sure. There was a placeholder was a samsung customization done in the middle of net_device and that was removed in the Froyo ROM (initially I applied it). the DMABOUNCE removal affects the struct device that is part of net_device so a lot of stuff goes off by 4 bytes by tweaking that arch config option. That gets set in some Kconfig patched in by samsung. You're right that probably tun isn't affected by the DMABOUNCE but I tried to get the net_device size right (just in case) and it may affect other net modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh crap, that is bad news.
Then both the DMABOUNCE and the net_device are likely a problem.
That's a stupid way of doing things.

raven-au said:
Oh crap, that is bad news.
Then both the DMABOUNCE and the net_device are likely a problem.
That's a stupid way of doing things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The smart way of doing things I already mentioned in the first post (public git tree tagged at every ROM release .

captive said:
@bdl1969
I made a subdir in /system/lib called "modules" and placed my tun.ko there.
Now it's insmodded automagically..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm I tried and it didn't work for me... are you sure? openvpn GUI runs insmod for me so it's no big deal.

That worked great for me, thanks for the suggestion! The only problem I found was that it caused my Good for Enterprise app to crash so I uninstalled and reinstalled it and then it was all fine. Only problem I'm left with now is when using VPNC, I make the VPN connection fine but I can't disconnect via the app, I have to bounce the network connection (eg. toggle WiFi) to drop the tunnel!

I compiled tun.ko using the 2.6.32 kernel from android git and your .config, but it won't load with dmesg saying "Unknown symbol mem_map". May I ask which kernel version did you use, and what arm toolchain are you using?

sztupy said:
I compiled tun.ko using the 2.6.32 kernel from android git and your .config, but it won't load with dmesg saying "Unknown symbol mem_map". May I ask which kernel version did you use, and what arm toolchain are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably you have discontigmem off in the .config. The platform of the galaxy isn't in the android kernel, it's in arch/arm/plat-s5pc11x (it's the thing that sets DMABOUNCE in v2.1 roms and I guess it doesn't on the JPK kernel).
You need to make a diff between android 2.6.29 and their tree, and apply it to the 2.6.32 kernel, then you need to solve enough rejects so that it can build external module. I didn't port the whole diff of course, just enough so make can start with the headers and .config all right. Then I built the module externally (adding the tun/ directory to their modules/ directory) but it should also work with just make modules setting CONFIG_TUN=m if you want to build it in-tree.
It's a bit tricky.. If you really need I can give you the broken diff to apply to the 2.6.32.9 android kernel. That is enough to build some module including tun.ko

newmail said:
Probably you have discontigmem off in the .config. The platform of the galaxy isn't in the android kernel, it's in arch/arm/plat-s5pc11x (it's the thing that sets DMABOUNCE in v2.1 roms and I guess it doesn't on the JPK kernel).
You need to make a diff between android 2.6.29 and their tree, and apply it to the 2.6.32 kernel, then you need to solve enough rejects so that it can build external module. I didn't port the whole diff of course, just enough so make can start with the headers and .config all right. Then I built the module externally (adding the tun/ directory to their modules/ directory) but it should also work with just make modules setting CONFIG_TUN=m if you want to build it in-tree.
It's a bit tricky.. If you really need I can give you the broken diff to apply to the 2.6.32.9 android kernel. That is enough to build some module including tun.ko
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'd be great. I've already tried to do the patching. It compiles, but crashes the phone when loaded. Maybe your version is a bit better.

sztupy said:
It'd be great. I've already tried to do the patching. It compiles, but crashes the phone when loaded. Maybe your version is a bit better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you find the source now that JPM has been released officially with Kies? I upgraded to JPM now, in the hope we get the source....
BTW, my tun.ko and my rfs_async.ko also works fine on JPM. I don't know about my ext4 build but I assume that will work too.
I used one CSC of this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=802909 and I deleted the KOR /efs/nv_data* created by the JPK ROM (leaving the .nv_data.bak*). So with this combination of CSC from that thread, and MODEM and PDA from the JPM rar, I apparently restored the original product_id (SGSToolbox also says I'm back to the original product_id). Not that product_id matters but I thought I'd try that next time I flashed and apparently it worked fine...

newmail said:
Did you find the source now that JPM has been released officially with Kies? I upgraded to JPM now, in the hope we get the source....
BTW, my tun.ko and my rfs_async.ko also works fine on JPM. I don't know about my ext4 build but I assume that will work too.
I used one CSC of this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=802909 and I deleted the KOR /efs/nv_data* created by the JPK ROM (leaving the .nv_data.bak*). So with this combination of CSC from that thread, and MODEM and PDA from the JPM rar, I apparently restored the original product_id (SGSToolbox also says I'm back to the original product_id). Not that product_id matters but I thought I'd try that next time I flashed and apparently it worked fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The JPM source was avialable for a few hours on the samsung's site, did grap it. You can find it on megaupload somewhere. I couldn't manage to compile a working module from that source either (it now loads fine, but does a kernel panic when I try to mount a loop device formatted with ext4), but I'm sure that's my fault.

Cifs

Dumb question maybe, but does the Samsung stock kernel support Cifs? Is there any kernels out there that will? I really would like to mount my linux server.

Just use an APP??
https://play.google.com/store/search?q=CIFS&c=apps

dipole said:
Dumb question maybe, but does the Samsung stock kernel support Cifs? Is there any kernels out there that will? I really would like to mount my linux server.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ES File Explorer (among others) supports samba shares (public and user/pass); it's all I use anymore for moving files between phone & NAS, as well as for streaming video directly (when my PLEX machine is down). Haven't bothered with system-level CIFS mounts in quite a while.

Compulsion Kernel v14 does. Also, I think Civz kernel also has it.
Haven't gotten it to work yet, though.
Update:
Got it to work within the CifsManager app by following These steps.
Unfortunately, other apps can't access the files and show the mount points as empty folders.
However, there's a solution I will try to see if it fixes it.

[Q] Cifs Modules for Vikinger kernel

I am using an S4 Mini i9195 with stock I9195XXUBML1 rooted and Vikinger kernel.
I have tried to mount network share with both CIFS manager and mount manager, always getting "mount: Invalid argument" error.
It seems that cifs.ko, md4.ko, nfs.ko modules based on the kernel are necessary in order to get smb or nfs mount.
Can anyone manage to compile the necessary kernel modules?

Visuality Systems CIFS team provides 24/7 support
Try to contact cifs.com
Good luck

talwid said:
Try to contact cifs.com
Good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Translation: no way to mount network share on s4 mini?

@M_J_Nazari Could you help on this? Amestris Kernel is the best kernel for 9192, but it does not suport cifs/nfs. :crying:

fhd kernel ( ZE551 ) & POSSIBLY hd (ZE550) with KVM & Bridge compiled. *need help*

fhd kernel ( ZE551 ) & POSSIBLY hd (ZE550) with KVM & Bridge compiled. *need help*
MODERATOR NOTICE:
All thread posted in the Development section must have a link to kernel sources to meet GPLv2 requirements. Because this thread does not have proper sources linked and because development has stopped, the thread has been closed.
This is my first time working with Android kernels, but I compiled the 2.12.40 kernel source adding in support for KVM ( Kernel supported Virtual Machines, ie running Windows almost full speed ) and Bridge ( to allow qemu-kvm to set up network adapters bridged with the current wifi adapter ).
I tar'd the bzImage & modules, but don't know what to do to make something installable/flashable so will need help on that end of things.
Edit:
I uploaded a new flashable kernel img based off 2.19. This one should support: kvm, bridge and NTFS read/ *LIMITED* write, swap and ignore kernel module signatures. XDA only allows 8mb for .img files, so I tar'd it.
Edit2:
I compiled a ZE550 kernel ( called hd ) and if some brave souls want to try it, I also put together a boot.img.
Edit3:
New fhd kernel has been compiled with additional usb modules. Kernel should now load kvm related modules automatically, so you shouldn't need to use the script anymore.
Anyone brave/crazy enough to try it out? I'm guessing you need an unlocked bootloader & root.
Edit 4:
New fhd & hd kernels for 2.20
Edit 5:
New exfat.ko module

ycavan said:
This is my first time working with Android kernels, but I compiled the 2.12.40 kernel source adding in support for KVM ( Kernel supported Virtual Machines, ie running Windows almost full speed ) and Bridge ( to allow qemu-kvm to set up network adapters bridged with the current wifi adapter ).
I tar'd the bzImage & modules, but don't know what to do to make something installable/flashable so will need help on that end of things.
Anyone brave/crazy enough to try it out? I'm guessing you need an unlocked bootloader & root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why 2.12? 2.18 kernel source is available...

That just happened to be the kernel source linked in Android development. If this test works out, I can probably do the same thing with whichever kernel source is available.
Our phones are pretty amazing to be able to compile their own kernels natively on the device.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using XDA Free mobile app

Finally able to compile the 2.18 kernel.. it's a bit weird since it acted like it was missing some files. Untar'd the 2.18 kernel source over 2.12's kernel source and that allowed it compile.
Anyway, it's in the OP called fhd_kernel_20150629.tar and should have KVM ( kernel supported virtualization ), Bridge ( for Qemu-KVM to create bridging ethernet adapters ) & NTFS Read/ *LIMITED* Write.
Once again, it's in the form of bzImage and the modules since I don't know how to replace the kernel on Android devices. ( normally, I'd just make a test linux line in the boot menu for Linux )

One suggestion would be to flash the zImage using
Code:
fastboot flash zImage nameofzImage
or test it using
Code:
fastboot boot nameofzImage
but I dont know if the phone supports the "boot" command.
I´m not sure about the modules either and I can´t test it, as my phone didn´t arrive yet.
Other solution, try this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2670512

ycavan said:
Finally able to compile the 2.18 kernel.. it's a bit weird since it acted like it was missing some files. Untar'd the 2.18 kernel source over 2.12's kernel source and that allowed it compile.
Anyway, it's in the OP called fhd_kernel_20150629.tar and should have KVM ( kernel supported virtualization ), Bridge ( for Qemu-KVM to create bridging ethernet adapters ) & NTFS Read/Write.
Once again, it's in the form of bzImage and the modules since I don't know how to replace the kernel on Android devices. ( normally, I'd just make a test linux line in the boot menu for Linux )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I ask how you included NTFS r/w support into your kernel? Did you just set the CONFIG_NTFS_FS flag?

TheSSJ said:
Can I ask how you included NTFS r/w support into your kernel? Did you just set the CONFIG_NTFS_FS flag?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m ( you could set to that y ) and CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y in /{working directory}/device/asus/moorefield/fhd/mofd_fhd_diffconfig
when you make the kernel, it's going to ***** about the config files not matching; follow the directions and manually update all of the other config files and it will finally compile.
Building for Android is a pita. )

Well, then here come the disappointing news (I discovered that when I wanted to include NTFS USB-OTG support directly by the kernel for my TWRP and it didn't mount it as R/W):
CONFIG_NTFS_RW is just a partial write support. It won't create files or folders, it can only overwrite existing files and only by the size they currently have
config NTFS_RW
bool "NTFS write support"
This enables the partial, but safe, write support in the NTFS driver. The only supported operation is overwriting existing files, without changing the file length. No file or directory creation, deletion or renaming is possible. Note only non-resident files can be written to so you may find that some very small files (<500 bytes or so) cannot be written to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only possibility available is to include ntfs-3g driver using fuse

Yeah, that is a bit of a downer. Now to figure out why nobody finished the NTFS kernel module.

ycavan said:
Yeah, that is a bit of a downer. Now to figure out why nobody finished the NTFS kernel module.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please keep me posted, I'd like to remove the dependency of ntfs-3g in recovery. I fear there actually is no native support of NTFS (googling was not helpful unfortunately)

1) modify module loading function to ignore module version/magic strings.
2) compile the kernel with toolchain used by ASUS (or close to it)
3) use pre-compiled tntfs.ko from original boot.img
I don't have right now the patch for module loading procedure. Need to check old Galaxy S3/S4 custom kernels source (but it's should be easy to patch by finding error string). In time when exFat module source wasn't available, this trick was very common in samsung custom kernels for exFat support.

Thanks

Wait wait wait. Did I read that correctly? Full speed windows? On the zenfone? I think I just died. Does this mean windows 8/10 or windows xp and below?

I know a bit about android kernel, and i'm thinking about buying this device. Well, i'm going to try to build a kernel for this device as soon as i got this device. One thing you should know is, android is an open-source, so before you uploading your compiled kernel, make sure you have already uploaded the sources

LUCKYSHOT52 said:
Wait wait wait. Did I read that correctly? Full speed windows? On the zenfone? I think I just died. Does this mean windows 8/10 or windows xp and below?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's only in theory.
In reality, there is no Z35xx support in windows, and i doubt anyone will write drivers by himself (windows isn't opensource). Officially Z35xx is Android-only SoC.

FajarMF28 said:
I know a bit about android kernel, and i'm thinking about buying this device. Well, i'm going to try to build a kernel for this device as soon as i got this device. One thing you should know is, android is an open-source, so before you uploading your compiled kernel, make sure you have already uploaded the sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The source is already available, so no worries there, since this is source that Asus released.

For all of the brave folks out there, I was finally able to create a bootable image of the latest 2.19.20 kernel. Anyone brave enough can find it in the OP.
I flashed it and my phone booted up, so that's a bonus.

ycavan said:
For all of the brave folks out there, I was finally able to create a bootable image of the latest 2.19.20 kernel. Anyone brave enough can find it in the OP.
I flashed it and my phone booted up, so that's a bonus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there extra features such as other governor or i/o scheduler?

cangcan said:
is there extra features such as other governor or i/o scheduler?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest? I can't remember since my main focus was getting kvm compiled in.
I've attached my .config for the 20150707 build ( in the boot image ).
I've also attached a screenshot of Windoze 7 being installed.
Commandline for Arch Linux x86_64 to start qemu-kvm to install windoze:
qemu-system-x86_64 -display none -vnc :1,password -monitor stdio -m 1G -smp 4 -enable-kvm -drive file=/mnt/0/machine1.img,format=raw -cpu host -cdrom /mnt/MicroSD/Vcd/en_windows_7.iso -boot menu=on --usbdevice tablet
breakdown of the command line:
-display none = no display, I did this to test the virtual machine. normally, you would probably use -display sdl w/ XServer-XSDL running
-vnc :1,password, This says to set up a vnc server with normal port + 1 ( 5901 ) and you expect a password to be set later
-m 1G, 1 gig of ram
-smp 4, our VM will use 4 cores
-enable-kvm, enable Kernel support Virtual Machines
-drive file=/mnt/0/machine1.img,format=raw, my "disk" file
-cpu host, use the same cpu information
-cdrom /mnt/MicroSD/Vcd/en_windows_7.iso, my Windows 7 install cd turned into an iso
-boot menu=on, enable the boot menu ( hit F12, etc.. )
--usbdevice tablet, Qemu's Vnc server sucks at tracking mouse positions so using tablet mode keeps the mouse pointer .. well on-point

Tks for share
Kernel great work
But how to install window 7 ? ?
Gửi từ ASUS_Z00AD của tôi bằng cách sử dụng Tapatalk