Carrier IQ - Samsung Captivate Glide

i have tested with several Carrier IQ scanners from the market including bitdefender.. And they all say my device does not have Carrier IQ..
AT&T Samsung Captivate Glide: ver: 2.3.6
Just thought i would share that info

Related

Telus SIII on Rogers?

Does anyone know if the Telus version of the SIII is the same modelt hat is on Rogers?
I went to the websites and seems the GSM frequencies are the same but was not clear on the LTE chip. Each service provider uses a different AWS and it is not clear if both are active on each phone or if there is a separate phone for each.
Anyone know?
I ask because I can get a deal on a used Telus one but I am on Rogers
as far as i know, the telus, bell, and rogers versions have the exact same model number, thus, same hardware:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_III#Model_variants
hope that helps.
Canadoc said:
Does anyone know if the Telus version of the SIII is the same modelt hat is on Rogers?
I went to the websites and seems the GSM frequencies are the same but was not clear on the LTE chip. Each service provider uses a different AWS and it is not clear if both are active on each phone or if there is a separate phone for each.
Anyone know?
I ask because I can get a deal on a used Telus one but I am on Rogers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mk_ln said:
as far as i know, the telus, bell, and rogers versions have the exact same model number, thus, same hardware:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_III#Model_variants
hope that helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I can confirm it will work fine.
Remember that you will have to UNLOCK it first either free manually (somewhere in XDA there is info), or paying Telus or paying a 3rd party. Then make sure to get the Rogers LTE Sim and also APN info specific to LTE etc.
I did see that telus was selling refurbished ones for pretty cheap.
Should be the same (i747m)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747M
They're identical phones. I was planning on getting one of those Telus refurbs until the page went down
You can just unlock it and flash the factory Bell or Rogers software onto it (so you can have the appropriate bloatware lol)

Canadian Phone with European SIM

Hi.
I have flashed the stock rom (4.1.1) and removed the carrier lock. Could someone tell me if this phone (Galaxy S3 I-747m) works with european SIM cards? LTE is not a issue here.
Thanks
Igor
It should work but it really depends on the carrier's frequencies.
Have a look at the carrier's website to determine the frequencies supported by their network.

Galaxy S4- Verizon Phone Being Used On T-Mobile

Help with Galaxy S4 -Verizon to T-Mobile
Hello, I have been reading through these forums and am starting to feel a bit of hope. I have a unlocked Samsung Galaxy S4 that I purchased from a friend who is a Verizon customer. I am using T-Mobile (Family Mobile...same thing?). The phone works with the T-Mobile SIM card however, the data is sketchy and the Text Messaging works some of the time, but does not work most of the time. I live in a Metropolitan area with excellent coverage. In fact, my wife and children have no problems with T-Mobile service; however, their phones were originally configured for T-Mobile. I can't say for certain, but it seems like the radio's are either incompatible or that they are configured incorrectly for T-Mobile.
I have never modified a phone's OS or ROM before, but I am familiar with the concepts and I am not afraid. Is there a custom ROM that can be flashed to get all traces of Verizon off of this phone? And can I configure it so that it is optimized for the T-Mobile networks?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Here is some info about the phone:
Model: SCH-I545
Android Version: 5.0.1
Baseband: I545VRUG0C1
Kernel: 3.4.0
Build No: LRX22C.I545VRUG0C1
Hardware Version: I545.06
KNOX: 2.3
Configuration Version: J12.SAM.SCHI545.0

A505U verizon with stock sprint firmware

Does anybody know if I can use Odin to put stock Sprint A505U firmware into my Verizon A505U? There's no OEM unlock option on the A505U (US version) phone so the bootloader is locked. I prefer not to root so I can use google-pay without any masking shenanigans.
The sprint firmware has a different set of enabled FDD-LTE bands that makes it more useful. Thanks.
Edit:
I've just learned that some carrier unlocked galaxies s8, s9, s10, etc. running pie will auto rebrand and adjust available bands to adapt to whatever Sim is installed. Does the A505U do this? This would be far easier than flashing if it works for the A505U.
The Samsung BYOD rebranding feature for U models based on sim insertion is always released about 10 months after the phone's initial release.
This has been the case for S8, Note 8, S9, and Note 9. It is not even released yet for S10.
So it will probably be getting close to mid-2020 before it is released for A505U, if even then.
Thanks for the response. I am still trying to wrap my head around how Samsung does their "BYOD Experience" rebranding. It appears that Samsung has gone the route of common hardware for US phones while supporting all the major carrier CSC's (multi-CSC?) within a given branded firmware .
Since only the CDMA carriers Xfinity, Sprint, and Verizon have the A505U, I'll try to find somebody with an ATT or TMO sim to see how my supposedly unlocked Verizon A505U reacts. I haven't seen any reports of what happens posted yet as it relates to the A505U.
I have a Galaxy A505U through Sprint. As you've said it is bootloader locked by the carrier. The 7 day trick does not work to show/enable Oem Unlock. I forget the reason now but I have reflashed stock firmware in Odin before which would modify system partion despite a locked bootloader. So I believe that you could in theory flash the sprint firmware in odion but I don't know how this will affect coverage. I do know sprint has roaming agreement in place with vzw so it should work.... But you're coverage may be degraded as I believe it's not going to support all of vzw lte bands... On a slightly separate note I am curious if there's some way to get around the lock using Odin. I am rusty on my Samsung modding(not eisnce sgs4) and terminology but I'm wondering if we could flash just the bootloader itself from another variant.
cominteldb said:
The Samsung BYOD rebranding feature for U models based on sim insertion is always released about 10 months after the phone's initial release.
This has been the case for S8, Note 8, S9, and Note 9. It is not even released yet for S10.
So it will probably be getting close to mid-2020 before it is released for A505U, if even then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is not accurate.. the devices contain multi csc in the omc partition so once the device is sim unlocked all the firmwares for usa variants have the csc for all the carriers.. you can use an app like phoneinfo and see the available csc's.. it has been this way as you stated since the S8 and up...
now if you are talking about U1 devices then thats a different story.. U1 devices typically have the same csc's but are just unbranded meaning little to no carrier bloat for example.
this is typically why all the firmwares are interchangeable because they are all containing the same csc. The only difference sometimes will be the userdata which might b labeled specific to a carrier but ultimately this doesnt matter either as they typically would contain only a few extra carrier bloat apps that shouldnt impact overall function at all..
heck, if you know what ur doing you can even change the csc code without even flashing any other firmware or putting another sim in.. i typically for example use sprint sales code with vzw network code bcuz i have verizon but sprint has more dialer codes..
as an example my g975u was purchased from verizon but i currently set the csc to GCF for research purposes and all my vzw services work great and to start I used a U firmware that had userdata labeled for SPR lol I also removed the last bit in the carrier code for research purposes.. when i toss a tmo sim in it automatically loads the apns and carrier mode for tmo and it just works without even rebooting
occams-razor said:
Thanks for the response. I am still trying to wrap my head around how Samsung does their "BYOD Experience" rebranding. It appears that Samsung has gone the route of common hardware for US phones while supporting all the major carrier CSC's (multi-CSC?) within a given branded firmware .
Since only the CDMA carriers Xfinity, Sprint, and Verizon have the A505U, I'll try to find somebody with an ATT or TMO sim to see how my supposedly unlocked Verizon A505U reacts. I haven't seen any reports of what happens posted yet as it relates to the A505U.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are correct.. the usa variants are multi csc so they should work anywhere.. international devices also contain multi csc for w.e region it is purchased in. once sim unlocked if u say try to take ur phone to china or something ur device wont contain that csc but you should be able to get it to work with apn edits for example and might not have all the bells and whistles since couldnt flash their specific csc if that makes sense..
These phones nowadays are all world capable for the most part and contain the hardware to work on the differet networks (cdma gsm etc)
Samsungs "byod" experience just means its carrier unbranded so its sim unlocked out the box and can b used on any usa network without all the carrier bloat.. this is sort of pointless in my opinion since usually these firmwares can also b flashed to carrier branded variants..
on a side note, i have a tmo sim but mainly i use verizon and am getting an A50 from big red tomorrow so I will test this out for u and let u kno how tmo is in a vzw a50.
i have a tmo purchased a10e and my vzw sim works great in it.. in fact, vzw works better in the tmo phone than tmo haha but thats bcuz tmo isnt as good service wise in my area
elliwigy said:
you are correct.. the usa variants are multi csc so they should work anywhere.. international devices also contain multi csc for w.e region it is purchased in. once sim unlocked if u say try to take ur phone to china or something ur device wont contain that csc but you should be able to get it to work with apn edits for example and might not have all the bells and whistles since couldnt flash their specific csc if that makes sense..
These phones nowadays are all world capable for the most part and contain the hardware to work on the differet networks (cdma gsm etc)
Samsungs "byod" experience just means its carrier unbranded so its sim unlocked out the box and can b used on any usa network without all the carrier bloat.. this is sort of pointless in my opinion since usually these firmwares can also b flashed to carrier branded variants..
on a side note, i have a tmo sim but mainly i use verizon and am getting an A50 from big red tomorrow so I will test this out for u and let u kno how tmo is in a vzw a50.
i have a tmo purchased a10e and my vzw sim works great in it.. in fact, vzw works better in the tmo phone than tmo haha but thats bcuz tmo isnt as good service wise in my area
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the great info! Please let us know how the TMO sim works out. I'm most curious about whether TMO features like their VoLTE and VoWIFI are enabled.
An Interested Observer...
elliwigy said:
the usa variants are multi csc so they should work anywhere...
These phones nowadays are all world capable for the most part and contain the hardware to work on the differet networks (cdma gsm etc)
i use verizon and am getting an A50 from big red tomorrow so I will test this out for u and let u kno how tmo is in a vzw a50.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello..
Your comment sparked my interest.. as I'm a new owner of the Xfinity variant of the Galaxy A50.
Although I have no plans to leave Xfinity for the remainder of 2019.. as I'm waiting for my $250.00 Promo Rebate which comes around the 4th Month of service to cover just under 65% of my investment in the A50... leaving me with a $135.00 balance.. But, if what you state is indeed the case.. and these devices have the guts to run on traditional GSM Carrier's.. this add much more intrigue into the equation..:angel:
I'm not one to pry.. but, did you follow through with your purchase? and if so... what were your findings?
elliwigy said:
These phones nowadays are all world capable for the most part and contain the hardware to work on the differet networks (cdma gsm etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is correct but as someone who works in the industry and works with 3 out of 4 nationwide carriers I can say Att typically has there iphones manufacturered without a cdma attena making it gsm only.
I just checked my sprint A505U and it does have csc codes for many carriers including att, spt, vzw and t-mob among others. So generally another firmware should work fine then?
I had purchased a used SM a505u from dubai market. 1 YEAR IT WORKS FINE and after that I understand phone is not getting updates and there was issue with fingerprint sensor. And I decided to flah march2020 update from samfrew . But after that I am not getting network .it says networ error. Sim card crash.contact carrier etc...

M9 / AT&T / VoLTE question

Outside of the iPhone which is a "special case", AT&T has been known to only provision VoLTE and/or WiFi calling for users of AT&T-branded and sold [Android] phones; however, every once in a while, they make an exception for a particular model (e.g. / famously, the Pixel 2).
In the case of the M9, both the AT&T-branded (locked or unlocked) and unbranded, factory-unlocked models share the same HTC model # (OPJA110). I have also noticed that if I take a clean IMEI from an unbranded model and run it through various AT&T IMEI checkers, it almost always returns a positive result, as though this IMEI exists in AT&T's database. But if I take, say, a clean IMEI from T-Mobile-branded M9 (OPJA120) and run it through the same checkers, they say this isn't an AT&T phone (which would be correct!).
So this raises the question: in order to achieve VoLTE on an M9 on AT&T, do you absolutely have to have an AT&T-branded model? Or has anybody had success with getting AT&T VoLTE working on an unbranded, factory-unlocked M9? That an unbranded phone's IMEI passes the AT&T IMEI checks would *seem* to suggest that AT&T might treat *all* OPJA110s as AT&T devices, not just the ones that happen to have their logo printed on the back.
(I realize that if you have an unbranded phone, you may need to change CID and flash the AT&T firmware on the phone to get VoLTE to work...my question is solely about people's experience with the AT&T/network-side of the equation. An unbranded phone with an AT&T CID and software should be functionally identical to an AT&T-branded phone, but the question is whether the AT&T network will refuse to provision VoLTE for one's SIM/account because they don't see the phone as an AT&T phone based on its IMEI.)
Thanks!

Categories

Resources