How much does it limit?? And if I un-check it will the phone be less sluggish?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Your phone is sluggish??
Even on the stock rom and kernel it was fast as hell.
Try doing a factory reset to see if that helps.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Turn that off all together, every option. The battery gain is marginal at best and it has a serious impact on functionality for the end user(you).
Sent from my SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
it underclocks the peak CPU speed to 1.0 GHz
Well I decided to run that and see where it ended up at.
According to CPU Spy, spent a lot of time at 1024mhz.
I think you are better off undervolting the CPU for sure before underclocking the CPU IMHO your phone will as fast as possible with greater gain in battery life. again do not undervolt your cpu with large deltas between min and max as some CPUs are not capable of handliing such as big steps at once in certain governors
Totally agree. Don't use cpu limiting.. not worth the little battery gain. I UV and get TWO days of battery and I even over clock to 1.8 Ghz! Power saving feature does very little but does slow u down a fair bit
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
Related
Here is my specs.
1.8
-75 undervolt
jdkernal 09.19
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
Moar quadrants!
(mine is actually just 1943 lol)
lol, that's funny ^
I almost always get 2200ish, when I'm at 1.2ghz or 1.6ghz... it doesn't change.
I'm posting 3800 on the first try with Tiamat 1.15 and MIUI 10.7
Set CPU at 1800 and smartassV2
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
Here's mine. Set at 1 GHz, and no undervolting.
Sent from my Droid Incredible 2 HD
CM7 and JD Kernels nightly at 1.5 overvolted +25
Testing a new AOSP kernal with miui 10.7. Im using smartassv2 & still at 1.8. No voltage tweaks yet.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
I decided I would have a little fun with this thread & I restored back to stock 2.3.3.
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
What is up with my battery readings. My phone is always making bizarre jumps like this. Notice the two vertical changes.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
There are actually 3. One drop which is not accompanied by the charging and 2 increases one of them severe.
Its actually the initial drop that makes it bizarre. The battery isn't that old or that worn so corrections to read capacity shouldn't be severe. Discrepancies while charging can be explained a little easier. All depends on the battery controllers methods of reading while charging and how the OS samples the data from that. As i say its the drop that confuses me.
I would definitely say a calibration is in order before further investigation unless some knowledge is out there.
I've also noticed battery drops like that for me where it drops about 30% and was caused by random reboots from flashing new roms.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Pretty pictures!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
How bout this one 49% to 18%
And explain the phantom recharge from 4% to 6%
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
On PAC rom with Nova kernel running 1.7ghz and yes it seems like a good impressive score for the phone.
But... Why does my Chinese tablet ( cube U30GT) score ridiculously higher @ 1.6GHz. Both are on JB 4.1
The cube gets -
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My XS gets -
Sent from my Jellybean Xperia S
optimisation.....optimisation.....
You're scores are what you get under best circumstances. Try running your phone all day using it as you normally would then run a test. You're score wont be that high I'm sure, what you get while doing your daily tasks is what really matters because in the end that's your typical situation, not all apps closed data off brightness low cpu ocs and gpu ocs set to full
Sent from my LT28at using xda app-developers app
My guess is that AnTuTu sucks, so use Quadrant...
AnTuTu gave my old Archos 10000 and my Xperia S about 8000, while Quadrant measures precisely and, most important, it measures the stuff that really matters WITHOUT crashing...
There is a kernel out there that performs fast as hell - with NO cpu overclock
figured I would share some screen shots
The point of this is to show what can be done without touching the CPU clock speeds
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks.
.so can you share the kernel too
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
There was no point to making this thread if you don't even link people to the kernel.
Also, lern2adaway
No kernel no care..
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
92drls said:
No kernel no care..
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol!!!
Sent from my SGH-M919GE using Tapatalk 2
Thread needs moar kernel linx.
"the point of this"........ is pointless.
OP is an OC PETA activist.
I can underclock (mildly) and with a few adjustments to the right governor, achieve 800+ MFLOPS in Linpack. 14000 isn't really "fast" for this phone in Quadrant either. That's easily done with the stock kernel.
Can we get this thread closed? Seems the schools are letting out early this year for Christmas and the kids are getting bored.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
You got that right!!!
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Worthless thread is worthless
My M8 scores very less only 21768 compared to others.
y is it so low ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Why*, and it might be because you have battery saver mode on. Disable it and run the benchmark again. If its still low and you're on a custom ROM, the developer might have removed the automatic speed boost when running useless benchmark apps.
Does it even matter in the end?
Sent from my HTC One_M8
otto888 said:
Why*, and it might be because you have battery saver mode on. Disable it and run the benchmark again. If its still low and you're on a custom ROM, the developer might have removed the automatic speed boost when running useless benchmark apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on a custom Rom and the feature HTC uses during benchmarks is useless. I went into trickster and all it does is pretty much run in performance mode which you can do yourself. And of code who wouldn't get a high score on performance? I agree benchmarks are useless.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using xda app-developers app