Wellllllll, so far I have got to the point where the option shows up--which I suppose isn't very difficult for anyone to do at all. But I've also made all of the smali edits that would have made this work on an HTC phone. In fact, it did work on the EVO LTE, except on the GS3 it doesn't. This leads me to believe that I'm either in a file that doesn't get noticed by the system, or the values I'm changing are wrong.
Maybe one of you very talented developers on XDA can lend a hand so we can all benefit from this much needed feature.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So, I started off thinking that this would be a very straight forward and easy thing to do. Boy was I wrong. hah.. Basically, on the HTC EVO line, it went something like this
Decompile Phone.apk, change a few things in smali and add the appropriate values in arrays.xml and hope for the best. I quickly discovered that on the GS3, things didn't work out quite in the same way.
First, you decompile SecPhone.apk
Navigate to /res/values-en-rUS/arrays.xml
To get our Roam Only option to show up, this is the file we're going to edit. You can either do a quick search for "Sprint Only" or just look a little bit below, it's pretty much right there at:
Code:
<string-array name="roaming_mode_entries">
Go ahead and add your Roam Only line:
Code:
<item>Roam Only</item>
I chose to add multiple lines for testing purposes but you can choose to do only one if you're confident this won't be much trouble
Next we'll have to add the values that our options will point to, which is directly below the roaming_mode_entries section:
Code:
<string-array name="roaming_mode_values">
Go ahead and add your value after 1:
Code:
<item>2</item>
I added as many as I did for the first one, so it went all the way up to 5 in my case. Hey, you never know! I was hoping at least one of them would work.
This was the easy part, now the part I'm actually stuck on.
Navigate to /com/android/phone/ Now my original theory was to look for files that were similar in structure to the EVO which I found under CdmaSystemSelectListPreference$MyHandler and CdmaSystemSelectListPreference and go from there. I was either wrong in this assumption or not doing something right because no amount of changes I made to them had any effect on roaming. The EVO used slightly different files, which were named CdmaRoamingSelectListPreference and CdmaRoamingSelectListPreference$MyHandler respectively. The first two files were similar enough that the changes made on the evo could also be made here, which are:
In CdmaSystemSelectListPreference Search for:
Code:
:pswitch_4c
const/4 v2, 0x3
Now, yours may say something slightly different, like pswitch_1, but it is around a group of switches, like this:
Code:
:pswitch_4a
const/4 v2, 0x2
goto :goto_2f
:pswitch_4c
const/4 v2, 0x3
goto :goto_2f
:pswitch_4e
const/4 v2, 0x4
The middle one is what we're focused on, so I changed it from 0x3 to 0x1 like on the EVO. Easy enough right? Save and close that then navigate to the second file labeled CdmaSystemSelectListPreference$MyHandler.
Search for that same block of switches:
Code:
if-eqz v2, :cond_34
const/4 v3, 0x2
if-eq v2, v3, :cond_34
const/4 v3, 0x3
if-eq v2, v3, :cond_34
const/4 v3, 0x4
if-ne v2, v3, :cond_54
Yours may look slightly different with cond_ and such, but the same block should be present. The middle one again is what we're focused on. Change it from 0x3 to 0x1 like on the EVO then save and close. These two edits along with the arrays.xml enabled Roam Only on the EVO. Fairly simple right? Well, on this phone they do absolutely nothing. So after hours of playing around with different values, I decided to look elsewhere, namely the files labeled "Roaming" in the /com/android/phone/ folder. There are a lot of them, but we can safely ignore most of the ones that don't look like they have anything to do with selecting Roaming preferences. For example: RoamingAutoDialOption and so forth. Now, these files seem like they are not cdma specific so that's why I never bothered to look at them before, but upon further inspection, there are some cdma elements in them.
Roaming.smali
RoamingSettings.smali
Roaming$MyHandler.smali
CdmaOptions.smali
These files are what I have narrowed it down to and have been working on. Problem is there are a ton of things to change in here and while I have tried to change some, it has resulted in phone force closes. Bad right? Not necessarily. It's given me more than the first two files did with all the changes I made to those! So I'm guessing that with the right edits to one or more of these files, we can get Roam Only to work.
So there you have it XDA.
First off freeza your the man, I remember you from the evo 3d, and sorry if this is a dumb question I'm coming from the skyrocket I have a few roms over there but what will this benefit? Roaming burns up mins rite?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Hey! Best of luck finding out how to do this. I can't exactly contribute to the project, but I do have 1 question.
When I switch to roam only mode for both voice and data, does it use roaming 2G by default or would I need to use a corporate PRL for roaming 3G?
Thanks
remf4i said:
First off freeza your the man, I remember you from the evo 3d, and sorry if this is a dumb question I'm coming from the skyrocket I have a few roms over there but what will this benefit? Roaming burns up mins rite?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, did u seriously just ask that beyond noob ass question?? How the hell do u get 500 thanks?? A buddy click ur meter up? Smh...
remf4i said:
First off freeza your the man, I remember you from the evo 3d, and sorry if this is a dumb question I'm coming from the skyrocket I have a few roms over there but what will this benefit? Roaming burns up mins rite?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure khtown84's reply didn't help so I'll explain. Sometimes us Sprint users will be on the edge of coverage and be flickering back and forth from roaming and Sprint's network. The roam only toggle will give us a solid connection to the roaming network. BTW Sprint gives user 300MB of data roaming before they contact you
Yep, we need Roam Only option.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Well I can't help with that. But I just flashed verizons 1.prl and had amazing service. But I heard if you roam to much they will just straight out cancel your contract. So I only ran it for two weeks. But it worked amazingly while I did. Was peaking at 1.4 Mbps download.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium HD app
remf4i said:
First off freeza your the man, I remember you from the evo 3d, and sorry if this is a dumb question I'm coming from the skyrocket I have a few roms over there but what will this benefit? Roaming burns up mins rite?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vinnythepooh said:
I'm sure khtown84's reply didn't help so I'll explain. Sometimes us Sprint users will be on the edge of coverage and be flickering back and forth from roaming and Sprint's network. The roam only toggle will give us a solid connection to the roaming network. BTW Sprint gives user 300MB of data roaming before they contact you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just to piggy back on what vinny stated. sprint customers roam on verizon towers (most if not all the time). so, switching to roaming in many areas will often lead to better coverage. definitely a worthwhile endeavor, especially since the roam control app (roamctrl.com) isn't working and the dev isn't responding to any messages i've sent (email, twitter, etc.)
anyway, thanks for giving this a try freeza! i'm willing to test anything you throw my way.
boboysdadda said:
Well I can't help with that. But I just flashed verizons 1.prl and had amazing service. But I heard if you roam to much they will just straight out cancel your contract. So I only ran it for two weeks. But it worked amazingly while I did. Was peaking at 1.4 Mbps download.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, you flashed verizons 1.prl and your on a sprint phone??
khtown84 said:
Wow, did u seriously just ask that beyond noob ass question?? How the hell do u get 500 thanks?? A buddy click ur meter up? Smh...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coming from gsm where i had no roamin to cdma and I do know that we bounce off Verizon's but question was mainly about the mins if on roaming all the time but thanks for the smart ass comment.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Will be posting up the instructions I've been trying soon
Are you looking in Services. Jar?
Sadly Samsung leaves in all the aosp code when they add in touchwiz so a lot of what you edit isn't going to work and has been overlapped by a touchwiz file. I'd check services jar.
khtown84 said:
Wow, did u seriously just ask that beyond noob ass question?? How the hell do u get 500 thanks?? A buddy click ur meter up? Smh...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! Really!?! This was totally uncalled for.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Ascertion said:
Are you looking in Services. Jar?
Sadly Samsung leaves in all the aosp code when they add in touchwiz so a lot of what you edit isn't going to work and has been overlapped by a touchwiz file. I'd check services jar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm starting to realize that now. It's insane. I'm not sure if it's a good thing or not. lol I think I like their approach a bit more than HTCs but everything I thought would work isn't. It just means I have to take a different approach I suppose.
Thanks for the suggesetion
I think I've narrowed it down to a few Roaming files in SecPhone.apk. Maybe once I post something up people can help because right now I'm pretty worn out!
freeza, I stand by my previous statement in another thread. You do not disappoint with your projects.
Now go get some sleep!
Tsudeily said:
freeza, I stand by my previous statement in another thread. You do not disappoint with your projects.
Now go get some sleep!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the motivation
sweet.
ill be looking forward to this.
im waiting on a how to or maybe a flashable zip since im sure there will be many changes until its figured out.
ill tinker with a bunch of the phones ## settings to see if something is blocking it.
i do know this phone can roam on 3g because i loaded a corp prl and it does automatically every now and then
i did force it to roam on 3g by going in to the 1x/hdr selection and changing it to evdo only.
this forced it to go on 3g because i only have 1x with sprint where i live.
maybe a logcat while switching to evdo only will help?
thanks!!!
Which corporate prl are you referring to? I used 12120 on my EVO 3D and it worked all the time, data roaming and such.
ycats said:
Which corporate prl are you referring to? I used 12120 on my EVO 3D and it worked all the time, data roaming and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone provide us with the corporate prl please.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Related
Today I Traded my wifes old MyTouch 4G for a GT-I9100 (The Real GS2) Unbranded and Unlocked. I Installed CWM & Rooted it. I installed VillanRom 3.0 and ran some Quadrants to see what this thing could do. I started off with 1.4GHz ondemand with SetCpu and first score was 3950 lol. The second one I bumped it to 1.6GHz and thru down 4750 Then it rebooted itself on the third, But I mean Damn this thing is fast.
To bad I can only get EDGE with it or I would keep it. This is going to make one happy AT&T user!! Craigslist or Ebay it goes soon, but I do want to play with it a few days. lol
Our T-Mobile Variant does'nt stand a chance against this Beast. LMAO
Where the heck did you trade for a gt9100?!
cashyftw said:
Where the heck did you trade for a gt9100?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had my Wifes MyTouch for sale on Craigslist for $225 Modded to the max. This guy text me and asked me if I could root his GT-I9100 because he could only pick up the EDGE Network. I told him that phone is the international version and he would not get 3 much less 4G. He asked if I would trade for it, I told him sure no problem that it would make me a great Dev Phone. we met and did the EVEN trade. Lol The I9100 is like new. Haha
let the flames begin
Teo032 said:
let the flames begin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be Courteous Teo...
You got an excellent deal my friend! I thought the international would get 4g though?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
vabeach454 said:
Today I Traded my wifes old MyTouch 4G for a GT-I9100 (The Real GS2) Unbranded and Unlocked. I Installed CWM & Rooted it. I installed VillanRom 3.0 and ran some Quadrants to see what this thing could do. I started off with 1.4GHz ondemand with SetCpu and first score was 3950 lol. The second one I bumped it to 1.6GHz and thru down 4750 Then it rebooted itself on the third, But I mean Damn this thing is fast.
To bad I can only get EDGE with it or I would keep it. This is going to make one happy AT&T user!! Craigslist or Ebay it goes soon, but I do want to play with it a few days. lol
Our T-Mobile Variant does'nt stand a chance against this Beast. LMAO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One its a god damn phone. They all run the same with enough tweaks and optimization. Two its a got damn benchmark. Quandrant means nothing which can be easily faked. Three I guess you lack confidence in real life somewhere to feel good about a benchmark.
Here what you should to be
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
jasontx said:
You got an excellent deal my friend! I thought the international would get 4g though?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish it would, but I have been on the I9100 forums most of the day and everyone says it does'nt support 1700MHz or 2100MHz (Our 3g and 4g) but it does support AT&T HSPA+.
Killbynature said:
One its a god damn phone. They all run the same with enough tweaks and optimization. Two its a got damn benchmark. Quandrant means nothing which can be easily faked. Three I guess you lack confidence in real life somewhere to feel good about a benchmark.
Here what you should to be
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you dont have anything good to say... Shut the **** Up!! Dont you realize that some processors are better than others?? Retard!!
vabeach454 said:
Be Courteous Teo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, see it as a considerate warning
vabeach454 said:
If you dont have anything good to say... Shut the **** Up!! Dont you realize that some processors are better than others?? Retard!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whoa whoa whoa, watch the language, no need for name calling, but yeah you should expect replies like this especially since you are in the hercules forum... But yeah you shouldn't rely on benchmarks much.
awesome deal though
vabeach454 said:
If you dont have anything good to say... Shut the **** Up!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You made a flame bait thread and then you do not even want to hear the truth. Before you tell people to stfu you should learn not to start a flame thread. You can't even have normal conversation without calling someone a retard. It be different if it was a nice comparison between the actual two devices. I would of left this thread alone.
Then you start by showing how big you feel on the Internet. The difference between two products is hardly night and day. Not like I can't run android apps because I don't have a exynos chipset. My phone still makes calls and still does literally and what the other variants can do. Unless the other variants with the exynos chipset grants me the ability to fly then there is no difference.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Teo032 said:
lol, see it as a considerate warning
whoa whoa whoa, watch the language, no need for name calling, but yeah you should expect replies like this especially since you are in the hercules forum... But yeah you shouldn't rely on benchmarks much.
awesome deal though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the cursing, but here he chimes in with GD Phone and quite frankly pissed me off. No I dont Rely on Benchmarks, but it is what it is. There were no shady mods done to boost #s. I own both phones and should be able to tell wich is faster. Clearly the processors on the GT-I9100 will Smoke Our T-Mobile US Versions.
Killbynature said:
You made a flame bait thread and then you do not even want to hear the truth. Before you tell people to stfu you should learn not to start a flame thread. You can't even have normal conversation without calling someone a retard. It be different if it was a nice comparison between the actual two devices. I would of left this thread alone.
Then you start by showing how big you feel on the Internet. The difference between two products is hardly night and day. Not like I can't run android apps because I don't have a exynos chipset. My phone still makes calls and still does literally and what the other variants can do. Unless the other variants with the exynos chipset grants me the ability to fly then there is no difference.
Ok... Maybee your right. I did not mean to start a flame war, but mearly piont out what I had picked up and my experience with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
vabeach454 said:
Sorry for the cursing, but here he chimes in with GD Phone and quite frankly pissed me off. No I dont Rely on Benchmarks, but it is what it is. There were no shady mods done to boost #s. I own both phones and should be able to tell wich is faster. Clearly the processors on the GT-I9100 will Smoke Our T-Mobile US Versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, yeah i noticed you own both phones based on your devices, but this could be a better opener lol. You can actually do comparisons and stuff not just benchmarks... good luck with the thread.
vabeach454 said:
Sorry for the cursing, but here he chimes in with GD Phone and quite frankly pissed me off. No I dont Rely on Benchmarks, but it is what it is. There were no shady mods done to boost #s. I own both phones and should be able to tell wich is faster. Clearly the processors on the GT-I9100 will Smoke Our T-Mobile US Versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't even test both phones unless they are the same playing field. Both running cm 7 or 9. Both have different kernel optimizations.
A flag ship device with the same internals which has had tons of tweaks and optimization. For at least year compared to Samsung which probably work on this device for the most at less than three months.
Forgive me for coming off rude. But in all reality you can't compare these two devices unless everything is put on the table on a fair ground. All phones are different just because the does the best benchmarks does that mean anything no it doesn't. People have the galaxy s2 but are still selling their phone for ics and a galaxy nexus. As I see it now it not a difference maybe in the far distance like a year or two future processors will matter.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Killbynature said:
I wouldn't even test both phones unless they are the same playing field. Both running cm 7 or 9. Both have different kernel optimizations.
A flag ship device with the same internals which has had tons of tweaks and optimization. For at least year compared to Samsung which probably work on this device for the most at less than three months.
Forgive me for coming off rude. But in all reality you can't compare these two devices unless everything is put on the table on a fair ground. All phones are different just because the does the best benchmarks does that mean anything no it doesn't. People have the galaxy s2 but are still selling their phone for ics and a galaxy nexus. As I see it now it not a difference maybe in the far distance like a year or two future processors will matter.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree and I would'nt trade my T-MO GS2 for it. It will be up for sale on Craigslist Very Soon. I guess your right and I got caught up in some Quadrant #s. lol
GT-I900 HANDS DOWN NO CONTEST, Specifically in graphics performance
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
vabeach454 said:
I agree and I would'nt trade my T-MO GS2 for it. It will be up for sale on Craigslist Very Soon. I guess your right and I got caught up in some Quadrant #s. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I apologize again all I see is why isn't ics here yet and vs threads. They start to annoy me. Cause the threads get made every day with the same questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
I loved my i9 but because I had to switch to T-Mobile, I needed our t989
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
From what I seen the original Samsung Galaxy s2. Started at 2.3.1. Gingerbread and. Pretty much Samsung start optimizing till 2.3.7 which was a year. They also have advantage of having an international phone which brings developers from around the world to work together and optimized each other's stuff. When you have dozens of people tweaking the same things they start to get refine. Then performance starts to show.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Solved/workaround found! I cleared my cookies and cache (first time since getting the phone in November
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Anybody else getting this when trying to pull up the desktop version of a website? I called customer support and politely explained what I was experiencing and I was told (that she was posting this on the T-Mobile forum) she'd get back to me on Thursday.
Workaround, perhaps?
Imported GSM Nexus in Chicago.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
That's weird. I always tether and I have never seen that.
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
I've heard of others having this happen, but I haven't experienced this myself. What data plan are you on? I wonder if that is a factor? I'm on the $30 Walmart plan.
Ulver said:
That's weird. I always tether and I have never seen that.
I wasn't even tethering! I was just trying to pull up desktop sites instead of mobile.
Buddy Revell said:
I've heard of others having this happen, but I haven't experienced this myself. What data plan are you on? I wonder if that is a factor? I'm on the $30 Walmart plan.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on a family plan with 5 GB "unlimited data"
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've replied to every one of these threads it seems. Do just a little research here.
T-Mobile "catches tethering" by filtering UAstring (user agent strings). Problem is, people can have desktop UAstrings on the phone, because they request desktop sites or use 3rd party browsers that only use desktop UAstrings.
Basically theres not much you can do (some things work for some people, no solution worked for me). You can call in and ***** about it but in my experience I wasn't able to get anyone to tell me anything they either literally had no idea what I was talking about, or refused to tell me anything.
In 14 months of T-Mobile service I've only had this happen 1 time, and it was for about 2 weeks then it stopped.
Good Luck.
OP, do you ever tether? If so, how much data do you typically transmit?
canca14 said:
OP, do you ever tether? If so, how much data do you typically transmit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It literally has nothing to do with you tethering. You can never turn on tethering and still get that message. They are only filtering UAstrings.
I just started having this problem today, and I spoke at length with a tmo tech who really couldn't help me much, said I needed to talk to Samsung (lol!) And unfortunately the cache/cookie clearing didn't help me at all. I think I'm going to call TMo back again...
UPDATE: Ticket has been submitted to the TMo engineers, so hopefully this will get fixed permanently at their end. This tech was much more helpful and actually listened when I told him was was obviously going on with the UA string filtering, etc. This sucks though...
I know this has nothing to do with tethering but it first showed up after I downloaded a massive file from tethering.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
joeski27 said:
UPDATE: Ticket has been submitted to the TMo engineers, so hopefully this will get fixed permanently at their end. This tech was much more helpful and actually listened when I told him was was obviously going on with the UA string filtering, etc. This sucks though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck. My ticket got "submitted to engineers" with an assurance that I'd hear back in 3-5 days and I never got a call back.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
I actually talked to someone in customer support and they seemed to understand that I was not tethering, just trying to access a desktop site. She got back to me with sorry don't know what I can but give me a couple days .
She actually got me on the phone with an engineer who kept asking me about the UAstring. Finally, I had to get into an in depth conversation about ICS and why the UAString is irrelevant. I think it hit home with him and he said they're working on a solution. He promised to keep me in the loop, let's see how that goes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
BlazinGTI said:
I actually talked to someone in customer support and they seemed to understand that I was not tethering, just trying to access a desktop site. She got back to me with sorry don't know what I can but give me a couple days .
She actually got me on the phone with an engineer who kept asking me about the UAstring. Finally, I had to get into an in depth conversation about ICS and why the UAString is irrelevant. I think it hit home with him and he said they're working on a solution. He promised to keep me in the loop, let's see how that goes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey thanks for posting your update. I also feel fairly confident that I conveyed the idea that TMo is erroneously using the detection of a desktop UA string as a means of detecting tethering users, and that users of all the best new phones (like the GNex) only ever use the desktop UA as these phones with their big displays and Flash capabilities have rendered the mobile site versions useless. So clearly its on them to sort it out ASAP, otherwise they are going to have thousands and thousands of really pissed off smartphone users.
BTW I'm giving them til Monday afternoon to return my call at which point I'm going to start calling tech support every day and really be up their butt about it. Plus it just so happens that I'm now no longer under contract with them, so I'll let them know if they can't sort it out quickly I'll take my business elsewhere.
---------- Post added at 05:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:50 PM ----------
By the way to the OP, might we be able to change the title of the thread to something like "Tmobile using desktop UA to detect tethering, block full websites?" just hoping that anyone and everyone who might be experiencing this to be able to easily spot this thread and know exactly what it is about so that they can chime in with their info or experience.
And actually it would be nice if Android Police or Droid Life picked up on this and posted a story.... perhaps a couple of emails might be in order this evening
joeski27 said:
And actually it would be nice if Android Police or Droid Life picked up on this and posted a story.... perhaps a couple of emails might be in order this evening
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya it'd be nice but this has been going on for a very very long time. You're not the first one to call and ***** at them about this.
martonikaj said:
Ya it'd be nice but this has been going on for a very very long time. You're not the first one to call and ***** at them about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I just sent email tips to both AP and DL, and linked to this thread so that they can see the screengrabs, etc.
As for the *****ing, I may not be the first to call them about it, but I promise you I can be a bigger pain in the ass about it than pretty much anyone. I'll call and have a ticket processed every day if I have to! The other odd thing that I can't figure out is, I'd been running my Nexus One for over 2 years and now my GN for the last 3 months (on desktop UA for every day of it) and only this morning did I encounter this for the first time. I just wonder, why now all of a sudden? Makes no sense.
For those of you who often wonder about the implications of using the Verizon PRL and struggle with poor Sprint service, here is a little story.
I finally got my warning letter after using 0001 for about 4 or 5 months. What surprised me is that I also got a courteous call in which a Sprint rep reminded me of Sprint's roaming policies.
I kindly pointed out that I barely have any data or voice service at my home, which is essentially true. The rep verified my claim, and actually offered me a contract termination without fees as an OPTION. I took the offer, and I am now an ATT SGSII owner. I have full service at my home, and often see dl speeds of 4-8 mbps in my general area on their HSPA+ network.
And so in the end, if you are a Sprint customer struggling with poor service...I really have to recommend using 0001.
boolboo said:
For those of you who often wonder about the implications of using the Verizon PRL and struggle with poor Sprint service, here is a little story.
I finally got my warning letter after using 0001 for about 4 or 5 months. What surprised me is that I also got a courteous call in which a Sprint rep reminded me of Sprint's roaming policies.
I kindly pointed out that I barely have any data or voice service at my home, which is essentially true. The rep verified my claim, and actually offered me a contract termination without fees as an OPTION. I took the offer, and I am now an ATT SGSII owner. I have full service at my home, and often see dl speeds of 4-8 mbps in my general area on their HSPA+ network.
And so in the end, if you are a Sprint customer struggling with poor service...I really have to recommend using 0001.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get about 20-25 Mbps up and down with my wifi. And the ping is something like 30ms.
Can your ATT beat that?
I use 1115 so I'll roam when I need it. I don't think I'd last long on a tiered plan without getting dinged with $500 bill sometime. Especially since ATT likes to encourage you to consume data more than usual. Its not like im downloading ROMs or watching movies when I'm out and about.
They could have sent you a airave, problem solved.
nabbed said:
I get about 20-25 Mbps up and down with my wifi. And the ping is something like 30ms.
Can your ATT beat that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This wasn't a "ha-ha" sort of post. Just sharing a personal experience. Does your wifi reach outside of your house?
phatmanxxl said:
I use 1115 so I'll roam when I need it. I don't think I'd last long on a tiered plan without getting dinged with $500 bill sometime. Especially since ATT likes to encourage you to consume data more than usual. Its not like im downloading ROMs or watching movies when I'm out and about.
They could have sent you a airave, problem solved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im scared of brain tumors. Doesnt the airave give you those? hahaha
nabbed said:
I get about 20-25 Mbps up and down with my wifi. And the ping is something like 30ms.
Can your ATT beat that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is a stupid response because 1) he obviously doesn't care about how fast his data speed is INSIDE his house where he is most likely using his computer connected to broadband internet anyways; 2) any idiot could've assumed he cares more about data speeds when he's out and about with friends; 3) even if he didn't have broadband internet at home and was tethering his phone data, then all the MORE reason to use ATT instead of Sprint.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
nabbed said:
I get about 20-25 Mbps up and down with my wifi. And the ping is something like 30ms.
Can your ATT beat that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a reason you compared wifi speeds to AT&T network speeds besides to be an ass?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
boolboo said:
This wasn't a "ha-ha" sort of post. Just sharing a personal experience.
Im scared of brain tumors. Doesnt the airave give you those? hahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have a airave that goes out all the time my internet at home is 30down 10up and sprint sucks in my house unless my airave works which it works at times. I want out
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
eao1991 said:
Is there a reason you compared wifi speeds to AT&T network speeds besides to be an ass?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because intelligence is overrated.
How do you like the AT&T SGS2 compared to the E4GT? I switched to AT&T because of their data speeds and am trying out the iPhone 4S right now, still have 2 weeks to decide which phone I want to go with. I might just keep this thing and buy a used SGS2 off craigslist and switch between the two depending on mood.
_MetalHead_ said:
How do you like the AT&T SGS2 compared to the E4GT? I switched to AT&T because of their data speeds and am trying out the iPhone 4S right now, still have 2 weeks to decide which phone I want to go with. I might just keep this thing and buy a used SGS2 off craigslist and switch between the two depending on mood.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its fine, a lateral move really. I miss the notification light though. The slightly smaller screen is a toss up. Word has it that ICS will be hitting the ATT SGSII Q1 2012. How do you like the Iphone right now? I almost thought of getting it, but the SGSII is such an awesome device.
Aside from a couple minor (and one MAJOR) complaints, I like it quite a bit. I really thought I was going to hate it, my original intention was to only keep it for a couple weeks and then swap it out for an SGS2 but it has really grown on me. My only real complaint is about Siri. It sucks. I used to use voice commands all the time on android and I feel like that ability is all but lost. Aside from that, I really like the simplicity of iOS, games on it are bad ass (save for the small screen), and the phone itself is beautifully designed and built.
_MetalHead_ said:
Aside from a couple minor (and one MAJOR) complaints, I like it quite a bit. I really thought I was going to hate it, my original intention was to only keep it for a couple weeks and then swap it out for an SGS2 but it has really grown on me. My only real complaint is about Siri. It sucks. I used to use voice commands all the time on android and I feel like that ability is all but lost. Aside from that, I really like the simplicity of iOS, games on it are bad ass (save for the small screen), and the phone itself is beautifully designed and built.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just don't drop it. EVER. I sell these things and I will toss my ET4G to demo the gorilla glass for customers all the time.
Good stuff boolboo.... cant wait for the e4gt
_MetalHead_ said:
Aside from a couple minor (and one MAJOR) complaints, I like it quite a bit. I really thought I was going to hate it, my original intention was to only keep it for a couple weeks and then swap it out for an SGS2 but it has really grown on me. My only real complaint is about Siri. It sucks. I used to use voice commands all the time on android and I feel like that ability is all but lost. Aside from that, I really like the simplicity of iOS, games on it are bad ass (save for the small screen), and the phone itself is beautifully designed and built.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you miss the larger screen at all?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
boolboo said:
Do you miss the larger screen at all?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For some things. While the games on iOS are FAR superior to those on Android, playing them on such a tiny screen sucks, to be frank. I'll play MC3 on this thing and then play it on my E4GT and it does make me question what the hell I'm doing by switching phones. Internet browsing too just isn't the same. That said, it is nice to not have to do any type of finger acrobatics to reach every corner of the screen. And everything else is great. I thought texting was going to be a problem too but it isn't, the iOS keyboard I'm sorry to say is FAR better than any keyboard I've tried on Android. It's fast and accurate and the autocorrect isn't nearly as bad (or as funny) as all the screencaps floating around would lead us to believe.
_MetalHead_ said:
For some things. While the games on iOS are FAR superior to those on Android, playing them on such a tiny screen sucks, to be frank. I'll play MC3 on this thing and then play it on my E4GT and it does make me question what the hell I'm doing by switching phones. Internet browsing too just isn't the same. That said, it is nice to not have to do any type of finger acrobatics to reach every corner of the screen. And everything else is great. I thought texting was going to be a problem too but it isn't, the iOS keyboard I'm sorry to say is FAR better than any keyboard I've tried on Android. It's fast and accurate and the autocorrect isn't nearly as bad (or as funny) as all the screencaps floating around would lead us to believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to agree on the iOS keyboard, best one I have ever used.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
JasonK75 said:
I have to agree on the iOS keyboard, best one I have ever used.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so true.
i came from iPhone to E4GT and one thing... i mean one and only thing i missed from iphone was the keyboard.
How snappy Is the AT&T version compared to ours?
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
My wife has the Skyrocket on the grandfathered plan & her data speeds kick my phones ass.
boolboo said:
Its fine, a lateral move really. I miss the notification light though. The slightly smaller screen is a toss up. Word has it that ICS will be hitting the ATT SGSII Q1 2012. How do you like the Iphone right now? I almost thought of getting it, but the SGSII is such an awesome device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why didnt you get the skyrocket?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Hey there all, I just got my Samsung Epic set up on Sprint again the other day and came back to the reality that Sprint's network does have holes in it in places. I downloaded a PRL that allows roaming on Verizon with EvDo data, but I'd like to be able to force roaming on demand when needed without using that other Verizon only PRL (I don't carry a computer and USB cable around everywhere in my pocket anyway). I've also tried version 1.6 and 2 of "RoamControl" and it is not working, for me anyway on any PRL I've tried so far, Legendary ROM version 2.1 or 2.2, or the latest version of the Samurai Kernel.
I saw somewhere there was a really complicated tweak you could do with the Evo that would just put the "roam only" option back in the regular network selection menu where it's supposed to be, but I haven't heard or seen of that working on a Samsung.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
- 2 Bunny
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1370198
NEGATIVE Reply
nikon120 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1370198
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24278427#post24278427
- 2 Bunny
OP is wasting people's time
Negative reply? Does that mean Roam Control doesn't achieve your goal? If not then say so. Responding with the post url for your OP and absolutely no feedback is just stupid.
SP MAY BE WASTING PEOPLE'S TIME Reply
nikon120 said:
Negative reply? Does that mean Roam Control doesn't achieve your goal? If not then say so. Responding with the post url for your OP and absolutely no feedback is just stupid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm down there dude, it was just a joke. It was a joke because in my opening post, I already stated that roam control doesn't work, and your post was a hasty reply that consisted of a lonely link to a thread promoting roam control.
I've also tried version 1.6 and 2 of "RoamControl" and it is not working, for me anyway on any PRL I've tried so far, Legendary ROM version 2.1 or 2.2, or the latest version of the Samurai Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
- 2B
kainppc6700 said:
Calm down there dude, it was just a joke. It was a joke because in my opening post, I already stated that roam control doesn't work, and your post was a hasty reply that consisted of a lonely link to a thread promoting roam control.
[quoteI've also tried version 1.6 and 2 of "RoamControl" and it is not working, for me anyway on any PRL I've tried so far, Legendary ROM version 2.1 or 2.2, or the latest version of the Samurai Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
- 2B[/QUOTE]
Roam control works fine if you actually pay for it and do not pirate
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
ROAM CONTROL SUCKS Reply
marcusant said:
- 2B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Roam control works fine if you actually pay for it and do not pirate
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
I'd really like to avoid paying for functionality that should be present in the software. I'll just stick with the free working version, but since that apparently does not work, we need to find an ALTERNATIVE to Roam control beside putting a different PRL on (I don't know about you, but I don't carry a computer or even a USB cable in my pocket that much).
- 2 Bunny
I'm not going to pay money for functionality that should be present in the software. I'll just stick with the free working version, but since that apparently does not work, we need to find an ALTERNATIVE to Roam control beside putting a different PRL on (I don't know about you, but I don't carry a computer or even a USB cable in my pocket that much).
- 2 Bunny
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Support the hard work of the devs, it's not their fault manufactures don't know how to make a phone to everyone's personal preference. Because of some awesome developer there is usually a app that'll fix things. Case in point I payed for roam control and use it w/ no problems.
Sent from a CM9 powered Epic.
Agreed. I got paid version of roam control and it is worth every penny.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
kainppc6700 said:
Calm down there dude, it was just a joke. It was a joke because in my opening post, I already stated that roam control doesn't work, and your post was a hasty reply that consisted of a lonely link to a thread promoting roam control.
- 2B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was very calm when typing my response. I simply stated my issue with your response to my suggested link.
I read your OP and saw what you quoted from it. I figured you were pirating Roam Control when you said it didn't work. If you don't wish to purchase the application, then that is fine. The link was provided because it is the easiest solution to your question.
The link I shared wasn't a promotional thread for Roam Control. It was an information thread at the time when Roam Control was in limbo on the Market. (As you can see/read in that thread's OP with the update edits)
At the moment it looks as if you have 4 choices remaining:
1. Buy a license for Roam Control.
2. Use CM or AOKP (assuming they offer forced roaming options in their vast array of settings)
3. Keep searching.
4. Give up.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Love having the ability to force roam when I'm at work in a dead spot for sprint. Also the roam control widget works great as well.
Sent from a CM9 powered Epic.
SOMETHING.. OTHER.. THAN.. ROAMCONTROL.. Reply
marcusant said:
Roam control works fine if you actually pay for it and do not pirate
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure the developers got it figured out. From what I've been reading, version 1.4 works for most people. Do you have a copy of it? Why would the free version not work?
Speedin07si said:
Support the hard work of the devs, it's not their fault manufactures don't know how to make a phone to everyone's personal preference. Because of some awesome developer there is usually a app that'll fix things. Case in point I payed for roam control and use it w/ no problems.
Sent from a CM9 powered Epic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried roam control too and it didn't work. I need to find a solution that does work.
Anyone! Any suggestions beside "Roam control"?
nikon120 said:
2. Use CM or AOKP (assuming they offer forced roaming options in their vast array of settings)
3. Keep searching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't option 2 a set of ROMs though? I already have what is possibly the best available ROM for the Epic - Legendary.
I've actually been doing a lot of searching too. Somebody found a complicated mod of a certain file on the Evo, but I'd like confirmation that it works on the Epic before I go in there and wreck something (I'm really leary of the whole process altogether).
Apart from those, I need the help of the community.
Any ideas?
- 2B
kainppc6700 said:
I'm pretty sure the developers got it figured out. From what I've been reading, version 1.4 works for most people. Do you have a copy of it? Why would the free version not work?
I tried the pirated roam control too and it didn't work. I need to find a solution that does work without paying for it.
Anyone! Any suggestions beside "Roam control"?
- 2B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There fixed your statement. Short answer You must pay to play or develop you own app. At least until a rom has this capability that works. I know CM7 and CM9 have the options but they currently don't work . Who knows when or if they ever will.
As far as you question "why won't the free one work" ... well there is no free one. The download is free but you have to purchase the license a one time $3.99.
http://www.roamctrl.com/download/
Clearly states will not work without a valid license.
Sent from a CM9 powered Epic.
Most roms will help with that
Most of the replies here work it out, some with the dreaded roamcontrol app, some within the custom rom itself if you go that route. Good luck!
elricdmaxx said:
Most of the replies here work it out, some with the dreaded roamcontrol app, some within the custom rom itself if you go that route. Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was hoping for a fee solution, so in reality, I didn't learn anything that I didn't already know aside from the fact that people have had limited success with the free version of Roam control.
Speedin07si said:
There fixed your statement. Short answer You must pay to play or develop you own app. At least until a rom has this capability that works. I know CM7 and CM9 have the options but they currently don't work . Who knows when or if they ever will.
As far as you question "why won't the free one work" ... well there is no free one. The download is free but you have to purchase the license a one time $3.99.
http://www.roamctrl.com/download/
Clearly states will not work without a valid license.
Sent from a CM9 powered Epic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's not entirely true. There was a free version on Mobilism for a while, but they stopped developing it. I'll try the paid version though.
- 2B
Why do people complain so much about spending $4 on an app? That's a gallon of gas. Just take one less trip to the store. If you are that broke then don't buy feature phones damnit.
Dude. Roam Control is cheap. Are you really complaining that an app that you pirated does not work... I purchased it and it fully works. There is no free version as it is a payed app. The developer of the app has spent more than $4 of his time to make the app. You do not just say "I have an idea for this app" and have it just appear. It takes alot of hard work and time to make an app... buy it or do not complain.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Roam Control doesn't always work
Hey all.
Just a heads up, but roam control doesn't always work... even if you buy it. I have an Epic 4G and bought the app with no luck. Yes the app does what it's supposed to do, it puts the phone in roam only mode. That's great, but here's the catch, for samsung phones, they only roam in 800mhz mode. Some parts of the US are 1900mhz only. This leaves the phone with no signal at all. Happened to me with the full paid app v 2.2.0.
Read the FAQ at roamctrl.com if you don't believe me.
Also found this blog where someone found a way to force roaming without changing PRL. Looks like you still need a pc and usb cable though.
http://mikescloset.blogspot.com/2011/10/force-roaming-on-samsung-epic-4g.html
ROAMING Reply
marcusant said:
Dude. Roam Control is cheap. Are you really complaining that an app that you pirated does not work... I purchased it and it fully works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He must be.
danipoak said:
Why do people complain so much about spending $4 on an app? That's a gallon of gas. Just take one less trip to the store. If you are that broke then don't buy feature phones damnit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know.
Why do some people complain about random things in a thread they haven't read?
acontrasto said:
Hey all.
Just a heads up, but roam control doesn't always work... even if you buy it. I have an Epic 4G and bought the app with no luck. Yes the app does what it's supposed to do, it puts the phone in roam only mode. That's great, but here's the catch, for samsung phones, they only roam in 800mhz mode. Some parts of the US are 1900mhz only. This leaves the phone with no signal at all. Happened to me with the full paid app v 2.2.0.
Read the FAQ at roamctrl.com if you don't believe me.
Also found this blog where someone found a way to force roaming without changing PRL. Looks like you still need a pc and usb cable though.
http://mikescloset.blogspot.com/2011/10/force-roaming-on-samsung-epic-4g.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. I was always under the impression that Sprint was exclusively 1900Mhz and that Verizon was almost all in that 800whatever Mhz band.
The post is very interesting though, I wonder if there is a way to do that right on the device itself.
- 2B
I have been trying various torrent apps and none of them seem to work anymore. Is it just me/my phone, my service area, or did sprint block all torrents from getting through?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
I think Sprint might have. But I have no issue when I tether my phone to my computer
Sent from my PG06100 using xda app-developers app
lol no sprint does not block downloading torrents, I average 30gb a month using phone/tether I would know =)
all torrent apps work but i recommend using aTorrent it always seems to work.
They're definitely blocking torrents now. Especially if you are using closed websites. If you are using open websites vuze connects after a few restarts but forget about utorrent. You can try downloading the openoffice torrent to try it and you will get the closed connection by peer error (or something like that) on utorrent and the socketexception error on vuze which mean they are indeed blocking traffic.
edit: btw Im talking about torrents while tethering, I have not tried it with a client app on the phone itself.
I torrent all day long using native usb tether with Utorrent or any other program/app, please guy your spreading false rumours...sprint is NOT blocking torrenting
btw I have that torrent downloading just fine usb tethered to my laptop.
Phr3d13 said:
I have been trying various torrent apps and none of them seem to work anymore. Is it just me/my phone, my service area, or did sprint block all torrents from getting through?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete the sprint proxy using ##3282# in the dial app
that was one of the first things I did, and it seemed to help for about a half an hour, then the connections got crappy again. I have since deleted the torrent I was trying to get and started a different one. it completed with no problems. I am also being told by sprint that my area is going through network vision upgrades. so I'm guessing that is the likely culprit
Have you tried orbot app or DROID vpn? Orbot is a little slower but it worked when I had the problem before I deleted the sprint proxy
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda app-developers app
For some reason it seems that TouchWiz ROMs are fine about downloading torrents but the AOSP based ROMs are not... /hmm
Still having this issue? I am. Sometimes it will work if I pause and unpause the download but that's rare. VPNs don't work either
blastboi said:
Delete the sprint proxy using ##3282# in the dial app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I dialed the number. Now what? Is there a risk? Will it void my warranty?
Bump
Bump
Nope. Works just fine for me. I use tTorrent.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
SGSIIIJB said:
I torrent all day long using native usb tether with Utorrent or any other program/app, please guy your spreading false rumours...sprint is NOT blocking torrenting
btw I have that torrent downloading just fine usb tethered to my laptop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude he is NOT spreading rumors, they are doing it to me too. ALSO There is a link of Sprint straight up admitting that they block peer2peer traffic
Just Google Sprint Blocking Torrents, It'll be the first link that leads to the Sprint Message Board (I can't post links yet)
SprintCare:
"Peer-to-peer sharing directly violates Sprint's terms and conditions. This includes the use of file-sharing sites such as Bittorrent, Ares, Gnutella, eDonkey and PP Live. Sprint has begun blocking these sites proactively. Thank you for your patience and understanding."
WarriorAtlas said:
Dude he is NOT spreading rumors, they are doing it to me too. ALSO There is a link of Sprint straight up admitting that they block peer2peer traffic
Just Google Sprint Blocking Torrents, It'll be the first link that leads to the Sprint Message Board (I can't post links yet)
SprintCare:
"Peer-to-peer sharing directly violates Sprint's terms and conditions. This includes the use of file-sharing sites such as Bittorrent, Ares, Gnutella, eDonkey and PP Live. Sprint has begun blocking these sites proactively. Thank you for your patience and understanding."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As Ive posted time and time again... Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading nor does it monitor when, where, why, what your downloading. My GS3 is my primary ISP I torrent HUGE files up to 7GB all day long! highest month usage was in the 60GB range with no issues. I pay for my unlimited data and I use it to the FULLEST.
Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading/torrenting, please stop spreading false rumors.
SGSIIIJB said:
As Ive posted time and time again... Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading nor does it monitor when, where, why, what your downloading. My GS3 is my primary ISP I torrent HUGE files up to 7GB all day long! highest month usage was in the 60GB range with no issues. I pay for my unlimited data and I use it to the FULLEST.
Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading/torrenting, please stop spreading false rumors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing you didn't bother doing the research I've provided you. It's too much reading for you I suppose.
It's great for you that it works for you and I have a Galaxy S4 with unlimited data as well. On my phone, bittorrent DOES in fact work, and I do several gigs a month as well. My point with this is that just because something doesn't apply to you, it doesn't mean it's not an issue. That's a very narrow-minded and immature way to look at the world.
My wifi from sprint however does not work, on any of my devices (7 in total between computers, tablets, and phones) nor on my neighbors computer (so it's not just me).
PLUS THEY FREAKING ADMIT TO DOING IT! I don't get why this isn't enough evidence for you considering they don't hide the fact.
Using a VPN I can get by the block and make it work, so it's not an issue for me anymore. For anyone else out there with this issue you can try using a VPN or I've heard enabling encryption on your torrent client will work too.
I hope this helps those who are having this issue.
WarriorAtlas said:
I'm guessing you didn't bother doing the research I've provided you. It's too much reading for you I suppose.
It's great for you that it works for you and I have a Galaxy S4 with unlimited data as well. On my phone, bittorrent DOES in fact work, and I do several gigs a month as well. My point with this is that just because something doesn't apply to you, it doesn't mean it's not an issue. That's a very narrow-minded and immature way to look at the world.
My wifi from sprint however does not work, on any of my devices (7 in total between computers, tablets, and phones) nor on my neighbors computer (so it's not just me).
PLUS THEY FREAKING ADMIT TO DOING IT! I don't get why this isn't enough evidence for you considering they don't hide the fact.
Using a VPN I can get by the block and make it work, so it's not an issue for me anymore. For anyone else out there with this issue you can try using a VPN or I've heard enabling encryption on your torrent client will work too.
I hope this helps those who are having this issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guy, this is real simple... If Sprint was blocking torrneting/downloading/w/e u want to call it; It would effect ALL of US customers not just you, Short answer Sprint does NOT block any torrneting/tethered/Hotspot/again w/e u want to call it; downloading.
Maybe it's just their partners.... in central VA we don't have sprint towers we use ntelos towers, everyone I know who has sprint or boost mobile can't torrent with out a vpn like torgard...
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
SGSIIIJB said:
Guy, this is real simple... If Sprint was blocking torrneting/downloading/w/e u want to call it; It would effect ALL of US customers not just you, Short answer Sprint does NOT block any torrneting/tethered/Hotspot/again w/e u want to call it; downloading.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you had done any research on the statements made by Sprint themselves (Which your ignorance and ineptitude clearly have shown that you didn't) you would know that they only block or throttle certain ports known to be used for torrenting, and only in certain locations at the moment. AGAIN This is ALL COMING FROM SPRINT! This is why using vpns to port forward seems to work. Other people have had the exact same issue, and have also heard from Sprint that this is in their T and C. I made it really easy for you understand and gather the information for yourself only because it's a benefit to others to have this info. However I don't really like dealing with idiots so if you still don't get it after this, then I will just give up. I will continue posting this info on here and on other boards and forums to spread the word.
blastboi said:
Maybe it's just their partners.... in central VA we don't have sprint towers we use ntelos towers, everyone I know who has sprint or boost mobile can't torrent with out a vpn like torgard...
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
blastboi, thank you for you contribution. You and your friends are not alone in this experience. Maybe SGSIIIJB will see that he is not the only person in the world and that just because he doesn't experience a problem, it doesn't mean that others don't experience it. I really appreciate your help.
Edit: Reading more and more I am finding so much stuff that confirms this and I'm finding that most ISP's are throttling p2p in some way.
SGSIIIJB said:
As Ive posted time and time again... Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading nor does it monitor when, where, why, what your downloading. My GS3 is my primary ISP I torrent HUGE files up to 7GB all day long! highest month usage was in the 60GB range with no issues. I pay for my unlimited data and I use it to the FULLEST.
Sprint does NOT block any type of downloading/torrenting, please stop spreading false rumors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://community.sprint.com/baw/message/756219
I'm in Portland, OR and I can't download torrents anymore. Tethered to my PC or from my native client. Sprint is doing something.