Related
Is there a CDMA hardspl? Can Verizon phones be flashed?
These phones are now just being released to Carriers
Verizon has the phone for $199
Sprint / ATT are expected to charge $299
Because I am a noob and had a tilt previously CDMA vs GSM wasn't an issue, my 2 year contract expires in a few days.
Will ROMS be cross compatible or GSM only or CDMA only?
Anyone have experience with differences in internet speeds?
Im a UK GSM user. Heres what i can tell you off hand.
Check the Rhodium CDMA forum to see if there is a HardSPL (I dont think so, yet)
$100 dollars is a lot of monies
Not cross compatible, dont do it. Dont think about it, im sure bad things happen.
No idea about internet speeds.
Me personally? GSM Model, $100 is a lot but there are far more GSM users on XDA devs therefore far more things to play about with. This phone is a toy for me, i dont need it but it occupies me. You chose!
Actually $349.99 for Sprint and T-Mobile
AT&T not listed as of yet, I will try to barter it for $199 when it comes out
Verizon actually looks very nice, but knowing them they usually block alot of stuff on their device or charge extra for things that should be free...
ATT is the way to go for me atleast...you get a wider support if its a gsm phone vs. cdma
The reason why verizon's TP2 is cheaper is because they require you to have a data plan for as long as you own the phone. the data plan is $29.99 a month. Thats $360 extra a year. I dont think spring requires a data plan which is why theirs is more expensive.
Verizon & Sprint = CDMA & GSM (first world phone for them cept BB an Nextel) Uses MSA 7601 Chip (Sprint's add on Data is 15 bucks WIN WIN with Sprint)
AT&T = GSM only and poor expensive data Network - Use's MSA7200 Chip < FAIL!
bimori said:
The reason why verizon's TP2 is cheaper is because they require you to have a data plan for as long as you own the phone. the data plan is $29.99 a month. Thats $360 extra a year. I dont think spring requires a data plan which is why theirs is more expensive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but Sprint also charges you for a data plan for as long as you have the phone. However, I'm not sure whether they lock you into it for the duration of the contract or not, but who gets a smartphone without data these days?
GeoffM said:
AT&T = GSM only and poor expensive data Network - Use's MSA7200 Chip < FAIL!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AT&T network is consistently the fastest. It only lags slightly behind Verizon in coverage, too.
GeoffM said:
Verizon & Sprint = CDMA & GSM (first world phone for them cept BB an Nextel) Uses MSA 7601 Chip (Sprint's add on Data is 15 bucks WIN WIN with Sprint)
AT&T = GSM only and poor expensive data Network - Use's MSA7200 Chip < FAIL!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know I should research this but do you know the differences between both chips. I am sure people on this thread are interested as well. Any clock speed differences or is it just the carrier hermaphrodite ability?
toiletduk said:
The AT&T network is consistently the fastest. It only lags slightly behind Verizon in coverage, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm gonna have to seriously disagree with this. This only applies in big cities. Verizon has better overall coverage and better broadband coverage. At&t also has HORRID customer service. Before At&t took over I would've agreed with this but At&t screwed everything up.
On the note of the one i would buy I would buy the Verizon or Sprint one based on the messed up keyboard design that at&t continues to go with.
I dont know about horrid customer service, It can be bad at times, but I had a tilt and warranty exchanged it twice and got a fuse. I think playing dumb with att will get you where you want to go and more info than you were looking for, Data coverage always varies upon where you live, I have lived in the sticks of upper michigan for a while now, NO 3G but never a dropped call and I mean never When I was in a bigger city with my fuse my data speeds were impressive but every time I went ut of range of a tower and conected to another it dropped my call, which is utter bull. So If your looking to buy a phone check out the internal specs on the device, see what can be unlocked and flashed to your liking and look at the device to see if it is aesthetically pleasing to your eye not someone elses, if you like the way it looks and what its got in it buy it. But just from my point of view dont buy CDMA having a sim card rocks you can put it into any phone and bam! new phone! Well any compatible phone but there are a lot of them. CDMA phones are a carriers way of shoving a cactus up you a** and telling you to like it.
7600 vs 7601
sdlopez83 said:
I know I should research this but do you know the differences between both chips. I am sure people on this thread are interested as well. Any clock speed differences or is it just the carrier hermaphrodite ability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Former Qualcommer here, and was involved in this, at least from the finance perspective.
The chips are identical in function. The only difference between the two of them were that the 7601 chips had a power save function disabled to be in compliance with a broadcom ruling on the 686 patent infringement case. This has long since been settled and the two companies are at peace with each other. It was only an issue for chips being imported into the USA from Singapore.
regards
42nate1 said:
Former Qualcommer here, and was involved in this, at least from the finance perspective.
The chips are identical in function. The only difference between the two of them were that the 7601 chips had a power save function disabled to be in compliance with a broadcom ruling on the 686 patent infringement case. This has long since been settled and the two companies are at peace with each other. It was only an issue for chips being imported into the USA from Singapore.
regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the clarification.
I havent seen anyone respond about the Verizon version TP2 being crippled so I will. It IS NOT for the first time, everything is the same as the others except the Verizon version is much sexier
stanglifemike said:
I havent seen anyone respond about the Verizon version TP2 being crippled so I will. It IS NOT for the first time, everything is the same as the others except the Verizon version is much sexier
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANK YOU!!! I'm considering the leap to Verizon. I would definitely like to know what you think of the device. What the removal of the ctrl key to add another message key. I really thought that was dumb...
Dont forget that if you have AT&T's family plan, you can ditch the data plan for the TP2 and add medianet for the dumb phone for $15 then swap SIM chip. Now you have TP2 with unlimited data plan for only $15.
Bxsteez said:
THANK YOU!!! I'm considering the leap to Verizon. I would definitely like to know what you think of the device. What the removal of the ctrl key to add another message key. I really thought that was dumb...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely wonderful!! The screen on this thing is simply beautiful, and the speed and smoothness of TF3D is quite an improvement of the TP. Overall, the BEST ppc that I have laid eyes on and I enjoy using it everytime I pick it up....enjoy looking at it too. I highly reccomend it!!
how do we even know if weve got the CDMA or GSM version .. ??
stanglifemike said:
Absolutely wonderful!! The screen on this thing is simply beautiful, and the speed and smoothness of TF3D is quite an improvement of the TP. Overall, the BEST ppc that I have laid eyes on and I enjoy using it everytime I pick it up....enjoy looking at it too. I highly reccomend it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm I was expecting a comparison to the WWE edition. The comparisons to the TP is what i already know but thanks. I had the TP and the Xperia and no doubt that the TP2 is by far better than those two. It is the greatest winmo device i've ever used and it had the best stock rom i've ever used as well. Thats why i'm thinking about making the switch to cdma. I like to be able to change phones as much as I want thats why i stuck with At&t.
well I'm sure you know about the GSM capabilities and the Verizon sim card already installed in the phone
While Verizon has the HTC Trophy as it's one and only Windows Phone, the wireless provider has given Microsoft an ultimatum of sorts that could see the Verizon dropping Windows Phone all together.
In a recent interview with CNET Verizon Wireless's Chief Marketing Officer Marni Walden commented,
"We've communicated to Microsoft that LTE is critical to us. We need to see a timeline that makes sense if we want to continue to represent them."
Microsoft hasn't responded to Walden's comments but has said it would add LTE support to Windows Phone but hasn't addressed the "when" of the subject. Should Microsoft and Verizon part ways, the wireless company will focus it's smartphone line-up on Android devices and the iPhone (which doesn't support LTE).
Verizon is still working with Microsoft on this issue and hopefully common ground can be found to bring the second generation Windows Phones to Verizon. If not, does the success of Windows Phones hinge on a Verizon model or will Microsoft do just fine without?
Source: CNET Via: Winsupersite
Verizon draws a line in the sand with Microsoft? | wpcentral | Windows Phone News, Forums, and Reviews
deadwrong03 said:
While Verizon has the HTC Trophy as it's one and only Windows Phone, the wireless provider has given Microsoft an ultimatum of sorts that could see the Verizon dropping Windows Phone all together.
In a recent interview with CNET Verizon Wireless's Chief Marketing Officer Marni Walden commented,
"We've communicated to Microsoft that LTE is critical to us. We need to see a timeline that makes sense if we want to continue to represent them."
Microsoft hasn't responded to Walden's comments but has said it would add LTE support to Windows Phone but hasn't addressed the "when" of the subject. Should Microsoft and Verizon part ways, the wireless company will focus it's smartphone line-up on Android devices and the iPhone (which doesn't support LTE).
Verizon is still working with Microsoft on this issue and hopefully common ground can be found to bring the second generation Windows Phones to Verizon. If not, does the success of Windows Phones hinge on a Verizon model or will Microsoft do just fine without?
Source: CNET Via: Winsupersite
Verizon draws a line in the sand with Microsoft? | wpcentral | Windows Phone News, Forums, and Reviews
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd think it's more of a planning prep on V's part. They can't exactly start an ad campaign that states "the most LTE devices" or anything like that if apple and microsoft haven't caught up yet. V is pushing it's LTE big time, and LTE should be pushed. It's not necessary to sell a phone, but every time a standard is adopted and speeds are increased, we all benefit.
Microsoft doesn't really benefit by LTE directly in phone sales. It's just another radio to them, much like Apple. On the other hand, they're in the business of getting more mindshare, and selling more licenses. With those licenses come more vender tie-ins, and that means BIG MONEY.
whatchathink ?
Lol even though they would never draw that line for apple and iPhone...
...not to mention as soon as LTE is finished, there will be 5G or Super-Duper LTE or some new thing...
scoobysnacks said:
Lol even though they would never draw that line for apple and iPhone...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering about that too.
Re-reading the quote from Walden, it is a bit ambiguous. Verizon wants to see a roadmap/timeline from Microsoft about LTE support, but they don't mention Apple at all. That could imply that Apple has provided such a roadmap to the carrier, while not releasing it to the public (a somewhat reasonable conclusion, I suppose), or that Versizon believes that Apple represents a large enough revenue stream to overlook the lack of LTE (which WP doesn't quite represent yet).
The question is, why wouldn't Microsoft want to communicate their plans to the carrier, at least to confirm that LTE is coming?
LTE support will require re-speccing CDMA devices for Verizon's network. The SoCs that Microsoft uses in WP7 do not support LTE. They will likely not have LTE support until they have Dual Core CPU [official] support in the OS/Devices.
The next iPhone is almost guaranteed to be LTE, and Apple isn't comparable to Microsoft, because Apple has greater Mindshare and sells way more phones than WP7. The 4S set records on almost every carrier who got it, and sold 4M units in a weekend on Pre-Order. No other phone performs that well.
Trying to call Apple out would not help Verizon, especially with AT&T starting to roll out their LTE network now. By the time the iPhone 5 launches, AT&T can have LTE in enough places that iPhone users wanting an upgrade (and leaving for AT&T) can significantly affect their bottom line. It would be a dumb move.
WP7 is the platform with something to prove, not Apple. iOS matches or exceeds WP7 in every area. Microsoft needs a competitive Advantage, and not getting to LTE before Apple does on Verizon (or even WiMax on Sprint) is not a good strategy, IMO.
calling out only one single os is an equally dumb move imo...
wouldn't want to upset the isheep though
Lte is barely available anywhere anyway.
N8ter said:
LTE support will require re-speccing CDMA devices for Verizon's network. The SoCs that Microsoft uses in WP7 do not support LTE. They will likely not have LTE support until they have Dual Core CPU [official] support in the OS/Devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't the HTC Thunderbolt use the same SoC used in today's Windows Phones?
scoobysnacks said:
Lol even though they would never draw that line for apple and iPhone...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizon (and everyone else) isn't in the position to dictate anything to Apple. Apple dictates to them. Just look at the Sprint deal.
scoobysnacks said:
calling out only one single os is an equally dumb move imo...
wouldn't want to upset the isheep though
Lte is barely available anywhere anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're that clueless about Verizon LTE coverage and the speed at which they're rolling it out?
Apple phone launch = camp outs at the store. WP device launch =?
Verizon is in the business of making money. They will push what sells and make them the most money. Additionally Apple users are more willing to upgrade a phone year over year than WinPhone users. It has nothing to do with iSheep or WinTards.
See what I did there?
As for the Thunderbolt that needs confirmation. (You're right)
It has the Qualcomm MSM8655 Snapdragon. Is that the same one in the new Mango phones. The radio would be totally different, though, so I'm unsure of the technical details beyond that. I think the Thunderbolt is renowned for terrible battery life, though the Photon 4G and Bionic seem to have better battery life on 4G/LTE.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Dual Core, 4G, LTE all this will do is drain the $h!t out of your battery life. I can't wait to see the iFans faces drop when their battery goes down hill because of LTE.
N8ter said:
You're that clueless about Verizon LTE coverage and the speed at which they're rolling it out?
Apple phone launch = camp outs at the store. WP device launch =?
Verizon is in the business of making money. They will push what sells and make them the most money. Additionally Apple users are more willing to upgrade a phone year over year than WinPhone users. It has nothing to do with iSheep or WinTards.
See what I did there?
As for the Thunderbolt that needs confirmation. (You're right)
It has the Qualcomm MSM8655 Snapdragon. Is that the same one in the new Mango phones. The radio would be totally different, though, so I'm unsure of the technical details beyond that. I think the Thunderbolt is renowned for terrible battery life, though the Photon 4G and Bionic seem to have better battery life on 4G/LTE.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
considering I dont live in the states I can only go with what i read/hear..
So what iPhone sales are higher?
A phone company should know better than to show that blatant of favoritism..
What if wp7 gets huge? It will take a bit but it could happen.
I'm sure they wouldn't forget that
Not many people follow what Verizon says...after all, they're the same guys that rejected the iPhone then kissed Apple's ass to get it.
They're the largest wireless carrier in the USA.
Over 100M people follow what they say.
If WP7 gets huge then they can use their user base to dictate the terms of deals, as Apple has done beautifully.
Sprint isn't exactly the richest carrier, but look how much they were willing to invest just to get the iPhone 4/4S.
Glad to see you're back to your usual masking opinions as facts self, but truth be told, Verizon was last to release a WP7 phone...and they only have one...they are hardly in a position to make demands...they can decide to sell Android and iPhone...Microsoft will still get paid.
Dr.8820 said:
Glad to see you're back to your usual masking opinions as facts self, but truth be told, Verizon was last to release a WP7 phone...and they only have one...they are hardly in a position to make demands...they can decide to sell Android and iPhone...Microsoft will still get paid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm glad you're not in charge
...don't really know what that has to do with what I posted, but it's true...Microsoft knows "LTE" "4G" and all that is just marketing...everyone using a WP7 phones knows it doesn't need dual core, 4G, or none of that stuff.
Dr.8820 said:
...don't really know what that has to do with what I posted, but it's true...Microsoft knows "LTE" "4G" and all that is just marketing...everyone using a WP7 phones knows it doesn't need dual core, 4G, or none of that stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its all just marketing? What makes you say that? It kind of sounds like you've fallen for some "you dont really need this thing we don't support" marketing. WP7 needs features and hardware that can compete with iOS and Android. That's it.
Says you, I've been using this HD7 since December 2010....still works fine and with no lag...only spec sheep care about that...the iPhone 4s sold more than all the others WITHOUT LTE or 4G.
That's exactly my point. The iPhone can afford it. Windows phone can't. That's what happens when you're three years later to market and gave apple a 3 year lead in building out their ecosystem.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
The iPhone didn't start off on fire, it gained a following...case in point: I had Sprint and a TP2, have a friend w/T-Mo and got an HD2 on their 2nd line. I then got my HD7 and they left T-Mo and got an Evo 3-D...they just left Sprint and got a Radar because of my HD7...word of mouth is way better than specs.
Verizon's Keith Lampron, Associate Director of device marketing, said at CES that Verizon will have almost every single device on its network carrying LTE connectivity from now on, save for the push-to-talk gear.
This "hard requirement" has been the main reason to snub Windows Phones devices until now, he said, whereas in fact Verizon is welcoming a third viable competitor in the mobile OS wars.
With the advent of the Nokia Lumia 900 on AT&T and the HTC Titan 2, both the first LTE Windows Phones, Verizon will be more likely to carry handsets with Microsoft's mobile OS.
In fact, as Nokia pointed out yesterday, Verizon is considered a very important partner, and the Finns are planning to supply it with a unique Windows Phone proposition of its own, that will make the carrier differentiate itself from the rest of the WP offerings. Mum's the word yet what this handset might look like, or when are we to eventually expect it.
source: CNET
Sent from my mwp6985 using Board Express
Same as Sprint, you may not see any new phones until the next major version of WinPhone. Around August.
http://mobile.pcmag.com/device2/art.../www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398768,00.asp
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
deadwrong03 said:
Verizon's Keith Lampron, Associate Director of device marketing, said at CES that Verizon will have almost every single device on its network carrying LTE connectivity from now on, save for the push-to-talk gear.
This "hard requirement" has been the main reason to snub Windows Phones devices until now, he said, whereas in fact Verizon is welcoming a third viable competitor in the mobile OS wars.
With the advent of the Nokia Lumia 900 on AT&T and the HTC Titan 2, both the first LTE Windows Phones, Verizon will be more likely to carry handsets with Microsoft's mobile OS.
In fact, as Nokia pointed out yesterday, Verizon is considered a very important partner, and the Finns are planning to supply it with a unique Windows Phone proposition of its own, that will make the carrier differentiate itself from the rest of the WP offerings. Mum's the word yet what this handset might look like, or when are we to eventually expect it.
source: CNET
Sent from my mwp6985 using Board Express
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really do hope not. AT&T, Microsoft, Nokia, and HTC are all finally working together on this project. The main reason Windows Phones don't sell well is the lack of promotion on the carrier's part. If AT&T really push windows phone at their stores and a similar phone shows up at verizon's doorstep, AT&T might not push it as much as they should.
Bunch of crap. Verizon has no problem selling the iphone which doesn't have LTE.
Ren13B said:
Bunch of crap. Verizon has no problem selling the iphone which doesn't have LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly...
And Sprint only has Wimax which they are basically going to be replacing with LTE (which they haven't rolled out yet).
Sprint is blaming the lack of enthusiasm on the poor sales of the 1 WP7 device they have, the Arrive.
Ren13B said:
Bunch of crap. Verizon has no problem selling the iphone which doesn't have LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iPhone sells tens of millions of units, it doesn't have to play by the same rules as everyone else.
Ren13B said:
Bunch of crap. Verizon has no problem selling the iphone which doesn't have LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but corporate verizon tries everything to sell you a LTE phone instead. From the double data promo to really expensive droid commercials. The representative at the store might only push iphones but that's because he probably doesn't know much about android and windows phones.
They're the largest carrier so they need to carry the icrap for idiots that have no knowledge of technology.
karan1203 said:
Yeah, but corporate verizon tries everything to sell you a LTE phone instead. From the double data promo to really expensive droid commercials. The representative at the store might only push iphones but that's because he probably doesn't know much about android and windows phones.
They're the largest carrier so they need to carry the icrap for idiots that have no knowledge of technology.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attention please. Thank you. Will everyone who is an idiot please stand up, and display your phone of choice so I can count them ? No one ? None of you are idiots ?
Let's try a new approach. Would everyone that believes they bought the best possible mobile device please stand up ? Oh my. Everyone. And would you please display... ok, you're a quick study.
My job here is done.
karan1203 said:
Yeah, but corporate verizon tries everything to sell you a LTE phone instead. From the double data promo to really expensive droid commercials. The representative at the store might only push iphones but that's because he probably doesn't know much about android and windows phones.
They're the largest carrier so they need to carry the icrap for idiots that have no knowledge of technology.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This post embodies EVERYTHING that is wrong with this forum. Thank you for providing such an excellent example for others to (hopefully) not follow.
These CDMA carriers are out of their minds and are all getting in bed with either android or apple. At least T-mobile is now heavily promoting the lumia. Literally seeing it in every commercial break on telemundo.
^ that's not T-Mobile promoting.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
This link takes you to the HTC One X specifications which I read over and thought to myself.."Okay so the united states is only going to get the dual-core version? WHY? Is the quad-core version, 'not safe enough for America', like all the cars from Europe?"
These damn companies are pissing me off by holding back "superior" technology from us here in the states. So wait, we have to wait until we receive the SGS3 that's going to finally give America it's first quad-core smart phone, correct me if I'm wrong, and meanwhile, as per usual, Europe and Asia already HAVE quad core phones and the next step for them is 1080p screens and 2-4GB RAM while America is BARELY starting to suggest the idea of anything so "impossible".
I'm a technology nut and I'm between a rock and a hard place on this because my career is going to be based on smartphone technology for America and we're always 2-steps behind the rest of the world so that leaves me with working on outdated phones and technologies.
Anyone feel stressed about this like me?
http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one-x/#specs
I'm also mad because I love Samsung technology and this HTC phone has the E4GT beat like a bratty toddler. I love my 4G touch but with those specs I would actually get one without regretting it too..
F my life!!
There is a reason and it has to do with economics and market zones. Each country has a technology release date according to current standards of tech at the time and how much the manufacturer wants to pay the government to put its higher tech out in order to get first dibs on the crazed tech fans money. Its all part of interventionism capitalism. If that is even a term. Of course there are other variables but this is A main reason among many.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
The only reason the one X in America didn't get the quad core was because the current tegra 3 chipset doesn't support LTE. Don't hold my word to it though...
The other variables are the standards. Europe and most of asia doesn't use our types of networks and radio bands. The only company that uses anything remotely like the rest of the world is ATT and their bands (which is why most people can use unlocked phones on ATT just fine).
Here we have two different CDMA carriers (sprint + verizon) with different 4g standards (wimax vs lte and soon LTE vs LTE on different frequencies) and two different GSM carriers with different base bands (standard bands on ATT while Tmobile uses different ones).
The rest of the world is pretty standardized so that's why it's so fast and easy to release the int'l versions....
Also the carriers don't have enough power or will to tamper with the phones in order to "differentiate" like our carriers because they have to actually COMPETE with each other unlike america..............(look at foreign phone plan prices compared to ours and how fast "3g" is...)
O_O
Blacklabel84 said:
There is a reason and it has to do with economics and market zones. Each country has a technology release date according to current standards of tech at the time and how much the manufacturer wants to pay the government to put its higher tech out in order to get first dibs on the crazed tech fans money. Its all part of interventionism capitalism. If that is even a term. Of course there are other variables but this is A main reason among many.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much as I wish and hope and dream that I could understand what you posted;
*hand fly's over my head* I have no idea BUT I do get what your saying but also that doesn't mean that I like it what so ever..I hate this stuff about one nation needs to have a higher tech rating then others.
I say lets all go out and buy the new Nexus2 with it's 1080p super AMOLED+ screen, and the quad-core processor at 1.8GHz and the 2000mah battery, and JELLY BEAN operating system...lol..I'm just talking random non-sense but this is how I keep my brain from going dry. so I'll keep making up stuff that only I can dream up..
Blame Bush.
ahhh!!!
lilotimz said:
The other variables are the standards. Europe and most of asia doesn't use our types of networks and radio bands. The only company that uses anything remotely like the rest of the world is ATT and their bands (which is why most people can use unlocked phones on ATT just fine).
Here we have two different CDMA carriers (sprint + verizon) with different 4g standards (wimax vs lte and soon LTE vs LTE on different frequencies) and two different GSM carriers with different base bands (standard bands on ATT while Tmobile uses different ones).
The rest of the world is pretty standardized so that's why it's so fast and easy to release the int'l versions....
Also the carriers don't have enough power or will to tamper with the phones in order to "differentiate" like our carriers because they have to actually COMPETE with each other unlike america..............(look at foreign phone plan prices compared to ours and how fast "3g" is...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I SAY WE PROTEST AGAINST AMERICA'S CARRIERS!!
...but then again I have no idea what I'm talking about.....
Anyway! I still say we should be more like the international carriers here in America because have you compared their bandwidth speeds to ours?
In London their down runs 20+MBps standard/minimum from what I've seen on youtube "speed test" videos. It only gets faster the farther East you go; Tokyo speed tests were running 30MBps+ easy because the people live so close together so the speeds have to be high.
I think were just ripping ourselves off here.
I'm getting a migraine thinking of the unfairness...
lol
phatmanxxl said:
Blame Bush.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why so? did he push a law that made it harder for technology to enter the country? or was it because of the war?
Nabbu said:
Why so? did he push a law that made it harder for technology to enter the country? or was it because of the war?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If not bush then ... the Jews?
Loool jk fellas
Pffft bush was a puppet. im a capitalist and ill say that. im a ron paul follower. anyway its the rich in an abstract chaotic global market that put limits to keep market competetition as fair as possible so one company doesnt monopolize.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
iSaint said:
If not bush then ... the Jews?
Loool jk fellas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it wasn't the Jews, I already double checked them in Mein Kampf and Hitler didn't say anything about them screwing America over in smartphone technology.
He did say that Europe(Germany) is going to be the most superior country in the world based on technology, so maybe he meant in smartphones?
I wonder if the hold companies like Microsoft have on this country has anything to do with the technology mind set in the US. The continued growth of Linux outside the US is teaching more and more people to think freedom when it comes to technology? I have to fight the entrenched mind set everyday.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
I'm not keen with the political definitions of the day so excuse me if I sound idiotic! ^^
..does that mean that the Government is regulating technology flow?
I would expect something like that to happen since nothing is free anymore and why would you give away something that you could charge for?
Government + technology = delays in technology + lazy Americans = rich international countries with high standard of living and free health care
Why not just create the 8-core processor here in America and leave the rest of the world in the dust like we always have in the past?
I don't even know anymore..
iSaint said:
If not bush then ... the Jews?
Loool jk fellas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a former Jew, I support this wholeheartedly.
I would rather have the A15 based Dual-core S4 than the A9 based Quad-core Tegra 3.
I was thinking the same thing..big companies like Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, and Microsoft need to be regulated so that smaller, and more reliable, companies can emerge without hindrance or fear of being bought out.
hmm
tommydaniel said:
I would rather have the A15 based Dual-core S4 than the A9 based Quad-core Tegra 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you better technology dual-core phones are a good choice but you can't beat the multitasking power and speed of a quad-core.
Imagine the same specs as that dual-core but in a quad-core version.
All I'm trying to say is give a man a chance to spend his money for something he ACTUALLY wants and not what the opinion polls have "proven" what America wants next. Ask anyone off the street and they'll say, "What's the difference?", and then you'll explain to them what it is and they'll say, "..of course the quad because the other one is outdated right?".
lol...I'm taking this to seriously..like anyone corporate actually cares.
_MetalHead_ said:
As a former Jew, I support this wholeheartedly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
"former Jew"
The government tries to regulate tech flow to try to prevent monopolies and to make sure one company isnt too far ahead of the other.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Nabbu said:
Why so? did he push a law that made it harder for technology to enter the country? or was it because of the war?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because he steered a hurricane into New Orleans.
This can only mean great things. Better coverage, handsets and plans.
Your Thoughts?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57573867-38/feds-approve-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs/
1SiK1500 said:
This can only mean great things. Better coverage, handsets and plans.
Your Thoughts?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57573867-38/feds-approve-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Time will tell but less competition in the wireless industry has had the opposite effect in the industry in the past so I'm skeptical.
I'm curious to see how many people get laid off as well. :/
EtherealRemnant said:
Time will tell but less competition in the wireless industry has had the opposite effect in the industry in the past so I'm skeptical.
I'm curious to see how many people get laid off as well. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They already did layoffs preemptively... That way they couldn't be forced as part of the deal to keep the same workforce as premerger.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Anything merging with tmobile sounds like trouble. Not too long ago the parent company wanted to leave the business and sell to At&t leaving their customers wondering what was next.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
merger
1SiK1500 said:
This can only mean great things. Better coverage, handsets and plans.
Your Thoughts?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57573867-38/feds-approve-t-mobile-merger-with-metropcs/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been with VoiceStream, now TMobile since 1998. At least every couple years I seriously look to see if another company would better service my needs. So far Tmobile has won my business, although I have not always been a happy camper.
This Galaxy S3 is my 4th smartphone and the first one where those around me are not hearing my tirade "I hate this f*&%$* phone".
Very pleased with the S3. Using Liquid Smooth 2.1 RC2. Sometmes with stock kernel, sometimes with KT747 or LeanKernel.
GeneLM said:
I have been with VoiceStream, now TMobile since 1998. At least every couple years I seriously look to see if another company would better service my needs. So far Tmobile has won my business, although I have not always been a happy camper.
This Galaxy S3 is my 4th smartphone and the first one where those around me are not hearing my tirade "I hate this f*&%$* phone".
Very pleased with the S3. Using Liquid Smooth 2.1 RC2. Sometmes with stock kernel, sometimes with KT747 or LeanKernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As soon as my ATT contract expired with an iPhone 4, I moved to T-Mobile with a Samsung Galaxy S3. For the family plan pricing, the better "unlimited dataplan", etc. I've been very pleased.
At this point in time, I do not miss ATT nor the iPhone 4.
EtherealRemnant said:
Time will tell but less competition in the wireless industry has had the opposite effect in the industry in the past so I'm skeptical.
I'm curious to see how many people get laid off as well. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that MetroPCS is a "regional" carrier and not part of the top 4 "nation wide" carriers. FCC didn't see this as a limitation of competition as all the major choices remain. In the Washington state area, I've watched regional carriers disappear, or leave the cellular service and stick to land line/internet services only.
No matter the reason, it's unfortunate when anyone is laid off, but that is a factor of change as well. Look at the bureau of labor statistics report in 2012 that shows that the average person born (1957-1964) held 11.3 jobs. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/nlsoy.pdf
The reality of graduating from High School and then going into a trade and expecting a single job for the rest of your life, even with labor union help, is just bordering on fantasy. I expect this will increase with the new generation of workers starting into the workforce in 1990 up.
MetroPCS is a regional carrier like Cricket but they have a considerable amount of spectrum licenses which really is the problem. With such finite amounts of spectrum available (or even suitable) for wireless usage, the carriers with the spectrum are the carriers that dominate.
That's why its really no surprise that Verizon has such a stranglehold on LTE right now. With their purchase of the entire 700MHz upper C block, they can roll out their towers much faster than anyone else because they don't have to worry about their service extending into areas they don't hold a license in, something the other carriers have to be wary of when they are doing network planning and one of the biggest oversights in FCC history in my opinion. Everyone else has to have cookie cutter networks while Verizon can deploy a contiguous network anywhere in the US that they feel like it.
I wonder what would happen to MetroPCS users. My mom have Metro and she's been thinking about getting a s3. Heal I wanted to buy it for her. But after this I wonder if I should wait or just get her to sign up for another carrier.